Short answer: the MoFi SourcePoint 888. It ranks #8 of 188 floorstanding speakers by sound quality (rated 4.7/5) at $5,495 and is still sold new; the Revel F208 ranks #27 (rated 4.5/5) and is discontinued, so it is only an option used. The Revel F208’s replacement, the Revel F228Be, is rated 4.5/5.
What the Revel F208 does well: CEA2034 spinorama shows a fairly even on-axis response with sensitivity matching spec at ~87-88dB. The tradeoff: Some directivity error and tweeter-response ripple right at the 2.2kHz crossover point.
The MoFi SourcePoint 888 is the deeper-bass option. Three-way vented design: an 8” coaxial mid-range/1.25” dome tweeter driver plus two additional 8” woofers crossed at about 130Hz, giving genuinely full-range output (F3 34Hz, F10 26Hz) other than the deepest subsonic content. Its bass reaches about 34Hz before falling 3dB, against 47Hz for the Revel F208. Watch for: A significant investment, best ordered from a dealer with a good return policy.
Buy the MoFi SourcePoint 888. It is rated higher for sound quality and still sold new, while the Revel F208 is discontinued.
Still deciding? The full Passive Home rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| Revel F208 | MoFi SourcePoint 888 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4,800 per pair used, Discontinued | $5495 per pair |
| Ranked | #27 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers | #8 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 24Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 26Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 34Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Dimensions | 46.6”H x 13.5”W x 14.8”D (1183.6 x 342.9 x 375.9 mm) | 41.2”H x 12.6”W x 16.1”D (1046.5 x 320 x 408.9 mm) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured, Audio Science Review) | 6 ohms nominal, 5 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Drivers | Dual 8” (20 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Woofers, 5.25” (13.3 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Midrange, 1” (2.5 cm) Aluminum Tweeter with Acoustic Lens Waveguide | Dual 8” paper cone woofers, 8” Paper Cone midrange, 1.25” wide roll soft dome tweeter |
| Sensitivity | 88.2dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 88.5dB manufacturer specified) | 85.6dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Weight | 79.4 lbs (36 kg) each | 94.8 lbs (43 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, front | ported, rear |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.35 | 6.09 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.67 | 7.21 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for MoFi SourcePoint 888:
- GR-Research NX-Treme vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- KEF Blade Two Meta vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs Revel F328Be
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
Prices on this page were last checked October 9, 2026 at 8:01 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Revel F208: $4,800 per pair used Discontinued eBay
Newer model: the Revel F228Be, ranked lower, rated 4.5/5.
Same family: the Revel M105 (smaller bookshelf, rated 4.2/5), the Revel M106 (larger bookshelf, rated 4.6/5), the Revel F206 (smaller floorstanding, ranked lower, rated 4.5/5), the Revel Performa3 C205 (smaller center, rated 4.1/5) and the Revel Performa3 C208 (larger center, rated 4/5).
Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows a fairly even on-axis response with sensitivity matching spec at ~87-88dB. Predicted in-room response is a smooth, textbook-quality downward slope that should translate well to most rooms without correction. Early reflections sum so cleanly with the direct sound that side-wall absorption isn’t recommended: it would work against the speaker’s naturally well-integrated off-axis behavior. Distortion stays below 0.5% from 100Hz up at 96dB/1m, with all distortion components falling below audible threshold above 200Hz. Very wide horizontal directivity of about ±75 degrees. Measured performance was judged very close to the flagship Revel Ultima2 Salon2, and Revel’s speakers (including this one) are developed using Harman’s double-blind listening test methodology. Preference score of 7.4 (7.7 with a subwoofer added). Measured bass extension of 47Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 88.2dB.
Cons: Some directivity error and tweeter-response ripple right at the 2.2kHz crossover point. A notable on-axis dip at about 4kHz, attributed to probable cabinet diffraction. Cumulative spectral decay (waterfall) shows an unexplained resonance around 4-5kHz that the reviewer couldn’t pin down a clear cause for. Vertical directivity shows narrowband interference nulls just above and below the tweeter axis (roughly 2-3kHz), typical of a non-coaxial tower with vertically separated drivers, so listening height matters more than it would with a coincident design. Minimum impedance dips to 3.4 ohms, calling for a robust, high-current amplifier. Distortion climbs substantially below about 80-100Hz (up to ~5% in the deep bass) when driven hard, an excursion-limited trade-off typical of towers at high output. Isolating the woofers alone shows their usable range ending around 500-700Hz at the crossover, with somewhat elevated (though still low in absolute terms) 2nd/3rd harmonic distortion in the 100-300Hz region. Discontinued.
Full Revel F208 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 24Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 46.6”H x 13.5”W x 14.8”D (1183.6 x 342.9 x 375.9 mm) |
| Drivers | Dual 8” (20 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Woofers, 5.25” (13.3 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Midrange, 1” (2.5 cm) Aluminum Tweeter with Acoustic Lens Waveguide |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Sensitivity | 88.2dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 88.5dB manufacturer specified) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.35 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.67 |
| Weight | 79.4 lbs (36 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, front |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
MoFi SourcePoint 888: $5495 per pair Crutchfield eBay
Same family: the MoFi SourcePoint 8 (smaller bookshelf, rated 4.5/5) and the MoFi SourcePoint 10 (larger bookshelf, rated 4.4/5).
Pros: Three-way vented design: an 8” coaxial mid-range/1.25” dome tweeter driver plus two additional 8” woofers crossed at about 130Hz, giving genuinely full-range output (F3 34Hz, F10 26Hz) other than the deepest subsonic content. Ranked by the reviewer among his personal top three speakers out of roughly 200 tested, alongside the KEF Blade Two Meta and Dutch & Dutch 8C, despite costing a small fraction of either. Excellent compression/dynamic-range linearity, holding its own against much pricier speakers like the March Audio Sointuva AWG, KEF Reference 1 Meta, and KEF Blade Two Meta. On-axis (0°) and 30°-off-axis estimated in-room responses track within about 1-1.5dB of each other above 500Hz, so tonal balance barely changes with placement or listening angle: excellent for multi-seat home theater or entertaining. Wide horizontal dispersion of about ±60°. Distortion stays low: under 1% at 86dB, and under 1% above 200Hz even at 96dB, with multitone distortion mostly under 1% as well. Not a difficult amplifier load (5-ohm minimum impedance, 4.2-ohm minimum EPDR). Checks the three boxes the reviewer considers essential for a home theater speaker: low compression, low distortion, and excellent directivity. Measured bass extension of 34Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85.6dB.
Cons: A significant investment, best ordered from a dealer with a good return policy. Large and heavy floorstander (about 96 lbs, 42” tall) requiring real floor space and rear clearance. Positioning is fairly specific: needs about 2 feet from the rear wall. Closer causes boominess in the 40-50Hz region, farther loses bass extension. Vertical dispersion (about ±50°) is narrower than horizontal (about ±60°), since the two 8” woofers are spaced vertically apart on a tower cabinet, causing some vertical mismatch at lower frequencies. A small on-axis dip around 500Hz and a deliberately lower tweeter level (about 0.5dB below the midrange) are intentional design choices for smoother in-room response, but mean the raw on-axis measurement isn’t perfectly flat. A mild diffraction-related dip appears around 3kHz in directivity measurements. Toeing the speaker out more than about 10° starts to noticeably reduce top-end energy.
Full MoFi SourcePoint 888 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 26Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 34Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 41.2”H x 12.6”W x 16.1”D (1046.5 x 320 x 408.9 mm) |
| Drivers | Dual 8” paper cone woofers, 8” Paper Cone midrange, 1.25” wide roll soft dome tweeter |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal, 5 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 85.6dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.09 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.21 |
| Weight | 94.8 lbs (43 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs Revel F328Be
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs KEF Blade Two Meta
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs GR-Research NX-Treme
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs KEF R5 Meta
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs Revel F226Be
- See all 37 comparisons