KEF Blade Two Meta vs Revel F208

Last updated: September 19, 2026

Short answer: the Blade Two Meta for dispersion, the Revel F208 for an even on-axis response. The Blade’s four 6.5in mid-bass drivers flank a coincident mid/tweeter for matched ~50 degree horizontal dispersion, though a 2dB dip and slight resonance around 200Hz remain. The F208’s CEA2034 spinorama shows a fairly even on-axis response with sensitivity matching spec at ~87-88dB, but some directivity error and ripple sit right at the 2.2kHz crossover.

KEF Blade Two Meta vs Revel F208

What the KEF Blade Two Meta gets right: True point-source coaxial design (four 6.5in mid-bass drivers flanking a coincident mid/tweeter) with matched ~50 degree horizontal. Set against that: 2dB dip and slight resonance around 200Hz, also visible in KEF white paper and likely cabinet-related.

On the Revel F208 side: CEA2034 spinorama shows a fairly even on-axis response with sensitivity matching spec at ~87-88dB. The catch: Some directivity error and tweeter-response ripple right at the 2.2kHz crossover point.

Worth knowing: the Revel F208 is discontinued, though it still ranks #15 of 71 floorstanding speakers by sound quality, so a used unit beats most of what is still sold new.

Buy the KEF Blade Two Meta if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Revel F208 if the price matters more than sound quality.

Still deciding? The full Passive Home rankings cover every ranked option.

Specifications Side By Side

KEF Blade Two Meta Revel F208
Price$28000 per pair only sold in stores$2400 per pair used, Discontinued
Ranked#2 of 71 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#15 of 71 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)26Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)24Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)31Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Dimensions46.6"H x 13.5"W x 14.8"D (1183.6 x 342.9 x 375.9 mm)46.6"H x 13.5"W x 14.8"D (1183.6 x 342.9 x 375.9 mm)
Impedance4 ohms nominal (3.3 ohms minimum, measured, Erin's Audio Corner)8 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured, Audio Science Review)
Drivers4 x 165 mm (6.5 in.) aluminium cone, force cancelling woofers, 125 mm (5 in.) aluminium cone midrange, 25 mm (1 in.) aluminium dome with MAT tweeterDual 8" (20 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Woofers, 5.25" (13.3 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Midrange, 1" (2.5 cm) Aluminum Tweeter with Acoustic Lens Waveguide
Sensitivity86.8dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)88.2dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 88.5dB manufacturer specified)
Weight79.4 lbs (36 kg) each79.4 lbs (36 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, rearported, front
Spinorama Preference Score6.255.65
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.376.97
Discontinued-Yes

More worthwhile head-to-heads for KEF Blade Two Meta:

Prices on this page were last checked September 22, 2026 at 5:11 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

KEF Blade Two Meta: $28000 per pair only sold in stores eBay

KEF Blade Two Meta ranking card

Pros: True point-source coaxial design (four 6.5in mid-bass drivers flanking a coincident mid/tweeter) with matched ~50 degree horizontal and vertical dispersion, unusual for a multi-driver speaker. Fully rounded, edgeless cabinet eliminates baffle diffraction. Frequency response holds within about 2.5dB across the listening window. Extremely low harmonic and multitone distortion even at 96dB, with under 0.5dB of compression at full output, rivaling the Reference 1 Meta and JBL 4367 in dynamic range. Reviewer described the imaging and soundstage depth as revealing recording details other speakers he tested (PS Audio FR10, MoFi SourcePoint 8, Neumann KH80) masked. Available in any custom finish at no extra charge. Measured bass extension of 31Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 86.8dB.

Cons: 2dB dip and slight resonance around 200Hz, also visible in KEF white paper and likely cabinet-related. Bass rolls off fairly quickly below its 31Hz F3. Horizontal dispersion (~50 degrees) is narrower than the reviewer preferred 70-80 degrees; benefits from toeing out 10-20 degrees to open soundstage without losing image focus. Needs a separate power amp, not AVR-friendly.

Bass Extension (-10dB)26Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)31Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions46.6"H x 13.5"W x 14.8"D (1183.6 x 342.9 x 375.9 mm)
Drivers4 x 165 mm (6.5 in.) aluminium cone, force cancelling woofers, 125 mm (5 in.) aluminium cone midrange, 25 mm (1 in.) aluminium dome with MAT tweeter
Impedance4 ohms nominal (3.3 ohms minimum, measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity86.8dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score6.25
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.37
Weight79.4 lbs (36 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

Revel F208: $2400 per pair used, Discontinued eBay

Revel F208 ranking card

Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows a fairly even on-axis response with sensitivity matching spec at ~87-88dB. Predicted in-room response is a smooth, textbook-quality downward slope that should translate well to most rooms without correction. Early reflections sum so cleanly with the direct sound that side-wall absorption isn’t recommended - it would work against the speaker’s naturally well-integrated off-axis behavior. Distortion stays below 0.5% from 100Hz up at 96dB/1m, with all distortion components falling below audible threshold above 200Hz. Very wide horizontal directivity of about ±75 degrees. Measured performance was judged very close to Revel’s own flagship Salon2, and Revel’s speakers (including this one) are developed using Harman’s double-blind listening test methodology. Preference score of 6.6 (7.7 with a subwoofer added). Measured bass extension of 47Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 88.2dB.

Cons: Some directivity error and tweeter-response ripple right at the 2.2kHz crossover point. A notable on-axis dip at about 4kHz, attributed to probable cabinet diffraction. Cumulative spectral decay (waterfall) shows an unexplained resonance around 4-5kHz that the reviewer couldn’t pin down a clear cause for. Vertical directivity shows narrowband interference nulls just above and below the tweeter axis (roughly 2-3kHz), typical of a non-coaxial tower with vertically separated drivers, so listening height matters more than it would with a coincident design. Minimum impedance dips to 3.4 ohms, calling for a robust, high-current amplifier. Distortion climbs substantially below about 80-100Hz (up to ~5% in the deep bass) when driven hard, an excursion-limited trade-off typical of towers at high output. Isolating the woofers alone shows their usable range ending around 500-700Hz at the crossover, with somewhat elevated (though still low in absolute terms) 2nd/3rd harmonic distortion in the 100-300Hz region. Discontinued.

Bass Extension (-10dB)24Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Dimensions46.6"H x 13.5"W x 14.8"D (1183.6 x 342.9 x 375.9 mm)
DiscontinuedYes
DriversDual 8" (20 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Woofers, 5.25" (13.3 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Midrange, 1" (2.5 cm) Aluminum Tweeter with Acoustic Lens Waveguide
Impedance8 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured, Audio Science Review)
Sensitivity88.2dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 88.5dB manufacturer specified)
Spinorama Preference Score5.65
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.97
Weight79.4 lbs (36 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, front