Klipsch Forte IV vs KEF Q11 Meta

Last updated: October 15, 2026

Short answer: the KEF Q11 Meta for a modern coaxial design, the Forte IV for scale. The Q11 Meta is a three-way tower whose coaxial layout places a 3/4” tweeter with Metamaterial Absorption Technology in a 4” mid-range, but it measures genuinely dark on-axis and needs sidewall reflections within about 6 feet to sound neutral. The Forte IV’s 12” woofer and 15” passive radiator cut a bigger figure, yet it is recessed around 1.5-4kHz.

Klipsch Forte IV vs KEF Q11 Meta

Buy the KEF Q11 Meta. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $3,000 less than the Klipsch Forte IV.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.

Klipsch Forte IV

Three-way heritage design: a 1” titanium tweeter and 1.75” compression driver for the midrange mated to a 12” woofer, plus a 15” passive radiator for extra bass reinforcement.

Amazon $5,499.98 Crutchfield $5,499.98 eBay
$5,499.98per pair
KEF Q11 Meta

Three-way tower design with a coaxial layout: a 3/4” aluminum dome tweeter (with KEF’s Metamaterial Absorption Technology behind it) mounted at the center of a 4” mid-range, plus three 6.5” bass drivers.

Amazon $1,249.99 eBay
$2,499.98per pair

Prices on this page were last checked October 15, 2026 at 5:41 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

Klipsch Forte IV KEF Q11 Meta
Price$5,499.98 per pair$2,499.98 per pair
Ranked#122 of 228 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#124 of 228 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)39Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)29Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)82Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)60Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity93.8dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner; manufacturer rates 99dB in-room / ~94dB anechoic)88.6dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Drivers1x 12” (305mm) fiber-composite woofer + 15” passive radiator, 1x 1.75” compression driver midrange on horn, 1x 1” titanium compression tweeter on horn25mm tweeter + dual 165mm drivers
Weight117.3 lbs (53.2 kg)106.9 lbs (48.5 kg)
Woofer Cabinetpassive radiatorported, rear
Impedance8 ohms4 ohms nominal (3.2 ohms minimum, measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions36”H x 16.5”W x 13”D (914.4 x 419.1 x 330.2 mm)43.8”H x 12.5”W x 15”D (1112.8 x 317.5 x 381.0 mm)
Spinorama Preference Score3.786.72
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub5.728.03
DIY KitNoNo

Frequency Response Compared

Both speakers’ spinorama measurements, overlaid. A flatter line is more neutral: peaks sound forward or harsh, dips sound recessed. Each curve is shifted so its average from 300 Hz to 3 kHz sits at 0 dB, so loudness differences between the two are removed and only the shape is compared.

Listening window: the sound arriving straight at you, averaged over a small window around the listening position.
Klipsch Forte IVKEF Q11 Meta
Listening window of the Klipsch Forte IV and KEF Q11 Meta-24-18-12-60+6dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k
Estimated in-room response: what a typical room adds: reflections from walls and the floor make it tilt down toward the treble, and a gentle, even tilt is ideal.
Klipsch Forte IVKEF Q11 Meta
Estimated in-room response of the Klipsch Forte IV and KEF Q11 Meta-24-18-12-60+6dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: Klipsch Forte IV (measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) and KEF Q11 Meta (measured by Erin’s Audio Corner), via spinorama.org.

More worthwhile head-to-heads for Klipsch Forte IV: