Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 vs Beyerdynamic DT 1350

Short answer: the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95. It ranks #164 of 231 over-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.1/5, at $1,250. The Beyerdynamic DT 1350 ranks #179, rated 2.9/5, at $1,161.61, $88.39 cheaper, not enough of a saving to outweigh the sound-quality gap.

Why pick the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95: A full-featured wireless ANC headphone with aptX Adaptive, AAC and SBC, Bluetooth 5.1, a built-in microphone, a wired option and a rated 38 hours of battery (50 without ANC). Watch for: Treble is erratic, with a 9.6 dB peak near 11.9 kHz and a 6.7 dB dip near 10 kHz, which makes the top end uneven and slightly hot in places.

The case for the Beyerdynamic DT 1350: This closed-back headphone weighs only 0.4 lbs (174 g) and keeps sound in and outside noise out, which suits monitoring in loud spaces. The tradeoff: A preference score of 58 in crinacle’s measurement places its tonal balance well away from the response most listeners prefer.

Buy the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $88.39 you would save on the Beyerdynamic DT 1350 does not close the gap.

Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.

Specifications Side By Side

Related Headphone Comparisons

More worthwhile head-to-heads for Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95:

• Fostex TH900mk2 vs Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95
• Beyerdynamic DT 1350 vs Focal Clear Mg
• Fostex TH900mk2 vs Beyerdynamic DT 1350
• Audio-Technica ATH-AWAS vs Beyerdynamic DT 1350
• Beyerdynamic DT 1350 vs Beyerdynamic DT 880

Prices on this page were last checked October 11, 2026 at 4:59 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Headphones In Full

Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95: $1,250.00 Wireless Amazon $1,250.00 eBay

Pros: A full-featured wireless ANC headphone with aptX Adaptive, AAC and SBC, Bluetooth 5.1, a built-in microphone, a wired option and a rated 38 hours of battery (50 without ANC). Sub-bass sits about 6 dB over target and the upper bass about 3 dB over, so low notes have weight and warmth. The midrange stays close to target, within about 2 dB, and the overall curve is fairly smooth for a wireless model.

Cons: Treble is erratic, with a 9.6 dB peak near 11.9 kHz and a 6.7 dB dip near 10 kHz, which makes the top end uneven and slightly hot in places. The bass boost and a 1.9 dB lift in the low mids can make male vocals and bass guitar a little thick. At 323 g and a very high price, it asks a lot for sound that scores only 62 on the Harman preference scale.

Full Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 review and specifications →

Active Noise Cancelling	Yes
Back	Closed
Battery Life	38 hours (50 without ANC, Manufacturer specified)
Bluetooth Codecs	SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive
Bluetooth Version	5.1
Built-in Microphone	Yes
Connection	Wireless and wired
Deviation From Target	2.65 dB standard deviation
Driver Type	Dynamic
Drivers	1 x 40mm dynamic
Form Factor	Over-ear
Frequency Response	20Hz - 22kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Harman Preference Score	62 (measured by oratory1990, via AutoEQ)
Impedance	12 ohms
Sensitivity	101.5 dB/mW
Sub-bass Extension	Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+5.2 dB at 30 Hz)
Tonal Tilt	-1.22 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Weight	0.7 lbs (323 g)

EQ preset to match the Harman target

Set a preamp of -3.6 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.

Filter	Frequency	Gain	Q
Low shelf	105 Hz	-4.5 dB	0.70
Peak	252 Hz	-3.8 dB	1.28
Peak	2,644 Hz	+2.2 dB	0.56
Peak	61 Hz	-2.0 dB	0.66
Peak	93 Hz	+5.1 dB	2.32
High shelf	10,000 Hz	-8.8 dB	0.70
Peak	9,731 Hz	+3.6 dB	1.42
Peak	1,253 Hz	-2.3 dB	2.36
Peak	842 Hz	+2.1 dB	3.42
Peak	1,919 Hz	+2.1 dB	3.99

• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • AutoEQ results for the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 (oratory1990 measurement)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 vs Fostex TH900mk2

Beyerdynamic DT 1350: $1,161.61 Amazon $1,161.61 eBay

Pros: This closed-back headphone weighs only 174 g and keeps sound in and outside noise out, which suits monitoring in loud spaces. With 80 ohm impedance and a nominal 109 dB sensitivity it reaches useful volume from portable sources without a headphone amp.

Cons: A preference score of 58 in crinacle’s measurement places its tonal balance well away from the response most listeners prefer. The Focal Elegia rates higher and costs less.

Full Beyerdynamic DT 1350 review and specifications →

Released	Feb 2011 (15 years ago)
Back	Closed
Connection	Wired
Deviation From Target	3.50 dB standard deviation
Driver Type	Dynamic
Drivers	1 x dynamic
Form Factor	Over-ear
Frequency Response	5Hz - 30kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Harman Preference Score	58 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ)
Impedance	80 ohms
Sensitivity	109 dB SPL (nominal)
Tonal Tilt	-0.78 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Weight	0.4 lbs (174 g)

EQ preset to match the Harman target

Set a preamp of -6.2 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.

Filter	Frequency	Gain	Q
Low shelf	105 Hz	+1.1 dB	0.70
Peak	2,762 Hz	+6.9 dB	1.10
Peak	496 Hz	-4.5 dB	0.48
Peak	4,606 Hz	-7.2 dB	1.87
Peak	1,546 Hz	+5.4 dB	1.70
High shelf	10,000 Hz	-1.7 dB	0.70
Peak	98 Hz	-1.6 dB	1.90
Peak	7,672 Hz	+2.5 dB	2.60
Peak	5,822 Hz	-2.3 dB	6.00
Peak	174 Hz	+1.4 dB	3.45

• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • AutoEQ results for the Beyerdynamic DT 1350 (crinacle measurement)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Beyerdynamic DT 1350 vs Audio-Technica ATH-AWAS
  • Beyerdynamic DT 1350 vs Fostex TH900mk2
  • Beyerdynamic DT 1350 vs Focal Clear Mg
  • Beyerdynamic DT 1350 vs Beyerdynamic DT 880