Short answer: the KEF Muo gen2 for better sound quality, the Tribit Stormbox for the lower price. The KEF Muo gen2 ranks #73 of 136 medium speakers at $249.99. The Tribit Stormbox ranks #93 at $68, $181.99 cheaper.
What the KEF Muo gen2 offers: KEF seemed to have fixed the rolled off treble and overall balance Watch for: Lacking deeper bass. Very thuddy bass. Appears to be the exact same hardware but with updated tuning. Bass distorts as volume increases, and the claimed 43Hz extension is really only audible at low listening volumes, with a few seconds of lag after volume changes. Loses most of its bass off-axis. Customer reviews are mixed, ranging from praise for detail at low volume to complaints of a boxy, hollow sound.
What the Tribit Stormbox offers: IPX7 water resistant, dual pairing for stereo setup, excellent battery life (20 hours), instant on/off buttons, 97dB max volume Watch for: Muffled sounding, treble dips from 5khz-12khz. Listening from the front is the worst frequency response, lay it down facing up with xbass off for the smoothest response. Not technically a 360 speaker, only front and rear.
Buy the KEF Muo gen2 if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Tribit Stormbox if the price matters more than sound quality.
Specifications Side By Side
| KEF Muo gen2 | Tribit Stormbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $249.99 | $68 |
| Ranked | #73 of 136 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers | #93 of 136 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers |
| App | Yes | No |
| Battery Life | 24 hours (Manufacturer specified) | 20 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, aptX Adaptive up to 48 KHz 24 bit | SBC |
| IP Rating | IP67 | IPX7 |
| Party Mode | Yes (Auracast) | No |
| Stereo | Yes | - |
| Omnidirectional | No | Yes |
| TWS | Yes | Yes |
| Digital Aux Input | Yes (USB-C) | No |
| Weight | 1.6 lbs / 740 g | 1.2 lbs / 535 g |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| Drivers | 1x 58x117mm racetrack woofer, 1x 20mm tweeter | 2x 45mm full-range drivers + 2x passive radiators |
| Dimensions | 8.5" x 3.2" x 2.3" (216 x 82 x 59 mm) | 7.1" x 2.7" x 2.7" (180 x 68 x 68 mm) |
| Frequency Response | 43Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) | - |
| Output Power | 40W | 20W |
| Max Volume | 90dB | 97dB |
| Aux Input | - | Yes |
| Aux Latency | - | 0ms |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | - | 52Hz |
| Built in Microphone | - | Yes |
| EQ | - | No |
| Bluetooth Latency | - | 166ms |
| Power Input | - | USB-C |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:
- Bose Soundlink Revolve vs Sony SRS-XB20
- Bose Soundlink Mini 2 vs Sony SRS-XE300
- Bose Soundlink Mini 2 vs Sony SRS-XB20
- JBL Charge 5 Wifi vs Tribit Stormbox
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Tribit Stormbox
Prices on this page were last checked August 27, 2026 at 10:09 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
KEF Muo gen2: $249.99 Amazon eBay
Pros: KEF seemed to have fixed the rolled off treble and overall balance
Cons: Lacking deeper bass. Very thuddy bass. Appears to be the exact same hardware but with updated tuning. Bass distorts as volume increases, and the claimed 43Hz extension is really only audible at low listening volumes, with a few seconds of lag after volume changes. Loses most of its bass off-axis. Customer reviews are mixed, ranging from praise for detail at low volume to complaints of a boxy, hollow sound.
Full KEF Muo gen2 review and specifications →
| App | Yes |
|---|---|
| Battery Life | 24 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, aptX Adaptive up to 48 KHz 24 bit |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.4 |
| Digital Aux Input | Yes (USB-C) |
| Dimensions | 8.5" x 3.2" x 2.3" (216 x 82 x 59 mm) |
| Drivers | 1x 58x117mm racetrack woofer, 1x 20mm tweeter |
| Frequency Response | 43Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| IP Rating | IP67 |
| Max Volume | 90dB |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Output Power | 40W |
| Party Mode | Yes (Auracast) |
| Stereo | Yes |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 1.6 lbs / 740 g |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Tribit Stormbox: $68 Amazon eBay
Pros: IPX7 water resistant, dual pairing for stereo setup, excellent battery life (20 hours), instant on/off buttons, 97dB max volume
Cons: Muffled sounding, treble dips from 5khz-12khz. Listening from the front is the worst frequency response, lay it down facing up with xbass off for the smoothest response. Not technically a 360 speaker, only front and rear.
Full Tribit Stormbox review and specifications →
| App | No |
|---|---|
| Aux Input | Yes |
| Aux Latency | 0ms |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 52Hz |
| Battery Life | 20 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC |
| Bluetooth Latency | 166ms |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.0 |
| Built in Microphone | Yes |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 7.1" x 2.7" x 2.7" (180 x 68 x 68 mm) |
| Drivers | 2x 45mm full-range drivers + 2x passive radiators |
| EQ | No |
| IP Rating | IPX7 |
| Max Volume | 97dB |
| Omnidirectional | Yes |
| Output Power | 20W |
| Party Mode | No |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 1.2 lbs / 535 g |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Alan Ross Reviews: All Tribit Speakers Compared - Maxsound Plus, Stormbox, Xsound Go, Maxboom More from alanrossreviews →
- Alan Ross Reviews: Earfun Uboom vs Tribit Stormbox - 360 degree bluetooth speaker comparison
- Alan Ross Reviews: Tribit Stormbox Pro Review - vs Tribit Stormbox - bass monster?? 🤔
- Reddit Search for Tribit Stormbox Review
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Tribit Stormbox vs Sony SRS-XB20
- Tribit Stormbox vs Sony SRS-XE300
- Tribit Stormbox vs Yamaha True X Speaker 1A
- Tribit Stormbox vs Klipsch Groove/Heritage Groove
- Tribit Stormbox vs Ultimate Ears Boom 3
- Tribit Stormbox vs Ultimate Ears Boom 4
- Tribit Stormbox vs Bose SoundLink Color II
- Tribit Stormbox vs Ultimate Ears Wonderboom
- See all 74 comparisons


