Short answer: the Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G for better sound quality, the Klipsch RP-500M II for the lower price. The Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G ranks #14 of [92 bookshelf speakers](/passive/bookshelf-medium/#monitor-audio-silver-50-0 lbs (7 g)), rated 4.2/5, at $799. The Klipsch RP-500M II ranks #18, rated 4.0/5, at $389.99, $409.01 cheaper.
Buy the Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G if sound quality is the priority over the price, or the Klipsch RP-500M II if the price is the priority over sound quality.
Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G | Klipsch RP-500M II | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $799 per pair | $389.99 per pair |
| Ranked | #14 of 92 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers | #18 of 92 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Enclosure | ported | - |
| Drivers | 1” C-CAM Gold Dome tweeter, 5.25” C-CAM RST II mid bass driver | 5.25” Cerametallic™ cone woofer with Faraday rings, 1” LTS Titanium diaphragm tweeter with Hybrid Cross-Section Expanded Tractrix® horn |
| Dimensions | 11.1”H x 6.5”W x 10.7”D (282 x 165 x 272 mm) | 13.6”H x 6.8”W x 10.6”D (344.4 x 173 x 270.5 mm) |
| Weight | 12.3 lbs (5.6 kg) each | 13 lbs (5.9 kg) each |
| Sensitivity | 86dB @ 2.83V/1m | 85dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal, 3.9 ohms minimum | 8 ohms nominal, 3.3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 87.9Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50.7Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Crossover Frequency | 2.6kHz | 1530Hz |
| Port Tuning | 58Hz | - |
| Power Handling | 100W RMS handling, 40-100W recommended amplifier power | - |
| Warranty | Lifetime, parts and labor | - |
| Country | China | - |
| Maximum SPL | 104dB (manufacturer specified) | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.40 | 5.22 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.01 | 7.84 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
| Woofer Cabinet | - | ported, rear |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G compares with other leading options:
- Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G vs Audio First Fidelia
- Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G vs Philharmonic Ceramic Mini
- Ascend Sierra 1 v2 vs Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G
- KEF LS50 Meta vs Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G
- XMechanik Mechano23 DIY vs Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G
Prices on this page were last checked October 3, 2026 at 10:26 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G: $799 per pair Crutchfield eBay
Pros: The 7th generation C-CAM Gold Dome tweeter with UD Waveguide II and RST II mid bass driver produce a listening window smoothness score of 0.50 at an accessible price, earning a Hi-Fi News Outstanding Product Award. A HiVe II reflex port system is tuned to 58Hz for real bass weight from a compact 5.25 inch two way. Measured bass extension of 87.9Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The on axis response trends noticeably upward toward the treble (rising about 0.5dB per octave, a steep tilt), which can read as bright on already bright recordings. Off axis sound also tracks the on axis response less consistently than most speakers here. Bass extension is limited to a measured 87.9Hz at -3dB, so a subwoofer is recommended for full range use, and minimum impedance dips to 3.9 ohms at 250Hz.
Full Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50.7Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 87.9Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Country | China |
| Crossover Frequency | 2.6kHz |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 11.1”H x 6.5”W x 10.7”D (282 x 165 x 272 mm) |
| Drivers | 1” C-CAM Gold Dome tweeter, 5.25” C-CAM RST II mid bass driver |
| Enclosure | ported |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal, 3.9 ohms minimum |
| Maximum SPL | 104dB (manufacturer specified) |
| Port Tuning | 58Hz |
| Power Handling | 100W RMS handling, 40-100W recommended amplifier power |
| Sensitivity | 86dB @ 2.83V/1m |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.40 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.01 |
| Warranty | Lifetime, parts and labor |
| Weight | 12.3 lbs (5.6 kg) each |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G vs Revel M105
- Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G vs Elac Carina BS243.4
- Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G vs Aalto Speakers Aalto 1 EVO
- Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G vs Ascend Acoustics Luna V2 Mini-Monitor Titan
- Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G vs Wharfedale Super Denton
- Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G vs Arendal 1961 Monitor
- Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G vs Wharfedale Diamond 12.1
- Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G vs Ascend Acoustics HTM-200SE2
- See all 29 comparisons
Klipsch RP-500M II: $389.99 per pair Amazon eBay
Older model: the Klipsch RP-500M (ranked lower, rated 3.4/5).
Pros: Major mid-range clarity improvement over the original RP-500M: about a 5dB fill-in between 1-3kHz in the estimated in-room response, giving a noticeably more resolved, detailed midrange. More neutral and linear overall than its sibling RP-600M II, which carries about 2-3dB more high-frequency energy and a touch more bass but less overall balance. Very precise soundstage imaging and instrument placement. Distortion through the midrange is cleaner than the previous generation. Measured bass extension of 67Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85dB.
Cons: Klipsch’s quoted sensitivity (around 92-93dB) uses an unconventional in-room-based rating rather than the standard anechoic measurement; on an anechoic basis it measures closer to about 85dB, in line with typical bookshelf speakers this size, so it isn’t the outlier in efficiency the spec sheet implies. Horizontal dispersion of about ±40-50° is narrower and more directive than the reviewer’s preference for a wider, more enveloping soundstage. Toeing the speaker out to widen the soundstage or soften on-axis brightness comes at some cost to imaging precision. Slightly less clean in the tweeter region than the midrange, likely tied to crossover placement, though not considered a dealbreaker. Low-frequency output is limited: measured around 95dB at 4 meters for the pair before the woofers started to unload, so a subwoofer is recommended for anyone wanting real bass rather than stepping up to a larger model.
Full Klipsch RP-500M II review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Crossover Frequency | 1530Hz |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 13.6”H x 6.8”W x 10.6”D (344.4 x 173 x 270.5 mm) |
| Drivers | 5.25” Cerametallic™ cone woofer with Faraday rings, 1” LTS Titanium diaphragm tweeter with Hybrid Cross-Section Expanded Tractrix® horn |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal, 3.3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 85dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.22 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.84 |
| Weight | 13 lbs (5.9 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Wharfedale Super Denton
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Wharfedale Diamond 12.1
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Radiant Acoustics Clarity 4.2
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Revel M105
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Moondrop M4P MTM
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs KEF Q150
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Arendal 1961 Monitor
- Klipsch RP-500M II vs Wharfedale Diamond 220
- See all 39 comparisons