Revel F206 vs Magnepan LRS+

Last updated: October 8, 2026

Short answer: the Revel F226Be, if you are buying new. The Revel F206 ranks higher than the Magnepan LRS+ (#29 vs #149 of 188 floorstanding speakers) but is discontinued; its replacement, the Revel F226Be, is rated 4.6/5 at $8,469.90 and is still sold new.

Revel F206 vs Magnepan LRS+

The Revel F206 is the more accurate, deeper-bass option. CEA2034 spinorama shows a pretty even on-axis response. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 5.51 against 1.27 for the Magnepan LRS+. Its bass reaches about 60Hz before falling 3dB, against 74Hz for the Magnepan LRS+. Watch for: Some directivity error and a small peak around 4.5kHz show up alongside the directivity error around 3kHz.

What the Magnepan LRS+ does well: Thin, two-way planar-magnetic open-baffle/dipole panel design (about 48” tall, just 1” deep). The tradeoff: Extremely current-hungry and power-hungry: even a pair of 600W Macintosh monoblock amplifiers only averaged about 90dB output.

Buy the Revel F226Be, the replacement for the discontinued Revel F206; it is rated higher for sound quality than the Magnepan LRS+.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Revel F206 Magnepan LRS+
Price$2,000 per pair used, Discontinued$1300 per pair
Ranked#29 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#149 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)34Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)60Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)74Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions40.3”H x 8.4”W x 12.2”D (1023.6 x 213.4 x 309.9 mm)48”H x 13.5”W x 1”D (1219.2 x 342.9 x 25.4 mm)
Impedance4 ohms nominal (3.3 ohms minimum, measured by Audio Science Review)4 ohms nominal, 3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DriversDual 6.5” (16.5 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Woofers, 5.25” (13.3 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Midrange, 1” (2.5 cm) Aluminum Tweeter with Acoustic Lens WaveguideFull-range planar magnetic dipole panel (48” tall x 13.5” wide); quasi-ribbon design, two-way with separate mid/bass and tweeter ribbon sections
Sensitivity87dB (measured, Audio Science Review)85.1dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Weight57.3 lbs (26 kg) each30 lbs (13.6 kg)
Woofer Cabinetported, frontopen baffle
Spinorama Preference Score5.511.27
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.524.32
DIY KitNoNo

More top alternatives to Revel F206:

Prices on this page were last checked October 7, 2026 at 9:25 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Revel F206: $2,000 per pair used Discontinued eBay

Revel F206 ranking card

Newer model: the Revel F226Be, ranked higher, rated 4.6/5.

Same family: the Revel M105 (smaller bookshelf, rated 4.2/5), the Revel M106 (larger bookshelf, rated 4.6/5), the Revel F208 (larger floorstanding, ranked higher, rated 4.5/5), the Revel Performa3 C205 (smaller center, rated 4.1/5) and the Revel Performa3 C208 (larger center, rated 4/5).

Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows a pretty even on-axis response. Predicted in-room response is excellent, with a smooth downward slope. Horizontal beamwidth of about ±65 degrees is wide, if a bit uneven. Distortion is very nice at 86dB SPL/1m, falling below the frequency range where human hearing is most sensitive, and stays excellent even at 96dB SPL/1m. Near-field measurements of the individual drivers show nice suppression of port and woofer resonances. Really amazing value for the performance. Measured bass extension of 60Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 87dB.

Cons: Some directivity error and a small peak around 4.5kHz show up alongside the directivity error around 3kHz. Vertical directivity means listening position needs to stay within the tweeter axis, though the reviewer notes there is some leeway. Minimum impedance dips to 3.3 ohms, calling for an amplifier comfortable with a demanding load. Discontinued.

Bass Extension (-10dB)34Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)60Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions40.3”H x 8.4”W x 12.2”D (1023.6 x 213.4 x 309.9 mm)
DriversDual 6.5” (16.5 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Woofers, 5.25” (13.3 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Midrange, 1” (2.5 cm) Aluminum Tweeter with Acoustic Lens Waveguide
Impedance4 ohms nominal (3.3 ohms minimum, measured by Audio Science Review)
Sensitivity87dB (measured, Audio Science Review)
Spinorama Preference Score5.51
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.52
Weight57.3 lbs (26 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, front

Magnepan LRS+: $1300 per pair Magnepan eBay

Magnepan LRS+ ranking card

Pros: Thin, two-way planar-magnetic open-baffle/dipole panel design (about 48” tall, just 1” deep). Delivers a uniquely dramatic and enveloping soundstage with genuinely three-dimensional depth effects that work across all music genres, not just classical or orchestral material as commonly assumed. Extremely tight, locked-in center-phantom imaging when set up correctly. Open-baffle design avoids the “boxy” enclosure coloration of conventional cabinet speakers. Multitone distortion is remarkably consistent from low to high frequency, a characteristic the reviewer hasn’t observed in conventional cone-and-dome speakers. Compression at high output stays modest (about 0.5-1dB) through the midrange and treble, giving roughly 20-26dB of usable dynamic range in that region. At its price, a strong contender for a dedicated secondary listening room, even if not a main-system replacement. Measured bass extension of 74Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85.1dB.

Cons: Extremely current-hungry and power-hungry: even a pair of 600W Macintosh monoblock amplifiers only averaged about 90dB output. A robust, high-power amplifier is essentially mandatory, and budget amps won’t cut it. Bass rolls off very quickly (F3 74Hz, F10 67Hz, described as falling off “like a rock”), making a subwoofer an absolute requirement for any low-end content. A roughly 3dB dip in the mid-bass (100-300Hz) region thins out vocal body and fullness compared to a conventional bookshelf speaker. A resonance/bump around 400Hz adds a mild boxy quality, though it responds well to about 2dB of EQ correction. Extraordinarily fussy about exact positioning: both seating height (must align with the acoustic reference point between the panel’s lower tie-down points) and horizontal aiming are unusually critical; moving just a couple of inches can cause treble content above roughly 500-600Hz to nearly vanish. Distinct off-axis cancellation zones exist directly to the sides of the panel, where very little sound is audible at all. Fails badly under extreme dynamic-transient testing in the bass, and the reviewer blew fuses pushing the speaker during testing: not built for high-volume or highly dynamic playback. A genuinely different category from conventional hi-fi speakers, requiring more setup patience and experimentation than a typical monopole design.

Bass Extension (-10dB)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)74Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions48”H x 13.5”W x 1”D (1219.2 x 342.9 x 25.4 mm)
DriversFull-range planar magnetic dipole panel (48” tall x 13.5” wide); quasi-ribbon design, two-way with separate mid/bass and tweeter ribbon sections
Impedance4 ohms nominal, 3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity85.1dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score1.27
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub4.32
Weight30 lbs (13.6 kg)
Woofer Cabinetopen baffle