Fatfreq Hayabusa Review: Ranked #93 of 238

Last updated: October 10, 2026

The Fatfreq Hayabusa ranks #93 out of 238 total In-Ear Headphones for sound quality. See all Headphones rankings for every top pick.

Brand: Fatfreq

Prices on this page were last checked October 10, 2026 at 5:37 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

#93 Fatfreq Hayabusa FATfreq eBay

Pros: A preference score of 76 in crinacle’s measurement places its tuning reasonably close to the Harman target most listeners prefer. As a closed, wired in-ear it isolates from outside noise.

Cons: The response is uneven, at 1.94 dB standard deviation from target, so some frequency regions stand out or fall back. It is a wired design with no wireless option.

BackClosed
ConnectionWired
Deviation From Target1.94 dB standard deviation
Form FactorIn-ear
Harman Preference Score76 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ)
Tonal Tilt+0.29 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
EQ preset to match the Harman target

Set a preamp of -2.8 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+2.6 dB0.70
Peak188 Hz-1.4 dB0.82
Peak5,241 Hz+3.0 dB3.70
Peak9,076 Hz+2.0 dB2.95
Peak69 Hz+0.6 dB1.28
High shelf10,000 Hz-4.2 dB0.70
Peak1,470 Hz-2.0 dB2.41
Peak2,478 Hz+2.4 dB2.85
Peak3,671 Hz-1.6 dB3.87
Peak855 Hz+1.0 dB1.93

More Fatfreq headphones →