Short answer: the JBL HDI-3600. It ranks #63 of 226 floorstanding speakers by sound quality (rated 4.3/5) at $3,800 and is still sold new; the Infinity Reference 253 ranks #178 (rated 3.5/5) and is discontinued, so it is only an option used.
The JBL HDI-3600 is the better-sounding choice. CEA2034 spinorama shows a fairly even on-axis response and flat overall frequency response, with high 90dB sensitivity and very low distortion through the midrange. Watch for: A wide shelving-down above 2kHz affects the in-room response, and vertical dispersion is a bigger issue than horizontal: the reviewer noted the dip is wider here than on the smaller JBL HDI-1600, making it more audible.
The Infinity Reference 253 is the more accurate choice. Horizontal beamwidth of about ±60 degrees is fairly smooth and well controlled. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 5.43 against 4.64 for the JBL HDI-3600. Watch for: CEA2034 spinorama and predicted in-room response both show elevated treble above 4kHz (“too hot”), a dip around 2kHz, and bass shelved down relative to the midrange.
Buy the JBL HDI-3600. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the Infinity Reference 253 is discontinued, so it is only available used.
Still deciding? The full Passive Home rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| JBL HDI-3600 | Infinity Reference 253 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3800 per pair | $400 per pair used, Discontinued |
| Ranked | #63 of 226 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers | #178 of 226 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 78Hz - the on-axis curve also shows an unusual step/dip around 40-55Hz that may be a near-field-scan artifact for this tower (measured, Audio Science Review) | 78Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 62Hz - the on-axis curve also shows an unusual step/dip around 40-55Hz that may be a near-field-scan artifact for this tower (measured, Audio Science Review) | 38Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Sensitivity | 89.5dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) | 86.9dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 88dB manufacturer specified) |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal | 6 ohms |
| Frequency Response | 38Hz - 30kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) | - |
| Drivers | 2410H-2 1” compression driver, 3x 6.5” Advanced Aluminum Matrix woofers | Dual 5.25” (130mm) CMMD™ woofers, 5.25” (130mm) flat-piston CMMD™ midrange, 1” (25mm) CMMD™ tweeter |
| Weight | 61.7 lbs (28 kg) each | 39.2 lbs (17.8 kg) each |
| Dimensions | 40.5”H x 10.2”W x 13.5”D (1029 x 260 x 343 mm) | 40.3”H x 6.8”W x 12.4”D (1023.6 x 172.7 x 315 mm) |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, dual rear-firing | ported, rear |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.64 (spinorama.org) | 5.43 (spinorama.org) |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.95 (spinorama.org) | 7.31 (spinorama.org) |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How JBL HDI-3600 compares with other leading options:
- JBL HDI-3600 vs KEF Blade Two Meta
- MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition vs JBL HDI-3600
- JBL HDI-3600 vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- JBL HDI-3600 vs Revel F328Be
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs JBL HDI-3600
Prices on this page were last checked October 9, 2026 at 8:01 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
JBL HDI-3600: $3800 per pair Audio Advice eBay
Same family: the JBL HDI-1600 (bookshelf, rated 4.2/5), the JBL HDI-3800 (larger floorstanding, ranked higher, rated 4.5/5), the JBL HDI-4500 (center, rated 3.7/5) and the JBL HDI-1200P (subwoofer, rated 3.9/5).
Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows a fairly even on-axis response and flat overall frequency response, with high 90dB sensitivity and very low distortion through the midrange. Triple 6.5” Advanced Aluminum Matrix woofers and a 1” compression driver in JBL’s HDI waveguide. Measured bass extension of 78Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 89.5dB.
Cons: A wide shelving-down above 2kHz affects the in-room response, and vertical dispersion is a bigger issue than horizontal: the reviewer noted the dip is wider here than on the smaller JBL HDI-1600, making it more audible. Narrow vertical sweet spot means careful listener-height positioning matters more than usual.
Full JBL HDI-3600 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 62Hz - the on-axis curve also shows an unusual step/dip around 40-55Hz that may be a near-field-scan artifact for this tower (measured, Audio Science Review) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 78Hz - the on-axis curve also shows an unusual step/dip around 40-55Hz that may be a near-field-scan artifact for this tower (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 40.5”H x 10.2”W x 13.5”D (1029 x 260 x 343 mm) |
| Drivers | 2410H-2 1” compression driver, 3x 6.5” Advanced Aluminum Matrix woofers |
| Frequency Response | 38Hz - 30kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal |
| Sensitivity | 89.5dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.64 (spinorama.org) |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.95 (spinorama.org) |
| Weight | 61.7 lbs (28 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, dual rear-firing |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- JBL HDI-3600 vs JBL Studio 698
- JBL HDI-3600 vs Perlisten R7t
- JBL HDI-3600 vs Polk Audio Reserve R700
- JBL HDI-3600 vs PSB Imagine T65
- JBL HDI-3600 vs KEF R11 Meta
- JBL HDI-3600 vs Ascend Acoustics Sierra Titan Tower
- JBL HDI-3600 vs Emotiva Airmotiv T2+
- JBL HDI-3600 vs ELAC Debut 3.0 DF63
- See all 43 comparisons
Infinity Reference 253: $400 per pair used Discontinued eBay
Same family: the Infinity Reference R152 (smaller bookshelf, rated 3.8/5), the Infinity Reference R162 (larger bookshelf, rated 3.8/5), the Infinity Reference R263 (larger floorstanding, ranked higher, rated 4.4/5), the Infinity Reference RC252 (smaller center, rated 4.4/5), the Infinity Reference RC263 (larger center, rated 4.2/5) and the Infinity Speakers REFERENCE SUB R12 (subwoofer, rated 3.7/5).
Pros: Horizontal beamwidth of about ±60 degrees is fairly smooth and well controlled. Really amazing value for the performance. Measured bass extension of 78Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 86.9dB.
Cons: CEA2034 spinorama and predicted in-room response both show elevated treble above 4kHz (“too hot”), a dip around 2kHz, and bass shelved down relative to the midrange. Vertical directivity requires staying at or below the tweeter axis for accurate tonal balance. Distortion at 96dB SPL/1m is broadly elevated above the reviewer’s audibility threshold across much of the midrange. Minimum impedance dips to 4.2 ohms. Discontinued.
Full Infinity Reference 253 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 38Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 78Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 40.3”H x 6.8”W x 12.4”D (1023.6 x 172.7 x 315 mm) |
| Drivers | Dual 5.25” (130mm) CMMD™ woofers, 5.25” (130mm) flat-piston CMMD™ midrange, 1” (25mm) CMMD™ tweeter |
| Impedance | 6 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 86.9dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 88dB manufacturer specified) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.43 (spinorama.org) |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.31 (spinorama.org) |
| Weight | 39.2 lbs (17.8 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Infinity Reference 253 vs Magnepan LRS+
- Infinity Reference 253 vs Polk Signature Elite ES60
- Infinity Reference 253 vs JBL Stage 2 280F
- Infinity Reference 253 vs Focal Aria Evo X N°2
- Infinity Reference 253 vs Polk T50
- Infinity Reference 253 vs SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle
- Infinity Reference 253 vs Definitive Technology BP-9020
- Infinity Reference 253 vs Sony SS-CS3
- See all 34 comparisons