Editor's top picks
Start with these speakers
Our leading recommendations at a glance. Each card links to its primary retailer.
Looking for a powered speaker with an XLR input? A balanced XLR connection rejects noise picked up over a cable run, which matters once a cable crosses a desk, runs behind a rack, or shares a path with power cords. It is the standard connector on audio interfaces, mixers and preamps, and on nearly every serious studio monitor. Every pick below has a verified XLR input; the recommendations are ordered by measured sound quality, not by the connector alone.
Want every match, not just the top pick per category? See every powered speaker with an XLR input →
Quick Navigation
- Best Overall
- Best Budget
- Best Reference
- Best XLR-Only Design
- Other Powered Speakers With an XLR Input
- What To Check Before Buying
- Where To Go Next
Prices on this page were last checked October 12, 2026 at 4:13 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Best Overall
For a compact DSP monitor with accurate tonal balance and an XLR input, the Neumann KH80 DSP: $1,198 per pair Amazon $599.00 B&H Photo Video $599 eBay
Same family: the Neumann KH120 MKII (larger bookshelf, ranked higher, rated 4.7/5), the Neumann KH 150 (larger bookshelf, rated 4.8/5), the Neumann KH 310 A (larger bookshelf, rated 4.6/5), the Neumann KH420 (larger bookshelf, rated 4.8/5) and the Neumann KH 750 DSP (subwoofer, rated 3.5/5). See every Neumann KH generation.
Pros: ASR’s selected Klippel measurement has a 1.4dB midrange response span and virtually no overall on-axis tilt. Scores of 5.89 standalone and 8.25 with an ideal subwoofer indicate excellent tonal accuracy in a compact monitor. The waveguide and steep crossover provide useful control of reflected sound, while placement filters help compensate for a desk or nearby boundaries. Existing multitone testing supports good moderate-level clarity. Measured bass extension of 57Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 91.9dB.
Cons: Bass reaches -3dB around 59Hz in this measurement, less deep than the KH120 II. Output protection and increasing multitone distortion limit loud listening, especially in the bass. Room reflections and listening distance can alter perceived treble balance despite its flat direct response. Calibration equipment adds to the cost; the preference score is not a measurement of maximum clean output. It is expensive for its size.
Full Neumann KH80 DSP review and specifications →
| Released | 2017 (9 years ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | No |
| Amplifier Power | 140W (90W woofer + 50W tweeter) |
| App | Yes (MA 1 alignment) |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 51Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 57Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| DSP | Yes |
| Dimensions | 13.6”H x 10.8”W x 9.6”D (345.4 x 274.3 x 243.8 mm) |
| Drivers | 4.1” woofer, 1” fabric dome tweeter |
| EQ | Yes (via DSP) |
| Frequency Response | 57 Hz - 25 kHz (+-3 dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | XLR |
| Maximum SPL | 110.7dB @ 1m (manufacturer specified) |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | No |
| Sensitivity | 91.9dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.89 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.25 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 9 lbs (4.1 kg) each |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Erin’s Audio Corner: Neumann KH 80 Studio Monitor Review. Excellent Performance. Small Size. More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
- Erin’s Audio Corner Review Measurements
- Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
- Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
- Joy & Oluv’Sone: 🎃🔥 UBoom X - Halloween Rock Special 🎸🤘 More from Oluv’Sone →
- DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs Focal Shape 40 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison More from DSAUDIOreview →
- DSAUDIO.review: KEF LSX vs Neumann KH80 DSP Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
- DSAUDIO.review: Adam Audio A3X vs Neumann KH80 DSP Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
- DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs Genelec 8020D Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
- DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs Yamaha HS8 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
- DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
- DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs JBL 305P MKII Sound & Frquency Response Comparison
- DSAUDIO.review: Neumann KH80 DSP vs KRK Rokit 5 G4 RP5G4 Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Neumann KH80 DSP vs Genelec 8030C
- Neumann KH80 DSP vs Reflector Audio Square Two
- Neumann KH80 DSP vs Neumann KH120 MKII
- Neumann KH80 DSP vs Dynaudio LYD 5
- Neumann KH80 DSP vs Genelec 8331A
- Neumann KH80 DSP vs Genelec 8330A
- Neumann KH80 DSP vs Genelec 8320A
- Neumann KH80 DSP vs Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
- See all 66 comparisons
Erin’s measurements support genuinely accurate tonal balance, and the onboard DSP includes an MA 1 alignment mode for matching a pair. The XLR input handles a preamp or interface over a longer run without picking up hum, and the compact cabinet fits a normal desk.
Bass output is limited by the small woofer, so a subwoofer helps for full-range material. It has no consumer inputs at all, so it assumes a source with a real line-level output rather than a phone or laptop headphone jack.
Best Budget
For an affordable pair with a strong measured score for the price, the JBL 308P MKII: $298 per pair Amazon $149.00 B&H Photo Video $149 eBay
Older model: the JBL LSR308 (ranked lower, estimated 4.2/5). See every JBL 3 Series generation.
Same family: the JBL 305P MKII (smaller bookshelf, rated 4.3/5) and the JBL 306P MKII (smaller bookshelf, ranked lower, rated 4.1/5).
Pros: A 1.8dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz and 7.69 ideal-subwoofer score support unusually good tonal balance for an accessible studio monitor. Measured -3dB extension of 42.5Hz supplies useful musical bass, and the waveguide helps maintain consistent horizontal coverage. Measured bass extension of 42.5Hz (-3dB).
Cons: Amplifier hiss may be noticeable in quiet, close-range use. Bass distortion and output limits matter when playing loudly, despite the 8-inch woofer. Keep the tweeter near ear height; vertical crossover behavior is less forgiving than the best coaxial designs. A resonance around 18kHz and a slight dip around 1.4kHz.
Full JBL 308P MKII review and specifications →
| Released | Jun 2020 (6 years ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | No |
| Amplifier Power | 112W total |
| App | No |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 37.6Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 42.5Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| DSP | No |
| Dimensions | 16.5”H x 10”W x 12.1”D (419.1 x 254 x 307.3 mm) |
| Drivers | 8” woofer, 1” neodymium tweeter |
| EQ | No |
| Frequency Response | 45Hz - 20kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | XLR, 1/4” TRS |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | No |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.88 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.69 |
| TRS Input | Yes |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 17.9 lbs (8.1 kg) each |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
The 308P MkII combines a 7.69 ideal-subwoofer preference score with a 1.8dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz and 42.5Hz bass extension at -3dB from an 8-inch woofer, results well below the price of most XLR-equipped monitors. It also has a TRS input alongside XLR, so it accepts either connector from an interface.
Amplifier hiss may be noticeable in quiet, close-range use, and bass distortion and output limits show up when playing loudly. Keep the tweeter near ear height, since vertical crossover behavior affects off-axis response.
For a smaller 6.5-inch cabinet with the same bass extension and a combo XLR/TRS input, the Kali Audio LP-6 V2: $498 per pair B&H Photo Video $249.00 eBay
Older model: the Kali Audio LP-6 (ranked lower, rated 4.3/5). See every Kali Audio LP generation.
Same family: the Kali Audio LP-8 V2 (larger bookshelf, ranked lower, rated 4.1/5) and the Kali Audio LP-UNF (larger bookshelf, rated 3.9/5).
Pros: Erin’s measurements give a 7.48 ideal-subwoofer score and 42.5Hz -3dB bass extension, a strong combination for an affordable nearfield monitor. The waveguide and placement switches help with practical setup, and the second generation improves close-range noise behavior. Measured bass extension of 42Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The 2.5dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz leaves some tonal unevenness. Vertical crossover behavior makes ear-height placement important, and compression limits loud bass playback. Its good tonal score is not evidence of the output capability of a much larger monitor.
Full Kali Audio LP-6 V2 review and specifications →
| Released | Nov 2021 (4 years ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | No |
| Amplifier Power | 40W LF + 40W HF per speaker; Bi-amplified Class D |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39.1Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 42Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| DSP | Yes; boundary presets and LF/HF trims |
| Dimensions | 14.1”H x 8.8”W x 10.2”D |
| Drivers | 1” soft-dome tweeter; 6.5” woofer |
| Frequency Response | 47Hz - 21kHz (±3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | XLR, balanced TRS and RCA |
| Maximum SPL | Approximately 102dB per pair with good measured linearity (Erin’s Audio Corner) (manufacturer specified) |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.53 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.48 |
| TRS Input | Yes |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 15.5 lbs (7.05 kg) each |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Erin’s Audio Corner: Kali Audio LP-6 V2 Review More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
- Erin’s Audio Corner: Which budget Kali monitor makes most sense for YOU? LP-6v2 or LP-8v2?
- Erin’s Audio Corner Website: Kali Audio LP-6 V2
- Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Kali Audio LP-6 V2 (2nd Wave) vs JBL 305P MKII sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Kali Audio LP-6 V2 (2nd Wave) vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO sound.DEMO
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Kali Audio LP-6 V2 vs Kali Audio IN-8 V2
- Kali Audio LP-6 V2 vs Yamaha HS8
- Kali Audio LP-6 V2 vs Genelec 8050B
- Kali Audio LP-6 V2 vs O.S. Acoustics DBS8
- Kali Audio LP-6 V2 vs JBL 4305P
- Kali Audio LP-6 V2 vs JBL 308P MKII
- Kali Audio LP-6 V2 vs Devialet Phantom Ultimate 108dB
- Kali Audio LP-6 V2 vs SHIVAUDYO Point Zero
- See all 67 comparisons
Best Reference
For a compact three-way reference monitor with coaxial imaging and GLM room correction, the Genelec 8331A: $5,750 per pair B&H Photo Video $2,875.00 eBay
Same family: the Genelec 8341A (larger bookshelf, rated 4.8/5), the Genelec 8351B (larger bookshelf, rated 4.8/5), the Genelec 8361A (larger bookshelf, rated 4.8/5) and the Genelec 8381A (floorstanding, estimated 4.9/5). See every Genelec 8351 and The Ones generation.
Pros: Erin’s Klippel measurements support its reference-monitor credentials: a 1.4dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz, low listening-window and predicted-room irregularity, and preference scores of 6.57 standalone and 8.51 with an ideal subwoofer. The coaxial mid/tweeter and concealed woofers maintain coherent radiation as listening position changes. Bass reaches -3dB around 48Hz, and GLM adds level, delay and room-response calibration. Measured bass extension of 49Hz (-3dB).
Cons: Expensive, with studio-oriented XLR connectivity rather than consumer streaming. The compact woofers still limit deep-bass output, and the review reports protection muting when pushed beyond its operating range. GLM calibration hardware is an additional purchase. Its excellent tonal score does not remove the need for a subwoofer or larger monitor at demanding levels.
Full Genelec 8331A review and specifications →
| Released | Jul 2020 (6 years ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | Yes |
| Amplifier Power | 72W LF + 36W MF + 36W HF |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 49Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 12”H x 7.4”W x 8.3”D (305 x 189 x 212 mm) |
| Drivers | Dual 130x65mm woofers; 90mm coaxial mid; 19mm tweeter |
| Frequency Response | 45Hz - 37kHz (-6dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | XLR, AES/EBU |
| Maximum SPL | 100dB at 3m before protection (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | No |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.57 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.51 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 14.8 lbs (6.7kg) each |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Erin’s Klippel measurements show a 1.4dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz along with low listening-window and predicted-room irregularity, reference-tier results. Genelec’s GLM software adds calibrated room correction over the same XLR connection.
It is studio-oriented rather than a consumer all-in-one: XLR is the only input, so it needs a proper source chain. The compact woofers also limit maximum deep-bass output, and the review reports protection muting when pushed hard.
Best XLR-Only Design
For a system built exclusively around a balanced analog input, the Topping MA4: $378 per pair Amazon $189.00 Audiophonics eBay
Pros: The selected manufacturer-supplied Klippel data shows a 1.6dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz, bass reaching -3dB around 50Hz, and preference scores of 5.64 standalone and 7.83 with an ideal subwoofer. That is strong measured tonal performance for a compact monitor. Its analog crossover and balanced XLR connection suit an existing audio interface. Measured bass extension of 49.8Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The native listening-window response is not as smooth as the leading Genelec and Neumann measurements. No USB, Bluetooth or built-in room-correction DSP: source control and correction need external equipment. Bass extension alone does not establish clean output capability. On-axis narrow-band deviation measures 0.503dB and listening-window smoothness a moderate 0.44.
Full Topping MA4 review and specifications →
| Released | Mar 2025 (1 year ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | No |
| Amplifier Power | 75W total (50W woofer, 25W tweeter, Class D) |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 42.9Hz (measured, spinorama.org vendor data) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 49.8Hz (measured, spinorama.org vendor data) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Country | China |
| Crossover Frequency | 1.3kHz |
| Dimensions | 10”H x 5.5”W x 11.3”D (255 x 140 x 288 mm) |
| Drivers | 1” soft dome tweeter with waveguide, 4” paper cone woofer |
| Enclosure | ported |
| Frequency Response | 49Hz-20kHz +/-3dB |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | XLR (balanced analog) |
| Maximum SPL | 105dB @ 1m (manufacturer specified) |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | No |
| Sensitivity | 92dB |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.64 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.83 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Warranty | 1-2 years (varies by region) |
| Weight | 8.3 lbs (3.78 kg) each |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
The MA4 has a single XLR input and nothing else, a deliberate simplification for a system already built around a preamp or DAC with balanced outputs. That single-purpose design keeps the signal path short between the input and the amplifier.
The tradeoff is flexibility: there is no way to add a consumer source without an external DAC or preamp that itself outputs XLR. Choose it only when the rest of the chain is already balanced.
Other Powered Speakers With an XLR Input
The AsciLab C8C: €5799 per pair Audiophonics eBay
Pros: ASR’s revised measurement combines an 8.48 ideal-subwoofer preference score with a 1.7dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz, supporting highly even vocal and instrumental balance. Bass reaches 30.8Hz at -3dB and 23.4Hz at -6dB, giving substantial low-end reach without an added subwoofer. Measured bass extension of 30.8Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The result applies to the revised measured configuration; confirm that the speaker’s tuning matches it. Each cabinet weighs about 27.5kg and needs a substantial stand. Deep extension and excellent tonality do not guarantee unlimited bass output or eliminate the need to adjust placement. The fitted bass-alignment Q of 2.13 is on the peaky side, so bass may sound boomy near the tuning frequency without EQ.
Full AsciLab C8C review and specifications →
| AES Input | Yes |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 600W total (100W tweeter, 250W midrange, 250W subwoofer) |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 20.5Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 30.8Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bass Extension (-6dB) | 23.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | Yes |
| Country | South Korea |
| Crossover Frequency | 150Hz, 1.2kHz |
| Dimensions | 22”H x 10”W x 13.8”D (560 x 254 x 350 mm) |
| Drivers | 1” alumina ceramic dome tweeter with waveguide, 2x 6” alumina ceramic midrange/woofers, 2x 8” side mounted opposed cardioid subwoofers |
| Enclosure | sealed |
| Frequency Response | 30Hz - 20kHz (±1.5dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | XLR, RCA, AES/EBU, Coaxial, Optical |
| Optical Input | Yes |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 7.70 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.48 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Warranty | 2 years |
| Weight | 60.6 lbs (27.5 kg) each |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
ASR’s revised measurement gives it an 8.48 ideal-subwoofer preference score and a 1.7dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz, with bass reaching 30.8Hz at -3dB.
The Genelec 8010A: $900 per pair B&H Photo Video $450 eBay
Same family: the Genelec 8020D (larger bookshelf, rated 4.4/5), the Genelec 8030C (larger bookshelf, rated 4.6/5), the Genelec 8040B (larger bookshelf, rated 4.3/5) and the Genelec 8050B (larger bookshelf, rated 4.4/5). See every Genelec 8000 and 8300 Series generation.
Pros: ASR’s Klippel measurements support a neutral compact monitor: the response spans 2.5dB from 300Hz to 5kHz, with lower narrow-band variation in the listening window than directly on-axis. Spinorama predicts 4.10 standalone and 7.01 with an ideal subwoofer, making it a strong choice when bass is handled separately. Its measured balance provides firmer evidence for critical listening than a recorded sound demonstration alone. Measured bass extension of 74Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The measured -3dB point is about 78Hz, so deep bass is missing without a subwoofer. The small enclosure and woofer are better suited to close listening than room-filling levels; the preference score does not measure headroom. The ADAM Audio D3v offers substantially deeper measured bass in a similarly compact format, while the Genelec’s premium price is harder to justify for casual desktop use.
Full Genelec 8010A review and specifications →
| Released | 2014 (12 years ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | No |
| Amplifier Power | 50W (25W woofer + 25W tweeter) |
| App | No |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 67Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 74Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 7.7”H x 4.8”W x 4.5”D (195.6 x 121.9 x 114.3 mm) |
| Drivers | 3” woofer, 0.75” metal dome tweeter |
| EQ | Yes (Bass tilt, Desk proximity) |
| Frequency Response | 67 Hz-25 kHz (-6dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | XLR |
| Maximum SPL | 96dB @ 1m (manufacturer specified) |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | No |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 3.3 lbs (1.5 kg) |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
- Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
- DSAUDIO.review: Genelec 8010A (Genelec G One) vs iLoud Micro Monitor Sound Demo w/ Bass Test More from DSAUDIOreview →
- DSAUDIO.review: Genelec 8010A (Genelec G One) vs Presonus Eris E4.5 Sound Demo w/ Bass Test
- DSAUDIO.review: Genelec 8010A (G One) vs JBL LSR305 Sound Demo w/ Bass Test
- DSAUDIO.review: Genelec 8010A (Genelec G One) vs Audioengine A2+ Sound Demo w/ Bass Test
- DSAUDIO.review: Genelec 8010A (Genelec G One) vs Yamaha HS5 Sound Demo w/ Bass Test
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Its response spans 2.5dB from 300Hz to 5kHz, but bass stops around 74Hz (-3dB), so pair it with a subwoofer for full-range music.
The Dynaudio LYD 5: $794 per pair Amazon $397.00 B&H Photo Video $499.00 eBay
Pros: ASR’s Klippel data is substantially stronger than a low ranking suggests: 4.72 standalone and 7.38 with an ideal subwoofer, with a 1.9dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz. Low listening-window narrow-band deviation of 0.242 supports relatively uncolored midrange reproduction. It is particularly competitive when used with a subwoofer rather than judged only by bass reach. Measured bass extension of 68Hz (-3dB).
Cons: Bass reaches -3dB around 72Hz, so it gives up low-frequency weight to deeper-reaching monitors. The existing review identifies a dip near 1.6kHz, upper-bass emphasis and uneven crossover-region dispersion. These issues and limited deep-bass capability keep it below the leading all-rounders despite its strong bass-normalized score. A subwoofer does not correct upper-frequency directivity errors.
Full Dynaudio LYD 5 review and specifications →
| Released | 2016 (10 years ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | No |
| Amplifier Power | 100W total (50W LF, 50W HF) |
| App | No |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 68Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| DSP | No |
| Dimensions | 10.2”H x 6.7”W x 8.3”D (260 x 170 x 211 mm) |
| Drivers | 5” woofer, 28mm soft dome tweeter |
| EQ | No |
| Frequency Response | 50Hz - 21kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | XLR, RCA |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 11.9 lbs (5.4 kg) each |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
A capable nearfield monitor for a smaller room, though its price sits above several of the picks above without a clearly stronger measured result.
The Reflector Audio Square Two: $6,499 per pair Monheim Microphones $6,499 eBay
Pros: The manufacturer-supplied data shows a very small 1.1dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz and preference scores of 6.52 standalone and 8.34 with an ideal subwoofer. Its horn-centered layout and four surrounding woofers offer a compact, controlled-radiation monitor, with a measured -3dB point around 49Hz. The linked Sound on Sound review also supports its use for detailed monitoring.
Cons: The nominal 60-by-60-degree pattern calls for careful aiming and gives less freedom to move than wide-dispersion monitors.
Full Reflector Audio Square Two review and specifications →
| AES Input | Yes |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 250W to woofers, 100W to compression driver (Hypex Class-D) |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | Yes |
| Country | Made in Latvia |
| Dimensions | 12.6”W x 13.6”H x 12.8”D (320 x 345 x 325 mm) |
| Drivers | 4x 5” woofers, 1x horn-loaded compression driver (ring diaphragm) |
| Enclosure | 2-way active coaxial horn monitor, bass-reflex (convertible to sealed) |
| Frequency Response | 40Hz-26kHz (-6dB) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | Analogue XLR/RCA, AES digital XLR, S/PDIF, TOSLINK optical |
| Maximum SPL | 118dB @ 1m (EIA-426B, single monitor) (manufacturer specified) |
| Optical Input | Yes |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.52 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.34 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 42.8 lbs (19.4 kg) each |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Neumann KH80 DSP
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs JBL 305P MKII
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Kali Audio IN-5
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs KEF LSX II LT
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs ADAM Audio T5V
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Kali Audio LP-UNF
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Yamaha HS5
- See all 13 comparisons
Its measured 1.1dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz is excellent, but the price and its 60-by-60-degree pattern call for deliberate room placement rather than a drop-in desktop upgrade.
The Aalto Speakers Aalto 9: €29,990 per pair Aalto Speakers eBay
Same family: the Aalto Speakers Aalto 1 EVO (smallest bookshelf, rated 4.3/5), the Aalto Speakers Aalto 3 Passive (bookshelf, rated 4.2/5) and the Aalto Speakers Aalto 3 Active Pro (largest bookshelf, rated 4.7/5).
Pros: Manufacturer measurements give it a 8.24 preference score without a subwoofer and 8.84 with an ideal one, the highest standard score of any speaker we list. Bass is flat to 20.3Hz at -3dB, so it needs no subwoofer at all. The 1.3dB reference band, 0.96 listening-window smoothness and 0.36dB average on-axis deviation mean a very even tonal balance, and the horn-loaded compression driver with a 10-inch midrange keeps directivity controlled into the treble. Built-in 1500W amplification, AES/EBU and USB inputs, optional Dante and FourAudio room correction make it a complete active system.
Cons: The data is the manufacturer’s own and spinorama rates its quality as low, so the scores lack independent confirmation. At €29,990 per pair it is sold only by Aalto Speakers in Finland, made to order and currently on back order. The 21-inch woofer makes for a very large cabinet that needs a big room.
Full Aalto Speakers Aalto 9 review and specifications →
| AES Input | Yes |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 1500W total per speaker |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | below 20Hz (measured, manufacturer data on spinorama.org) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 20.3Hz (measured, manufacturer data on spinorama.org) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Country | Made in Finland |
| Crossover Frequency | 220Hz and 1.45kHz |
| DSP | FourAudio room correction software (Windows/Mac), touchscreen control |
| Drivers | 21” paper-cone woofer, 10” paper-cone midrange, 1” compression driver on horn |
| Enclosure | 3-way active, bass reflex |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz-24kHz (manufacturer) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | Analogue XLR, AES/EBU XLR, USB, optional Dante |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | No |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 8.24 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.84 |
| USB Input | Yes |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Manufacturer measurements give it an 8.24 preference score, with bass flat to about 20Hz from a 21-inch woofer, 1500W of amplification and FourAudio room correction. It is made to order in Finland and sold only direct, at €29,990 a pair.
The Grimm Audio LS1c + SB1: $43,440 per pair The Listening Room $43,440 eBay
Pros: Independently measured by Audio Science Review as a complete system with its SB1 subwoofers, with 0.83 listening-window smoothness and 0.38dB average on-axis deviation. ASR found the widest horizontal dispersion it had measured, very clean decay and distortion that stays low at 86 and 96dB. The -10dB point sits near 28.9Hz, and the SB1’s motional feedback controls the 10-inch woofer. It is a complete active system with Hypex NCore amplification, DSP crossovers and analog, AES/EBU and USB inputs. Measured bass extension of 28.9Hz (-10dB).
Cons: The standard preference score is only 5.73, rising to 7.54 with an ideal subwoofer, because spinorama puts the system’s -6dB point at 45.4Hz despite the subwoofers. At $43440 per pair with the SB1s, it costs far more than active systems that score higher. ASR measured a maximum of about 105dB, modest output for the price. Custom finishes add weeks to the dealer lead time.
Full Grimm Audio LS1c + SB1 review and specifications →
| Released | 2024 (2 years ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | Yes |
| Amplifier Power | 240W woofer and 100W tweeter per speaker (Hypex NCore); 400W per SB1 subwoofer |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | approximately 28.9Hz (measured, spinorama.org ASR data) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Country | Made in the Netherlands |
| Dimensions | 45.3”H x 20.5”W x 6.3”D (1150 x 521 x 160 mm) |
| Drivers | TPCD carbon composite tweeter (Seas); 8” Seas midrange-woofer; 10” up-firing SB1 subwoofer |
| Enclosure | Active 2-way monitor on stand with integrated SB1 sealed subwoofer (3-way system) |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz-27kHz +0.5/-3dB with SB1 (manufacturer) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | Analog XLR, 3x AES/EBU, USB |
| Maximum SPL | 105dB (measured by ASR) |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | No |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.73 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.54 |
| USB Input | Yes |
| Weight | 119 lbs (54 kg) each with SB1 |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Audio Science Review measured almost perfectly flat on-axis response and very wide dispersion from the complete system. Maximum output of about 105dB is modest for $43440 a pair.
What To Check Before Buying
Combo jacks: many “XLR” inputs are actually combo XLR/TRS jacks that accept either connector, so check whether a speaker needs a dedicated XLR cable or can also take a 1/4” plug from the same port.
Cable length and run: the main benefit of XLR over an unbalanced RCA or 3.5mm connection shows up on longer runs or when a cable shares a path with other cables. On a short direct desktop run, the practical difference is smaller.
Gain staging: a preamp, interface or mixer’s output level needs to be matched to the speaker’s input sensitivity. Check both devices’ specifications rather than assuming line level is standardized identically everywhere.
Where To Go Next
See the best studio monitors for the full set of picks these XLR-equipped monitors are drawn from, or every powered speaker with a TRS input for the other common balanced connector.
Related guides: powered speaker inputs explained, best powered speakers for a computer desk, and the powered speaker buyer’s guide.