Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R vs AKG K371

Short answer: the Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R. It ranks #35 of 216 over-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 4.2/5, at $159.99; the AKG K371 ranks #39, rated 4.1/5, and costs $179, so there is little reason to consider the other one.

The case for the Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R: A preference score of 86 in crinacle’s measurement shows it tracks the Harman target closely, with a smoothness of 1.9 dB. The tradeoff: Only the overall score is available, so there is no band by band breakdown of where it deviates from target.

What the AKG K371 does well: A preference score of 85 with only 1.66 dB of deviation makes it one of the smoother closed-back models, and sub-bass runs about 1.6 dB above target for a full, extended low end. The tradeoff: A 7 dB dip near 3.9 kHz and presence about 2.6 dB low push vocals and instrument detail back, while air above 10 kHz is roughly 3.5 dB low, so the sound is dark and lacks sparkle.

Buy the Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R. It is rated higher for sound quality than the AKG K371 and costs less, so only choose the other one for a particular feature it does better.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Related Headphone Comparisons

More worthwhile head-to-heads for Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R:

• Beyerdynamic DT 880 vs Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R
• Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R vs FiiO JT7
• Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R vs Audio-Technica ATH-R50x
• AKG K371 vs Audio-Technica ATH-R50x
• AKG K371 vs HIFIMAN Sundara

Prices on this page were last checked October 11, 2026 at 4:59 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Headphones In Full

Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R: $159.99 Amazon eBay

Pros: A preference score of 86 in crinacle’s measurement shows it tracks the Harman target closely, with a smoothness of 1.9 dB. The 32 ohm impedance and 96 dB sensitivity mean it runs fine from a phone or laptop, and 290 g is manageable for an open-back design. It shares its rating with the FiiO FT1 Pro at a lower price.

Cons: Only the overall score is available, so there is no band by band breakdown of where it deviates from target. The open back leaks sound and offers no isolation, and there is no built-in microphone, so it suits quiet listening and desk use rather than commuting or calls.

Full Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R review and specifications →

Released	2019 (7 years ago)
Back	Open
Built-in Microphone	No
Connection	Wired
Deviation From Target	1.90 dB standard deviation
Form Factor	Over-ear
Frequency Response	5Hz - 35kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Harman Preference Score	86 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ)
Impedance	32 ohms
Sensitivity	96 dB SPL
Tonal Tilt	-0.30 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Weight	0.6 lbs (290 g)

EQ preset to match the Harman target

Set a preamp of -5.9 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.

Filter	Frequency	Gain	Q
Low shelf	105 Hz	+16.5 dB	0.70
Peak	43 Hz	-14.1 dB	0.32
Peak	2,772 Hz	+2.4 dB	1.07
Peak	626 Hz	+2.7 dB	1.03
Peak	5,621 Hz	-6.0 dB	5.22
High shelf	10,000 Hz	-6.3 dB	0.70
Peak	4,679 Hz	+1.3 dB	6.00
Peak	23 Hz	-0.5 dB	4.16
Peak	30 Hz	+0.3 dB	2.29
Peak	6,882 Hz	+1.3 dB	5.99

• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • AutoEQ results for the Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R (crinacle measurement)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R vs FiiO JT7
  • Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R vs Beyerdynamic DT 880
  • Beyerdynamic TYGR 300 R vs Audio-Technica ATH-R50x

AKG K371: $179.00 Amazon eBay

Pros: A preference score of 85 with only 1.66 dB of deviation makes it one of the smoother closed-back models, and sub-bass runs about 1.6 dB above target for a full, extended low end. At 32 ohms and 114 dB per volt it is easy to drive from a phone, and the closed design isolates reasonably well. The warm tilt suits listeners who want bass without harshness.

Cons: A 7 dB dip near 3.9 kHz and presence about 2.6 dB low push vocals and instrument detail back, while air above 10 kHz is roughly 3.5 dB low, so the sound is dark and lacks sparkle. Fans of a bright or highly detailed presentation will find it veiled.

Full AKG K371 review and specifications →

Released	Aug 2019 (7 years ago)
Back	Closed
Connection	Wired
Deviation From Target	1.66 dB standard deviation
Driver Type	Dynamic
Drivers	1 x 50mm dynamic
Form Factor	Over-ear
Frequency Response	5Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Harman Preference Score	85 (measured by oratory1990, via AutoEQ)
Impedance	32 ohms
Sensitivity	114 dB SPL/V
Sub-bass Extension	Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+2.1 dB at 30 Hz)
Tonal Tilt	-0.57 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Weight	0.6 lbs (255 g)

EQ preset to match the Harman target

Set a preamp of -5.6 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.

Filter	Frequency	Gain	Q
Low shelf	105 Hz	-2.7 dB	0.70
Peak	182 Hz	-2.3 dB	1.23
Peak	4,038 Hz	+5.0 dB	3.60
Peak	67 Hz	+3.1 dB	1.41
Peak	1,066 Hz	-0.8 dB	2.57
High shelf	10,000 Hz	+2.4 dB	0.70
Peak	5,564 Hz	-1.6 dB	3.89
Peak	4,232 Hz	+0.9 dB	5.03
Peak	524 Hz	+0.3 dB	1.66
Peak	2,048 Hz	+0.5 dB	4.67

• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • AutoEQ results for the AKG K371 (oratory1990 measurement)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • AKG K371 vs Audio-Technica ATH-R50x
  • AKG K371 vs Sennheiser HD 25 Plus
  • AKG K371 vs HIFIMAN Sundara