Short answer: the MoFi SourcePoint 888 for a modern coaxial three-way, the Klipsch Forte IV for a heritage horn design. The SourcePoint 888 is a three-way vented speaker with an 8” coaxial mid-range and 1.25” dome tweeter plus two more 8” woofers crossed at about 130Hz, but it is a significant investment best bought from a dealer with a good return policy. The Forte IV is a three-way heritage design with a 12” woofer, and it is not bright.
On the Klipsch Forte IV side: Three-way heritage design: a 1” titanium tweeter and 1.75” compression driver for the midrange mated to a 12” woofer. Set against that: Contrary to the classic Klipsch reputation for being forward and bright.
The case for the MoFi SourcePoint 888: Three-way vented design: an 8” coaxial mid-range/1.25” dome tweeter driver plus two additional 8” woofers crossed at about 130Hz. The catch: A significant investment, best ordered from a dealer with a good return policy.
Buy the MoFi SourcePoint 888. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Klipsch Forte IV and costs less, which settles it without a real tradeoff to make.
Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Klipsch Forte IV | MoFi SourcePoint 888 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5,499.98 per pair | $5495 per pair |
| Ranked | #41 of 71 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers | #4 of 71 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) | 26Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 82Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) | 34Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 93.8dB (measured average, Erin's Audio Corner; manufacturer rates 99dB in-room / ~94dB anechoic) | 85.6dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Drivers | 1x 12" (305mm) fiber-composite woofer + 15" passive radiator, 1x 1.75" compression driver midrange on horn, 1x 1" titanium compression tweeter on horn | Dual 8" paper cone woofers, 8" Paper Cone midrange, 1.25" wide roll soft dome tweeter |
| Weight | 117.3 lbs (53.2 kg) | 94.8 lbs (43 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | passive radiator | ported, rear |
| Impedance | 8 ohms | 6 ohms nominal, 5 ohms minimum (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Dimensions | 36"H x 16.5"W x 13"D (914.4 x 419.1 x 330.2 mm) | 41.2"H x 12.6"W x 16.1"D (1046.5 x 320 x 408.9 mm) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 2.89 | 5.21 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 4.84 | 6.33 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to MoFi SourcePoint 888:
- GR-Research NX-Treme vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- KEF Blade Two Meta vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower
Prices on this page were last checked September 23, 2026 at 11:24 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Klipsch Forte IV: $5,499.98 per pair Amazon Crutchfield eBay
Pros: Three-way heritage design: a 1” titanium tweeter and 1.75” compression driver for the midrange mated to a 12” woofer, plus a 15” passive radiator for extra bass reinforcement. Genuinely resonance-free cabinet, a clear improvement over the notably boomy, resonant Heresy 4 in the same lineup. Surprisingly wide, expansive soundstage that beat both the Heresy 4 and a KEF LS50 Wireless 2 in direct comparison - images occasionally appeared several feet outside the physical speaker location. Deeper bass extension than the Heresy 4 (F3 of 82Hz, about 10Hz lower). Distortion measures well below 1% at 86dB and stays mostly within 1% even at 96dB. Comes as a factory-matched serial-numbered pair, backed by an unusually generous 10-year warranty. Mostly above 4 ohms impedance, so it’s compatible with AVRs, solid-state, or tube amplifiers. More neutral overall than other Klipsch models the reviewer has tested, making it a reasonable pick for listeners who already like the “Klipsch sound” but want something more balanced. Measured bass extension of 82Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 93.8dB.
Cons: Contrary to the classic Klipsch reputation for being forward and bright, this model is actually somewhat recessed in the 1.5-4kHz “presence” region, which can make some tracks sound dull or lacking in detail. A peak around 6kHz reads as sibilant and “painful” when seated exactly on the tweeter axis; sitting a bit above that axis reduces it somewhat. Klipsch’s marketed 99dB sensitivity figure is an in-room rating that assumes 3-6dB of boundary gain - anechoic sensitivity measures closer to 94dB, which the manufacturer does disclose but can still mislead buyers comparing spec sheets. Radiation width isn’t consistent across all frequencies - a noticeable notch around 2-3kHz interrupts otherwise wide dispersion, which can cause a fundamental tone and its harmonics to image in slightly different places in the soundstage. Uses shallow low-pass crossover slopes (despite Klipsch’s steep-crossover marketing, which applies only to the high-pass side), likely contributing to some of the measured dips and possible cone-breakup artifacts. Some compression shows up around the midrange crossover point at very high output (102dB), though likely only audible at extreme volumes. At around $5500/pair, a significant investment, and still needs a subwoofer for material extending below about 50Hz.
Full Klipsch Forte IV review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 82Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 36"H x 16.5"W x 13"D (914.4 x 419.1 x 330.2 mm) |
| Drivers | 1x 12" (305mm) fiber-composite woofer + 15" passive radiator, 1x 1.75" compression driver midrange on horn, 1x 1" titanium compression tweeter on horn |
| Impedance | 8 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 93.8dB (measured average, Erin's Audio Corner; manufacturer rates 99dB in-room / ~94dB anechoic) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 2.89 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 4.84 |
| Weight | 117.3 lbs (53.2 kg) |
| Woofer Cabinet | passive radiator |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Infinity Primus 360
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Polk Audio XT70
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Definitive Technology BP-9020
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Polk Audio XT60
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Klipsch Heresy IV
- Klipsch Forte IV vs KEF Q11 Meta
- Klipsch Forte IV vs Polk Reserve R500
- Klipsch Forte IV vs ELAC Debut 3.0 DF63
- See all 46 comparisons
MoFi SourcePoint 888: $5495 per pair Crutchfield eBay
Pros: Three-way vented design: an 8” coaxial mid-range/1.25” dome tweeter driver plus two additional 8” woofers crossed at about 130Hz, giving genuinely full-range output (F3 34Hz, F10 26Hz) other than the deepest subsonic content. Ranked by the reviewer among his personal top three speakers out of roughly 200 tested, alongside the KEF Blade 2 Meta and Dutch & Dutch 8C, despite costing a small fraction of either. Excellent compression/dynamic-range linearity, holding its own against much pricier speakers like the March Audio Sointuva AWG, KEF Reference 1 Meta, and KEF Blade 2 Meta. On-axis (0°) and 30°-off-axis estimated in-room responses track within about 1-1.5dB of each other above 500Hz, so tonal balance barely changes with placement or listening angle - excellent for multi-seat home theater or entertaining. Wide horizontal dispersion of about ±60°. Distortion stays low: under 1% at 86dB, and under 1% above 200Hz even at 96dB, with multitone distortion mostly under 1% as well. Not a difficult amplifier load (5-ohm minimum impedance, 4.2-ohm minimum EPDR). Checks the three boxes the reviewer considers essential for a home theater speaker: low compression, low distortion, and excellent directivity. Measured bass extension of 34Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85.6dB.
Cons: A significant investment, best ordered from a dealer with a good return policy. Large and heavy floorstander (about 96 lbs, 42” tall) requiring real floor space and rear clearance. Positioning is fairly specific: needs about 2 feet from the rear wall - closer causes boominess in the 40-50Hz region, farther loses bass extension. Vertical dispersion (about ±50°) is narrower than horizontal (about ±60°), since the two 8” woofers are spaced vertically apart on a tower cabinet, causing some vertical mismatch at lower frequencies. A small on-axis dip around 500Hz and a deliberately lower tweeter level (about 0.5dB below the midrange) are intentional design choices for smoother in-room response, but mean the raw on-axis measurement isn’t perfectly flat. A mild diffraction-related dip appears around 3kHz in directivity measurements. Toeing the speaker out more than about 10° starts to noticeably reduce top-end energy.
Full MoFi SourcePoint 888 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 26Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 34Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 41.2"H x 12.6"W x 16.1"D (1046.5 x 320 x 408.9 mm) |
| Drivers | Dual 8" paper cone woofers, 8" Paper Cone midrange, 1.25" wide roll soft dome tweeter |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal, 5 ohms minimum (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 85.6dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.21 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.33 |
| Weight | 94.8 lbs (43 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs KEF Blade Two Meta
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs GR-Research NX-Treme
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs JBL HDI-3800
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs Revel F328Be
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs KEF R5 Meta
- See all 35 comparisons


