Short answer: the Revel F328Be for the higher ranking, the Klipsch Forte IV for the lower price. The Revel F328Be ranks #5 of 25 floorstanding speakers at $13600. The Klipsch Forte IV ranks #24 at $5499.98, $8100.02 cheaper.
What the Klipsch Forte IV gets right: Three-way heritage design: a 1” titanium tweeter and 1.75” compression driver for the midrange mated to a 12” woofer. Set against that: Contrary to the classic Klipsch reputation for being forward and bright.
On the Revel F328Be side: CEA2034 spinorama shows a quite flat on-axis response with superb directivity and efficiency above 90dB. The tradeoff: Vertical directivity is asymmetric - the reviewer recommends staying between -20 and +40 degrees relative to the tweeter axis.
Buy the Klipsch Forte IV if the price matters more than the ranking. Buy the Revel F328Be if the ranking matters more than the price.
Specifications Side By Side
| Klipsch Forte IV | Revel F328Be | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5,499.98 | $13600 |
| Ranked | #24 of 25 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers | #5 of 25 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39Hz | 39Hz |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 82Hz | 74Hz |
| Sensitivity | 94dB | 91dB |
| Drivers | 1x 12" (305mm) fiber-composite woofer + 15" passive radiator, 1x 1.75" compression driver midrange on horn, 1x 1" titanium compression tweeter on horn | Three 8" (200mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cones, with cast frames woofer, 5-1/4" (130mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cone, with cast frame midrange, 1" (25mm) Beryllium dome, with acoustic lens waveguide tweeter |
| Weight | 117.3 lbs / 53.2 kg | 112.4 lbs / 51 kg each |
| Dimensions | - | 50.9"H x 13.5"W x 17.6"D (1292.9 x 342.9 x 447 mm) |
| Impedance | - | 8 ohms |
| Woofer Cabinet | - | Dual rear-mounted ports |
The Two Speakers In Full
Klipsch Forte IV: $5,499.98 Crutchfield Amazon
Pros: Three-way heritage design: a 1” titanium tweeter and 1.75” compression driver for the midrange mated to a 12” woofer, plus a 15” passive radiator for extra bass reinforcement. Genuinely resonance-free cabinet, a clear improvement over the notably boomy, resonant Heresy 4 in the same lineup. Surprisingly wide, expansive soundstage that beat both the Heresy 4 and a KEF LS50 Wireless 2 in direct comparison - images occasionally appeared several feet outside the physical speaker location. Deeper bass extension than the Heresy 4 (F3 of 82Hz, about 10Hz lower). Distortion measures well below 1% at 86dB and stays mostly within 1% even at 96dB. Comes as a factory-matched serial-numbered pair, backed by an unusually generous 10-year warranty. Mostly above 4 ohms impedance, so it’s compatible with AVRs, solid-state, or tube amplifiers. More neutral overall than other Klipsch models the reviewer has tested, making it a reasonable pick for listeners who already like the “Klipsch sound” but want something more balanced.
Cons: Contrary to the classic Klipsch reputation for being forward and bright, this model is actually somewhat recessed in the 1.5-4kHz “presence” region, which can make some tracks sound dull or lacking in detail. A peak around 6kHz reads as sibilant and “painful” when seated exactly on the tweeter axis; sitting a bit above that axis reduces it somewhat. Klipsch’s marketed 99dB sensitivity figure is an in-room rating that assumes 3-6dB of boundary gain - anechoic sensitivity measures closer to 94dB, which the manufacturer does disclose but can still mislead buyers comparing spec sheets. Radiation width isn’t consistent across all frequencies - a noticeable notch around 2-3kHz interrupts otherwise wide dispersion, which can cause a fundamental tone and its harmonics to image in slightly different places in the soundstage. Uses shallow low-pass crossover slopes (despite Klipsch’s steep-crossover marketing, which applies only to the high-pass side), likely contributing to some of the measured dips and possible cone-breakup artifacts. Some compression shows up around the midrange crossover point at very high output (102dB), though likely only audible at extreme volumes. At around $5,000/pair, a significant investment, and still needs a subwoofer for material extending below about 50Hz.
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39Hz |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 82Hz |
| Drivers | 1x 12" (305mm) fiber-composite woofer + 15" passive radiator, 1x 1.75" compression driver midrange on horn, 1x 1" titanium compression tweeter on horn |
| Sensitivity | 94dB |
| Weight | 117.3 lbs / 53.2 kg |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Links
Revel F328Be: $13600 Crutchfield
Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows a quite flat on-axis response with superb directivity and efficiency above 90dB. Predicted in-room response is extremely accurate, with a smooth ~5dB downward slope from bass to treble that suits typical rooms without correction. Early reflections sum very nicely with the direct sound. Horizontal beamwidth of about ±70 degrees is wide and quite smooth. At 96dB SPL/1m distortion stays easily below the reviewer’s audibility threshold across nearly the whole range.
Cons: Vertical directivity is asymmetric - the reviewer recommends staying between -20 and +40 degrees relative to the tweeter axis, reflecting the driver layout of this three-way tower. Impedance dips to a minimum of 3 ohms with an additional resonance-driven phase swing, calling for an amplifier comfortable with a demanding load. Very expensive and very heavy (51 kg each).
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39Hz |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 74Hz |
| Dimensions | 50.9"H x 13.5"W x 17.6"D (1292.9 x 342.9 x 447 mm) |
| Drivers | Three 8" (200mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cones, with cast frames woofer, 5-1/4" (130mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cone, with cast frame midrange, 1" (25mm) Beryllium dome, with acoustic lens waveguide tweeter |
| Impedance | 8 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 91dB |
| Weight | 112.4 lbs / 51 kg each |
| Woofer Cabinet | Dual rear-mounted ports |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Revel F328Be vs Revel F208
- Revel F328Be vs Revel F228Be
- Revel F328Be vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- Revel F328Be vs KEF R11 Meta
- Revel F328Be vs KEF Blade Two Meta
- Revel F328Be vs GR-Research NX-Treme
- Revel F328Be vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- Revel F328Be vs Revel Concerta2 F35
- See all 9 comparisons
- Links
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Product prices and availability were last checked August 9, 2026 at 6:57 AM UTC and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.