The Klipsch RP-500M II ranks #20 out of 122 total Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers for sound quality. See all Passive Home rankings for every top pick.
Brand: Klipsch
Prices on this page were last checked October 5, 2026 at 10:21 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
#20 Klipsch RP-500M II: $399.99 per pair Amazon eBay
Older model: the Klipsch RP-500M (ranked lower, rated 3.4/5).
Larger models: the Klipsch RP-600M II (rated 3.7/5), the Klipsch RP-5000F II (rated 4/5), the Klipsch RP-6000F II (rated 3.9/5) and the Klipsch RP-8000F II (rated 3.9/5).
Pros: Major mid-range clarity improvement over the original RP-500M: about a 5dB fill-in between 1-3kHz in the estimated in-room response, giving a noticeably more resolved, detailed midrange. More neutral and linear overall than its sibling RP-600M II, which carries about 2-3dB more high-frequency energy and a touch more bass but less overall balance. Very precise soundstage imaging and instrument placement. Distortion through the midrange is cleaner than the previous generation. Measured bass extension of 67Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85dB.
Cons: Klipsch’s quoted sensitivity (around 92-93dB) uses an unconventional in-room-based rating rather than the standard anechoic measurement; on an anechoic basis it measures closer to about 85dB, in line with typical bookshelf speakers this size, so it isn’t the outlier in efficiency the spec sheet implies. Horizontal dispersion of about ±40-50° is narrower and more directive than the reviewer’s preference for a wider, more enveloping soundstage. Toeing the speaker out to widen the soundstage or soften on-axis brightness comes at some cost to imaging precision. Slightly less clean in the tweeter region than the midrange, likely tied to crossover placement, though not considered a dealbreaker. Low-frequency output is limited: measured around 95dB at 4 meters for the pair before the woofers started to unload, so a subwoofer is recommended for anyone wanting real bass rather than stepping up to a larger model.
Related speakers: Klipsch RP-500M.
How it compares: Just above it: Wharfedale Diamond 12.1i - $99 more, 3Hz higher bass extension (-3dB). Just below it: Wharfedale Super Denton - $1099 more, 1.6Hz higher bass extension (-3dB).
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Crossover Frequency | 1530Hz |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 13.6”H x 6.8”W x 10.6”D (344.4 x 173 x 270.5 mm) |
| Drivers | 5.25” Cerametallic™ cone woofer with Faraday rings, 1” LTS Titanium diaphragm tweeter with Hybrid Cross-Section Expanded Tractrix® horn |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal, 3.3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 85dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.22 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.84 |
| Weight | 13 lbs (5.9 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
Head-to-Head Comparisons
40 comparisons- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Wharfedale Super Denton
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Wharfedale Diamond 12.1
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Revel M105
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Moondrop M4P MTM
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Radiant Acoustics Clarity 4.2
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Arendal 1961 Monitor
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs KEF LS50 Meta
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Ascend Sierra 1 v2
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs KEF Q150
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Audio First Fidelia
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Wharfedale Diamond 220
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Polk Audio XT15
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Neumi Silk 4
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Boston Acoustics A25
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Klipsch RP-500M
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs JBL Studio 530
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.2
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Sony SS-CS5 M2
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Paradigm Monitor SE Atom
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs JBL Stage 250B
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Dynaudio Emit M10
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs ELAC BS U5
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Dynaudio X14
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Pioneer SP-BS22-LR (Philharmonic AAM Mod)
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs JBL L52 Classic
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs JBL Stage A120
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs KEF Q100
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Q Acoustics 3020i
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Zaph Audio ZA5.2 TM
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Micca RB42
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Q Acoustics 5020
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs JBL Stage A130
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Fluance Signature HFS
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs JBL Control 1 Pro
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Polk T15
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Definitive Technology ProMonitor 1000
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Pioneer Elite SP-EBS73-LR
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Klipsch R-41M
No comparisons match that search.
