Klipsch The Fives vs Kali Audio IN-UNF

Last updated: August 15, 2026

Short answer: the Klipsch The Fives ranks #31 of 36 powered bookshelf speakers by sound quality at $699; the Kali Audio IN-UNF ranks #34 at $699. Close enough in price that the sound-quality gap is the deciding factor.

What the Klipsch The Fives offers: Versatile powered stereo alternative to a soundbar, with HDMI ARC, USB, optical, Bluetooth, phono/line RCA and subwoofer output. Watch for: The nominal Flat mode is bass-heavy rather than flat, and the response/directivity transition around the 4.5-inch woofer and Tractrix horn requires careful placement or EQ.

What the Kali Audio IN-UNF offers: Ingenious ultra-nearfield system: a desk-mounted bass module uses two opposed 4.5-inch woofers below 280Hz, while the satellites use time-aligned 4-inch/1-inch coincident drivers. Watch for: This is a very specialized system rather than a general desktop-speaker recommendation.

Buy the Klipsch The Fives. It ranks higher for sound quality than the Kali Audio IN-UNF at the same price, so there is no real case for the other one.

If sound quality matters at all to you, skip both of these and look higher up the 36 powered bookshelf speakers instead.

Klipsch The Fives vs Kali Audio IN-UNF

Specifications Side By Side

Klipsch The Fives Kali Audio IN-UNF
Price$699/pair$699
Ranked#31 of 36 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers#34 of 36 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers
Bass Extension (-3dB)57Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)47Hz (manufacturer specified; Erin did not publish an anechoic F3)
SensitivityNot applicable (active DSP loudspeaker)-
Drivers1" horn-loaded tweeter; 4.5" wooferBass module: two opposed 4.5" woofers; satellites: 4" coincident midrange with 1" textile-dome tweeter
InputsHDMI ARC, USB, optical, Bluetooth, phono/line RCAUSB-C, optical, 3.5mm, balanced TRS
DSPDynamic Bass, Flat and Bass Cut profilesYes (placement/boundary and tonal trims)
Output Power-100W LF + 60W mid/HF per channel (continuous)
Bass Extension (-10dB)-39Hz (manufacturer specified; Erin did not publish an anechoic F10)
Frequency Response-47Hz - 21kHz +/-3dB (manufacturer specified)
Crossovers-280Hz LF-to-midrange; 2.8kHz midrange-to-HF
Dimensions-Bass module: 11.6"H x 19.4"W x 5.25"D; satellites: 6.25" diameter
Max SPL-103dB peak at 1m (manufacturer specified)
Bluetooth-No

More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:

The Two Speakers In Full

Klipsch The Fives: $699/pair Amazon

Klipsch The Fives ranking card

Pros: Versatile powered stereo alternative to a soundbar, with HDMI ARC, USB, optical, Bluetooth, phono/line RCA and subwoofer output. Erin measured F3 at 57Hz and found generally benign harmonic distortion at normal levels. The horn-loaded 1-inch tweeter provides useful controlled radiation, real-wood cabinets are well finished, and firmware offers Dynamic Bass, Flat and Bass Cut profiles; Bass Cut is the closest to neutral.

Cons: The nominal Flat mode is bass-heavy rather than flat, and the response/directivity transition around the 4.5-inch woofer and Tractrix horn requires careful placement or EQ. Erin measured roughly 2.5dB compression around 200Hz and still more below 80Hz at high drive; limiting protects the small woofer but audibly removes bass dynamics. A subwoofer is advisable, especially at distance. This amplified system has no meaningful passive impedance or sensitivity specification.

Bass Extension (-3dB)57Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
DSPDynamic Bass, Flat and Bass Cut profiles
Drivers1" horn-loaded tweeter; 4.5" woofer
InputsHDMI ARC, USB, optical, Bluetooth, phono/line RCA
SensitivityNot applicable (active DSP loudspeaker)

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Kali Audio IN-UNF: $699 Kali Audio

Kali Audio IN-UNF ranking card

Pros: Ingenious ultra-nearfield system: a desk-mounted bass module uses two opposed 4.5-inch woofers below 280Hz, while the satellites use time-aligned 4-inch/1-inch coincident drivers. It is specifically engineered around the desk and, set up to Kali’s supplied placement template, sounded much better than it initially did to Erin; his moving-mic measurement at arm’s length closely matched the system’s predicted response. DSP provides placement, boundary and tonal trims, while USB-C, optical, 3.5mm and balanced TRS inputs cover desktop and studio sources. The round satellite enclosure avoids conventional baffle-edge diffraction, and the coaxial satellites image best aimed directly at the listener.

Cons: This is a very specialized system rather than a general desktop-speaker recommendation. The sizeable bass module must stay on the desk and prescribed satellite spacing can conflict with dual or ultrawide monitors; Erin and Joe N Tell both preferred Kali’s LP-6/IN-series alternatives for their own desks. A bump around 100-130Hz and a possible 1.2kHz diffraction feature appeared in Erin’s exploratory anechoic data, but he explicitly cautioned that those measurements do not replicate the required desk geometry. Bass falls away around 40-50Hz despite the separate bass unit. Erin did not publish comparable anechoic F3/F10, sensitivity or impedance figures because the system is designed around a fixed desk arrangement.

Bass Extension (-10dB)39Hz (manufacturer specified; Erin did not publish an anechoic F10)
Bass Extension (-3dB)47Hz (manufacturer specified; Erin did not publish an anechoic F3)
BluetoothNo
Crossovers280Hz LF-to-midrange; 2.8kHz midrange-to-HF
DSPYes (placement/boundary and tonal trims)
DimensionsBass module: 11.6"H x 19.4"W x 5.25"D; satellites: 6.25" diameter
DriversBass module: two opposed 4.5" woofers; satellites: 4" coincident midrange with 1" textile-dome tweeter
Frequency Response47Hz - 21kHz +/-3dB (manufacturer specified)
InputsUSB-C, optical, 3.5mm, balanced TRS
Max SPL103dB peak at 1m (manufacturer specified)
Output Power100W LF + 60W mid/HF per channel (continuous)

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.