Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers Ranked

This page ranks 68 medium powered bookshelf speakers, generally with woofers between 4” and 6”. This size offers a useful balance of desktop space, bass reach and output, though the list also includes some specialized multi-driver systems. All have built-in amplification, but studio monitors are often sold individually and may need an audio interface or suitable volume-controlled source. Check whether the listed price is for one speaker or a pair.

The order emphasizes measured tonal accuracy, using the un-EQed Spinorama preference score with an ideal subwoofer as a starting point for comparing performance above the bass range. Standalone bass, dispersion, distortion, output limits and measurement quality also matter: this is an editorial ranking, not a strict score sort. Close scores are treated as broadly comparable. The ideal-subwoofer score is a model, not a test of an actual speaker/subwoofer combination or a promise of easy subwoofer integration.

The Genelec 8331A, Neumann KH120 II and Genelec 8030C have particularly strong independent measurement support. Tested port configurations, firmware and EQ modes are identified where they affect performance. Specialized systems such as the Kali IN-UNF and Avantone MixCube are judged here for general listening, not solely for their intended studio task. See how the rankings work for the methodology.

Prices on this page were last checked October 1, 2026 at 6:23 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

#1 Genelec 8331A: $5750 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: Erin’s Klippel measurements support its reference-monitor credentials: a 1.4dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz, low listening-window and predicted-room irregularity, and preference scores of 6.57 standalone and 8.51 with an ideal subwoofer. The coaxial mid/tweeter and concealed woofers maintain coherent radiation as listening position changes. Bass reaches -3dB around 48Hz, and GLM adds level, delay and room-response calibration. Measured bass extension of 49Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Expensive, with studio-oriented XLR connectivity rather than consumer streaming. The compact woofers still limit deep-bass output, and the review reports protection muting when pushed beyond its operating range. GLM calibration hardware is an additional purchase. Its excellent tonal score does not remove the need for a subwoofer or larger monitor at demanding levels.

Full Genelec 8331A review and specifications →

AES Input	Yes
Amplifier Power	72W LF + 36W MF + 36W HF
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	39Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	49Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	12”H x 7.4”W x 8.3”D (305 x 189 x 212 mm)
Drivers	Dual 130x65mm woofers; 90mm coaxial mid; 19mm tweeter
Frequency Response	45Hz - 37kHz (-6dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR, AES/EBU
Maximum SPL	100dB at 3m before protection (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	6.57
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	8.51
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	14.8 lbs (6.7kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Genelec 8331A page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner video review More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner written measurements
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Genelec 8331A vs Neumann KH120 MKII
  • Genelec 8331A vs Genelec 8030C
  • Genelec 8331A vs Neumann KH80 DSP
  • Genelec 8331A vs Dynaudio LYD 5
  • Genelec 8331A vs Genelec 8330A
  • Genelec 8331A vs Genelec 8320A
  • Genelec 8331A vs Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
  • Genelec 8331A vs Genelec 8020D
  • See all 46 comparisons

#2 Neumann KH120 MKII: $2000 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: ASR’s Klippel data shows exceptional neutrality: only a 1.5dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz and low listening-window narrow-band deviation of 0.208. Scores of 6.49 standalone and 8.44 with an ideal subwoofer place it among the strongest measured options here. Bass reaches -3dB around 45Hz. The review reports very low distortion at 86dB/1m and clean performance outside deep bass at 96dB. Measured bass extension of 46Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Vertical crossover interference makes listening height important even though horizontal dispersion is well controlled. A small directivity irregularity remains around 2kHz. Distortion increases below about 50Hz at high output; a subwoofer can extend the system and reduce low-frequency demands. High price, and a flat anechoic response still needs suitable placement in the room.

Full Neumann KH120 MKII review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	245W (145W woofer + 100W tweeter)
App	Yes (MA 1 alignment)
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	36Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	46Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
DSP	Yes
Dimensions	11.3”H x 7.2”W x 8.9”D (287 x 182.9 x 226.1 mm)
Drivers	5.25” woofer, 1” titanium fabric dome tweeter
EQ	Yes (via DSP)
Frequency Response	44Hz - 21kHz (±3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR
Maximum SPL	116.8dB @ 1m (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	6.49
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	8.44
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	14.6 lbs (6.6 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Neumann KH120 MKII Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Neumann KH120 MKII vs Genelec 8030C
  • Neumann KH120 MKII vs Genelec 8331A
  • Neumann KH120 MKII vs Neumann KH80 DSP
  • Neumann KH120 MKII vs Dynaudio LYD 5
  • Neumann KH120 MKII vs Genelec 8330A
  • Neumann KH120 MKII vs Genelec 8320A
  • Neumann KH120 MKII vs Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
  • Neumann KH120 MKII vs Topping MA4
  • See all 51 comparisons

#3 Genelec 8030C: $1,750 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: ASR’s Klippel measurements show a 1.9dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz and smooth listening-window behavior. Predicted preference scores of 5.35 standalone and 7.60 with an ideal subwoofer support its high position for tonal accuracy. Broad, controlled horizontal radiation makes the balance relatively stable across a desk, and bass reaches -3dB around 56Hz. Measured bass extension of 59Hz (-3dB).

Cons: A dip around 2-3kHz remains, and vertical placement is less forgiving than the horizontal coverage suggests. Deep-bass headroom is limited; isolated high-output measurements at higher frequencies do not describe full-band loudness. The review found demanding bass material could cause audible distress beyond moderate levels. A subwoofer is useful for full-range monitoring.

Full Genelec 8030C review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	100W (50W woofer + 50W tweeter)
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	59Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	11.7”H x 7.4”W x 7”D (297.2 x 188 x 177.8 mm)
Drivers	5.1” woofer, 0.75” metal dome tweeter
EQ	Yes (Bass tilt, treble tilt, room response)
Frequency Response	54Hz - 20kHz (±2.5dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR
Maximum SPL	110dB @ 1m (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	11 lbs (5 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Genelec 8030C Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Genelec 8030C vs Neumann KH120 MKII
  • Genelec 8030C vs Neumann KH80 DSP
  • Genelec 8030C vs Genelec 8331A
  • Genelec 8030C vs Dynaudio LYD 5
  • Genelec 8030C vs Genelec 8330A
  • Genelec 8030C vs Genelec 8320A
  • Genelec 8030C vs Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
  • Genelec 8030C vs Topping MA4
  • See all 52 comparisons

#4 Neumann KH80 DSP: $1,198 per pair Amazon B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: ASR’s selected Klippel measurement has a 1.4dB midrange response span and virtually no overall on-axis tilt. Scores of 5.89 standalone and 8.25 with an ideal subwoofer indicate excellent tonal accuracy in a compact monitor. The waveguide and steep crossover provide useful control of reflected sound, while placement filters help compensate for a desk or nearby boundaries. Existing multitone testing supports good moderate-level clarity. Measured bass extension of 57Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 91.9dB.

Cons: Bass reaches -3dB around 59Hz in this measurement, less deep than the KH120 II. Output protection and increasing multitone distortion limit loud listening, especially in the bass. Room reflections and listening distance can alter perceived treble balance despite its flat direct response. Calibration equipment adds to the cost; the preference score is not a measurement of maximum clean output. It is expensive for its size.

Full Neumann KH80 DSP review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	140W (90W woofer + 50W tweeter)
App	Yes (MA 1 alignment)
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	51Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	57Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
DSP	Yes
Dimensions	13.6”H x 10.8”W x 9.6”D (345.4 x 274.3 x 243.8 mm)
Drivers	4.1” woofer, 1” fabric dome tweeter
EQ	Yes (via DSP)
Frequency Response	57 Hz - 25 kHz (+-3 dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR
Maximum SPL	110.7dB @ 1m (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Sensitivity	91.9dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score	5.89
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	8.25
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	9 lbs (4.1 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Neumann KH80 DSP Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Neumann KH 80 Studio Monitor Review. Excellent Performance. Small Size. More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Review Measurements
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs Genelec 8020D Sound & Frequency Response Comparison More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs Yamaha HS8 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs Focal Shape 40 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs JBL 305P MKII Sound & Frquency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: KEF LSX vs Neumann KH80 DSP Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Adam Audio A3X vs Neumann KH80 DSP Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs KRK Rokit 5 G4 RP5G4 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • Joy & Oluv’Sone: 🎃🔥 UBoom X - Halloween Rock Special 🎸🤘 More from Oluv’Sone →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Neumann KH80 DSP vs Genelec 8030C
  • Neumann KH80 DSP vs Reflector Audio Square Two
  • Neumann KH80 DSP vs Neumann KH120 MKII
  • Neumann KH80 DSP vs Dynaudio LYD 5
  • Neumann KH80 DSP vs Genelec 8331A
  • Neumann KH80 DSP vs Genelec 8330A
  • Neumann KH80 DSP vs Genelec 8320A
  • Neumann KH80 DSP vs Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
  • See all 66 comparisons

#5 Reflector Audio Square Two: $6,499 per pair Monheim Microphones eBay

Pros: The manufacturer-supplied data shows a very small 1.1dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz and preference scores of 6.52 standalone and 8.34 with an ideal subwoofer. Its horn-centered layout and four surrounding woofers offer a compact, controlled-radiation monitor, with a measured -3dB point around 49Hz. The linked Sound on Sound review also supports its use for detailed monitoring.

Cons: The nominal 60-by-60-degree pattern calls for careful aiming and gives less freedom to move than wide-dispersion monitors.

Full Reflector Audio Square Two review and specifications →

AES Input	Yes
Amplifier Power	250W to woofers, 100W to compression driver (Hypex Class-D)
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	Yes
Country	Made in Latvia
Dimensions	12.6”W x 13.6”H x 12.8”D (320 x 345 x 325 mm)
Drivers	4x 5” woofers, 1x horn-loaded compression driver (ring diaphragm)
Enclosure	2-way active coaxial horn monitor, bass-reflex (convertible to sealed)
Frequency Response	40Hz-26kHz (-6dB)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Analogue XLR/RCA, AES digital XLR, S/PDIF, TOSLINK optical
Maximum SPL	118dB @ 1m (EIA-426B, single monitor) (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	Yes
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	6.52
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	8.34
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	42.8 lbs (19.4 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Reflector Audio Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Sound on Sound Review
  • Manufacturer Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Reflector Audio Square Two vs Neumann KH80 DSP
  • Reflector Audio Square Two vs JBL 305P MKII
  • Reflector Audio Square Two vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
  • Reflector Audio Square Two vs Kali Audio IN-5
  • Reflector Audio Square Two vs KEF LSX II LT
  • Reflector Audio Square Two vs Adam Audio T5V
  • Reflector Audio Square Two vs Kali LP-UNF
  • Reflector Audio Square Two vs Yamaha HS5
  • See all 13 comparisons

#6 Dynaudio LYD 5: $998 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: ASR’s Klippel data is substantially stronger than a low ranking suggests: 4.72 standalone and 7.38 with an ideal subwoofer, with a 1.9dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz. Low listening-window narrow-band deviation of 0.242 supports relatively uncolored midrange reproduction. It is particularly competitive when used with a subwoofer rather than judged only by bass reach. Measured bass extension of 68Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Bass reaches -3dB around 72Hz, so it gives up low-frequency weight to deeper-reaching monitors. The existing review identifies a dip near 1.6kHz, upper-bass emphasis and uneven crossover-region dispersion. These issues and limited deep-bass capability keep it below the leading all-rounders despite its strong bass-normalized score. A subwoofer does not correct upper-frequency directivity errors.

Full Dynaudio LYD 5 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	100W total (50W LF, 50W HF)
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	50Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	68Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
DSP	No
Dimensions	10.2”H x 6.7”W x 8.3”D (260 x 170 x 211 mm)
Drivers	5” woofer, 28mm soft dome tweeter
EQ	No
Frequency Response	50Hz - 21kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR, RCA
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	11.9 lbs (5.4 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Dynaudio LYD 5 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Dynaudio LYD 5 vs Genelec 8330A
  • Dynaudio LYD 5 vs Neumann KH80 DSP
  • Dynaudio LYD 5 vs Genelec 8320A
  • Dynaudio LYD 5 vs Genelec 8030C
  • Dynaudio LYD 5 vs Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
  • Dynaudio LYD 5 vs Neumann KH120 MKII
  • Dynaudio LYD 5 vs Topping MA4
  • Dynaudio LYD 5 vs Genelec 8020D
  • See all 52 comparisons

#7 Genelec 8330A: $2,250 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: ASR’s measurements give a 2.3dB midrange response span and a -3dB point around 56Hz. Scores of 5.54 standalone and 7.79 with an ideal subwoofer indicate solid tonal accuracy, while deeper bass than the 8320A helps without a sub. GLM calibration, the waveguide and rounded aluminum enclosure make it a practical compact studio system. Measured bass extension of 55.7Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The listening-window response has more local variation than the 8030C or KH80 in the selected measurements, so DSP capability should not be mistaken for superior native neutrality. GLM calibration hardware costs extra. Small-driver bass headroom remains finite, and neither the modeled ideal-subwoofer score nor the fitted bass Q establishes maximum output or freedom from resonances.

Full Genelec 8330A review and specifications →

AES Input	Yes
Amplifier Power	100W total (50W woofer, 50W tweeter, Class D)
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	44.9Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	55.7Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Country	Finland
Dimensions	11.8”H x 7.4”W x 7”D (299 x 189 x 178 mm)
Drivers	0.75” metal dome tweeter, 5.1” cone woofer
Enclosure	ported
Frequency Response	45Hz-23kHz -6dB
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR, AES/EBU
Maximum SPL	104dB (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	5.54
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.79
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Warranty	2 years (5 with product registration)
Weight	11.2 lbs (5.1 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Genelec 8330A Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org) More from Audio Science Review →
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Genelec 8330A vs Genelec 8320A
  • Genelec 8330A vs Dynaudio LYD 5
  • Genelec 8330A vs Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
  • Genelec 8330A vs Neumann KH80 DSP
  • Genelec 8330A vs Genelec 8020D
  • Genelec 8330A vs Genelec 8030C
  • Genelec 8330A vs Neumann KH120 MKII
  • Genelec 8330A vs Klipsch The Fives
  • See all 44 comparisons

#8 Genelec 8320A: $1,700 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: A measured 1.6dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz and preference scores of 5.52 standalone and 8.04 with an ideal subwoofer support accurate close-range monitoring. The waveguide helps control the balance between direct and reflected sound. GLM room calibration is useful for matching levels and placement in a compact setup. Measured bass extension of 67.4Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The -3dB point is about 67Hz, making a subwoofer important for lower bass and giving the larger 8330A a practical advantage without one. Calibration hardware is sold separately. The small woofer limits its intended listening distance and bass output; a favorable response-fit parameter is not evidence that it has uniquely well-damped bass or unusually high headroom.

Full Genelec 8320A review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	100W total (50W woofer, 50W tweeter, Class D)
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	53.2Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	67.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Country	Finland
Dimensions	9.5”H x 5.9”W x 5.6”D (242 x 151 x 142 mm)
Drivers	0.75” metal dome tweeter, 4.1” cone woofer
Enclosure	ported
Frequency Response	55Hz-23kHz -6dB
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR
Maximum SPL	Peak 107dB (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	5.52
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	8.04
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Warranty	2 years (5 with product registration)
Weight	7.1 lbs (3.2 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Genelec 8320A Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review: Genelec 8320A Review More from Audio Science Review →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Genelec 8320A vs Genelec 8330A
  • Genelec 8320A vs Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
  • Genelec 8320A vs Dynaudio LYD 5
  • Genelec 8320A vs Topping MA4
  • Genelec 8320A vs Genelec 8020D
  • Genelec 8320A vs Neumann KH80 DSP
  • Genelec 8320A vs Klipsch The Fives
  • Genelec 8320A vs JBL 305P MKII
  • See all 47 comparisons

#9 Devialet Phantom II 98 dB: $2,998 per pair Devialet eBay

Pros: The manufacturer-supplied measurement shows unusually deep bass for the enclosure size: -3dB at 30Hz. Scores of 6.87 standalone and 7.95 with an ideal subwoofer suggest that its appeal is not limited to bass quantity. Integrated amplification and network playback can replace several components, and its 2.3dB midrange response span is reasonably even. Measured bass extension of 30Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Small-enclosure bass extension at the measurement level does not guarantee the same response at high volume. Stereo requires two units, and the integrated architecture offers less system flexibility than conventional monitors.

Full Devialet Phantom II 98 dB review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	400W RMS each
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	approximately 22.6Hz (measured, spinorama.org)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	30Hz (measured, spinorama.org)
Bluetooth	Yes
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC, AAC
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	6.6 x 6.2 x 8.6 in each
Drivers	One aluminum full-range driver; two aluminum bass drivers
Frequency Response	18Hz - 21kHz (-6dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Wi-Fi, Ethernet, Bluetooth, AirPlay 2, Spotify Connect, UPnP, Roon Ready, analog/optical combo jack
Maximum SPL	98dB at 1m each (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	Yes
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	6.87
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.95
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	9.5 lbs (4.3 kg) each
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Devialet Phantom II 98 dB Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Devialet Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Devialet Phantom II 98 dB vs Genelec 8320A
  • Devialet Phantom II 98 dB vs Genelec 8020D
  • Devialet Phantom II 98 dB vs Genelec 8330A
  • Devialet Phantom II 98 dB vs Klipsch The Fives
  • Devialet Phantom II 98 dB vs Dynaudio LYD 5
  • Devialet Phantom II 98 dB vs JBL 305P MKII
  • Devialet Phantom II 98 dB vs Neumann KH80 DSP
  • Devialet Phantom II 98 dB vs KEF LS50 Wireless II
  • See all 40 comparisons

#10 Topping MA4: €449 per pair Audiophonics eBay

Pros: The selected manufacturer-supplied Klippel data shows a 1.6dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz, bass reaching -3dB around 50Hz, and preference scores of 5.64 standalone and 7.83 with an ideal subwoofer. That is strong measured tonal performance for a compact monitor. Its analog crossover and balanced XLR connection suit an existing audio interface. Measured bass extension of 49.8Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The native listening-window response is not as smooth as the leading Genelec and Neumann measurements. No USB, Bluetooth or built-in room-correction DSP: source control and correction need external equipment. Bass extension alone does not establish clean output capability. On-axis narrow-band deviation measures 0.503dB and listening-window smoothness a moderate 0.44.

Full Topping MA4 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	75W total (50W woofer, 25W tweeter, Class D)
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	42.9Hz (measured, spinorama.org vendor data)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	49.8Hz (measured, spinorama.org vendor data)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Country	China
Crossover Frequency	1.3kHz
Dimensions	10”H x 5.5”W x 11.3”D (255 x 140 x 288 mm)
Drivers	1” soft dome tweeter with waveguide, 4” paper cone woofer
Enclosure	ported
Frequency Response	49Hz-20kHz +/-3dB
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR (balanced analog)
Maximum SPL	105dB @ 1m (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Sensitivity	92dB
Spinorama Preference Score	5.64
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.83
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Warranty	1-2 years (varies by region)
Weight	8.3 lbs (3.78 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Topping MA4 Product Gallery
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review: Topping MA4 Review More from Audio Science Review →
  • Manufacturer Measurements (spinorama.org)
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Website: Topping MA4 More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Topping MA4 vs Genelec 8020D
  • Topping MA4 vs Klipsch The Fives
  • Topping MA4 vs Genelec 8320A
  • Topping MA4 vs JBL 305P MKII
  • Topping MA4 vs Dynaudio LYD 5
  • Topping MA4 vs Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus
  • Topping MA4 vs Neumann KH80 DSP
  • Topping MA4 vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
  • See all 39 comparisons

#11 Genelec 8020D: $1,390 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: A compact waveguided monitor with balanced XLR input and placement filters, well suited to a small studio desk. Klippel measurements show a flat, well-behaved on-axis response from about 60Hz to 10kHz, with listening-window and early-reflection curves tracking closely, a sign of well-controlled directivity. Measured bass extension of 56Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Small size limits deep-bass reach and headroom. It lacks the GLM calibration of the SAM models, and the price is substantial for a compact analog-input monitor. Sound power starts rolling off around 500Hz to 1kHz as the small drivers begin to beam.

Full Genelec 8020D review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	100W (50W woofer + 50W tweeter)
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	50Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	56Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	9.5”H x 5.8”W x 5.6”D (241.3 x 147.3 x 142.2 mm)
Drivers	4.1” woofer, 0.75” metal dome tweeter
EQ	Yes (Bass tilt, desk proximity)
Frequency Response	56 Hz - 25 kHz (-6 dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR
Maximum SPL	103dB @ 1m (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	7.1 lbs (3.2 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Genelec 8020D Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • DSAUDIO.review: Genelec 8020D vs Yamaha HS5 Soun & Frequency Response Comparison More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: Genelec 8020D vs Yamaha HS8 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs Genelec 8020D Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs Genelec 8020D Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: KEF LSX vs Genelec 8020D Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Genelec 8020D vs Adam Audo T5V Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Genelec 8020D & KRK Rokit 5 G4 PR5G4 - Same, same, but different Sound & Response Comparison
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Genelec 8020D vs Klipsch The Fives
  • Genelec 8020D vs Topping MA4
  • Genelec 8020D vs JBL 305P MKII
  • Genelec 8020D vs Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
  • Genelec 8020D vs Genelec 8320A
  • Genelec 8020D vs KEF LS50 Wireless II
  • Genelec 8020D vs Genelec 8330A
  • Genelec 8020D vs Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus
  • See all 52 comparisons

#12 Klipsch The Fives: $699 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: In the tested Bass Cut mode, Erin’s Klippel data gives preference scores of 5.52 standalone and 7.89 with an ideal subwoofer, with a 2.7dB midrange response span. That mode offers considerably better tonal balance than the bass-heavy default behavior. HDMI ARC, phono/line input, digital inputs and subwoofer output make it a versatile stereo alternative to a soundbar. Measured bass extension of 57Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The favorable score specifically requires Bass Cut mode; it does not describe every firmware or bass setting. Bass reaches -3dB around 59Hz in that configuration. The review reports increasing compression around 200Hz and below 80Hz as volume rises, reducing bass dynamics. Careful placement and a subwoofer remain useful, and the horn/woofer transition is not perfectly uniform off-axis.

Full Klipsch The Fives review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	160W total system power (320W peak)
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	47.3Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	57Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	Yes, 5.0
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD
Coaxial Input	No
DSP	Dynamic Bass, Flat and Bass Cut profiles
Dimensions	12”H x 6.5”W x 9.2”D (304.8 x 165.1 x 234.95 mm)
Drivers	1” horn-loaded tweeter; 4.5” woofer
Frequency Response	50Hz - 25kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	Yes
Inputs	HDMI ARC, USB, optical, Bluetooth, phono/line RCA
Optical Input	Yes
Outputs	Subwoofer
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	5.52
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.89
Subwoofer Output	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	Yes
Weight	Primary 11.8 lbs (5.35 kg), Secondary 10.7 lbs (4.85 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Klipsch The Fives Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Klipsch The Fives Review More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Website: Klipsch The Fives
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
  • Jasper Tech: Best Bookshelf Speakers For TV & Gaming - 2025 More from Jasper Tech →
  • Jasper Tech: Best Powered Bookshelf Speakers for Every Budget - 2025
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Klipsch The Fives vs JBL 305P MKII
  • Klipsch The Fives vs Genelec 8020D
  • Klipsch The Fives vs Topping MA4
  • Klipsch The Fives vs KEF LS50 Wireless II
  • Klipsch The Fives vs Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus
  • Klipsch The Fives vs Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
  • Klipsch The Fives vs Genelec 8320A
  • Klipsch The Fives vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
  • See all 55 comparisons

#13 JBL 305P MKII: $289.00 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Erin’s Klippel data gives 5.38 standalone and 7.52 with an ideal subwoofer, with bass reaching -3dB around 51Hz. Broad horizontal coverage and reasonably smooth reflected sound support stable imaging across a desk. The existing review reports effective limiting and little sustained thermal compression, making it a strong budget-monitor option rather than just a speaker with a promising frequency curve. Measured bass extension of 50Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 91.1dB.

Cons: The 3.3dB midrange span and rising response show it is not perfectly neutral. A port-related feature around 1.6kHz and some excess treble can be audible; the review recommends the treble-trim switch. Vertical crossover interference makes ear height important. Amplifier hiss may matter in very quiet nearfield use, and rear-port placement needs room-boundary adjustment.

Full JBL 305P MKII review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	81w Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	43Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	50Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	11.7”H x 7.3”W x 9.1”D (297.2 x 185.4 x 231.1 mm)
Drivers	5” (127mm) woofer
EQ	Yes (Room adjustment)
Frequency Response	49 Hz - 20 kHz (+-3 dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR, TRS
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Sensitivity	91.1dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score	5.38
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.52
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	10.4 lbs (4.7 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official JBL 305P MKII Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Review Measurements More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: LIVE! JBL 305P MkII Powered Studio Monitor Review
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs JBL 305P MKII sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: JBL 305P MKII vs Yamaha HS5 6-Track Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review JBL 305P MKII vs KRK Classic 5 CL5G3 sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: JBL 305P MKII vs Adam Audio T5V 6-Track Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Adam Audio A5X vs JBL 305P MKII sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Kali Audio LP-6 V2 (2nd Wave) vs JBL 305P MKII sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs JBL 305P MKII sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: Kali Audio IN-5 vs JBL 305P MKII Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: JBL 308P MKII vs JBL 305P MKII Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs JBL 305P MKII Sound & Frquency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: JBL 305P MKII vs PreSonus Eris E5 6-Track Comparison
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
  • Jasper Tech: Best Desktop Computer Speakers for Every Budget – 2026 More from Jasper Tech →
  • Jasper Tech: Best Powered Bookshelf Speakers for Every Budget - 2025
  • Jasper Tech: Are the iLoud Micro Monitor Pro the Best Studio Monitor Speakers for your Home Studio?
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • JBL 305P MKII vs KEF LS50 Wireless II
  • JBL 305P MKII vs Klipsch The Fives
  • JBL 305P MKII vs Genelec 8020D
  • JBL 305P MKII vs Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus
  • JBL 305P MKII vs Topping MA4
  • JBL 305P MKII vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
  • JBL 305P MKII vs Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
  • JBL 305P MKII vs Genelec 8320A
  • See all 68 comparisons

#14 KEF LS50 Wireless II: $2,999.00 per pair Amazon KEF Crutchfield eBay

Pros: Erin’s measurements give preference scores of 5.43 standalone and 7.51 with an ideal subwoofer, with a -3dB point around 51Hz. The coincident Uni-Q layout helps preserve tonal consistency across horizontal and vertical listening positions. Low listening-window narrow-band deviation of 0.308 supports relatively clean midrange reproduction. HDMI eARC and streaming functions make it a capable all-in-one stereo system. Measured bass extension of 51.3Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The 3.0dB response span is good but not reference-leading, and dispersion still varies with frequency. Compact bass drivers limit deep-bass output. App placement adjustments are not the same as microphone-based automatic room correction. The price and primary/secondary architecture are practical trade-offs; neither driver geometry nor a single directivity statistic guarantees the best sound in every room.

Full KEF LS50 Wireless II review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	280W (LF) + 100W (HF) per speaker, bi-amped
App	KEF Connect (placement EQ presets, source selection, firmware updates)
Aux Input	Yes
Bass Extension (-10dB)	41.5Hz (measured, spinorama.org)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	51.3Hz (measured, spinorama.org)
Bluetooth	Yes, 4.2
Coaxial Input	Yes
Dimensions	12” x 7.9” x 12.2” (305 x 200 x 311 mm) each
Drivers	Uni-Q coincident array: 130mm aluminum woofer + 25mm MAT aluminum dome tweeter
EQ	Yes, fixed placement presets (desk/bookshelf/wall-mount) - no automatic room correction
Frequency Response	45Hz - 28kHz ±3dB
HDMI Input	Yes
Inputs	HDMI eARC, optical, digital coaxial, 3.5mm analog, USB-A (service), Ethernet
Maximum SPL	108dB at 1m (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	Yes
Outputs	RCA subwoofer
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	5.43
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.51
Subwoofer Output	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	44.3 lbs (20.1 kg) for the pair
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official KEF LS50 Wireless II Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org) More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Kef LS50 Wireless II Review. One of my new favorites. With some caveats.
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • KEF LS50 Wireless II vs JBL 305P MKII
  • KEF LS50 Wireless II vs Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus
  • KEF LS50 Wireless II vs Klipsch The Fives
  • KEF LS50 Wireless II vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
  • KEF LS50 Wireless II vs Genelec 8020D
  • KEF LS50 Wireless II vs Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
  • KEF LS50 Wireless II vs Genelec 8320A
  • KEF LS50 Wireless II vs Kali Audio SM-5
  • See all 46 comparisons

#15 Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus: $699.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Erin’s Klippel data combines a small 1.7dB midrange response span with a -3dB point around 44Hz. Scores of 5.57 standalone and 7.38 with an ideal subwoofer make it an attractive standalone system as well as a subwoofer partner. Remote tone controls, multiple digital and analog inputs, and automatic subwoofer crossover engagement simplify setup. Measured bass extension of 42Hz (-3dB).

Cons: A mild 4-6kHz edge and a smaller 1-2kHz recession were audible in the review, so its smooth midrange summary does not mean there is nothing to improve with EQ. No HDMI ARC. Deep bass and louder playback still benefit from a subwoofer; amplifier wattage alone does not establish clean room-filling output.

Full Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	240W total (100W + 20W Class D amplifiers per enclosure)
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	34Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	42Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	Yes
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD
Coaxial Input	Yes
Dimensions	10” x 6.5” x 8” (254 x 165 x 203 mm)
Drivers	5.25” aluminum-cone woofer with XBL motor, 5.25” passive radiator (rear), 1” aluminum dome tweeter with waveguide and phase plug
Frequency Response	48Hz - 20kHz ±3dB (manufacturer specified, Flat mode)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	USB, Optical, Coax, Analog, Bluetooth
Optical Input	Yes
Outputs	RCA subwoofer
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	5.57
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.38
Subwoofer Output	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	Yes
Weight	10.8 lbs (4.9 kg) (passive unit), 12.1 lbs (5.5 kg) (active unit)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus Review More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Website: Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs KEF LS50 Wireless II
  • Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
  • Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs JBL 305P MKII
  • Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs Klipsch The Fives
  • Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs Genelec 8020D
  • Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs Kali Audio SM-5
  • Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs Topping MA4
  • Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs Kali Audio IN-5
  • See all 51 comparisons

#16 Genelec G Two: $1,390 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: A compact die-cast aluminum speaker built on the same drivers and waveguide as Genelec’s 8020 studio monitor, and it plugs straight into consumer gear through an RCA input. Spinorama measurements show the listening-window response holding within a 2.7dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz, and a smooth predicted in-room response (0.79 smoothness), so voices and instruments sound natural rather than colored. With a subwoofer, its measured preference score rises to 7.64. Rear tone switches let you adjust the bass and treble for desk or wall placement. Measured bass extension of 54Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Bass reaches only about 54Hz (-3dB) and fades by about 48Hz (-10dB), so it needs a subwoofer for full-range music or movies. On-axis response is less even than Genelec’s larger monitors (0.42 narrow-band deviation versus 0.23 for the 8030C), and its preference score without a sub is a modest 5.26. Output tops out around 100dB short-term, and there is no balanced XLR input or GLM room calibration like the studio models.

Full Genelec G Two review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	100W (50W woofer + 50W tweeter)
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	48Hz (measured, spinorama.org)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	54Hz (measured, spinorama.org)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	9.5”H x 5.9”W x 5.6”D (242 x 151 x 142 mm)
Drivers	4.1” (105mm) woofer, 0.75” (19mm) metal dome tweeter
EQ	Yes (bass and treble room switches)
Frequency Response	62Hz - 20kHz (±2.5dB), 56Hz - 25kHz (-6dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	RCA
Maximum SPL	100dB @ 1m (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	5.26
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.64
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	7.1 lbs (3.2 kg) each
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Genelec G Two Website
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Spinorama Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Genelec G Two vs KEF LSX II LT
  • Genelec G Two vs Kali LP-UNF
  • Genelec G Two vs Yamaha HS5
  • Genelec G Two vs Edifier S2000MKIII
  • Genelec G Two vs Edifier MR4
  • Genelec G Two vs Edifier S1000MKII

#17 IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII: $799.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Older model: the IK Multimedia iLoud MTM (ranked lower, rated 4.1/5).

Pros: Erin’s MKII measurements give a 2.2dB midrange span, a -3dB point around 53Hz, and preference scores of 5.22 standalone and 7.44 with an ideal subwoofer. The compact layout and included calibration microphone suit a close desktop setup. Existing tests show useful room-peak correction and good harmonic-distortion behavior at moderate levels. Measured bass extension of 52.7Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Some excess treble remains in the native tuning. The two-woofer MTM arrangement narrows the vertical listening window, so ear height and orientation matter. Multitone distortion rises strongly when pushed toward 96dB/1m; the review favors moderate listening levels, and a subwoofer does not eliminate all midrange output limits. These are MKII results, not measurements of the original MTM. Treble runs about 3dB hot on-axis; the rear -3dB treble switch overcorrects, and about -1.5dB of external EQ works better.

Full IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	100w Per Speaker
App	Yes (X-MONITOR speaker emulation)
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	46.3Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	52.7Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	10.4”H x 5.1”W x 6.3”D (264.2 x 129.5 x 160 mm)
Drivers	2x 3.5” (89mm) woofers, 1” silk dome tweeter
EQ	Yes (Room adjustment)
Frequency Response	48 Hz - 28 kHz (±2dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR
Maximum SPL	112.5dB peak (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	5.22
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.44
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	5.5 lbs (2.5 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Unbiased Review of iLoud MTM MKII More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
  • Jasper Tech: Are the D3V The Best Studio Monitors For The Money? More from Jasper Tech →
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII vs Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII vs Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII vs HEDD Type 05 A-CORE
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII vs Kali Audio SM-5
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII vs KEF LS50 Wireless II
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII vs Kali Audio IN-5
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII vs JBL 305P MKII
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII vs Klipsch The Fives
  • See all 63 comparisons

#18 Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2: $18,043.20 for the full system (2 speakers + 2 dedicated subwoofers, built to order) Sigberg Audio eBay

Older model: the Sigberg Audio SBS.1 (ranked lower, rated 4.1/5).

Pros: The measured speaker-and-subwoofer system has a 1.7dB midrange response span and a 7.51 ideal-subwoofer preference score, supporting useful tonal accuracy above the bass region. The measured system reaches -3dB around 34Hz. Onboard parametric EQ and dedicated amplification provide flexible integration for a complete high-performance setup. Measured bass extension of 24Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The measured system explicitly includes a subwoofer: its 6.56 full-system score and bass extension must not be attributed to the bookshelf speaker alone. It is not directly equivalent to the standalone-monitor tests around it. The complete system is expensive and occupies more space than the main speakers suggest; the score alone does not prove superior output or room performance.

Full Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2 review and specifications →

AES Input	Yes
Amplifier Power	350W per speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-3dB)	24Hz (measured, spinorama.org, with companion subwoofer)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	Yes
Country	Norway
DSP	Yes
Dimensions	16.1”H x 7.5”W x 9.1”D (410 x 190 x 230 mm)
Drivers	5.5” midbass, 5.5” coaxial mid/tweeter with 1” silk dome
EQ	Yes (9-band parametric, factory presets)
Enclosure	sealed
Frequency Response	26Hz - 20kHz (±2.5dB, with subwoofers) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR, RCA, Optical, Coaxial/SPDIF, AES
Maximum SPL	116dB (manufacturer specified)
Measurement Source	Manufacturer
Optical Input	Yes
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	6.56
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.51
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	20.9 lbs (9.5 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2 Website
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review: New Development Thread - Sigberg Audio SBS Generation 2 More from Audio Science Review →
  • Manufacturer Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2 vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
  • Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2 vs Kali Audio IN-5
  • Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2 vs JBL 305P MKII
  • Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2 vs KEF LSX II LT
  • Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2 vs Adam Audio T5V
  • Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2 vs Neumann KH80 DSP
  • Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2 vs Kali LP-UNF
  • Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2 vs Yamaha HS5
  • See all 13 comparisons

#19 HEDD Type 05 A-CORE: $1,398 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: ASR’s Klippel data shows useful bass reach for this size, with -3dB around 44Hz. Preference scores of 5.35 standalone and 7.23 with an ideal subwoofer support it as a balanced all-round option. The AMT tweeter and analog signal path appeal to users who want a studio monitor without digital conversion or firmware dependence. Measured bass extension of 43.9Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The 2.7dB midrange span and listening-window narrow-band deviation of 0.404 trail the most linear monitors here. The response rises modestly toward the treble. The analog-only design does not provide built-in room correction or digital inputs, and published amplification power should not be read as a measured clean-output rating.

Full HEDD Type 05 A-CORE review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	200W total, bi-amped (2x100W ICEpower Class D)
App	None (analog-only, no DSP)
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	37.1Hz (measured, spinorama.org)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	43.9Hz (measured, spinorama.org)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	12.1” x 7.1” x 9.6” (308 x 180 x 245 mm) each
Drivers	AMT (Air Motion Transformer) tweeter, 5” Honeycomb-compound woofer
EQ	Yes, analog High/Low shelving, ±6dB continuous
Frequency Response	43Hz - 50kHz
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	RCA unbalanced, XLR/TRS combo balanced
Maximum SPL	112dB per pair at 1m (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	5.35
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.23
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	13.7 lbs (6.2 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official HEDD Type 05 A-CORE Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org) More from Audio Science Review →
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • HEDD Type 05 A-CORE vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
  • HEDD Type 05 A-CORE vs Kali Audio IN-5
  • HEDD Type 05 A-CORE vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM
  • HEDD Type 05 A-CORE vs JBL 305P MKII
  • HEDD Type 05 A-CORE vs Klipsch The Fives
  • HEDD Type 05 A-CORE vs KEF LSX II LT
  • HEDD Type 05 A-CORE vs Audioengine A5+ Classic
  • HEDD Type 05 A-CORE vs Adam Audio T5V
  • See all 21 comparisons

#20 Kali Audio SM-5: $3000 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: Erin’s measurements show bass reaching -3dB around 43Hz and a 2.8dB midrange response span. The coaxial mid/tweeter and large waveguide give useful consistency horizontally and vertically, reducing sensitivity to listening height. Built-in per-speaker DSP and mounting options make placement flexible. Existing testing reports low midrange distortion at 96dB. Measured bass extension of 45Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Scores of 5.18 standalone and 7.13 with an ideal subwoofer are good but below the leading reference monitors, so its advanced driver layout does not justify a near-top ranking by itself. A small upper-midrange irregularity remains. The five-inch woofer and limiter constrain loud bass; the review places compression onset roughly in the 96-102dB/1m region.

Full Kali Audio SM-5 review and specifications →

AES Input	Yes
Amplifier Power	150W total
App	Kali Audio DSP software (free download)
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	39Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	45Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	15.7”H x 7.9”W x 9.8”D (400 x 200 x 250 mm)
Drivers	1” coaxial tweeter, 4” coaxial midrange, 5” mid-bass woofer
EQ	Yes, per-speaker DSP
Frequency Response	39Hz - 35kHz ±10dB (47Hz - 21kHz ±3dB, Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR/TRS, AES/EBU (BNC), RJ45 network control
Maximum SPL	117dB (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	5.18
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.13
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	20.9 lbs (9.5 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Kali Audio SM-5 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Kali Audio SM-5 Review (With Sound Clips!) More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Kali Audio SM-5 vs Kali Audio IN-5
  • Kali Audio SM-5 vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM
  • Kali Audio SM-5 vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
  • Kali Audio SM-5 vs Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus
  • Kali Audio SM-5 vs Pioneer DJ VM-50
  • Kali Audio SM-5 vs Airpulse A100
  • Kali Audio SM-5 vs KEF LS50 Wireless II
  • Kali Audio SM-5 vs JBL 305P MKII
  • See all 50 comparisons

#21 Kali Audio IN-5: $698 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: The active three-way layout separates bass duties from the coaxial mid/tweeter, giving flexible listening geometry. Erin’s data shows a 1.8dB midrange response span and -3dB bass around 45Hz, with scores of 5.12 standalone and 7.13 with an ideal subwoofer. Placement switches and balanced inputs help integrate it into a studio; moderate-level distortion is well controlled in the existing review. Measured bass extension of 45Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Local listening-window irregularities remain despite the small overall midrange span. The review reports midrange distortion rising above 3% at 96dB and a brighter perceived balance at closer distances. Limiting makes it unsuitable for demanding farfield playback. Coaxial construction improves geometry but does not remove response errors or guarantee unlimited output.

Full Kali Audio IN-5 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	80W LF + 40W mid + 40W HF
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	40.0Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	Approximately 45Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	15” x 8.1” x 11.1” (382 x 206 x 282 mm) (H x W x D)
Drivers	1” tweeter coaxial with 4” midrange; 5” woofer
Frequency Response	39Hz - 25kHz (-10dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR, TRS, RCA
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	5.12
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.13
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	18.6 lbs (8.43 kg) each
Woofer Cabinet	ported, front
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Kali Audio IN-5 Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Kali Audio IN-5 Review More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Website: Kali Audio IN-5
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Kali Audio IN-5 vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM
  • Kali Audio IN-5 vs Kali Audio SM-5
  • Kali Audio IN-5 vs HEDD Type 05 A-CORE
  • Kali Audio IN-5 vs Sigberg Audio SBS.1
  • Kali Audio IN-5 vs Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2
  • Kali Audio IN-5 vs Mackie MR524
  • Kali Audio IN-5 vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
  • Kali Audio IN-5 vs Pioneer DJ VM-50
  • See all 62 comparisons

#22 IK Multimedia iLoud MTM: $1,600 per pair Discontinued Amazon eBay

Newer model: the IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII, ranked higher, rated 4.2/5.

Pros: ASR’s measurements of the original MTM give scores of 4.07 standalone and 6.26 with an ideal subwoofer, a 2.4dB midrange response span and a -3dB point around 53Hz. The small cabinet, balanced input and calibration capability make it useful for close listening where larger monitors would be impractical. Measured bass extension of 50Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The MTM arrangement makes listening height and orientation important, while bass below the low-50Hz region still needs support. The native response is not as smooth as the best compact reference monitors. Exact compression ceilings and correction examples from the MKII review should not be assigned to this original version; its score describes tonal response, not maximum clean volume. Treble runs about 3dB hot on-axis; the reviewer found the rear -3dB switch too aggressive and preferred about -1.5dB of external EQ. Discontinued.

Full IK Multimedia iLoud MTM review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	100w Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	40Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	50Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	10.4”H x 5.1”W x 6.3”D (264.2 x 129.5 x 160 mm)
Drivers	2x 3.5” (89mm) woofers
EQ	Yes (Room adjustment)
Frequency Response	50 Hz - 24 kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	5.5 lbs (2.5 kg)
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official IK Multimedia iLoud MTM Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • DSAUDIO.review: IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs Genelec 8020D Sound & Frequency Response Comparison More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIOreview: IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs iLoud Micro Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs KRK Rokit 5 G4 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs Edifier S3000 Pro Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Adam Audio A3X vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Yamaha HS8 vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs Kali Audio IN-5
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs Kali Audio SM-5
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs Pioneer DJ VM-50
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs HEDD Type 05 A-CORE
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs Airpulse A100
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs KEF LSX II LT
  • IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs Audioengine A5+ Classic
  • See all 48 comparisons

#23 Sigberg Audio SBS.1 Discontinued eBay

Newer model: the Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2, ranked higher, rated 4.2/5.

Pros: The 7.17 preference score with an ideal subwoofer is the relevant tonal comparison for this subwoofer-dependent design. Manufacturer-supplied data shows a 2.0dB midrange response span, and onboard parametric EQ offers substantial system-tuning flexibility. It is intended as a main speaker in a complete system rather than a conventional full-range desktop pair.

Cons: The measured -3dB point is around 97Hz and the standalone score is 3.87, reflecting the requirement for a companion subwoofer rather than an unexpectedly weak full-range design. It is discontinued, so condition and system compatibility matter when buying used.

Full Sigberg Audio SBS.1 review and specifications →

AES Input	Yes
Amplifier Power	350W per speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-3dB)	18Hz (manufacturer, with companion subwoofers)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	Yes
Country	Norway
DSP	Yes
Dimensions	16.1”H x 7.5”W x 9.1”D (410 x 190 x 230 mm)
Drivers	2x 5.5” midbass, 1” coaxial silk dome tweeter
EQ	Yes (9-band parametric, factory presets)
Enclosure	sealed
Frequency Response	26Hz - 20kHz (±2.5dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR, RCA, Optical, Coaxial/SPDIF, AES
Maximum SPL	116dB (manufacturer specified)
Measurement Source	Manufacturer
Optical Input	Yes
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	3.87
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.17
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	20.9 lbs (9.5 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Sigberg Audio SBS.1 Website
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audioholics: Sigberg Audio SBS.1 Review
  • Audio Science Review: Sigberg Audio SBS.1 Active Speakers (Prototype Build Thread) More from Audio Science Review →
  • Manufacturer Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Sigberg Audio SBS.1 vs Kali Audio IN-5
  • Sigberg Audio SBS.1 vs KEF LSX II LT
  • Sigberg Audio SBS.1 vs Adam Audio T5V
  • Sigberg Audio SBS.1 vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
  • Sigberg Audio SBS.1 vs JBL 305P MKII
  • Sigberg Audio SBS.1 vs Kali LP-UNF
  • Sigberg Audio SBS.1 vs Neumann KH80 DSP
  • Sigberg Audio SBS.1 vs Yamaha HS5
  • See all 11 comparisons

#24 Mackie MR524: $379.98 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: The available third-party data suggests a useful combination of bass reach and midrange balance: -3dB around 46Hz, a 2.0dB midrange span, and preference estimates of 5.11 standalone and 7.06 with an ideal subwoofer. Balanced inputs, boundary compensation and treble trim are practical studio features. Measured bass extension of 46.2Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The measured response trends upward toward the treble by about 0.47dB per octave, which can lend a brighter balance. Boundary compensation and treble trim help with setup but are less flexible than parametric correction.

Full Mackie MR524 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	50W bi-amplified per speaker
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	approximately 38Hz (measured, spinorama.org)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	46.2Hz (measured, spinorama.org)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	11.1” x 7.1” x 8.7” (281 x 180 x 221 mm) (H x W x D)
Drivers	5-inch polypropylene woofer; 1-inch silk-dome tweeter
Frequency Response	45Hz-20kHz
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Balanced XLR, balanced TRS, RCA
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	5.11
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.06
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	10.1 lbs (4.6 kg)
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Mackie MR524 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Weeb Labs Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Mackie MR524 vs KEF LSX II LT
  • Mackie MR524 vs Kali Audio IN-5
  • Mackie MR524 vs Audioengine A5+ Classic
  • Mackie MR524 vs Adam Audio T5V
  • Mackie MR524 vs Kanto YU6
  • Mackie MR524 vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
  • Mackie MR524 vs M-Audio BX5 D3
  • Mackie MR524 vs Kali LP-UNF
  • See all 19 comparisons

#25 Pioneer DJ VM-50: $338 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Erin’s Klippel measurements give scores of 4.64 standalone and 7.00 with an ideal subwoofer, with a -3dB point around 60Hz. The existing review reports low distortion and little sustained compression, supporting practical clean playback beyond what the tonal score alone captures. Separate bass and treble voicings and balanced inputs make adjustment straightforward. Measured bass extension of 61Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The default response spans 3.5dB from 300Hz to 5kHz, and the upper-midrange/treble balance varies with angle. EQ-switch selection and aiming therefore matter. Bass below about 50Hz is reduced, so it is not a full-range substitute for a monitor-and-subwoofer system. Its output evidence supports nearfield use, not unrestricted home-theater levels.

Full Pioneer DJ VM-50 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	30W LF + 30W HF; Class D
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	47.3Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	61Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
DSP	Four LF and four HF EQ settings
Dimensions	7.8” x 11.8” x 10.1” (198 x 300 x 256 mm) (W x H x D)
Drivers	1” tweeter in horn; 5.25” aramid-fiber woofer
Frequency Response	40Hz - 36kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR/TRS combo and RCA
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	4.64
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.00
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	12.1 lbs (5.5 kg)
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Pioneer DJ VM-50 Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Pioneer DJ VM-50 Review More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Website: Pioneer DJ VM-50
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Pioneer DJ VM-50 vs Airpulse A100
  • Pioneer DJ VM-50 vs KEF LSX II LT
  • Pioneer DJ VM-50 vs Audioengine A5+ Classic
  • Pioneer DJ VM-50 vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM
  • Pioneer DJ VM-50 vs Kali Audio IN-5
  • Pioneer DJ VM-50 vs Adam Audio T5V
  • Pioneer DJ VM-50 vs Kali Audio SM-5
  • Pioneer DJ VM-50 vs Kanto YU6
  • See all 54 comparisons

#26 Airpulse A100: $999.99 per pair Amazon B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: ASR’s Klippel data gives a 2.9dB midrange span and scores of 4.56 standalone and 7.08 with an ideal subwoofer. The ribbon tweeter and five-inch woofer provide a distinctive compact powered system, with remote control and a subwoofer output simplifying everyday use. Measured bass extension of 63.0Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Bass reaches -3dB around 63Hz, so lower notes need a subwoofer for full weight. Listening-window narrow-band deviation of 0.419 shows more local tonal variation than the leading monitors. Rear tone controls are less flexible than parametric EQ or room correction. Neither the ribbon tweeter nor a directivity-index summary establishes uniquely wide or perfectly controlled dispersion. The remote cannot reach the rear bass and treble knobs, and there is no app EQ.

Full Airpulse A100 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	100W total (40W+40W woofer, 10W+10W tweeter)
App	None (physical bass/treble knobs, IR remote)
Aux Input	Yes
Bass Extension (-10dB)	53.2Hz (measured, spinorama.org)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	63.0Hz (measured, spinorama.org)
Bluetooth	Yes (SBC, aptX)
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC, aptX
Coaxial Input	Yes
Dimensions	6.3” x 11.1” x 10” (160 x 283 x 255 mm) each
Drivers	Horn-loaded ribbon tweeter, 5” hard-anodized aluminum cone woofer
EQ	Yes, rear-panel bass/treble trim knobs
Frequency Response	52Hz - 40kHz
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	RCA (aux), USB, optical, coaxial, Bluetooth aptX
Optical Input	Yes
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	4.56
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.08
TRS Input	No
USB Input	Yes
Weight	24.3 lbs (11 kg) each
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Airpulse A100 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org) More from Audio Science Review →
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Airpulse A100 vs KEF LSX II LT
  • Airpulse A100 vs Pioneer DJ VM-50
  • Airpulse A100 vs Audioengine A5+ Classic
  • Airpulse A100 vs Adam Audio T5V
  • Airpulse A100 vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM
  • Airpulse A100 vs Kanto YU6
  • Airpulse A100 vs Kali Audio IN-5
  • Airpulse A100 vs M-Audio BX5 D3
  • See all 50 comparisons

#27 KEF LSX II LT: $479.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: The coincident driver provides useful consistency across listening positions, and the app offers placement and subwoofer adjustments. Erin’s measurements give preference scores of 4.81 standalone and 7.03 with an ideal subwoofer, with -3dB bass around 56Hz. HDMI and USB connectivity make it convenient for a small TV or desktop system. Horizontal and vertical dispersion both reach about ±60°, giving a broad sweet spot for more than one seat. Measured bass extension of 55Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 84dB.

Cons: The 3.4dB midrange response span and treble-region dips keep it below more neutral monitors. The existing review finds bass compression around 88-92dB/1m and rising distortion at higher levels, so the small drivers suit close listening rather than a large room. This LT version has no analog input; a turntable cannot plug straight into it.

Full KEF LSX II LT review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	100w RMS Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	46Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	55Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	Yes
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	9.5”H x 6.1”W x 7.1”D (241.3 x 154.9 x 180.3 mm)
Drivers	115mm (4.5in.) magnesium/aluminium alloy cone woofer, 19mm (0.75in.) aluminium dome tweeter
EQ	No
Frequency Response	54Hz - 28kHz (±3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	Yes
Inputs	Wifi, USB-C, HDMI, Optical, Bluetooth
Optical Input	Yes
Outputs	RCA Subwoofer
RCA Input	No
Sensitivity	84dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score	4.81
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.03
Subwoofer Output	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	Yes
Weight	15 lbs (6.8 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official KEF LSX II LT Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Transform Your Sound System with the KEF LSX II LT Speaker More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Website: KEF LSX II LT
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
  • Jasper Tech: Best Desktop Computer Speakers for Every Budget – 2026 More from Jasper Tech →
  • Jasper Tech: Best Bookshelf Speakers For TV & Gaming - 2025
  • Jasper Tech: Best Powered Bookshelf Speakers for Every Budget - 2025
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • KEF LSX II LT vs Audioengine A5+ Classic
  • KEF LSX II LT vs Airpulse A100
  • KEF LSX II LT vs Adam Audio T5V
  • KEF LSX II LT vs Pioneer DJ VM-50
  • KEF LSX II LT vs Mackie MR524
  • KEF LSX II LT vs Kanto YU6
  • KEF LSX II LT vs Sigberg Audio SBS.1
  • KEF LSX II LT vs M-Audio BX5 D3
  • See all 70 comparisons

#28 Audioengine A5+ Classic: $399.00 per pair Amazon B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: ASR’s A5+ Powered measurements give 4.59 standalone and 7.06 with an ideal subwoofer, with a 2.7dB midrange span. The analog powered pair is straightforward to use without an external amplifier. The measured result supports a more capable tonal balance than its former low position suggested. Measured bass extension of 68Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The measured -3dB point is around 69Hz, and the upper-bass recession can reduce body in voices and instruments. The existing review reports crossover-region directivity errors and a distortion feature around 800-900Hz. The score does not make it a reference monitor, and adding a subwoofer cannot correct those midrange and off-axis issues.

Full Audioengine A5+ Classic review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	50W RMS / 75W peak
App	No
Aux Input	Yes
Bass Extension (-10dB)	50Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	68Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
DSP	No
Dimensions	10.9”H x 7.2”W x 9.7”D (276.2 x 182.6 x 247.6 mm)
Drivers	5” Kevlar woofer, 0.75” silk dome tweeter
EQ	No
Frequency Response	50Hz - 22kHz (+/-1.5dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	RCA, Aux
Optical Input	No
Outputs	RCA variable output (subwoofer)
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	4.59
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.06
Subwoofer Output	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	15.4 lbs (7 kg) (left/powered), 9.7 lbs (4.4 kg) (right)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Audioengine A5+ Classic Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
  • Jasper Tech: Best Powered Bookshelf Speakers for Every Budget - 2025 More from Jasper Tech →
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Audioengine A5+ Classic vs KEF LSX II LT
  • Audioengine A5+ Classic vs Adam Audio T5V
  • Audioengine A5+ Classic vs Airpulse A100
  • Audioengine A5+ Classic vs Kanto YU6
  • Audioengine A5+ Classic vs Pioneer DJ VM-50
  • Audioengine A5+ Classic vs M-Audio BX5 D3
  • Audioengine A5+ Classic vs JBL 705P
  • Audioengine A5+ Classic vs Mackie MR524
  • See all 60 comparisons

#29 Adam Audio T5V: $472 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: ASR’s data shows a small 2.0dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz, a -3dB point around 59Hz, and scores of 4.65 standalone and 7.02 with an ideal subwoofer. It offers useful bass and midrange performance for an affordable studio monitor. Rear tonal trims allow broad placement adjustment. Measured bass extension of 58.6Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The response rises toward the treble by about 0.56dB per octave, so the small midrange span should not be mistaken for flat full-band response. Upper-frequency unevenness remains, and a shelving control cannot precisely remove every peak. The existing review finds distortion reasonable for the price rather than reference-class; deeper bass and demanding levels still call for more capable hardware.

Full Adam Audio T5V review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	70w Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	45.9Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	58.6Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	11.7”H x 7”W x 11.7”D (297.2 x 177.8 x 297.2 mm)
Drivers	5” (127mm) woofer
EQ	Yes (Room adjustment)
Frequency Response	58Hz - 24kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR, RCA
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	4.65
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.02
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	12.6 lbs (5.7 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Adam Audio T5V Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • DSAUDIO.review: JBL 305P MKII vs Adam Audio T5V 6-Track Comparison More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: Kali LP-6 vs Adam Audio T5V Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Adam Audio T5V vs Yamaha HS5 5 Track Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Adam Audio A5X vs Adam Audio T5V sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Adam Audio T5V sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: Adam Audio T5V vs Presonus Eris E5 5 Track Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: KRK Rokit 5 G4 RP5G4 vs Adam Audio T5V Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Bright and brighter. PreSonus E5 XT takes on Adam Audio T5V SOUND & FREQUENCY RESPONSE COMPARISON
  • DSAUDIO.review: Adam Audio T5V vs Adam Audio T7V Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
  • Jasper Tech: Best Desktop Computer Speakers for Every Budget – 2026 More from Jasper Tech →
  • Jasper Tech: Are the iLoud Micro Monitor Pro the Best Studio Monitor Speakers for your Home Studio?
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Adam Audio T5V vs Audioengine A5+ Classic
  • Adam Audio T5V vs Kanto YU6
  • Adam Audio T5V vs KEF LSX II LT
  • Adam Audio T5V vs M-Audio BX5 D3
  • Adam Audio T5V vs JBL 705P
  • Adam Audio T5V vs Airpulse A100
  • Adam Audio T5V vs Pioneer DJ VM-50
  • Adam Audio T5V vs Kali LP-UNF
  • See all 67 comparisons

#30 Kanto YU6: $380.00 per pair Discontinued Amazon eBay

Newer model: the Kanto YU6 G2. It’s likely to perform similarly, though we can’t confirm that yet.

Pros: ASR’s measurements give preference scores of 4.28 standalone and 6.89 with an ideal subwoofer, stronger than several smaller lifestyle pairs. Phono input, optical connections and remote control make it useful for a simple multi-source system. The overall response trend is close to level rather than strongly tilted.

Cons: Local response variation remains despite the mild overall tilt: the midrange span is 3.8dB and listening-window narrow-band deviation is 0.419. Bass reaches -3dB around 75Hz, so the preference model’s 58Hz LFX value should not be quoted as full-level bass extension. A subwoofer improves bandwidth but does not remove tonal irregularities. Discontinued.

Full Kanto YU6 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	200W peak Class D (100W RMS total)
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	Yes, 4.0
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC, aptX
Coaxial Input	No
Country	Canada (design)
Dimensions	6.9W x 8.1D x 10.7H in each
Drivers	1” silk dome tweeter, 5.25” Kevlar woofer
Enclosure	2-way active, MDF cabinet
Frequency Response	50Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Bluetooth aptX, RCA phono preamp, 2x optical
Optical Input	Yes
Outputs	Subwoofer
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	4.28
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.89
Subwoofer Output	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	11.5 lbs (5.2 kg) (active), 8.6 lbs (3.9 kg) (passive)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Kanto YU6 Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org) More from Audio Science Review →
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Kanto YU6 vs Adam Audio T5V
  • Kanto YU6 vs M-Audio BX5 D3
  • Kanto YU6 vs Audioengine A5+ Classic
  • Kanto YU6 vs KEF LSX II LT
  • Kanto YU6 vs Kanto Tuk G2
  • Kanto YU6 vs Kali LP-UNF
  • Kanto YU6 vs Airpulse A100
  • Kanto YU6 vs Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus
  • See all 47 comparisons

#31 M-Audio BX5 D3: $299 per pair Discontinued Amazon eBay

Pros: The third-party measurements suggest scores of 4.09 standalone and 6.69 with an ideal subwoofer, with a 2.4dB midrange span. Balanced inputs and acoustic-space adjustment are useful for a basic studio setup. The measured -3dB estimate is about 64Hz.

Cons: The response slopes downward by about 0.65dB per octave, potentially softening treble relative to the midrange. There is no digital input or automatic calibration, and the preference estimate does not verify distortion or output headroom. Discontinued.

Full M-Audio BX5 D3 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	100W each
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	10H x 6.9W x 7.8D in
Drivers	1-inch silk tweeter, 5-inch Kevlar woofer
Enclosure	Active 2-way, rear-ported
Frequency Response	52Hz-35kHz
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR and TRS
Maximum SPL	110dB
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	4.09
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.69
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	12.3 lbs (5.6 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • M-Audio BX5 D3 Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • M-Audio BX5 D3 Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • M-Audio BX5 D3 vs Kanto YU6
  • M-Audio BX5 D3 vs Adam Audio T5V
  • M-Audio BX5 D3 vs Kali LP-UNF
  • M-Audio BX5 D3 vs Audioengine A5+ Classic
  • M-Audio BX5 D3 vs KEF LSX II LT
  • M-Audio BX5 D3 vs Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus
  • M-Audio BX5 D3 vs Airpulse A100
  • M-Audio BX5 D3 vs Neumi BS5P-ARC
  • See all 44 comparisons

#32 JBL 705P: $1998 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: ASR’s data gives bass reaching -3dB around 48Hz and a 6.71 ideal-subwoofer preference score. Its waveguided compression driver and dedicated amplification are suited to studio use, and the broad response trend is close to level. It has useful low-frequency reach for a five-inch monitor. Measured bass extension of 47.6Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The standalone score is 4.70, and a localized cancellation near 750Hz contributes to the large 7.8dB midrange response span. A crossover-region rise also prevents reference-flat reproduction. An average flat trend does not erase these features, and amplifier wattage is not a measured clean-SPL rating. The data does not support calling it uniformly flat simply because it shares technology with larger JBL models.

Full JBL 705P review and specifications →

AES Input	Yes
Amplifier Power	500W total (250W woofer, 250W tweeter)
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	38.9Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	47.6Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
DSP	No
Dimensions	10.6”H x 5.9”W x 10.8”D (268 x 151 x 274 mm)
Drivers	5” woofer, 2409H 1” compression driver
EQ	No
Frequency Response	39Hz - 36kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR/TRS combo (analog), XLR AES3 (digital)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	4.70
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.71
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	12.6 lbs (5.7 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official JBL 705P Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • JBL 705P vs Kali LP-UNF
  • JBL 705P vs Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus
  • JBL 705P vs Adam Audio T5V
  • JBL 705P vs Audioengine A5+ Classic
  • JBL 705P vs KEF LSX II LT
  • JBL 705P vs Neumi BS5P
  • JBL 705P vs Airpulse A100
  • JBL 705P vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO
  • See all 49 comparisons

#33 Kanto Tuk G2: $899.99 per pair Crutchfield eBay

Pros: Bass reaches about 52Hz at -3dB and 42Hz at -10dB in Erin’s measurements, legitimate extension from a 5.25-inch woofer. The predicted in-room response is fairly even from the upper bass through the treble, which lifts its preference score to about 4.6 on its own and 6.7 with an ideal subwoofer. Connections cover most desk and living room sources: optical, two RCA inputs, USB-C from a computer and Bluetooth 5.4 with aptX Adaptive, plus a subwoofer output with an 80Hz low-pass, a remote and a USB charging port. Measured bass extension of 52Hz (-3dB).

Cons: On-axis response is uneven, with elevated upper bass around 80 to 100Hz, a forward midrange near 800Hz to 1.5kHz and further ripples through the treble. Horizontal dispersion widens abruptly around 2 to 2.5kHz before narrowing again, and the vertical listening window is narrow, so keep the AMT tweeter near ear height. Compression grows at 96dB and becomes severe near 102dB, with distortion rising sharply at high levels, so it sounds best as a nearfield or small room speaker at moderate volume.

Full Kanto Tuk G2 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	130W Class D total (Manufacturer specified)
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	42Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	52Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	Yes, 5.4
Bluetooth Codecs	aptX Adaptive, SBC
Bluetooth Version	5.4
Coaxial Input	No
DSP	Yes
Dimensions	7.2”W x 12”H x 10”D (183 x 305 x 254 mm)
Drivers	5.25-inch aluminum woofer + AMT folded ribbon tweeter (each), bass reflex
Frequency Response	50Hz-22kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Headphone Output	No
Inputs	Optical, 2x RCA, USB-C, Bluetooth
Measurement Source	Erin’s Audio Corner
Optical Input	Yes
Outputs	Subwoofer RCA (80Hz low-pass), USB-A charging (5V/2A)
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	4.61 (calculated from Erin’s Audio Corner CEA2034 data)
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.73 (calculated from Erin’s Audio Corner CEA2034 data)
Subwoofer Output	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	Yes
Weight	12.3 lbs (5.6 kg) (active), 11.5 lbs (5.2 kg) (passive)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Kanto Tuk G2 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Review Website Kanto Audio Tuk G2
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Kanto Tuk G2 vs Kali LP-UNF
  • Kanto Tuk G2 vs Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus
  • Kanto Tuk G2 vs Kanto YU6
  • Kanto Tuk G2 vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO
  • Kanto Tuk G2 vs KEF LSX II LT
  • Kanto Tuk G2 vs Airpulse A100
  • Kanto Tuk G2 vs Kanto YU
  • Kanto Tuk G2 vs Yamaha HS5
  • See all 12 comparisons

#34 Kali LP-UNF: $349.00 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: A practical compact desktop system with USB-C, analog inputs and Bluetooth, plus extensive placement switches. Erin’s Klippel data gives -3dB bass around 54Hz and scores of 4.60 standalone and 6.67 with an ideal subwoofer. The low crossover and waveguide provide useful freedom of listening height for a two-way design, and moderate-level distortion is well controlled in the review. The 1.9kHz crossover gives vertical coverage of about ±30 to 40°, well beyond the typical ±10 to 15° of a two-way. Measured bass extension of 54Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 88.1dB.

Cons: The 2.9dB midrange span masks local response ripples; listening-window narrow-band deviation of 0.467 is behind the best monitors. The review finds limiting around 91dB/1m per speaker. No dedicated subwoofer output means integration requires suitable external routing or bass management. Its strength is affordable close listening, not top-tier tonal accuracy or high-output room playback.

Full Kali LP-UNF review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	160W total (Class D, 2-channel bi-amped)
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	39Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	54Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	Yes
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	10”H x 6.5”W x 7.4”D (254 x 165 x 188 mm)
Drivers	4.5” woofer, 1” Textile Dome tweeter
EQ	No
Frequency Response	39Hz - 25kHz (-10dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Bluetooth, USB-C (digital), RCA, TRS
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Sensitivity	88.1dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score	4.60
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.67
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	Yes
Weight	17.2 lbs (7.8 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Kali LP-UNF Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Review Measurements More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: The Perfect Desktop Speaker? Kali LP-UNF.
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: The Best Budget Desktop Speakers, Tested & Rated
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: My Absolute Favorite Products of 2024 Revealed
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: 10 Great (and Terrible) Speakers Under $300!
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
  • Jasper Tech: Best Desktop Computer Speakers for Every Budget – 2026 More from Jasper Tech →
  • Jasper Tech: Are the iLoud Micro Monitor Pro the Best Studio Monitor Speakers for your Home Studio?
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Kali LP-UNF vs Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus
  • Kali LP-UNF vs Kanto Tuk G2
  • Kali LP-UNF vs JBL 705P
  • Kali LP-UNF vs Neumi BS5P-ARC
  • Kali LP-UNF vs Neumi BS5P
  • Kali LP-UNF vs M-Audio BX5 D3
  • Kali LP-UNF vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO
  • Kali LP-UNF vs Kanto YU6
  • See all 71 comparisons

#35 Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus: $499.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Erin’s data shows a small 1.7dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz and a broadly level midrange trend. Scores of 4.07 standalone and 6.73 with an ideal subwoofer support it as a useful compact desktop option. Flexible cabinet orientation, multiple inputs and automatic subwoofer crossover behavior help with setup. Measured bass extension of 92Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 88.5dB.

Cons: The measured -3dB point is around 95Hz, with a much lower F10 in the original review; this is not flat bass to the low-50Hz region. Vertical listening angle changes the upper-midrange response. The review finds cleaner results at moderate levels than near maximum output, where multitone distortion increases. A subwoofer is particularly valuable here. An 8th-order high-pass filter at 58Hz sharply cuts bass below that point, so kick drum fundamentals need a subwoofer.

Full Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	120W total (Class D)
Aux Input	Yes
Bass Extension (-10dB)	53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	92Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	Yes
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD
Coaxial Input	No
DSP	Yes (8th-order Butterworth high-pass at 58Hz)
Dimensions	8.5”H x 5.5”W x 6”D
Drivers	4” aluminum cone woofer, 4” long-throw passive radiator, 1” soft dome tweeter
Frequency Response	56Hz - 20kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Bluetooth (aptX HD), USB (24-bit/96kHz), Toslink Optical (24-bit/96kHz), 3.5mm Analog
Optical Input	Yes
Outputs	RCA subwoofer
RCA Input	No
Sensitivity	88.5dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score	4.07
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.73
Subwoofer Output	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	Yes
Weight	7.1 lbs (3.2 kg) each
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus Review. More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Website: Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
  • Jasper Tech: Best Desktop Computer Speakers for Every Budget – 2026 More from Jasper Tech →
  • Jasper Tech: Are the D3V The Best Studio Monitors For The Money?
  • Jasper Tech: Best Powered Bookshelf Speakers for Every Budget - 2025
  • Jasper Tech: Best Premium Computer Speakers: Kanto ORA4 Review & Comparison
  • Jasper Tech: Are the iLoud Micro Monitor Pro the Best Studio Monitor Speakers for your Home Studio?
  • Jasper Tech: Best Desktop Computer Speakers for Every Budget
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus vs Kali LP-UNF
  • Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus vs Neumi BS5P
  • Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus vs Kanto Tuk G2
  • Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus vs JBL 705P
  • Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO
  • Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus vs Dayton Audio M4
  • Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus vs M-Audio BX5 D3
  • Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus vs Kanto YU6
  • See all 54 comparisons

#36 Neumi BS5P-ARC: $219.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Older model: the Neumi BS5P (ranked lower, rated 3.8/5).

Pros: Erin’s selected measurements give a 2.6dB midrange span and a 7.03 ideal-subwoofer preference score, indicating better tonal performance above the bass than its former near-bottom position suggested. HDMI ARC makes it a convenient low-cost TV stereo system.

Cons: The standalone score drops to 3.84. The published response reaches -3dB around 113Hz and -6dB around 83Hz, so bass balance is a significant limitation in that measured configuration. It is not the same model or dataset as the original BS5P. The score alone cannot establish clean output, and a subwoofer should not be assumed to solve crossover or room-integration issues automatically.

Full Neumi BS5P-ARC review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	75W total (37.5W per channel)
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	Yes
Coaxial Input	Yes
Country	China
Dimensions	10.6H x 7.2W x 8.5D in each
Drivers	1” silk dome tweeter with integrated waveguide, 5” poly-cone woofer
Enclosure	2-way active
Frequency Response	50Hz - 20kHz (Typical In-Room) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	Yes
Inputs	HDMI ARC, Bluetooth, USB-C, optical, coaxial, RCA analog
Optical Input	Yes
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	3.84
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.03
TRS Input	No
USB Input	Yes
Weight	24.9 lbs (11.3 kg) pair
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Neumi BS5P-ARC Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org) More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Jasper Tech: Best Bookshelf Speakers For TV & Gaming - 2025 More from Jasper Tech →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: 10 Great (and Terrible) Speakers Under $300!
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Neumi BS5P-ARC vs Kali LP-UNF
  • Neumi BS5P-ARC vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO
  • Neumi BS5P-ARC vs Onkyo GX-30ARC
  • Neumi BS5P-ARC vs M-Audio BX5 D3
  • Neumi BS5P-ARC vs Kanto YU
  • Neumi BS5P-ARC vs Kanto YU6
  • Neumi BS5P-ARC vs Yamaha HS5
  • Neumi BS5P-ARC vs Adam Audio T5V
  • See all 23 comparisons

#37 Neumi BS5P: $150 per pair Discontinued eBay

Newer model: the Neumi BS5P-ARC, ranked higher, rated 3.8/5.

Pros: Erin’s retest with corrected tweeter polarity, updated internal EQ and plugged ports gives a much more neutral result: 4.83 standalone and 7.83 with an ideal subwoofer, with a 2.7dB midrange span. The reviewer also found that configuration substantially better in listening. Its analog and digital inputs make it a flexible inexpensive system. Measured bass extension of 90.8Hz (-3dB).

Cons: That result is conditional on the tested firmware and port configuration, not a guarantee for an unknown stock or used pair. The first sample had reversed tweeter polarity, so its poor initial result should not be generalized to every unit either. Plugged-port bass reaches -3dB around 91Hz. Confirm configuration before expecting the improved balance; tonal scores do not remove output limits. Discontinued.

Full Neumi BS5P review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	75W total
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension	Erin’s response shows usable midbass but limited deep-bass headroom
Bass Extension (-10dB)	56.1Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	90.8Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	Yes
Coaxial Input	Yes
Dimensions	10.6” x 7.2” x 8.5” (269 x 183 x 216 mm) (H x W x D)
Drivers	1” silk-dome tweeter; 5” fiberglass woofer
Frequency Response	50Hz - 20kHz (Typical in-room) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Bluetooth, optical, coaxial and RCA
Optical Input	Yes
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	4.83
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.83
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Neumi BS5P Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Neumi BS5P Review More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Website: Neumi BS5P
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Website: Updated Firmware
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: LIVE REVIEW! Neumi BS5P, Take Two! || Killer Budget Speaker.
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Neumi BS5P vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO
  • Neumi BS5P vs Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus
  • Neumi BS5P vs Kali LP-UNF
  • Neumi BS5P vs KRK Rokit 5 G4
  • Neumi BS5P vs JBL 705P
  • Neumi BS5P vs Yamaha HS5
  • Neumi BS5P vs Adam Audio T5V
  • Neumi BS5P vs Audioengine A5+ Classic
  • See all 36 comparisons

#38 Focal Alpha 50 EVO: $658 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Rear shelving controls and a conventional studio-monitor layout provide practical placement adjustment.

Cons: Basic shelving controls are less flexible than parametric room correction. Careful placement is still important, especially near walls or on a desk.

Full Focal Alpha 50 EVO review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	60w Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	12.2”H x 9”W x 9.4”D (309.9 x 228.6 x 238.8 mm)
Drivers	5” (127mm) woofer
EQ	Yes (Room adjustment)
Frequency Response	45 Hz - 22 kHz (+-3 dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR, TRS, RCA
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	1.04
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	5.70
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	13.2 lbs (6.0 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Focal Alpha 50 EVO Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Independent Measurements (spinorama.org)
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Adam Audio T5V sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review APS Klasik 2020 vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Focal Alpha 65 EVO sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs KRK Rokit 5 G4 RP5G4 sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs JBL 305P MKII sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Adam Audio A5X vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Eve Audio SC205 sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Kali Audio LP-6 V2 (2nd Wave) vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs KRK Classic 5 CL5G3 sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Yamaha HS5 sound.DEMO
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Dayton Audio M4
  • Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Neumi BS5P
  • Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Neumi BS5P-ARC
  • Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Onkyo GX-30ARC
  • Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus
  • Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Kanto YU
  • Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs KRK Rokit 5 G4
  • Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Kali LP-UNF
  • See all 64 comparisons

#39 Dayton Audio M4: $249.98 per pair Parts Express eBay

Pros: A compact powered pair with a subwoofer output, useful source connections and a solid cabinet. The existing review describes reasonable linearity for the price and a subdued upper treble that avoids an aggressively bright presentation. It is best considered for a close desktop setup. Measured bass extension of 121Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Existing listening and output notes describe limited bass, a balance that changes with distance, and distortion rising above roughly 93dB. The soft treble is a tonal preference, not evidence of reference neutrality; a subwoofer does not establish greater midrange headroom.

Full Dayton Audio M4 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	75W RMS (150W peak)
App	No
Aux Input	Yes (RCA)
Bass Extension (-10dB)	60Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	121Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	Yes, 5.0
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC, aptX
Bluetooth Version	5.0
Coaxial Input	No
Digital Aux Input	Yes (USB-C DAC, up to 192kHz/32-bit)
Dimensions	5” x 6.5” x 9.5” (127 x 165 x 241 mm) (W x D x H)
Drivers	4” aluminum woofer, 1” silk dome tweeter
Frequency Response	40Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	RCA, USB-C, Bluetooth
Optical Input	No
Outputs	Subwoofer (20Hz-200Hz)
Power Input	AC Power cord
RCA Input	Yes
Stereo	Yes
Subwoofer Output	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	Yes
Weight	6.2 lbs (2.81 kg) (active), 5.1 lbs (2.31 kg) (passive)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Dayton Audio M4 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Live Review! Dayton Audio M4 Powered Speaker More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Dayton Audio M4 vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO
  • Dayton Audio M4 vs Onkyo GX-30ARC
  • Dayton Audio M4 vs Kanto YU
  • Dayton Audio M4 vs KRK Rokit 5 G4
  • Dayton Audio M4 vs Yamaha HS5
  • Dayton Audio M4 vs Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus
  • Dayton Audio M4 vs Kali LP-UNF
  • Dayton Audio M4 vs JBL 705P
  • See all 46 comparisons

#40 Onkyo GX-30ARC: $269.99 per pair Amazon B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: HDMI ARC, USB-C, optical and analog inputs make it a convenient compact system for a desk or TV. Erin’s Klippel data gives a 3.69 standalone preference score and 6.42 with an ideal subwoofer. The midrange response spans 3.8dB, offering usable but not reference-level tonal performance.

Cons: The response rises toward the treble by about 0.48dB per octave. Bass reaches -3dB around 74Hz, not the lower LFX value used inside the preference model. Vertical listening position affects crossover balance. Its extensive connectivity does not compensate for response irregularities, and the published tonal data alone does not establish maximum clean output.

Full Onkyo GX-30ARC review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	Class D amplification
Aux Input	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes, 5.3
Coaxial Input	No
Country	Japan (design)
Dimensions	approx. 8.7H x 5.8W x 7.9D in each
Drivers	1” tweeter, 4” woofer
Enclosure	2-way powered, rear-ported
Frequency Response	55Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	Yes
Inputs	HDMI ARC, USB-C, optical, phono/line, 3.5mm aux, Bluetooth 5.3
Optical Input	Yes
Outputs	Subwoofer
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	3.69
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.42
Subwoofer Output	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	Yes
Weight	6.2 lbs (2.8 kg) (primary speaker)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Onkyo GX-30ARC Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org) More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Onkyo GX-30ARC vs Kanto YU
  • Onkyo GX-30ARC vs Dayton Audio M4
  • Onkyo GX-30ARC vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO
  • Onkyo GX-30ARC vs Yamaha HS5
  • Onkyo GX-30ARC vs Neumi BS5P-ARC
  • Onkyo GX-30ARC vs Adam Audio A4V
  • Onkyo GX-30ARC vs Palmer STUDIMON 5
  • Onkyo GX-30ARC vs Kali LP-UNF
  • See all 24 comparisons

#41 Kanto YU: $349.99 per pair Discontinued Kanto eBay

Newer model: the Kanto YU4 G2. It’s likely to perform similarly, though we can’t confirm that yet.

Pros: RCA and Bluetooth inputs, remote control, tone adjustment and a subwoofer output make this compact pair simple to use. ASR’s measurements show a 2.9dB midrange span and a 6.38 preference score with an ideal subwoofer, supporting moderate desktop use with bass assistance.

Cons: Standalone preference is 3.46 and the -3dB point is about 85Hz, so it lacks low-bass weight. The response trends upward toward the treble and retains local irregularities across the listening window. A subwoofer adds bandwidth but does not make the speaker neutral. Connectivity is basic compared with models offering USB, optical or HDMI. Discontinued.

Full Kanto YU review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	70W RMS / 140W peak per pair
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	Yes, 4.2
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC, aptX
Coaxial Input	No
Country	Canada (design)
Dimensions	8.7H x 5.5W x 7.5D in
Drivers	1” silk-dome tweeter, 4” Kevlar woofer
Enclosure	2-way powered, rear-ported MDF
Frequency Response	60Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	RCA and Bluetooth 4.2 aptX
Optical Input	No
Outputs	Subwoofer
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	3.46
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.38
Subwoofer Output	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	6.2 lbs (2.8 kg) active, 5.3 lbs (2.4 kg) passive
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Kanto YU Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org) More from Audio Science Review →
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Kanto YU vs Onkyo GX-30ARC
  • Kanto YU vs Yamaha HS5
  • Kanto YU vs Dayton Audio M4
  • Kanto YU vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO
  • Kanto YU vs Adam Audio A4V
  • Kanto YU vs Palmer STUDIMON 5
  • Kanto YU vs Edifier MR4.5
  • Kanto YU vs Neumi BS5P-ARC
  • See all 47 comparisons

#42 KRK Rokit 5 G4: $337 per pair Discontinued eBay

Newer model: the KRK Rokit 5 G5. It’s likely to perform similarly, though we don’t have measurements to confirm that yet.

Pros: ASR’s data gives -3dB bass around 56Hz and scores of 3.92 standalone and 6.29 with an ideal subwoofer. The waveguide provides useful horizontal directivity control, while onboard adjustments help tailor broad balance. The existing review reports low distortion at 86dB and low audible hiss. Measured bass extension of 55.7Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The 3.6dB midrange span and listening-window narrow-band deviation of 0.502 show that native response is not reference-flat. A port-region resonance and other tonal irregularities remain. Its deeper bass does not establish greater detail or mixing accuracy than another monitor. EQ can help, but the unequalized measurements determine the starting recommendation. Discontinued.

Full KRK Rokit 5 G4 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	55w Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	44.4Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	55.7Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	11.2”H x 7.5”W x 9.5”D (284.5 x 190.5 x 241.3 mm)
Drivers	5” (127mm) woofer
EQ	Yes (Room adjustment)
Frequency Response	58Hz - 24kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	TRS/XLR
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	3.92
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.29
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	10.8 lbs (4.9 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official KRK Rokit 5 G4 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs KRK Rokit 5 G4 RP5G4 sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: KRK Rokit 5 G4 RP5G4 vs Adam Audio T5V Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review KRK Classic 5 CL5G3 vs KRK Rokit 5 RP5G4 sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: KRK Rokit 5 G4 RP5G4 vs Yamaha HS5 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: KRK Rokit 5 G4 RP5G4 vs Presonus Eris E5 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: PreSonus E5 XT vs KRK Rokit 5 G4 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Genelec 8020D & KRK Rokit 5 G4 PR5G4 - Same, same, but different Sound & Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs KRK Rokit 5 G4 RP5G4 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Tannoy Gold 5 vs KRK Rokit 5 G4 RP5G4 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: IK Multimedia iLoud MTM vs KRK Rokit 5 G4 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • KRK Rokit 5 G4 vs Yamaha HS5
  • KRK Rokit 5 G4 vs Dayton Audio M4
  • KRK Rokit 5 G4 vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO
  • KRK Rokit 5 G4 vs Presonus Eris E5 XT
  • KRK Rokit 5 G4 vs Neumi BS5P
  • KRK Rokit 5 G4 vs Edifier S2000MKIII
  • KRK Rokit 5 G4 vs Edifier MR4
  • KRK Rokit 5 G4 vs Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus
  • See all 47 comparisons

#43 Yamaha HS5: $399.98 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: ASR found reasonably smooth early-reflection directivity, which makes broad EQ correction more promising than on speakers whose off-axis response changes abruptly. Balanced inputs and placement controls suit studio use. The measured preference scores are 3.70 standalone and 6.32 with an ideal subwoofer. Measured bass extension of 88Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The measurements do not support describing it as very neutral: excess midrange and reduced lower-midrange/upper-bass weight produce a bass-light balance. The 300Hz-5kHz span is 4.3dB. Its automated -3dB crossing is affected by response shape, so it should not be treated as a simple bass-cutoff specification. A subwoofer adds low bass but does not fix the elevated midrange.

Full Yamaha HS5 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	45w Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	68Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	88Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	11.2”H x 6.7”W x 8.7”D (284.5 x 170.2 x 221 mm)
Drivers	5” (127mm) woofer
EQ	Yes (Room adjustment)
Frequency Response	58Hz - 24kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	3.70
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.32
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	12.1 lbs (5.5 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Yamaha HS5 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review KRK Classic 5 CL5G3 vs Yamaha HS5 sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Yamaha HS5 sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: Genelec 8020D vs Yamaha HS5 Soun & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: JBL 305P MKII vs Yamaha HS5 6-Track Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Adam Audio T5V vs Yamaha HS5 5 Track Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Yamaha HS5 vs Presonus Eris E5 Sound Demo
  • DSAUDIO.review: KRK Rokit 5 G4 RP5G4 vs Yamaha HS5 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: New PreSonus E5 XT and Yamaha HS5 could not sound any more different! SOUND AND RESPONSE COMPARISON
  • DSAUDIO.review: Yamaha HS8 vs Yamaha HS5 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Genelec 8010A (Genelec G One) vs Yamaha HS5 Sound Demo w/ Bass Test
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Yamaha HS5 vs KRK Rokit 5 G4
  • Yamaha HS5 vs Adam Audio A4V
  • Yamaha HS5 vs Kanto YU
  • Yamaha HS5 vs Palmer STUDIMON 5
  • Yamaha HS5 vs Onkyo GX-30ARC
  • Yamaha HS5 vs Edifier MR4.5
  • Yamaha HS5 vs Presonus Eris E5 XT
  • Yamaha HS5 vs Dayton Audio M4
  • See all 71 comparisons

#44 Adam Audio A4V: $1,199.98 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: Compact monitor with onboard DSP, placement controls and room-correction integration. ASR’s Klippel data gives a -3dB point around 59Hz and preference scores of 3.92 standalone and 6.33 with an ideal subwoofer. Its adjustment facilities are useful when placement or tonal correction is needed.

Cons: A small average-deviation figure hides a major localized response irregularity: the selected measurement spans 10.8dB from 300Hz to 5kHz, and listening-window narrow-band deviation is 0.547. The native response should therefore not be called smoothly neutral. Correction potential is not the same as stock performance, and analog audio inputs mean a separate interface is needed for USB sources.

Full Adam Audio A4V review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	130W RMS each
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	10.6H x 6.2W x 8.7D in
Drivers	X-ART folded-ribbon tweeter, 4” MLM woofer
Enclosure	2-way active, dual front ports
Frequency Response	58Hz - 41kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR and RCA; Ethernet for control
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	3.92
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.33
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	12.8 lbs (5.8 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Adam Audio A4V Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org) More from Audio Science Review →
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Adam Audio A4V vs Yamaha HS5
  • Adam Audio A4V vs Palmer STUDIMON 5
  • Adam Audio A4V vs Edifier MR4.5
  • Adam Audio A4V vs Kanto YU
  • Adam Audio A4V vs Presonus Eris E5 XT
  • Adam Audio A4V vs Edifier S2000MKIII
  • Adam Audio A4V vs Onkyo GX-30ARC
  • Adam Audio A4V vs Edifier MR4
  • See all 46 comparisons

#45 Palmer STUDIMON 5: $350 per pair Thomann eBay

Pros: The available third-party measurements predict 3.48 standalone and 6.37 with an ideal subwoofer. Balanced inputs and a conventional compact monitor cabinet make it straightforward to use with studio equipment. The broad response trend is approximately level rather than strongly bright or dark.

Cons: The trace spans 4.0dB from 300Hz to 5kHz and estimates -3dB bass around 80Hz, with local irregularities despite the level overall trend. There are no room-EQ controls to address broad placement errors, and the available score does not establish clean output.

Full Palmer STUDIMON 5 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	60W each (30W LF, 30W HF)
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Country	Germany (design)
Dimensions	10.6H x 7.5W x 8.5D in
Drivers	0.75” soft-dome tweeter, 5” woofer
Enclosure	2-way active, rear-ported
Frequency Response	70Hz - 20kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Balanced XLR and 1/4” TRS
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	3.48
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.37
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	8.6 lbs (3.9 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Palmer STUDIMON 5 Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Sound & Recording Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Palmer STUDIMON 5 vs Edifier MR4.5
  • Palmer STUDIMON 5 vs Adam Audio A4V
  • Palmer STUDIMON 5 vs Yamaha HS5
  • Palmer STUDIMON 5 vs Presonus Eris E5 XT
  • Palmer STUDIMON 5 vs Edifier S2000MKIII
  • Palmer STUDIMON 5 vs Kanto YU
  • Palmer STUDIMON 5 vs Edifier MR4
  • Palmer STUDIMON 5 vs KRK Classic 5
  • See all 24 comparisons

#46 Edifier MR4.5: $249.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Bass reaches about 60Hz at -3dB and 44Hz at -10dB in Erin’s measurements, notably deep for a 4.5-inch desktop monitor and well beyond the smaller MR4. It connects to nearly anything: balanced XLR and TRS, RCA and 3.5mm aux inputs, Bluetooth 6.0 with LDAC and multipoint, plus a front headphone output. Rear high and low shelving knobs and the ConneX app’s room compensation settings help tune it for desk or wall placement. Measured bass extension of 60Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The response is uneven, with a broad upper-bass bump around 120 to 150Hz, a presence dip of roughly 3dB around 2 to 3kHz and brighter treble above it (listening-window tilt +0.22dB per octave), which holds its preference score to about 3.9 on its own and 6.1 with an ideal subwoofer. Vertical lobing means the tweeter should be aimed at ear height. Compression is already meaningful at 96dB and distortion climbs sharply between 700Hz and 3kHz when pushed, so it suits nearfield desk listening rather than filling a room.

Full Edifier MR4.5 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	80W RMS total (Manufacturer specified)
App	Yes (Edifier ConneX)
Aux Input	Yes
Bass Extension (-10dB)	44Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	60Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	Yes, 6.0
Bluetooth Codecs	LDAC, SBC
Bluetooth Version	6.0
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	5.5”W x 9.6”H x 9”D (140 x 244 x 229 mm) (active); 140W x 244H x 208D mm (passive)
Drivers	4.5-inch mid-bass driver + 1-inch silk-dome tweeter (each)
EQ	Yes (app EQ, room compensation settings and rear high/low controls)
Frequency Response	50Hz-40kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Headphone Output	Yes
Inputs	Balanced XLR, balanced 6.35mm TRS, RCA, 3.5mm Aux, Bluetooth
Maximum SPL	98dB (Manufacturer specified, 1m)
Measurement Source	Erin’s Audio Corner
Optical Input	No
Outputs	3.5mm headphone
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	3.86 (calculated from Erin’s Audio Corner CEA2034 data)
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.10 (calculated from Erin’s Audio Corner CEA2034 data)
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	14.6 lbs (6.63 kg)
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Edifier MR4.5 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Review Website Edifier MR4.5
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Edifier MR4.5 vs Presonus Eris E5 XT
  • Edifier MR4.5 vs Palmer STUDIMON 5
  • Edifier MR4.5 vs Adam Audio A4V
  • Edifier MR4.5 vs Edifier S2000MKIII
  • Edifier MR4.5 vs Edifier MR4
  • Edifier MR4.5 vs Yamaha HS5
  • Edifier MR4.5 vs Kanto YU
  • Edifier MR4.5 vs Onkyo GX-30ARC
  • See all 33 comparisons

#47 Presonus Eris E5 XT: $239.98 per pair Discontinued eBay

Newer model: the PreSonus Eris Studio 5. It’s likely to perform similarly, though we don’t have measurements to confirm that yet.

Pros: ASR’s measurements show reasonably consistent directivity through the crossover, so EQ changes are more likely to benefit both direct and reflected sound. Bass reaches -3dB around 56Hz. A standalone preference score of 3.58 rises to 6.00 with an ideal subwoofer, indicating useful bass reach but only moderate native tonal performance. Measured bass extension of 56.4Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The response has bass and treble emphasis with a recessed crossover region; smooth directivity carries that imbalance into room reflections rather than fixing it. Existing distortion testing shows problems across a broad range when pushed to 96dB. Tone correction and moderate levels help, but it is not a reference-flat monitor out of the box. Discontinued.

Full Presonus Eris E5 XT review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	80w Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	46.9Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	56.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	10.2”H x 7”W x 7.7”D (259.1 x 177.8 x 195.6 mm)
Drivers	5” (127mm) woofer
EQ	Yes (Room adjustment)
Frequency Response	53Hz - 22kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	TRS, XLR, RCA
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	3.58
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.00
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	10.1 lbs (4.6 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Presonus Eris E5 XT Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • DSAUDIO.review: New PreSonus E5 XT and Yamaha HS5 could not sound any more different! SOUND AND RESPONSE COMPARISON More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: Bright and brighter. PreSonus E5 XT takes on Adam Audio T5V SOUND & FREQUENCY RESPONSE COMPARISON
  • DSAUDIO.review: PreSonus Eris E5 XT vs PreSonus Eris E5 (new vs old) Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: PreSonus E7 XT vs PreSonus E5 XT Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: PreSonus Eris E8 XT vs PreSonus Eris E5 XT Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: PreSonus E5 XT vs KRK Rokit 5 G4 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Presonus Eris E5 XT vs Edifier S2000MKIII
  • Presonus Eris E5 XT vs Edifier MR4.5
  • Presonus Eris E5 XT vs Edifier MR4
  • Presonus Eris E5 XT vs Palmer STUDIMON 5
  • Presonus Eris E5 XT vs KRK Classic 5
  • Presonus Eris E5 XT vs Adam Audio A4V
  • Presonus Eris E5 XT vs Yamaha HS5
  • Presonus Eris E5 XT vs M-Audio BX4 D3
  • See all 56 comparisons

#48 Edifier S2000MKIII: $699.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: The available digitized response suggests substantial bass reach, with a -3dB estimate around 41Hz. Scores are 4.24 standalone and 5.99 with an ideal subwoofer. Digital inputs and a self-contained stereo-pair format are convenient for general music listening. Digital input handles high-resolution audio up to 192kHz/24-bit.

Cons: The 4.0dB midrange span and uneven predicted room response suggest meaningful coloration. Favorable modeled EQ results should not be treated as the sound of the stock speaker or as proof that all dispersion issues are correctable.

Full Edifier S2000MKIII review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	65w RMS Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	Yes, 5.0
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC, aptX HD
Coaxial Input	Yes
Dimensions	13.5”H x 7.8”W x 10.8”D (342.9 x 198.1 x 274.3 mm)
Drivers	5.5” (140mm) woofer
EQ	No
Frequency Response	40.5Hz at -3dB; 37Hz at -6dB (Spinorama)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Bluetooth, 2x RCA Input, Digital Optical, Digital Coax
Optical Input	Yes
Outputs	None
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	4.24
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	5.99
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	20.7 lbs (9.4 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Edifier S2000MKIII Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier S1000MKII vs Edifier S2000MKIII sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier S2000MKIII vs Klipsch The Three II sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier R2850DB vs Edifier S2000MKIII sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: Edifier S2000MKIII vs Edifier S3000PRO Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • Archimago Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Edifier S2000MKIII vs Edifier MR4
  • Edifier S2000MKIII vs Presonus Eris E5 XT
  • Edifier S2000MKIII vs KRK Classic 5
  • Edifier S2000MKIII vs Edifier MR4.5
  • Edifier S2000MKIII vs Palmer STUDIMON 5
  • Edifier S2000MKIII vs M-Audio BX4 D3
  • Edifier S2000MKIII vs Presonus Eris E5
  • Edifier S2000MKIII vs Adam Audio A4V
  • See all 73 comparisons

#49 Edifier MR4: $138.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Erin’s data supports a useful budget desktop monitor: a 3.0dB midrange span, little overall on-axis tilt, and preference scores of 3.25 standalone and 6.00 with an ideal subwoofer. Balanced TRS inputs and tone controls are practical at its price, and its response is more balanced than the measured R1280T. Measured bass extension of 79Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 78dB.

Cons: Bass reaches -3dB around 79Hz, so deep extension should not be inferred from the overall flat trend. Listening-window response still has local irregularities, including lower-treble unevenness. The existing review reports rapidly increasing distortion and audible distress when pushed well above moderate desktop levels. No Bluetooth, and adding a subwoofer does not cure every output or tonal limitation.

Full Edifier MR4 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	42W RMS total (21W per speaker)
App	No
Aux Input	Yes
Bass Extension (-10dB)	59Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	79Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	9”H x 5.5”W x 7.6”D (228.6 x 139.7 x 193 mm)
Drivers	4” (102mm) woofer, 1” silk dome tweeter
EQ	Yes (Monitor and Music modes)
Frequency Response	60 Hz-20 kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Headphone Output	Yes
Inputs	TRS Balanced, RCA, Aux
Optical Input	No
Outputs	Headphone
RCA Input	Yes
Sensitivity	78dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score	3.25
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.00
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	9.9 lbs (4.5 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Edifier MR4 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Review Measurements More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs Edifier R1280DBs sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs Edifier R1700BT sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs JBL 305P MKII sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs Presonus Eris E3.5 sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs iLoud Micro Monitor sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs Presonus Eris E4.5 sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs Mackie CR4-X sound.DEMO
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
  • Jasper Tech: Best Desktop Computer Speakers for Every Budget – 2026 More from Jasper Tech →
  • Jasper Tech: Are the iLoud Micro Monitor Pro the Best Studio Monitor Speakers for your Home Studio?
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Edifier MR4 Powered Studio Monitors Review
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Edifier MR4 vs KRK Classic 5
  • Edifier MR4 vs Edifier S2000MKIII
  • Edifier MR4 vs Presonus Eris E5 XT
  • Edifier MR4 vs M-Audio BX4 D3
  • Edifier MR4 vs Presonus Eris E5
  • Edifier MR4 vs Edifier MR4.5
  • Edifier MR4 vs Edifier MR5
  • Edifier MR4 vs Palmer STUDIMON 5
  • See all 72 comparisons

#50 KRK Classic 5: $319.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: ASR’s Klippel data gives -3dB bass around 60Hz and a 5.99 preference score with an ideal subwoofer. Broad tonal correction can improve it, so it may be useful to someone willing to measure and EQ a basic studio setup. Measured bass extension of 60.1Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The native standalone score is 3.47 and the midrange span is a large 6.5dB. Excess treble and crossover/directivity errors keep it from being neutral out of the box, while low-bass distortion limits loud playback. Modeled EQ scores are not stock performance and do not demonstrate corrected distortion or dispersion.

Full KRK Classic 5 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	50w RMS Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-3dB)	60.1Hz (Spinorama/Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-6dB)	54.2Hz (Spinorama/Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	9.7”H x 7.4”W x 11.2”D (246.4 x 188 x 284.5 mm)
Drivers	5” (127mm) woofer
EQ	Yes (Room adjustment)
Frequency Response	56Hz-30kHz (+-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	RCA, TRS, XLR
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	3.47
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	5.99
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	12.9 lbs (5.87 kg)
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official KRK Classic 5 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier S1000MKII vs Edifier S2000MKIII sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: Edifier S2000MKIII vs Edifier S3000PRO Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs KRK Classic 5 CL5G3 sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review JBL 305P MKII vs KRK Classic 5 CL5G3 sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review KRK Classic 5 CL5G3 vs Yamaha HS5 sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review KRK Classic 5 CL5G3 vs KRK Rokit 5 RP5G4 sound.DEMO
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • KRK Classic 5 vs Edifier MR4
  • KRK Classic 5 vs M-Audio BX4 D3
  • KRK Classic 5 vs Edifier S2000MKIII
  • KRK Classic 5 vs Presonus Eris E5
  • KRK Classic 5 vs Presonus Eris E5 XT
  • KRK Classic 5 vs Edifier MR5
  • KRK Classic 5 vs Audioengine HD6
  • KRK Classic 5 vs Edifier R2000DB
  • See all 66 comparisons

#51 M-Audio BX4 D3: $149 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Balanced TRS, RCA and front auxiliary/headphone connections, plus tone controls, make this a flexible inexpensive desktop pair. The third-party measurement gives scores of 3.29 standalone and 6.03 with an ideal subwoofer, with -3dB bass estimated around 67Hz.

Cons: A rising response of about 0.62dB per octave and listening-window deviation of 0.546 indicate bright, locally uneven reproduction. The compact system suits moderate nearfield use; the preference estimate does not verify high-level headroom.

Full M-Audio BX4 D3 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	120W peak system
Aux Input	Yes
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	8.9H x 6.1W x 6.9D in
Drivers	1” dome tweeter, 4.5” Kevlar woofer
Enclosure	2-way powered stereo pair, rear-ported
Frequency Response	69Hz - 22kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	TRS, RCA, 3.5mm aux; headphone output
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	3.29
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.03
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	9.7 lbs (4.4 kg)/pair
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • M-Audio BX4 D3 Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Independent Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • M-Audio BX4 D3 vs KRK Classic 5
  • M-Audio BX4 D3 vs Presonus Eris E5
  • M-Audio BX4 D3 vs Edifier MR4
  • M-Audio BX4 D3 vs Edifier S2000MKIII
  • M-Audio BX4 D3 vs Presonus Eris E5 XT
  • M-Audio BX4 D3 vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • M-Audio BX4 D3 vs Yamaha HS5
  • M-Audio BX4 D3 vs Edifier R1700BT
  • See all 20 comparisons

#52 Presonus Eris E5: $219.98 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Balanced XLR/TRS and RCA inputs plus placement adjustment make the original Eris E5 easy to connect to studio or consumer sources. Existing listening notes describe a fuller low end than some small, bass-light monitors, which may suit casual nearfield listening.

Cons: A fuller bass balance is not necessarily neutral. Placement adjustment is useful, but it does not replace a properly integrated subwoofer for deep-bass monitoring.

Full Presonus Eris E5 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	80w Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	10.2”H x 7”W x 7.7”D (259.1 x 177.8 x 195.6 mm)
Drivers	5” (127mm) woofer
EQ	Yes (Room adjustment)
Frequency Response	53Hz - 22kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	TRS, XLR, RCA
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	10.1 lbs (4.6 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Presonus Eris E5 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • DSAUDIO.review: Adam Audio T5V vs Presonus Eris E5 5 Track Comparison More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: Yamaha HS5 vs Presonus Eris E5 Sound Demo
  • DSAUDIO.review: Fluid Audio F5 vs Presonus Eris E5 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: M-Audio BX5 D3 vs Presonus Eris E5 5 Track Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: PreSonus Eris E5 XT vs PreSonus Eris E5 (new vs old) Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: JBL 305P MKII vs PreSonus Eris E5 6-Track Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Mackie CR5 BT vs Presonus Eris E5 Sound Demo w/ Bass Test
  • DSAUDIO.review: KRK Rokit 5 RP5G3 vs Presonus E5 Sound Demo w/ Bass Test
  • DSAUDIO.review: JBL LSR305 vs Presonus Eris E5 Sound Demo
  • DSAUDIO.review: KRK Rokit 5 G4 RP5G4 vs Presonus Eris E5 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Presonus Eris E5 vs Edifier MR5
  • Presonus Eris E5 vs M-Audio BX4 D3
  • Presonus Eris E5 vs KRK Classic 5
  • Presonus Eris E5 vs Audioengine HD6
  • Presonus Eris E5 vs Edifier MR4
  • Presonus Eris E5 vs Edifier R2000DB
  • Presonus Eris E5 vs Edifier S1000W
  • Presonus Eris E5 vs Edifier S2000MKIII
  • See all 50 comparisons

#53 Edifier MR5: $349.99 per pair Amazon B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: Erin’s Audio Corner measured useful bass for a compact 5-inch monitor, with F3 around 51Hz. The three-way active design adds a dedicated 3.75-inch midrange, and the 110W RMS system, app EQ, room-compensation controls, LDAC, balanced XLR/TRS inputs, and front headphone output make it unusually well equipped at $350 per pair. Measured bass extension of 51Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85dB.

Cons: Erin’s CTA-2034 data shows upper-midrange and treble irregularities, while off-axis response narrows more quickly than ideal above about 2-3kHz. Bass output is level-limited below about 70Hz and distortion/compression rise at higher levels, so it suits moderate nearfield use better than loud mid-field playback.

Full Edifier MR5 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	110W RMS total (Manufacturer specified)
App	Yes (Edifier ConneX)
Aux Input	Yes
Bass Extension (-3dB)	51Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	Yes, 6.0
Bluetooth Codecs	LDAC, SBC
Bluetooth Version	6.0
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	6.3”W x 10.4”H x 11”D (159 x 264 x 280 mm) (active); 159W x 264H x 257D mm (passive)
Drivers	5-inch woofer + 3.75-inch midrange + 1-inch silk-dome tweeter (each)
EQ	Yes (app EQ and rear high/low controls)
Frequency Response	46Hz-40kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Headphone Output	Yes
Inputs	Balanced XLR, balanced 6.35mm TRS, RCA, 3.5mm Aux
Maximum SPL	101dB (Manufacturer specified, 1m)
Measurement Source	Erin’s Audio Corner
Optical Input	No
Outputs	3.5mm headphone
RCA Input	Yes
Sensitivity	85dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner)
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	22.9 lbs (10.38 kg)
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Edifier MR5 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Review Measurements More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Budget Desktop Speakers Battle – Which Sounds the Best?
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Edifier MR5 vs Presonus Eris E5
  • Edifier MR5 vs Audioengine HD6
  • Edifier MR5 vs Edifier R2000DB
  • Edifier MR5 vs KRK Classic 5
  • Edifier MR5 vs Edifier S1000W
  • Edifier MR5 vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • Edifier MR5 vs Edifier MR4
  • Edifier MR5 vs Edifier S2000MKIII
  • See all 33 comparisons

#54 Audioengine HD6: $817.44 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Analog and optical inputs, RCA output and built-in amplification provide a convenient self-contained stereo setup. The cabinet and driver size can be practical for general music listening without assembling a separate amplifier system.

Cons: Listening impressions describe bass and treble emphasis with a recessed midrange, which may suit casual listening better than neutral monitoring.

Full Audioengine HD6 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	50w RMS Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes, 5.0
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	11.7”H x 7.2”W x 10”D (298.4 x 184.1 x 254 mm)
Drivers	5.5” (140mm) woofer
EQ	No
Frequency Response	45Hz-40kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Bluetooth, Aux, RCA Input, Digital Optical
Optical Input	Yes
Outputs	RCA variable output (subwoofer)
RCA Input	Yes
Subwoofer Output	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	17.4 lbs (7.9 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Audioengine HD6 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • DSAUDIO.review: Audioengine HD6 vs Edifier S1000DB 5 Track Comparison More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: Audioengine HD6 vs Audioengine A5+ 5 Track Comparison
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Audioengine HD6 vs Edifier R2000DB
  • Audioengine HD6 vs Edifier MR5
  • Audioengine HD6 vs Edifier S1000W
  • Audioengine HD6 vs Presonus Eris E5
  • Audioengine HD6 vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • Audioengine HD6 vs Kali Audio IN-UNF
  • Audioengine HD6 vs KRK Classic 5
  • Audioengine HD6 vs Edifier MR4
  • See all 49 comparisons

#55 Edifier R2000DB: $399.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Multiple analog inputs and optical connectivity make it convenient for a simple powered stereo system. It can suit general desktop listening when source flexibility matters more than professional monitoring functions.

Cons: Listening impressions suggest a midrange-forward presentation. It is better suited to a simple home stereo setup than a studio workflow requiring balanced inputs.

Full Edifier R2000DB review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	60w RMS Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	Yes
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	11.3”H x 7.5”W x 9.5”D (285.8 x 190.5 x 241.3 mm)
Drivers	5” (127mm) woofer
EQ	No
Frequency Response	55Hz-40kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Bluetooth, 2x RCA Input, Digital Optical
Optical Input	Yes
RCA Input	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	17.4 lbs (7.9 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Edifier R2000DB Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • DSAUDIO.review: Edifier R1700BT vs Edifier R2000DB Sound Demo More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: Edifier R2730DB vs Edifier R2000DB Sound Demo w/ Bass Test
  • DSAUDIO.review: Edifier R1280T vs Edifier R2000DB Sound Demo
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Edifier R2000DB vs Edifier S1000W
  • Edifier R2000DB vs Audioengine HD6
  • Edifier R2000DB vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • Edifier R2000DB vs Edifier MR5
  • Edifier R2000DB vs Kali Audio IN-UNF
  • Edifier R2000DB vs Presonus Eris E5
  • Edifier R2000DB vs Audioengine HD4
  • Edifier R2000DB vs Edifier R1700BT
  • See all 59 comparisons

#56 Edifier S1000W: $599.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Network playback and multiple digital and analog connections make it a convenient all-in-one music system. Support for high-resolution input is useful for compatibility with different sources.

Cons: High-resolution input support does not itself improve acoustic accuracy. The all-in-one format offers less component flexibility than separate speakers and amplification. No independent measurements exist; reviews are limited to informal listening comparisons.

Full Edifier S1000W review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	60w RMS Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	Yes, 5.2
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified)
Coaxial Input	Yes
Dimensions	13.6”H x 7.6”W x 11.6”D (345.4 x 193 x 294.6 mm)
Drivers	5.5” (140mm) woofer
EQ	No
Frequency Response	45Hz-40kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Bluetooth, Wifi, 2x RCA Input, Digital Optical, Digital Coax
Optical Input	Yes
Outputs	None
RCA Input	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	37 lbs (16.8 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Edifier S1000W Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • DSAUDIO.review: Audioengine HD6 vs Edifier S1000DB 5 Track Comparison More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier R2850DB vs Edifier S1000MKII sound.DEMO
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Edifier S1000W vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • Edifier S1000W vs Edifier R2000DB
  • Edifier S1000W vs Kali Audio IN-UNF
  • Edifier S1000W vs Audioengine HD6
  • Edifier S1000W vs Audioengine HD4
  • Edifier S1000W vs Edifier MR5
  • Edifier S1000W vs Presonus Eris E5
  • Edifier S1000W vs Edifier R1700BT
  • See all 56 comparisons

#57 Edifier S1000MKII: $499.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: A self-powered stereo pair with optical, coaxial and analog inputs, plus high-resolution digital support, makes source switching unusually simple. Consumer Reports rates its sound accurate and detailed, so it is a strong one-box alternative to separate amplifier-and-speaker systems for nearfield or small-room listening.

Cons: High-resolution input support is not a guarantee of perfect tuning, and the fixed internal amplification prevents the gradual upgrades possible with separates. These are mains-powered speakers rather than portable wireless speakers, and their size and left/right cabling need a planned desktop or stand setup. No independent measurements exist; reviews are limited to informal listening comparisons.

Full Edifier S1000MKII review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	60w RMS Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	Yes
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC, aptX HD
Coaxial Input	Yes
Dimensions	13.6”H x 7.6”W x 11.6”D (345.4 x 193 x 294.6 mm)
Drivers	5.5” (140mm) woofer
EQ	No
Frequency Response	45Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Bluetooth, 2x RCA Input, Digital Optical, Digital Coax
Optical Input	Yes
Outputs	None
RCA Input	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	37 lbs (16.8 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Edifier S1000MKII Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier S1000MKII vs Edifier S2000MKIII sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: Edifier S2000MKIII vs Edifier S3000PRO Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier R2850DB vs Edifier S1000MKII sound.DEMO
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Edifier S1000MKII vs Kali Audio IN-UNF
  • Edifier S1000MKII vs Edifier S1000W
  • Edifier S1000MKII vs Audioengine HD4
  • Edifier S1000MKII vs Edifier R2000DB
  • Edifier S1000MKII vs Edifier R1700BT
  • Edifier S1000MKII vs Audioengine HD6
  • Edifier S1000MKII vs Edifier R1280DB
  • Edifier S1000MKII vs Edifier MR5
  • See all 71 comparisons

#58 Kali Audio IN-UNF: $699 per pair Kali Audio eBay

Pros: A specialized ultra-nearfield system with coaxial satellites and an opposed-woofer bass module designed to sit on the desk. Erin found it worked much better when positioned using Kali’s placement template, with useful agreement between the intended response and close-range moving-microphone measurements. DSP placement controls and varied inputs make it a thoughtful solution for the right desk.

Cons: The intended desk geometry is part of the acoustic design. The bass module and prescribed spacing occupy considerable desk space and may conflict with large monitors. It is not designed for arbitrary room placement.

Full Kali Audio IN-UNF review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	100W LF + 60W mid/HF per channel (continuous)
Aux Input	Yes
Bass Extension (-10dB)	39Hz (manufacturer specified; Erin did not publish an anechoic F10)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	47Hz (manufacturer specified; Erin did not publish an anechoic F3)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Crossover Frequency	280Hz LF-to-midrange; 2.8kHz midrange-to-HF
DSP	Yes (placement/boundary and tonal trims)
Dimensions	Bass module: 11.6”H x 19.4”W x 5.25”D; satellites: 6.25” diameter
Drivers	Bass module: two opposed 4.5” woofers; satellites: 4” coincident midrange with 1” textile-dome tweeter
Frequency Response	47Hz - 21kHz +/-3dB (manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	USB-C, optical, 3.5mm, balanced TRS
Maximum SPL	103dB peak at 1m (manufacturer specified)
Optical Input	Yes
RCA Input	No
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	Yes
Weight	24.7 lbs (11.2 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Kali Audio IN-UNF Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Two Reviews in One! Kali IN-UNF Ultra Nearfield Monitor Review with Joe N Tell. More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Website: Kali Audio IN-UNF
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Kali Audio IN-UNF vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • Kali Audio IN-UNF vs Audioengine HD4
  • Kali Audio IN-UNF vs Edifier S1000W
  • Kali Audio IN-UNF vs Edifier R1700BT
  • Kali Audio IN-UNF vs Edifier R2000DB
  • Kali Audio IN-UNF vs Edifier R1280DB
  • Kali Audio IN-UNF vs Audioengine HD6
  • Kali Audio IN-UNF vs Edifier R1280T
  • See all 53 comparisons

#59 Audioengine HD4: $429.00 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Compact powered cabinets, analog input options and RCA output can simplify a desktop stereo system. Its modest footprint is useful where larger studio monitors are impractical.

Cons: The compact cabinets suit close desktop listening rather than a large-room system. A separate subwoofer adds cost and space if deeper bass is a priority.

Full Audioengine HD4 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	50w RMS Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	9”H x 5.5”W x 6.5”D (228.6 x 139.7 x 165.1 mm)
Drivers	4” (102mm) woofer
EQ	No
Frequency Response	60 Hz-20 kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Bluetooth, Aux, RCA Input
Optical Input	No
Outputs	RCA variable output (subwoofer)
RCA Input	Yes
Subwoofer Output	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	7.3 lbs (3.3 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Audioengine HD4 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier R1855DB vs Audioengine HD4 sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Audioengine HD3 vs Audioengine HD4 sound.DEMO
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Audioengine HD4 vs Kali Audio IN-UNF
  • Audioengine HD4 vs Edifier R1700BT
  • Audioengine HD4 vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • Audioengine HD4 vs Edifier R1280DB
  • Audioengine HD4 vs Edifier S1000W
  • Audioengine HD4 vs Edifier R1280T
  • Audioengine HD4 vs Edifier R2000DB
  • Audioengine HD4 vs JBL One Series 104
  • See all 46 comparisons

#60 Edifier R1700BT: $218.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: A compact powered pair with analog and Bluetooth connectivity for uncomplicated desktop listening. Its self-contained design avoids the need for a separate amplifier.

Cons: Listening impressions suggest a bass-and-treble-forward balance rather than strict neutrality. Its analog and Bluetooth connections are less convenient for sources that require optical or HDMI input.

Full Edifier R1700BT review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	66w RMS Per Speaker
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	Yes, 5.1
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified)
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	10”H x 6.1”W x 8.4”D (254 x 154.9 x 213.4 mm)
Drivers	4” (102mm) woofer
EQ	No
Frequency Response	60 Hz-20 kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Bluetooth, RCA Input
Optical Input	No
Outputs	None
RCA Input	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	14.6 lbs (6.6 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Edifier R1700BT Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs Edifier R1700BT sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Audioengine HD3 vs Edifier R1700BT sound.DEMO
  • DSAUDIO.review: Edifier R1280DB vs Edifier R1700BT Sound Demo w/ Bass Test
  • DSAUDIO.review: Edifier R1280DBs vs Edifier R1700BTs Sound Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: Edifier R1700BT vs Edifier R2000DB Sound Demo
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier D12 vs Edifier R1700BT sound.DEMO
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Edifier R1700BT vs Edifier R1280DB
  • Edifier R1700BT vs Audioengine HD4
  • Edifier R1700BT vs Kali Audio IN-UNF
  • Edifier R1700BT vs Edifier R1280T
  • Edifier R1700BT vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • Edifier R1700BT vs Midiplus MI5 II
  • Edifier R1700BT vs Edifier S1000W
  • Edifier R1700BT vs JBL One Series 104
  • See all 63 comparisons

#61 Edifier R1280DB: $189.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: Optical/coaxial inputs and Bluetooth add practical flexibility over the analog R1280T, while remote and tone controls simplify everyday listening. It is a convenient inexpensive stereo system rather than a separate amplifier-and-speaker setup. Measured bass extension of 63Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The compact format is better suited to nearfield listening than high-volume playback across a large room. Basic tone controls offer less flexibility than parametric equalization.

Full Edifier R1280DB review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	42w RMS Total
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	53.2Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	63Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) - shares the R1280T driver and cabinet; read from that measurement
Bluetooth	Yes, 5.1
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified)
Coaxial Input	Yes
Dimensions	9.2”H x 5.7”W x 7.7”D (233.7 x 144.8 x 195.6 mm)
Drivers	4” (102mm) woofer
EQ	No
Frequency Response	55 Hz-20 kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Bluetooth, 2x RCA Input, Digital Optical, Digital Coax
Optical Input	Yes
Outputs	None
RCA Input	Yes
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	10.8 lbs (4.9 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Edifier R1280DB Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Related-model measurements: Edifier R1280T (not R1280DB)
  • DSAUDIO.review: Edifier R1280DB vs Edifier R1700BT Sound Demo w/ Bass Test More from DSAUDIOreview →
  • DSAUDIO.review: Edifier R1280DBs vs Edifier R1700BTs Sound Comparison
  • DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs Edifier R1280DBs sound.DEMO
  • Related-model Spinorama: Edifier R1280T (not R1280DB)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Edifier R1280DB vs Edifier R1700BT
  • Edifier R1280DB vs Edifier R1280T
  • Edifier R1280DB vs Audioengine HD4
  • Edifier R1280DB vs Midiplus MI5 II
  • Edifier R1280DB vs Kali Audio IN-UNF
  • Edifier R1280DB vs JBL One Series 104
  • Edifier R1280DB vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • Edifier R1280DB vs Fluid Audio FX50 V2
  • See all 71 comparisons

#62 Edifier R1280T: $149.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: ASR’s review found useful moderate-level bass output from an inexpensive powered pair. Remote volume and bass/treble controls make it easy to use without separate amplification. Measured bass reaches -3dB around 63Hz. Measured bass extension of 63Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Preference scores of 2.41 standalone and 5.02 with an ideal subwoofer reflect substantial tonal limitations, not just missing bass. The response spans 5.5dB from 300Hz to 5kHz, and listening-window narrow-band deviation is 0.650. Resonances and treble unevenness affect reflected sound too. Listening height is important, and high-level compression changes the balance.

Full Edifier R1280T review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	42w RMS Total
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	53.2Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	63Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	9.2”H x 7.7”W x 5.7”D (234 x 196 x 146 mm)
Drivers	4” (102mm) woofer
EQ	No
Frequency Response	52Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	2x RCA Input
Optical Input	No
Outputs	None
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	2.41
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	5.02
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	10.8 lbs (4.9 kg)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official Edifier R1280T Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
  • Jasper Tech: Best Desktop Computer Speakers for Every Budget – 2026 More from Jasper Tech →
  • Jasper Tech: Best Powered Bookshelf Speakers for Every Budget - 2025
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Edifier R1280T vs Edifier R1280DB
  • Edifier R1280T vs Midiplus MI5 II
  • Edifier R1280T vs JBL One Series 104
  • Edifier R1280T vs Edifier R1700BT
  • Edifier R1280T vs Audioengine HD4
  • Edifier R1280T vs Fluid Audio FX50 V2
  • Edifier R1280T vs Kali Audio IN-UNF
  • Edifier R1280T vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • See all 61 comparisons

#63 Midiplus MI5 II: $169 per pair Discontinued eBay

Newer model: the Midiplus MI5 II V2. It’s likely to perform similarly, though we can’t confirm that yet.

Pros: Balanced inputs, Bluetooth and a powered-pair format offer useful connectivity. The measured -3dB point is around 54Hz, so it reaches lower in the bass than some compact monitors.

Cons: The 2.24 standalone and 4.53 ideal-subwoofer scores show significant problems above the bass region. A large 9.4dB midrange response span and listening-window narrow-band deviation of 0.644 indicate substantial coloration even though the overall response slope is fairly mild. A subwoofer cannot fix those irregularities. Amplifier-power specifications do not establish clean output. Discontinued.

Full Midiplus MI5 II review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	100W RMS per pair
Aux Input	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	10.1H x 6.7W x 9.4D in
Drivers	1-inch silk tweeter, 5-inch fiberglass woofer
Enclosure	Powered 2-way rear-ported
Frequency Response	50Hz-25kHz
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	TRS, RCA, 3.5mm, Bluetooth
Maximum SPL	103dB
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	2.24
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	4.53
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Midiplus Monitor Products
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Midiplus MI5 II Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Midiplus MI5 II vs Edifier R1280T
  • Midiplus MI5 II vs Edifier R1280DB
  • Midiplus MI5 II vs Fluid Audio FX50 V2
  • Midiplus MI5 II vs Edifier R1700BT
  • Midiplus MI5 II vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • Midiplus MI5 II vs Edifier MR5
  • Midiplus MI5 II vs Presonus Eris E5
  • Midiplus MI5 II vs M-Audio BX4 D3
  • See all 19 comparisons

#64 JBL One Series 104: $129 per pair Discontinued eBay

Pros: ASR’s powered-system measurement gives -3dB bass around 72Hz, and the compact coaxial layout is convenient for a small desk. Its internal equalization is part of the working speaker and should be included when assessing it, rather than judging the passive drivers with that correction bypassed. Measured bass extension of 45Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Even with the active system measured properly, scores are only 1.36 standalone and 4.08 with an ideal subwoofer. The 4.9dB midrange span and a high-frequency cancellation around 7.4kHz indicate significant unevenness; the review also found some vocals bright and irritating. These are results for the original 104, not a verification of the later 104-BT. Discontinued.

Full JBL One Series 104 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	60W total Class D (30W per speaker)
App	No
Aux Input	Yes
Bass Extension (-10dB)	35Hz with the amplifier’s DSP bass boost active (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	45Hz with the amplifier’s DSP bass boost active (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
DSP	Yes
Dimensions	9.7H x 6W x 4.9D in (per manufacturer, 104-BT)
Drivers	4.5” coaxial low-frequency driver, 0.75” soft dome tweeter
EQ	Yes (fixed, amplifier-applied)
Frequency Response	60Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	1/4” TRS, RCA, 3.5mm Aux
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	4.5 lbs (2.06 kg) (master), 3.8 lbs (1.73 kg) (slave)
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Official JBL One Series 104 Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • JBL One Series 104 vs Edifier R1280T
  • JBL One Series 104 vs NHT Pro M-00
  • JBL One Series 104 vs Edifier R1280DB
  • JBL One Series 104 vs Edifier R1700BT
  • JBL One Series 104 vs Audioengine HD4
  • JBL One Series 104 vs Kali Audio IN-UNF
  • JBL One Series 104 vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • JBL One Series 104 vs Edifier S1000W
  • See all 42 comparisons

#65 Fluid Audio FX50 V2: $298 per pair Fluid Audio eBay

Pros: The coaxial geometry and mounting provisions allow flexible physical orientation, while balanced inputs and boundary controls suit a compact studio installation. Bass reaches -3dB around 67Hz in ASR’s selected measurement.

Cons: Scores of 1.80 standalone and 4.42 with an ideal subwoofer indicate poor native tonal accuracy. Listening-window and predicted-room narrow-band deviations are both around 0.80, showing irregular sound for both the listener and room reflections. Coaxial construction does not guarantee smooth dispersion or neutral reproduction, and correction features should not be credited as a proven fix.

Full Fluid Audio FX50 V2 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	90W each
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	9.2H x 6.9W x 9.1D in
Drivers	1-inch silk tweeter coaxially mounted in 5-inch paper woofer
Enclosure	Active coaxial, front-ported
Frequency Response	49Hz-22kHz +/-2dB
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR/TRS and RCA
Maximum SPL	110dB
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	1.80
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	4.42
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	8.4 lbs (3.8 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Fluid Audio FX50 V2 Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Fluid FX50 V2 Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Fluid Audio FX50 V2 vs Midiplus MI5 II
  • Fluid Audio FX50 V2 vs Edifier R1280T
  • Fluid Audio FX50 V2 vs Avantone Pro Active MixCube
  • Fluid Audio FX50 V2 vs Edifier R1280DB
  • Fluid Audio FX50 V2 vs Edifier R1700BT
  • Fluid Audio FX50 V2 vs Audioengine HD4
  • Fluid Audio FX50 V2 vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • Fluid Audio FX50 V2 vs Edifier R2000DB
  • See all 21 comparisons

#66 Donner Dyna 3: $89 per pair Amazon eBay

Pros: A low-cost powered desktop pair with several input options and a small footprint. It can provide basic close-range background playback without an external amplifier. Measured bass extension of 85.0Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Erin’s Klippel measurements give a negative standalone preference score of -0.06 and only 3.24 with an ideal subwoofer. The response spans 8.2dB from 300Hz to 5kHz, with large listening-window irregularities. Bass reaches -3dB around 85Hz, and the existing review reports distortion and compression limits. It is not a credible neutral studio monitor despite that style of marketing.

Full Donner Dyna 3 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	Built in
Aux Input	Yes
Bass Extension	Limited by 3” woofer (Erin’s Audio Corner measurement)
Bass Extension (-10dB)	66.8Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	85.0Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	Yes, 5.0
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	5.4” x 5.9” x 8.1” (136 x 150 x 205 mm)
Drivers	1” dome tweeter; 3” woofer
Frequency Response	80Hz - 22kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Bluetooth, TRS, RCA and 3.5mm
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
Spinorama Preference Score	-0.06
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	3.24
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
XLR Input	No

• Links
  • Donner Dyna Series
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: Donner Dyna 3 Review More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Website: Donner Dyna 3
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Donner Dyna 3 vs Avantone Pro Active MixCube
  • Donner Dyna 3 vs Edifier R1280DB
  • Donner Dyna 3 vs Edifier R1700BT
  • Donner Dyna 3 vs Kali Audio IN-UNF
  • Donner Dyna 3 vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • Donner Dyna 3 vs Edifier S1000W
  • Donner Dyna 3 vs KRK Classic 5
  • Donner Dyna 3 vs Edifier MR4
  • See all 32 comparisons

#67 NHT Pro M-00: $498 per pair (used market; originally $249 each) Discontinued eBay

Pros: A sturdy metal enclosure, analog studio/consumer connections and selectable nearfield/farfield voicing give it practical features as an older powered monitor. Measured bass extension of 83.3Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The review identifies a pronounced upper-bass cancellation, treble peaks and problematic vertical response, and strongly prefers the JBL 305P MKII in direct listening. Discontinued.

Full NHT Pro M-00 review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	75W RMS continuous, 150W peak (per speaker)
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	59.7Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	83.3Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
DSP	No
Dimensions	9H x 5.7W x 7.3D in
Drivers	1” ferrofluid-cooled fabric dome tweeter, 4.5” treated paper-cone woofer
Frequency Response	98Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	RCA, XLR/TRS
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	Yes
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	14 lbs (6.35 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • NHT Pro M-00 vs JBL One Series 104
  • NHT Pro M-00 vs Edifier R1280T
  • NHT Pro M-00 vs Edifier R1280DB
  • NHT Pro M-00 vs Edifier R1700BT
  • NHT Pro M-00 vs Audioengine HD4
  • NHT Pro M-00 vs Kali Audio IN-UNF
  • NHT Pro M-00 vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • NHT Pro M-00 vs Edifier S1000W
  • See all 41 comparisons

#68 Avantone Pro Active MixCube: $518 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: A deliberately bandwidth-limited single-driver monitor for checking midrange balance and mix translation. The powered, sealed format, isolation pad and stand mounting make it useful as a secondary studio reference.

Cons: It is not a full-range music speaker. The measured -3dB point is around 297Hz, and scores of -3.58 standalone and 1.16 with an ideal subwoofer reflect severe bandwidth and response limitations for general listening. A subwoofer cannot restore the missing high-frequency coverage. This low general-purpose rank does not measure its usefulness for the specialist task of checking a mix.

Full Avantone Pro Active MixCube review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	60W RMS Class AB
Aux Input	No
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
Dimensions	6.5H x 6.5W x 6.5D in
Drivers	5.25-inch paper-cone driver; 5.25-inch paper-cone driver; 5.25-inch paper-cone driver; 5.25-inch paper-cone driver
Enclosure	Powered sealed full-range monitor
Frequency Response	90Hz-17kHz
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	Balanced XLR/TRS combo
Maximum SPL	104dB at 1m
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	-3.58
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	1.16
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	7.1 lbs (3.2 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Avantone Pro Active MixCube Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Avantone Pro MixCube Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Avantone Pro Active MixCube vs Donner Dyna 3
  • Avantone Pro Active MixCube vs Fluid Audio FX50 V2
  • Avantone Pro Active MixCube vs Edifier R1280DB
  • Avantone Pro Active MixCube vs Audioengine HD4
  • Avantone Pro Active MixCube vs Edifier S1000MKII
  • Avantone Pro Active MixCube vs Edifier S1000W
  • Avantone Pro Active MixCube vs Edifier R2000DB
  • Avantone Pro Active MixCube vs KRK Classic 5
  • See all 17 comparisons