Revel F208 vs Klipsch RP-6000F II

Last updated: October 9, 2026

Short answer: the Revel F228Be, if you are buying new. The Revel F208 ranks higher than the Klipsch RP-6000F II (#28 vs #140 of 226 floorstanding speakers) but is discontinued; its replacement, the Revel F228Be, is rated 4.5/5 at $11,000 and is still sold new.

Revel F208 vs Klipsch RP-6000F II

The Revel F208 is the more accurate, deeper-bass option. CEA2034 spinorama shows a fairly even on-axis response with sensitivity matching spec at ~87-88dB. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 6.35 against 5.74 for the Klipsch RP-6000F II. Its bass reaches about 47Hz before falling 3dB, against 67Hz for the Klipsch RP-6000F II. The catch: Some directivity error and tweeter-response ripple right at the 2.2kHz crossover point.

What the Klipsch RP-6000F II does well: Highest power handling and clean, well-behaved compression at typical volumes. The catch: Worse baffle-step coloration than the smaller Klipsch RP-5000F II (3-4dB swing vs 2dB), plus a sibilance issue the 5000F doesn’t have: a real regression in tonal balance despite the higher price.

Buy the Revel F228Be, the replacement for the discontinued Revel F208; it is rated higher for sound quality than the Klipsch RP-6000F II.

Still deciding? The full Passive Home rankings cover every ranked option.

Specifications Side By Side

Revel F208 Klipsch RP-6000F II
Price$4,800 per pair used, Discontinued$999.98 per pair
Ranked#28 of 226 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#140 of 226 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)24Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)33Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions46.6”H x 13.5”W x 14.8”D (1183.6 x 342.9 x 375.9 mm)39.6” x 9.3” x 17.6” (1006 x 236 x 446 mm)
Impedance8 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured, Audio Science Review)8 ohms nominal (3.7 ohms minimum, measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DriversDual 8” (20 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Woofers, 5.25” (13.3 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Midrange, 1” (2.5 cm) Aluminum Tweeter with Acoustic Lens Waveguide1” titanium tweeter with Tractrix horn, dual 6.5” cerametallic woofers
Sensitivity88.2dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 88.5dB manufacturer specified)90dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)
Weight79.4 lbs (36 kg) each49.4 lbs (22.4 kg)
Woofer Cabinetported, frontported, rear
Spinorama Preference Score6.355.74
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.677.47
DIY KitNoNo
Frequency Response-38Hz - 25kHz (+-3dB, Manufacturer specified)
Crossover Frequency-1770Hz
Power Handling-125W continuous, 500W peak

How Revel F208 compares with other leading options:

Prices on this page were last checked October 9, 2026 at 8:01 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Revel F208: $4,800 per pair used Discontinued eBay

Revel F208 ranking card

Newer model: the Revel F228Be, ranked lower, rated 4.5/5. See every Revel Performa generation.

Same family: the Revel M105 (smaller bookshelf, rated 4.2/5), the Revel M106 (larger bookshelf, rated 4.6/5), the Revel F206 (smaller floorstanding, ranked lower, rated 4.5/5), the Revel Performa3 C205 (smaller center, rated 4.1/5) and the Revel Performa3 C208 (larger center, rated 4/5).

Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows a fairly even on-axis response with sensitivity matching spec at ~87-88dB. Predicted in-room response is a smooth, textbook-quality downward slope that should translate well to most rooms without correction. Early reflections sum so cleanly with the direct sound that side-wall absorption isn’t recommended: it would work against the speaker’s naturally well-integrated off-axis behavior. Distortion stays below 0.5% from 100Hz up at 96dB/1m, with all distortion components falling below audible threshold above 200Hz. Very wide horizontal directivity of about ±75 degrees. Measured performance was judged very close to the flagship Revel Ultima2 Salon2, and Revel’s speakers (including this one) are developed using Harman’s double-blind listening test methodology. Preference score of 7.4 (7.7 with a subwoofer added). Measured bass extension of 47Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 88.2dB.

Cons: Some directivity error and tweeter-response ripple right at the 2.2kHz crossover point. A notable on-axis dip at about 4kHz, attributed to probable cabinet diffraction. Cumulative spectral decay (waterfall) shows an unexplained resonance around 4-5kHz that the reviewer couldn’t pin down a clear cause for. Vertical directivity shows narrowband interference nulls just above and below the tweeter axis (roughly 2-3kHz), typical of a non-coaxial tower with vertically separated drivers, so listening height matters more than it would with a coincident design. Minimum impedance dips to 3.4 ohms, calling for a robust, high-current amplifier. Distortion climbs substantially below about 80-100Hz (up to ~5% in the deep bass) when driven hard, an excursion-limited trade-off typical of towers at high output. Isolating the woofers alone shows their usable range ending around 500-700Hz at the crossover, with somewhat elevated (though still low in absolute terms) 2nd/3rd harmonic distortion in the 100-300Hz region. Discontinued.

Bass Extension (-10dB)24Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions46.6”H x 13.5”W x 14.8”D (1183.6 x 342.9 x 375.9 mm)
DriversDual 8” (20 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Woofers, 5.25” (13.3 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Midrange, 1” (2.5 cm) Aluminum Tweeter with Acoustic Lens Waveguide
Impedance8 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured, Audio Science Review)
Sensitivity88.2dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 88.5dB manufacturer specified)
Spinorama Preference Score6.35
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.67
Weight79.4 lbs (36 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, front

Klipsch RP-6000F II: $999.98 per pair Amazon eBay

Klipsch RP-6000F II ranking card

Same family: the Klipsch RP-500M II (smaller bookshelf, rated 4/5), the Klipsch RP-600M II (larger bookshelf, rated 3.7/5), the Klipsch RP-5000F II (smaller floorstanding, ranked higher, rated 4/5), the Klipsch RP-8000F II (larger floorstanding, ranked higher, rated 3.9/5), the Klipsch RP-8060FA II (larger floorstanding, ranked lower, estimated 3.8/5), the Klipsch RP-404C II (smallest center, rated 3.7/5), the Klipsch RP-500C II (center, rated 3.9/5), the Klipsch RP-504C II (largest center, rated 3.8/5), the Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500SA II (smaller surround, estimated 3.5/5) and the Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-502S II (larger surround, estimated 3.5/5).

Pros: Highest power handling and clean, well-behaved compression at typical volumes. Precise imaging from the controlled horn directivity. Measured bass extension of 67Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 90dB.

Cons: Worse baffle-step coloration than the smaller Klipsch RP-5000F II (3-4dB swing vs 2dB), plus a sibilance issue the 5000F doesn’t have: a real regression in tonal balance despite the higher price. Bass extension is mixed (less deep at -3dB (67Hz) than the 5000F) and needs a subwoofer regardless. Narrow horizontal dispersion (~50-60 degrees).

Bass Extension (-10dB)33Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Crossover Frequency1770Hz
DIY KitNo
Dimensions39.6” x 9.3” x 17.6” (1006 x 236 x 446 mm)
Drivers1” titanium tweeter with Tractrix horn, dual 6.5” cerametallic woofers
Frequency Response38Hz - 25kHz (+-3dB, Manufacturer specified)
Impedance8 ohms nominal (3.7 ohms minimum, measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Power Handling125W continuous, 500W peak
Sensitivity90dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score5.74
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.47
Weight49.4 lbs (22.4 kg)
Woofer Cabinetported, rear