Short answer: the Bose Soundlink Micro 2. Both are rated 3.6/5 for sound quality (#18 and #19 of 59 small speakers), and the Bose Soundlink Micro 2 costs $129 against $249 for the Vifa Reykjavik, with sound quality a draw, the lower price decides it.
The Bose Soundlink Micro 2 is the lighter, tougher option. IP67 rated, survives a 1m dunk for 30 minutes. At 0.7 lbs (329 g) it weighs much less than the Vifa Reykjavik at 1.3 lbs (600 g). It is rated IP67 against IPX4 for the Vifa Reykjavik. It supports aptX Bluetooth, which the Vifa Reykjavik lacks. The catch: Lack of clarity.
What the Vifa Reykjavik does well: In side by side tests it was the best tuned, flattest and clearest next to the JBL Charge 4 and Ultimate Ears Boom 3. It keeps a wired aux input, which the Bose Soundlink Micro 2 lacks. The catch: Thin bass at low volume and less punch than the Charge 4, and What Hi-Fi found its midrange lacks solidity.
Buy the Bose Soundlink Micro 2. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $120 less than the Vifa Reykjavik.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Portable Bluetooth rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Bose Soundlink Micro 2 | Vifa Reykjavik | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $129.00 | $249.00 |
| Ranked | #18 of 59 in Small Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers | #19 of 59 in Small Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers |
| App | Yes | No |
| Battery Life | 12 hours (Manufacturer specified) | - |
| Built-in Microphone | No | - |
| EQ | Yes | - |
| IP Rating | IP67 | IPX4 |
| Party Mode | Yes (Bose Party mode) | - |
| Power Bank | No | - |
| Power Input | USB-C | USB-C |
| Stereo | No | Partially |
| Omnidirectional | Pointing up | - |
| TWS | Yes | Yes |
| Weight | 0.7 lbs (329 g) | 1.3 lbs (0.6 kg) |
| Aux Input | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | AAC, aptX, SBC | SBC |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.4 | 4.2 |
| Dimensions | 4.1” x 4.1” x 1.7” (104 x 104 x 43 mm) | 65H x 139 diameter mm |
| Charging Time | 3 hours | - |
| Drivers | 40mm full-range driver with passive radiator | 1x 88 mm woofer, 2x 19 mm tweeters |
| Digital Aux Input | No | - |
| Strap | Yes (built-in strap) | - |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to Bose Soundlink Micro 2:
- Tribit Stormbox Micro 2 vs Bose Soundlink Micro 2
- Soundcore Boom Go 3i vs Bose Soundlink Micro 2
- Minirig Mini 2 vs Bose Soundlink Micro 2
- Tribit Stormbox Micro vs Bose Soundlink Micro 2
- Bose Soundlink Micro 2 vs Tribit Stormbox Micro 3
Prices on this page were last checked October 11, 2026 at 4:59 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Bose Soundlink Micro 2: $129.00 Amazon eBay
Older model: the Bose Soundlink Micro (ranked lower, rated 3.5/5). See every Bose SoundLink Flex, Micro, Max and Plus generation.
Same family: the Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen (smaller model, rated 3.8/5), the Bose SoundLink Max (smaller model, rated 4.3/5) and the Bose SoundLink Plus (larger model, rated 4.2/5).
Pros: IP67 rated, survives a 1m dunk for 30 minutes. Compact fabric strap for clipping to bags/bikes: replaces the 1st-gen’s hook clip, which was prone to breaking. USB-C charging. Surprisingly good bass when mounted outdoors, like on a bike.
Cons: Lack of clarity. Overly boosted bass that causes some thudding, and can overdrive/distort at higher volumes: worse in this regard than the 1st-gen model. Overly boosted treble, turn down bass and treble in the EQ. Falls clearly behind the Tribit Stormbox Micro 2 on bass depth, cleanliness, and loudness.
Full Bose Soundlink Micro 2 review and specifications →
| Released | Aug 2025 (1 year ago) |
|---|---|
| App | Yes |
| Aux Input | No |
| Battery Life | 12 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | AAC, aptX, SBC |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.4 |
| Built-in Microphone | No |
| Charging Time | 3 hours |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 4.1” x 4.1” x 1.7” (104 x 104 x 43 mm) |
| Drivers | 40mm full-range driver with passive radiator |
| EQ | Yes |
| IP Rating | IP67 |
| Omnidirectional | Pointing up |
| Party Mode | Yes (Bose Party mode) |
| Power Bank | No |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | No |
| Strap | Yes (built-in strap) |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 0.7 lbs (329 g) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Bose Soundlink Micro 2 vs Bose Soundlink Micro
- Bose Soundlink Micro 2 vs B&O Beoplay P2
- Bose Soundlink Micro 2 vs Klipsch Austin
- Bose Soundlink Micro 2 vs TOZO PE1
- Bose Soundlink Micro 2 vs JBL Clip 5
- Bose Soundlink Micro 2 vs Marshall Willen
- Bose Soundlink Micro 2 vs JBL Clip 4
- Bose Soundlink Micro 2 vs Soundcore Mini
- See all 55 comparisons
Vifa Reykjavik: $249.00 Amazon eBay
Same family: the Vifa Oslo (larger model, rated 4.5/5) and the Vifa Helsinki (larger model, rated 4.8/5).
Pros: In side by side tests it was the best tuned, flattest and clearest next to the JBL Charge 4 and Ultimate Ears Boom 3. What Hi-Fi praised its tight timing and spacious sound.
Cons: Thin bass at low volume and less punch than the Charge 4, and What Hi-Fi found its midrange lacks solidity.
Full Vifa Reykjavik review and specifications →
| Released | Oct 2017 (9 years ago) |
|---|---|
| App | No |
| Aux Input | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC |
| Bluetooth Version | 4.2 |
| Dimensions | 65H x 139 diameter mm |
| Drivers | 1x 88 mm woofer, 2x 19 mm tweeters |
| IP Rating | IPX4 |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | Partially |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 1.3 lbs (0.6 kg) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons