Short answer: the Revel Concerta2 F35 for a modern waveguide design, the Klipsch Forte IV for a heritage three-way. The F35 is a two-and-a-half-way, four-driver design with a 1” aluminum dome tweeter on a waveguide and a 5.25” mid-range, but its F3 of 61Hz and F10 of 39Hz mean a subwoofer is needed. The Forte IV mates a 1” titanium tweeter and 1.75” compression driver to a 12” woofer, and it is not the forward, bright Klipsch of reputation.
What the Klipsch Forte IV gets right: Three-way heritage design: a 1” titanium tweeter and 1.75” compression driver for the midrange mated to a 12” woofer. The tradeoff: Contrary to the classic Klipsch reputation for being forward and bright.
On the Revel Concerta2 F35 side: Two-and-a-half-way, four-driver design: a 1” aluminum dome tweeter on a waveguide, a 5.25” mid-range. The tradeoff: F3 of 61Hz and F10 of 39Hz mean a subwoofer is needed for real bass extension.
Buy the Revel Concerta2 F35. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Klipsch Forte IV and costs less, so the other one has nothing left to offer.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Klipsch Forte IV | Revel Concerta2 F35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5,499.98 per pair | $900 per pair |
| Ranked | #41 of 71 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers | #23 of 71 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) | 50Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 82Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) | 70Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 93.8dB (measured average, Erin's Audio Corner; manufacturer rates 99dB in-room / ~94dB anechoic) | 89.4dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner; 90dB manufacturer specified) |
| Drivers | 1x 12" (305mm) fiber-composite woofer + 15" passive radiator, 1x 1.75" compression driver midrange on horn, 1x 1" titanium compression tweeter on horn | 3x 5.25" deep anodized aluminum cone woofers, 1" Aluminum Tweeter |
| Weight | 117.3 lbs (53.2 kg) | 41 lbs (18.6 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | passive radiator | ported, rear |
| Impedance | 8 ohms | 6 ohms nominal (3.8 ohms minimum, measured by Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Dimensions | 36"H x 16.5"W x 13"D (914.4 x 419.1 x 330.2 mm) | 40.3"H x 8.4"W x 12.2"D (1023.6 x 213.4 x 309.9 mm) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.78 | 5.35 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 5.72 | 7.30 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to Revel Concerta2 F35:
- GR-Research NX-Treme vs Revel Concerta2 F35
- KEF Blade Two Meta vs Revel Concerta2 F35
- MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition vs Revel Concerta2 F35
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs Revel Concerta2 F35
- JBL HDI-3800 vs Revel Concerta2 F35
Prices on this page were last checked September 23, 2026 at 11:24 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Klipsch Forte IV: $5,499.98 per pair Amazon Crutchfield eBay
Pros: Three-way heritage design: a 1” titanium tweeter and 1.75” compression driver for the midrange mated to a 12” woofer, plus a 15” passive radiator for extra bass reinforcement. Genuinely resonance-free cabinet, a clear improvement over the notably boomy, resonant Heresy 4 in the same lineup. Surprisingly wide, expansive soundstage that beat both the Heresy 4 and a KEF LS50 Wireless 2 in direct comparison - images occasionally appeared several feet outside the physical speaker location. Deeper bass extension than the Heresy 4 (F3 of 82Hz, about 10Hz lower). Distortion measures well below 1% at 86dB and stays mostly within 1% even at 96dB. Comes as a factory-matched serial-numbered pair, backed by an unusually generous 10-year warranty. Mostly above 4 ohms impedance, so it’s compatible with AVRs, solid-state, or tube amplifiers. More neutral overall than other Klipsch models the reviewer has tested, making it a reasonable pick for listeners who already like the “Klipsch sound” but want something more balanced. Measured bass extension of 82Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 93.8dB.
Cons: Contrary to the classic Klipsch reputation for being forward and bright, this model is actually somewhat recessed in the 1.5-4kHz “presence” region, which can make some tracks sound dull or lacking in detail. A peak around 6kHz reads as sibilant and “painful” when seated exactly on the tweeter axis; sitting a bit above that axis reduces it somewhat. Klipsch’s marketed 99dB sensitivity figure is an in-room rating that assumes 3-6dB of boundary gain - anechoic sensitivity measures closer to 94dB, which the manufacturer does disclose but can still mislead buyers comparing spec sheets. Radiation width isn’t consistent across all frequencies - a noticeable notch around 2-3kHz interrupts otherwise wide dispersion, which can cause a fundamental tone and its harmonics to image in slightly different places in the soundstage. Uses shallow low-pass crossover slopes (despite Klipsch’s steep-crossover marketing, which applies only to the high-pass side), likely contributing to some of the measured dips and possible cone-breakup artifacts. Some compression shows up around the midrange crossover point at very high output (102dB), though likely only audible at extreme volumes. At around $5500/pair, a significant investment, and still needs a subwoofer for material extending below about 50Hz.
Full Klipsch Forte IV review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 82Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 36"H x 16.5"W x 13"D (914.4 x 419.1 x 330.2 mm) |
| Drivers | 1x 12" (305mm) fiber-composite woofer + 15" passive radiator, 1x 1.75" compression driver midrange on horn, 1x 1" titanium compression tweeter on horn |
| Impedance | 8 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 93.8dB (measured average, Erin's Audio Corner; manufacturer rates 99dB in-room / ~94dB anechoic) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.78 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 5.72 |
| Weight | 117.3 lbs (53.2 kg) |
| Woofer Cabinet | passive radiator |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Infinity Primus 360
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Polk Audio XT70
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Definitive Technology BP-9020
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Polk Audio XT60
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Klipsch Heresy IV
- Klipsch Forte IV vs KEF Q11 Meta
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Polk Reserve R500
- Klipsch Forte IV vs ELAC Debut 3.0 DF63
- See all 46 comparisons
Revel Concerta2 F35: $900 per pair Crutchfield eBay
Pros: Two-and-a-half-way, four-driver design: a 1” aluminum dome tweeter on a waveguide, a 5.25” mid-range, and dual 5.25” mid-bass drivers in a rear-ported cabinet. Measured sensitivity of 89.4dB closely matches the 90dB spec, and distortion looks good at both 86dB and 96dB, holding up well even with a high-pass filter applied. At its sale price (around $900/pair, down from full retail), the reviewer calls it a “no-brainer,” undercutting comparable budget floorstanders like the ELAC DF63. Frequency response and directivity mismatches are largely EQ-able, since most of what shows up in measurements traces to physical tweeter/mid-range separation rather than a fundamental flaw. Compression is fairly well controlled for the price - about 1dB of loss around 100Hz under long-term compression, described as “par for the course” at this cost. Measured bass extension of 70Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 89.4dB.
Cons: F3 of 61Hz and F10 of 39Hz mean a subwoofer is needed for real bass extension. A dip in the lower midrange/2-3kHz region reduces attack and detail, and a peak around 5kHz adds some edge and sibilance in the lower treble. A peak in off-axis energy around 3kHz reflects off sidewalls at roughly 60-70° off-axis and arrives louder than the direct sound - this specific issue can’t be fixed with EQ (boosting the direct sound would boost the stronger reflection too) and would need acoustic absorption to properly address, though the reviewer considers it a minor, optional fix at this price. A couple of minor resonances appear in the impedance plot, including one around 300Hz that may partly explain a subtle sense of vocal warmth noticed in listening, though it’s more likely room-related. Minimum impedance around 3.8 ohms. Short-term compression testing shows some increased distortion in the tweeter and higher-frequency compression at loud output.
Full Revel Concerta2 F35 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 70Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 40.3"H x 8.4"W x 12.2"D (1023.6 x 213.4 x 309.9 mm) |
| Drivers | 3x 5.25" deep anodized aluminum cone woofers, 1" Aluminum Tweeter |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal (3.8 ohms minimum, measured by Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 89.4dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner; 90dB manufacturer specified) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.35 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.30 |
| Weight | 41 lbs (18.6 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs Revel F206
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs Perlisten S7t
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs JBL Studio 698
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs KEF R11 Meta
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs Arendal 1961 Tower
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs JBL HDI-3600
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs Emotiva Airmotiv T2+
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs Revel F228Be
- See all 55 comparisons