Klipsch Forte IV vs Focal Chora 816

Last updated: October 8, 2026

Short answer: the Focal Theva N°2, if you are buying new. The Focal Chora 816 ranks higher than the Klipsch Forte IV (#26 vs #101 of 188 floorstanding speakers) but is discontinued; its replacement, the Focal Theva N°2, is rated 4.4/5 at $999 and is still sold new.

Klipsch Forte IV vs Focal Chora 816

The case for the Klipsch Forte IV: Three-way heritage design: a 1” titanium tweeter and 1.75” compression driver for the midrange mated to a 12” woofer, plus a 15” passive radiator for extra bass reinforcement. Watch for: Contrary to the classic Klipsch reputation for being forward and bright, this model is actually somewhat recessed in the 1.5-4kHz “presence” region, which can make some tracks sound dull or lacking in detail.

The Focal Chora 816 is the more accurate, deeper-bass choice. CEA2034 spinorama shows a generally even on-axis response with nice bass extension and high sensitivity. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 4.30 against 3.78 for the Klipsch Forte IV. Its bass reaches about 60Hz before falling 3dB, against 82Hz for the Klipsch Forte IV. Watch for: Some messiness appears between 500Hz-2kHz on-axis, including a dip around 550Hz.

Buy the Focal Theva N°2, the replacement for the discontinued Focal Chora 816; it is rated higher for sound quality than the Klipsch Forte IV.

Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Klipsch Forte IV Focal Chora 816
Price$5,499.98 per pair$900 per pair used, Discontinued
Ranked#101 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#26 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)39Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)35Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)82Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)60Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Sensitivity93.8dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner; manufacturer rates 99dB in-room / ~94dB anechoic)91dB (measured, Audio Science Review)
Drivers1x 12” (305mm) fiber-composite woofer + 15” passive radiator, 1x 1.75” compression driver midrange on horn, 1x 1” titanium compression tweeter on horn6.5” (16.5cm) Slatefiber woofer, 6.5” (16.5cm) Slatefiber midrange, 1” (25mm) TNF Al/Mg inverted dome tweeter
Weight117.3 lbs (53.2 kg)40.8 lbs (18.5 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetpassive radiatorported, front
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms nominal (3.9 ohms minimum, measured, Audio Science Review)
Dimensions36”H x 16.5”W x 13”D (914.4 x 419.1 x 330.2 mm)40.7”H x 11.8”W x 15.3”D (1033.8 x 299.7 x 388.6 mm)
Spinorama Preference Score3.784.30
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub5.726.37
DIY KitNoNo

More worthwhile head-to-heads for Focal Chora 816:

Prices on this page were last checked October 7, 2026 at 9:25 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Klipsch Forte IV: $5,499.98 per pair Amazon Crutchfield eBay

Klipsch Forte IV ranking card

Same family: the Klipsch Heresy IV (smaller floorstanding, ranked lower, rated 2.3/5), the Klipsch Cornwall IV (larger floorstanding, ranked lower, estimated 2.8/5), the Klipsch La Scala AL6 (larger floorstanding, ranked lower, estimated 2.8/5) and the Klipsch Klipschorn AK7 (larger floorstanding, ranked lower, estimated 3/5).

Pros: Three-way heritage design: a 1” titanium tweeter and 1.75” compression driver for the midrange mated to a 12” woofer, plus a 15” passive radiator for extra bass reinforcement. Genuinely resonance-free cabinet, a clear improvement over the notably boomy, resonant Heresy 4 in the same lineup. Surprisingly wide, expansive soundstage that beat both the Heresy 4 and a KEF LS50 Wireless 2 in direct comparison: images occasionally appeared several feet outside the physical speaker location. Deeper bass extension than the Heresy 4 (F3 of 82Hz, about 10Hz lower). Distortion measures well below 1% at 86dB and stays mostly within 1% even at 96dB. Comes as a factory-matched serial-numbered pair, backed by an unusually generous 10-year warranty. Mostly above 4 ohms impedance, so it’s compatible with AVRs, solid-state, or tube amplifiers. More neutral overall than other Klipsch models the reviewer has tested, making it a reasonable pick for listeners who already like the “Klipsch sound” but want something more balanced. Measured bass extension of 82Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 93.8dB.

Cons: Contrary to the classic Klipsch reputation for being forward and bright, this model is actually somewhat recessed in the 1.5-4kHz “presence” region, which can make some tracks sound dull or lacking in detail. A peak around 6kHz reads as sibilant and “painful” when seated exactly on the tweeter axis; sitting a bit above that axis reduces it somewhat. Klipsch’s marketed 99dB sensitivity figure is an in-room rating that assumes 3-6dB of boundary gain: anechoic sensitivity measures closer to 94dB, which the manufacturer does disclose but can still mislead buyers comparing spec sheets. Radiation width isn’t consistent across all frequencies: a noticeable notch around 2-3kHz interrupts otherwise wide dispersion, which can cause a fundamental tone and its harmonics to image in slightly different places in the soundstage. Uses shallow low-pass crossover slopes (despite Klipsch’s steep-crossover marketing, which applies only to the high-pass side), likely contributing to some of the measured dips and possible cone-breakup artifacts. Some compression shows up around the midrange crossover point at very high output (102dB), though likely only audible at extreme volumes. At around $5500/pair, a significant investment, and still needs a subwoofer for material extending below about 50Hz.

Bass Extension (-10dB)39Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)82Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions36”H x 16.5”W x 13”D (914.4 x 419.1 x 330.2 mm)
Drivers1x 12” (305mm) fiber-composite woofer + 15” passive radiator, 1x 1.75” compression driver midrange on horn, 1x 1” titanium compression tweeter on horn
Impedance8 ohms
Sensitivity93.8dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner; manufacturer rates 99dB in-room / ~94dB anechoic)
Spinorama Preference Score3.78
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub5.72
Weight117.3 lbs (53.2 kg)
Woofer Cabinetpassive radiator

Focal Chora 816: $900 per pair used Discontinued eBay

Focal Chora 816 ranking card

Newer model: the Focal Theva N°2, ranked lower, estimated 4.4/5.

Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows a generally even on-axis response with nice bass extension and high sensitivity. Predicted in-room response is very good aside from a peak around 8kHz. Horizontal beamwidth of about ±60 degrees is typical and fairly controlled. Distortion is very low at 86dB SPL/1m and still usable at 96dB SPL/1m. Measured bass extension of 60Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 91dB.

Cons: Some messiness appears between 500Hz-2kHz on-axis, including a dip around 550Hz. Vertical directivity narrows a little, so listening height matters more than with a coincident design. Cumulative spectral decay (waterfall) shows a fair bit of resonances lingering across the midrange. Distortion rises substantially in the 1-2kHz region at 96dB SPL/1m. Minimum impedance dips to about 3.9 ohms. Discontinued.

Bass Extension (-10dB)35Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)60Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions40.7”H x 11.8”W x 15.3”D (1033.8 x 299.7 x 388.6 mm)
Drivers6.5” (16.5cm) Slatefiber woofer, 6.5” (16.5cm) Slatefiber midrange, 1” (25mm) TNF Al/Mg inverted dome tweeter
Impedance8 ohms nominal (3.9 ohms minimum, measured, Audio Science Review)
Sensitivity91dB (measured, Audio Science Review)
Spinorama Preference Score4.30
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.37
Weight40.8 lbs (18.5 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, front