TANGZU Wan'er S.G Review: Ranked #29 of 68

Last updated: October 10, 2026

The TANGZU Wan’er S.G ranks #29 out of 68 total In-Ear Headphones for sound quality. See all Headphones rankings for every top pick.

Prices on this page were last checked October 10, 2026 at 5:37 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

#29 TANGZU Wan’er S.G: $18.00 Amazon eBay

Pros: A preference score of 71 in crinacle’s measurement at a very low cost is good value, with a mildly warm tilt that keeps treble from becoming harsh. Each earbud weighs only 4.2 g, and a built-in microphone makes it usable for calls. It rates higher than the KZ ZST and costs less.

Cons: The 2.5 dB deviation from the target is the least smooth of this group, so tonal accuracy trails the CCA CRA and KZ ZSN Pro, both of which rate higher. A single 10mm dynamic driver and no listed impedance or sensitivity leave less to go on for matching it with a source.

Released2023 (3 years ago)
BackClosed
Built-in MicrophoneYes
ConnectionWired
Deviation From Target2.48 dB standard deviation
Driver TypeDynamic
Drivers1 x 10mm dynamic
Form FactorIn-ear
Frequency Response20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Harman Preference Score71 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ)
Tonal Tilt-0.32 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Weight0 lbs (4.2 g) per earbud
EQ preset to match the Harman target

Set a preamp of -5.4 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+1.8 dB0.70
Peak6,638 Hz+5.1 dB1.36
Peak145 Hz-2.6 dB0.76
Peak1,930 Hz-2.9 dB1.79
Peak9,431 Hz+3.0 dB2.56
High shelf10,000 Hz-1.1 dB0.70
Peak894 Hz+1.2 dB1.34
Peak1,321 Hz-1.2 dB2.81
Peak275 Hz-0.4 dB1.71
Peak570 Hz+0.5 dB2.18

Head-to-Head Comparisons

1 comparisons