Fatfreq Hayabusa vs Tin HiFi Huo

Short answer: a tie on sound quality. Both are rated 4.2/5 (#188 and #177 of 450 in-ear headphones), so choose on features and fit.

Why pick the Fatfreq Hayabusa: A preference score of 76 in crinacle’s measurement places its tuning reasonably close to the Harman target most listeners prefer. The catch: The response is uneven, at 1.94 dB standard deviation from target, so some frequency regions stand out or fall back.

Buy the Fatfreq Hayabusa or the Tin HiFi Huo on features: they are rated the same for sound quality at close to the same price.

Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Related Headphone Comparisons

How Tin HiFi Huo compares with other leading options:

• KZ CRN vs Tin HiFi Huo
• Moondrop Beautiful World vs Tin HiFi Huo
• TANGZU Zetian Wu vs Tin HiFi Huo
• TANGZU Wan’er S.G 2 vs Tin HiFi Huo
• EPZ P50 vs Fatfreq Hayabusa

Prices on this page were last checked October 11, 2026 at 4:59 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Headphones In Full

Fatfreq Hayabusa FATfreq eBay

Pros: A preference score of 76 in crinacle’s measurement places its tuning reasonably close to the Harman target most listeners prefer. As a closed, wired in-ear it isolates from outside noise.

Cons: The response is uneven, at 1.94 dB standard deviation from target, so some frequency regions stand out or fall back. It is a wired design with no wireless option.

Full Fatfreq Hayabusa review and specifications →

Back	Closed
Connection	Wired
Deviation From Target	1.94 dB standard deviation
Form Factor	In-ear
Harman Preference Score	76 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ)
Tonal Tilt	+0.29 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)

EQ preset to match the Harman target

Set a preamp of -2.8 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.

Filter	Frequency	Gain	Q
Low shelf	105 Hz	+2.6 dB	0.70
Peak	188 Hz	-1.4 dB	0.82
Peak	5,241 Hz	+3.0 dB	3.70
Peak	9,076 Hz	+2.0 dB	2.95
Peak	69 Hz	+0.6 dB	1.28
High shelf	10,000 Hz	-4.2 dB	0.70
Peak	1,470 Hz	-2.0 dB	2.41
Peak	2,478 Hz	+2.4 dB	2.85
Peak	3,671 Hz	-1.6 dB	3.87
Peak	855 Hz	+1.0 dB	1.93

• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • AutoEQ results for the Fatfreq Hayabusa (crinacle measurement)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Fatfreq Hayabusa vs NiceHCK Rockies
  • Fatfreq Hayabusa vs EPZ P50

Tin HiFi Huo: $25.00 Amazon eBay

Full Tin HiFi Huo review and specifications →

Back	Closed
Connection	Wired
Deviation From Target	1.66 dB standard deviation
Driver Type	Hybrid (1 dynamic + 1 balanced armature)
Drivers	1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x balanced armature
Form Factor	In-ear
Harman Preference Score	77 (median of 8 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Impedance	20 ohms
Sensitivity	108 dB
Sub-bass Extension	Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.3 dB at 30 Hz)
Tonal Tilt	-0.31 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)

• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Frequency response measurements of the Tin HiFi Huo by 8 squig.link measurers
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Tin HiFi Huo vs TANGZU Zetian Wu
  • Tin HiFi Huo vs Moondrop Beautiful World
  • Tin HiFi Huo vs KZ CRN
  • Tin HiFi Huo vs TANGZU Wan’er S.G 2