The Klipsch Forte IV ranks #42 out of 74 total Large Size Floorstanding Speakers for sound quality. See all Passive Home rankings for every top pick.
Brand: Klipsch
Prices on this page were last checked September 30, 2026 at 2:57 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
#42 Klipsch Forte IV: $5,499.98 per pair Amazon Crutchfield eBay
Pros: Three-way heritage design: a 1” titanium tweeter and 1.75” compression driver for the midrange mated to a 12” woofer, plus a 15” passive radiator for extra bass reinforcement. Genuinely resonance-free cabinet, a clear improvement over the notably boomy, resonant Heresy 4 in the same lineup. Surprisingly wide, expansive soundstage that beat both the Heresy 4 and a KEF LS50 Wireless 2 in direct comparison: images occasionally appeared several feet outside the physical speaker location. Deeper bass extension than the Heresy 4 (F3 of 82Hz, about 10Hz lower). Distortion measures well below 1% at 86dB and stays mostly within 1% even at 96dB. Comes as a factory-matched serial-numbered pair, backed by an unusually generous 10-year warranty. Mostly above 4 ohms impedance, so it’s compatible with AVRs, solid-state, or tube amplifiers. More neutral overall than other Klipsch models the reviewer has tested, making it a reasonable pick for listeners who already like the “Klipsch sound” but want something more balanced. Measured bass extension of 82Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 93.8dB.
Cons: Contrary to the classic Klipsch reputation for being forward and bright, this model is actually somewhat recessed in the 1.5-4kHz “presence” region, which can make some tracks sound dull or lacking in detail. A peak around 6kHz reads as sibilant and “painful” when seated exactly on the tweeter axis; sitting a bit above that axis reduces it somewhat. Klipsch’s marketed 99dB sensitivity figure is an in-room rating that assumes 3-6dB of boundary gain: anechoic sensitivity measures closer to 94dB, which the manufacturer does disclose but can still mislead buyers comparing spec sheets. Radiation width isn’t consistent across all frequencies: a noticeable notch around 2-3kHz interrupts otherwise wide dispersion, which can cause a fundamental tone and its harmonics to image in slightly different places in the soundstage. Uses shallow low-pass crossover slopes (despite Klipsch’s steep-crossover marketing, which applies only to the high-pass side), likely contributing to some of the measured dips and possible cone-breakup artifacts. Some compression shows up around the midrange crossover point at very high output (102dB), though likely only audible at extreme volumes. At around $5500/pair, a significant investment, and still needs a subwoofer for material extending below about 50Hz.
How it compares: Just above it: Q Acoustics 5040 - $4263 cheaper, 2.3Hz lower bass extension (-3dB). Just below it: Revival Audio Atalante 5 - $500 cheaper, 5.2Hz lower bass extension (-3dB).
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 82Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 36”H x 16.5”W x 13”D (914.4 x 419.1 x 330.2 mm) |
| Drivers | 1x 12” (305mm) fiber-composite woofer + 15” passive radiator, 1x 1.75” compression driver midrange on horn, 1x 1” titanium compression tweeter on horn |
| Impedance | 8 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 93.8dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner; manufacturer rates 99dB in-room / ~94dB anechoic) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.78 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 5.72 |
| Weight | 117.3 lbs (53.2 kg) |
| Woofer Cabinet | passive radiator |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Q Acoustics 5040
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Infinity Primus 360
- Klipsch Forte IV vs KEF Q11 Meta
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Klipsch RP-5000F II
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Polk Reserve R500
- Klipsch Forte IV vs ELAC Debut 3.0 DF63
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Klipsch RP-8000F II
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Emotiva Airmotiv T2+
- Klipsch Forte IV vs PSB Imagine T65
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Dynaudio Emit 30
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Polk Audio Reserve R700
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Klipsch RP-6000F II
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Definitive Technology BP-9020
- Klipsch Forte IV vs SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle
- Klipsch Forte IV vs JBL HDI-3600
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Polk T50
- Klipsch Forte IV vs JBL Studio 698
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Focal Aria Evo X N°2
- Klipsch Forte IV vs KEF R11 Meta
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Polk Audio XT70
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Polk Audio XT60
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Infinity Reference 253
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Magnepan LRS+
- Klipsch Forte IV vs KEF R5
- Klipsch Forte IV vs JBL Stage 2 280F
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Revel Concerta2 F35
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Atlantic Technology 8600eLR
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Revel F206
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Revel F228Be
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Revel F208
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Sony SS-CS3
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Focal Chora 816
- Klipsch Forte IV vs JBL Studio 590
- Klipsch Forte IV vs JBL HDI-3800
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Triangle Esprit Antal Ez
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Klipsch Heresy IV
- Klipsch Forte IV vs KEF Reference 203
- Klipsch Forte IV vs JBL 4367
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Revel F226Be
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Bose 901 Series V
- Klipsch Forte IV vs KEF R5 Meta
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Revel F328Be
- Klipsch Forte IV vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- Klipsch Forte IV vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- Klipsch Forte IV vs KEF Blade Two Meta
- Klipsch Forte IV vs GR-Research NX-Treme