Editor's top picks
Start with these speakers
Our leading recommendations at a glance. Each card links to its primary retailer.
Looking for a powered speaker with an optical input? An optical (TOSLINK) digital input carries sound in as light through a fiber cable, feeding a TV, game console or streaming box directly without an analog stage in between and without the ground loop hum an analog cable run can pick up between two devices plugged into different outlets. Every pick below has a verified optical input; the recommendations are ordered by measured sound quality, not by the connector alone.
Want every match, not just the top pick per category? See every powered speaker with an optical input →
Quick Navigation
- Best Overall
- Best Budget
- Best For a TV Setup
- Other Powered Speakers With an Optical Input
- What To Check Before Buying
- Where To Go Next
Prices on this page were last checked October 12, 2026 at 4:13 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Best Overall
For a reference-tier wireless system with an optical input for a TV or disc player, the KEF LS60: $5,999.99 per pair Amazon $5,999.99 Crutchfield $5,999.99 eBay
Same family: the KEF LSX II LT (smallest bookshelf, rated 4/5), the KEF LSX II (bookshelf, estimated 4.1/5) and the KEF LS50 Wireless II (largest bookshelf, rated 4.3/5).
Pros: Erin’s on-axis measurement combines a 1.9dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz with a 7.91 ideal-subwoofer preference score, supporting even vocal and instrumental balance. Extended-mode bass reaches roughly 25Hz at -3dB. The coaxial Uni-Q arrangement maintains unusually consistent tonality across listening positions, while HDMI, digital and analog inputs plus network streaming make this a convenient complete music and TV system. Measured bass extension of 23Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 97.7dB.
Cons: A diffraction dip around 9kHz can soften cymbal shimmer when aimed directly at the listener; 10-20 degrees of toe-out helps. DSP limiting reduces bass reach and dynamic output at high volume, so its deep low-level extension is not a promise of the same performance on loud peaks. App placement and tone controls are less flexible than parametric room correction. Each roughly 31kg tower is awkward to move.
Full KEF LS60 review and specifications →
| Released | Jun 2022 (4 years ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | No |
| Amplifier Power | 700W (500W LF Class D + 100W MF Class D + 100W HF Class AB) |
| App | Yes (KEF Connect) |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | <20Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 23Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, AAC |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.0 |
| Coaxial Input | Yes |
| DSP | Yes (Music Integrity Engine) |
| Dimensions | 42.9”H x 8.3”W x 15.5”D (1089.7 x 210.8 x 393.7 mm) |
| Drivers | 4 x 135 mm (5.25 in.) Uni-Core Force Cancelling Driver: woofers, 100 mm (4in.) aluminium cone midrange, 19 mm (0.75 in.) vented aluminium dome with Metamaterial Absorption Technology tweeter |
| EQ | Yes (Normal and Expert modes, room adaptation) |
| Frequency Response | 31Hz - 24kHz (±3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | Yes |
| Inputs | Wifi, Optical, Digital coaxial, RCA, HDMI eARC, Ethernet |
| Maximum SPL | 111dB @ 1m (pink noise) (manufacturer specified) |
| Optical Input | Yes |
| Outputs | Subwoofer RCA |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Sensitivity | 97.7dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 7.26 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.91 |
| Streaming Services | Yes (AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Roon Ready, Spotify Connect, Tidal Connect, Amazon Music, Qobuz, Deezer) |
| Subwoofer Output | Yes |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 69 lbs (31.3 kg) each |
| Wi-Fi | Yes (dual-band) |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Erin’s on-axis measurement combines a 1.9dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz with a 7.91 ideal-subwoofer preference score, and extended-mode bass reaches roughly 25Hz at -3dB, deep enough to skip a separate subwoofer in most rooms. The optical input handles a TV or set-top box without an extra analog cable run.
A diffraction dip around 9kHz can soften cymbal shimmer when aimed directly at the listener, and DSP limiting reduces bass reach and dynamic output at high volume. It is also priced well above the rest of this page.
Best Budget
For a genuinely affordable pair with an optical input and a neutral measured response, the Cambridge Audio L/R S: $549.00 per pair Amazon $549.00 eBay
Same family: the Cambridge Audio L/R M (larger bookshelf, estimated 4.2/5) and the Cambridge Audio L/R X (larger bookshelf, rated 4.1/5).
Pros: A 2-way active bookshelf pair built for near-field desktop use, with a 21mm aluminum tweeter and a 3-inch long-throw woofer on each speaker. Erin’s Audio Corner measured a very neutral on-axis response with good directivity control up through the 2-3kHz handoff to the tweeter, an F3 of about 57Hz and F10 of about 50Hz, and output held within roughly plus or minus 2.5dB from 80Hz to 20kHz. Horizontal dispersion of about plus or minus 60 degrees and a vertical window of about plus 30 to minus 20 degrees make it forgiving of off-center desktop seating. Two rear switches (a desktop-placement compensation switch and a near-wall/free-space switch) plus in-app DSP for room size, wall distance, and reflective surface type let you tune the in-room response rather than just hoping placement works out, and the reviewer noted an audible tightening of the bass moving between room-size settings. Rear connectivity includes RCA, optical digital, USB-C, and a dedicated subwoofer output. Measured bass extension of 57Hz (-3dB).
Cons: Maximum clean output is limited: Erin’s Audio Corner measured about 86dB before the onboard limiter engages around 96dB to protect the drivers, so this is a near-field or small-room speaker rather than one built to fill a living room. Each speaker’s Class D amplifier splits only 50W to the woofer and 50W to the tweeter, modest for the class. The DSP room-correction options are preset-based rather than a true microphone-measured calibration at the listening position, so results depend on picking settings that match your actual room.
Full Cambridge Audio L/R S review and specifications →
| Released | Apr 2026 (6 months ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | No |
| Amplifier Power | 100W total (50W to woofer, 50W to tweeter, per speaker) |
| App | Yes |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 57Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| DSP | Yes, room size, wall distance, and reflective surface correction; desktop-placement and near-wall/free-space switches |
| Dimensions | 5.3” (134 mm) W x 226mm H x 180mm D (each) |
| Drivers | 21mm aluminum dome tweeter, 3” long-throw woofer |
| Frequency Response | 55Hz - 24kHz (±3dB, manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | RCA, optical digital, USB-C |
| Optical Input | Yes |
| Outputs | Subwoofer, wired speaker-to-speaker link |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Subwoofer Output | Yes |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | Yes |
| Weight | 6.6 lbs (3.0kg) primary speaker, 5.7 lbs (2.6kg) secondary speaker |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Cambridge Audio L/R S vs ADAM Audio D3v
- Cambridge Audio L/R S vs Genelec G One
- Cambridge Audio L/R S vs IK Multimedia iLoud Micro Monitor
- Cambridge Audio L/R S vs Genelec 8010A
- Cambridge Audio L/R S vs Audio Smile Little British Monitor
- Cambridge Audio L/R S vs Edifier M60
- Cambridge Audio L/R S vs HiVi Swan X3
- Cambridge Audio L/R S vs Edifier MR3
- See all 19 comparisons
Erin’s Audio Corner measured a very neutral on-axis response with good directivity on this near-field pair, at a fraction of the price of the reference picks above. The optical input is a straightforward way to add a TV or streaming box without a receiver.
Maximum clean output is limited: about 86dB before the onboard limiter engages, so this is a near-field or small-room speaker rather than one built to fill a living room at party volume.
Best For a TV Setup
For a compact system built around TV and soundbar-style use, with an optical input, the Klipsch The Fives: $324.95 per pair Amazon $324.95 eBay
Newer model: the Klipsch The Fives II, ranked lower, estimated 4.3/5, released Jan 2026. See every Klipsch The Fives, Sevens and Nines generation.
Same family: the Klipsch The Sevens (larger bookshelf, rated 3.7/5) and the Klipsch The Nines (larger bookshelf, rated 4.2/5).
Pros: In the tested Bass Cut mode, Erin’s Klippel data gives preference scores of 5.52 standalone and 7.89 with an ideal subwoofer, with a 2.7dB midrange response span. That mode offers considerably better tonal balance than the bass-heavy default behavior. HDMI ARC, phono/line input, digital inputs and subwoofer output make it a versatile stereo alternative to a soundbar. Measured bass extension of 57Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The favorable score specifically requires Bass Cut mode; it does not describe every firmware or bass setting. Bass reaches -3dB around 59Hz in that configuration. The review reports increasing compression around 200Hz and below 80Hz as volume rises, reducing bass dynamics. Careful placement and a subwoofer remain useful, and the horn/woofer transition is not perfectly uniform off-axis.
Full Klipsch The Fives review and specifications →
| Released | May 2020 (6 years ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | No |
| Amplifier Power | 160W total system power (320W peak) |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 47.3Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 57Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.0 |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| DSP | Dynamic Bass, Flat and Bass Cut profiles |
| Dimensions | 12”H x 6.5”W x 9.2”D (304.8 x 165.1 x 234.95 mm) |
| Drivers | 1” horn-loaded tweeter; 4.5” woofer |
| Frequency Response | 50Hz - 25kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | Yes |
| Inputs | HDMI ARC, USB, optical, Bluetooth, phono/line RCA |
| Optical Input | Yes |
| Outputs | Subwoofer |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.52 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.89 |
| Subwoofer Output | Yes |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | Yes |
| Weight | Primary 11.8 lbs (5.35 kg), Secondary 10.7 lbs (4.85 kg) |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Erin’s Audio Corner: Klipsch The Fives Review More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
- Erin’s Audio Corner Website: Klipsch The Fives
- Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
- Jasper Tech: Best Bookshelf Speakers For TV & Gaming - 2025 More from Jasper Tech →
- Jasper Tech: Best Powered Bookshelf Speakers for Every Budget - 2025
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Klipsch The Fives vs JBL 305P MKII
- Klipsch The Fives vs KEF LS50 Wireless II
- Klipsch The Fives vs Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus
- Klipsch The Fives vs Genelec 8020D
- Klipsch The Fives vs Topping MA4
- Klipsch The Fives vs Klipsch The Fives II
- Klipsch The Fives vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
- Klipsch The Fives vs Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
- See all 59 comparisons
In its tested Bass Cut mode, Erin’s Klippel data gives preference scores of 5.52 standalone and 7.89 with an ideal subwoofer, considerably better tonal balance than its default setting. That mode is worth switching to specifically for the optical/TV use case.
The favorable score depends on using Bass Cut mode; other settings measure worse. Bass reaches -3dB around 59Hz in that configuration, and the review reports increasing compression around 200Hz at higher output.
Other Powered Speakers With an Optical Input
The AsciLab C8C: €5799 per pair Audiophonics eBay
Pros: ASR’s revised measurement combines an 8.48 ideal-subwoofer preference score with a 1.7dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz, supporting highly even vocal and instrumental balance. Bass reaches 30.8Hz at -3dB and 23.4Hz at -6dB, giving substantial low-end reach without an added subwoofer. Measured bass extension of 30.8Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The result applies to the revised measured configuration; confirm that the speaker’s tuning matches it. Each cabinet weighs about 27.5kg and needs a substantial stand. Deep extension and excellent tonality do not guarantee unlimited bass output or eliminate the need to adjust placement. The fitted bass-alignment Q of 2.13 is on the peaky side, so bass may sound boomy near the tuning frequency without EQ.
Full AsciLab C8C review and specifications →
| AES Input | Yes |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 600W total (100W tweeter, 250W midrange, 250W subwoofer) |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 20.5Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 30.8Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bass Extension (-6dB) | 23.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | Yes |
| Country | South Korea |
| Crossover Frequency | 150Hz, 1.2kHz |
| Dimensions | 22”H x 10”W x 13.8”D (560 x 254 x 350 mm) |
| Drivers | 1” alumina ceramic dome tweeter with waveguide, 2x 6” alumina ceramic midrange/woofers, 2x 8” side mounted opposed cardioid subwoofers |
| Enclosure | sealed |
| Frequency Response | 30Hz - 20kHz (±1.5dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | XLR, RCA, AES/EBU, Coaxial, Optical |
| Optical Input | Yes |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 7.70 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.48 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Warranty | 2 years |
| Weight | 60.6 lbs (27.5 kg) each |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
ASR’s revised measurement gives it an 8.48 ideal-subwoofer preference score, with bass reaching 30.8Hz at -3dB.
The Devialet Phantom Ultimate 98dB: $3,998 per pair Amazon $1,999.00 eBay
Older model: the Devialet Phantom II 98 dB (ranked higher, rated 4.4/5). See every Devialet Phantom generation.
Same family: the Devialet Phantom Ultimate 108dB (larger bookshelf, rated 4.4/5).
Pros: The smaller Phantom Ultimate, with the same opposed side woofers as the Devialet Phantom Ultimate 108dB: two aluminum dome woofers fire outward in sync so they cancel each other’s vibration and reach very deep bass for the size, specified to 18Hz (-6dB). A full-range aluminum dome on the front handles the rest, with 400W of amplification. It streams over Wi-Fi with AirPlay 2, Google Cast, Spotify Connect and Tidal Connect, also takes Bluetooth and optical, and two can pair as a stereo set.
Cons: No independent measurements yet, so its tonal balance and directivity can’t be compared directly with measured speakers; the rating is estimated from the measured Devialet Phantom Ultimate 108dB and Phantom II 98dB. A single forward-firing full-range driver gives a narrower soundstage than a two-way monitor pair, and the 98dB maximum output is well below the larger model.
Full Devialet Phantom Ultimate 98dB review and specifications →
| Released | Nov 2025 (11 months ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | No |
| Amplifier Power | 400W |
| App | Yes |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 6.6” (168 mm) H x 157mm W x 219mm D |
| Drivers | Full-range aluminum dome, 2x opposed aluminum dome woofers |
| Frequency Response | 18Hz - 25kHz (-6dB, manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, optical |
| Maximum SPL | 98dB @ 1m (manufacturer specified) |
| Optical Input | Yes |
| RCA Input | No |
| Streaming Services | AirPlay 2, Google Cast, Spotify Connect, Tidal Connect |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 9.5 lbs (4.3 kg) |
| Wi-Fi | Yes |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- No independent measurement review is linked for this model; it is ranked from hands-on listening and comparison against similarly priced speakers.
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Two opposed side woofers are specified down to 18Hz (-6dB) from a compact cabinet, and Wi-Fi streaming and Bluetooth sit alongside the optical input. It replaces the measured Phantom II 98dB, so its rating is estimated from that model and the larger Phantom Ultimate 108dB. Stereo requires buying two units, and the integrated design offers less system flexibility than conventional monitors.
The Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus: $699.99 per pair Amazon $699.99 eBay
Older model: the Vanatoo Transparent One Encore (ranked lower, rated 3.9/5). See every Vanatoo Transparent One generation.
Pros: Erin’s Klippel data combines a small 1.7dB midrange response span with a -3dB point around 44Hz. Scores of 5.57 standalone and 7.38 with an ideal subwoofer make it an attractive standalone system as well as a subwoofer partner. Remote tone controls, multiple digital and analog inputs, and automatic subwoofer crossover engagement simplify setup. Measured bass extension of 42Hz (-3dB).
Cons: A mild 4-6kHz edge and a smaller 1-2kHz recession were audible in the review, so its smooth midrange summary does not mean there is nothing to improve with EQ. No HDMI ARC. Deep bass and louder playback still benefit from a subwoofer; amplifier wattage alone does not establish clean room-filling output.
Full Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus review and specifications →
| Released | Nov 2023 (2 years ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | No |
| Amplifier Power | 240W total (100W + 20W Class D amplifiers per enclosure) |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 34Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 42Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD |
| Coaxial Input | Yes |
| Dimensions | 10” x 6.5” x 8” (254 x 165 x 203 mm) |
| Drivers | 5.25” aluminum-cone woofer with XBL motor, 5.25” passive radiator (rear), 1” aluminum dome tweeter with waveguide and phase plug |
| Frequency Response | 48Hz - 20kHz ±3dB (manufacturer specified, Flat mode) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | USB, Optical, Coax, Analog, Bluetooth |
| Optical Input | Yes |
| Outputs | RCA subwoofer |
| RCA Input | No |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.57 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.38 |
| Subwoofer Output | Yes |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | Yes |
| Weight | 10.8 lbs (4.9 kg) (passive unit), 12.1 lbs (5.5 kg) (active unit) |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs KEF LS50 Wireless II
- Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs JBL 305P MKII
- Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs Klipsch The Fives
- Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
- Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs Kali Audio SM-5
- Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs Kali Audio IN-5
- Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs Genelec 8020D
- Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus vs Topping MA4
- See all 51 comparisons
Erin’s Klippel data shows a 1.7dB midrange response span and bass to about 44Hz at -3dB, and it adds coaxial, USB, analog and Bluetooth inputs plus automatic subwoofer crossover. A mild 4-6kHz edge was audible in the review, and there is no HDMI ARC.
The JBL 4305P: $1,499.99 per pair Amazon $1,499.99 JBL eBay
Same family: the JBL 4329P (larger bookshelf, ranked lower, rated 4.1/5).
Pros: The measured 1.5dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz supports even mids, with a 7.45 ideal-subwoofer score and 45.4Hz -3dB bass extension. Integrated consumer connectivity makes this a more convenient living-room system than many studio monitors. Measured bass extension of 45Hz (-3dB).
Cons: Crossover-region directivity changes mean the narrow on-axis span does not describe every listening angle. Limiting becomes relevant at high output, particularly with bass-heavy music. It suits near- to midfield listening better than the largest high-output systems here. Erin measured about 8dB lost near 50Hz at the highest drive level and reached roughly 93dB unweighted at 2m in-room.
Full JBL 4305P review and specifications →
| Released | 2022 (4 years ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | No |
| Amplifier Power | 300W system: 125W LF + 25W HF per speaker |
| Aux Input | Yes |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 40.5Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 45Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.1 |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 13.2H x 8.3W x 8.8D inches |
| Drivers | 5.25-inch pulp woofer; 1-inch annular compression driver |
| Frequency Response | 45Hz - 25kHz (-6dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | XLR/TRS combo, 3.5mm Aux, Optical, USB-B, Ethernet |
| Maximum SPL | ~93dB at 2m in-room before limiting (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Optical Input | Yes |
| RCA Input | No |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.44 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.45 |
| TRS Input | Yes |
| USB Input | Yes |
| Weight | Primary 14.6 lbs (6.6 kg), Secondary 14.1 lbs (6.4 kg) |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Erin’s measurements show a 1.5dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz and bass to 45.4Hz at -3dB, with XLR/TRS, USB and Ethernet alongside the optical input. It suits near- to midfield listening; Erin measured about 8dB of bass compression near 50Hz at the highest drive level.
The Marshall Stanmore II, Klipsch The Three II and Devialet Phantom II 98dB that used to appear here are discontinued, so treat them as used buys only.
What To Check Before Buying
Optical vs. coaxial: a TV or disc player may only offer one of the two digital outputs. Confirm which your source actually has; see every powered speaker with a coaxial digital input if your source uses that connector instead.
Format support: optical carries stereo PCM and often compressed surround formats, but check both the source device’s output settings and the speaker’s supported input formats before assuming full compatibility with a game console’s audio mix.
Cable length: TOSLINK fiber cables are more length- and bend-sensitive than copper cable. Keep the run reasonably short and avoid sharp bends.
Where To Go Next
See the best powered speakers with a coaxial digital input for the other common digital connector, or every powered speaker with an optical input for the complete list.
Related guides: powered speaker inputs explained, best powered speakers for TVs, and the powered speaker buyer’s guide.






