Short answer: the Zealot S95. It ranks #35 of 98 boombox speakers by sound quality, rated 3.7/5, at $157.41; the Marshall Tufton ranks #83, rated 2.4/5, and costs $369.99, which makes this an easy call rather than a real tradeoff.
The Zealot S95 is the better-sounding, tougher option. A good value for the boombox class. It is rated IPX6 against IPX2 for the Marshall Tufton. It links with other speakers (PartyAdd up to 100 speakers), which the Marshall Tufton cannot. It plays in stereo from a single unit, unlike the Marshall Tufton. The tradeoff: A little rolled off up top and not that balanced through the rest of the range.
The Marshall Tufton is the longer-running pick. 20 hour battery life; 2.5 hour full charge, or 20-min quick-charge for 4 hours of play. It is rated for 20 hours of battery against 12 for the Zealot S95. Watch for: Not much lower bass, upper bass boomy, boosted treble, not very balanced overall.
Buy the Zealot S95. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Marshall Tufton and costs less, so it is the default pick unless a specific strength of the other one matters more to you.
Want more options? Browse the full Portable Bluetooth rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Zealot S95 | Marshall Tufton | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $157.41 | $369.99 |
| Ranked | #35 of 98 in Boombox Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers | #83 of 98 in Boombox Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers |
| App | No | No |
| Aux Input | Yes | Yes |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 45Hz | 42Hz |
| Battery Life | 12 hours (Manufacturer specified) | 20 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| EQ | Yes (multiple modes) | Yes (hidden bass and treble adjustment) |
| IP Rating | IPX6 | IPX2 |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC | SBC |
| MicroSD Playback | Yes | - |
| Party Mode | Yes (PartyAdd up to 100 speakers) | No |
| Power Input | USB-C | USB-C |
| Stereo | Yes | No |
| Omnidirectional | No | Yes |
| TWS | Yes | No |
| Weight | 11.3 lbs (5.11 kg) | 10.8 lbs (4.9 kg) |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-A, 5V/2A) | No |
| USB Playback | Yes | No |
| Built-in Microphone | No | Yes |
| Amplifier Power | 120W | 80W |
| Dimensions | 14.1” x 9.6” x 6.6” (358 x 243 x 167 mm) | 9” x 6.4” x 13.8” (229.1 x 163.1 x 350 mm) |
| Drivers | 130W subwoofer + dual drivers | 1x 5.25” woofer + 2x 2” full-range + 1x 16mm tweeter |
| Digital Aux Input | No | No |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 | 5.0 |
| Strap | - | Yes (built-in strap) |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Zealot S95:
- EarFun Uboom X vs Zealot S95
- Tribit Stormbox Blast vs Zealot S95
- Harman Kardon Go + Play 3 vs Zealot S95
- JBL Partybox Encore 2 vs Zealot S95
- JBL PartyBox On-The-Go 2 Plus vs Zealot S95
Prices on this page were last checked October 12, 2026 at 4:13 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Zealot S95: $157.41 Amazon $157.41 AliExpress eBay
Pros: A good value for the boombox class. Appears to be the same internals as the Zealot ZE01. Bigger case and goes deeper than the Zealot ZE01. Measured bass extension of 45Hz (-10dB).
Cons: A little rolled off up top and not that balanced through the rest of the range. Clarity isn’t as good as better speakers.
Full Zealot S95 review and specifications →
| Released | Aug 2024 (2 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 120W |
| App | No |
| Aux Input | Yes |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 45Hz |
| Battery Life | 12 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 |
| Built-in Microphone | No |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 14.1” x 9.6” x 6.6” (358 x 243 x 167 mm) |
| Drivers | 130W subwoofer + dual drivers |
| EQ | Yes (multiple modes) |
| IP Rating | IPX6 |
| MicroSD Playback | Yes |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Party Mode | Yes (PartyAdd up to 100 speakers) |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-A, 5V/2A) |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | Yes |
| TWS | Yes |
| USB Playback | Yes |
| Weight | 11.3 lbs (5.11 kg) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Techder Audios: W-king X20 VS Zealot S95 DEEP BASS VS DEEPER & LOUDER BASS?! More from techderaudios →
- Techder Audios: ZEALOT S85 VS ZEALOT S95 "SIMILAR DESIGNS BUT BIG DIFFERENCE!!"
- Jagist reviews: Jbl Boombox 4 Vs Zealot S95!!! More from Jagistreviews →
- Jagist reviews: Zealot S95 Vs Tribit Stormbox Blast 2!!!
- Jagist reviews: Zealot S95 Vs Soundcore Boom 2 Plus!!!
- Jagist reviews: LG xboom Stage 301 Vs Zealot S95!!!
- Jagist reviews: Zealot S95 Vs Zealot S98!!! 😍😍😍
- YARNZO Tech: Zealot s98 vs zealot s89 and zealot s95 outdoor sound battle 🔊 More from YARNZO Tech →
- flmclau: Zealot s79 plus s167 vs Zealot s95 comparison
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Marshall Tufton: $369.99 Amazon $369.99 eBay
Pros: 20 hour battery life; 2.5 hour full charge, or 20-min quick-charge for 4 hours of play. 3-way speaker design covers full frequency range in 360°. Sturdy construction with IPX2 rating. Measured bass extension of 42Hz (-10dB).
Cons: Not much lower bass, upper bass boomy, boosted treble, not very balanced overall. Not as loud as others in the class. Very low water rating
Full Marshall Tufton review and specifications →
| Released | May 2019 (7 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 80W |
| App | No |
| Aux Input | Yes |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 42Hz |
| Battery Life | 20 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.0 |
| Built-in Microphone | Yes |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 9” x 6.4” x 13.8” (229.1 x 163.1 x 350 mm) |
| Drivers | 1x 5.25” woofer + 2x 2” full-range + 1x 16mm tweeter |
| EQ | Yes (hidden bass and treble adjustment) |
| IP Rating | IPX2 |
| Omnidirectional | Yes |
| Party Mode | No |
| Power Bank | No |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | No |
| Strap | Yes (built-in strap) |
| TWS | No |
| USB Playback | No |
| Weight | 10.8 lbs (4.9 kg) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons