Polk T50 vs Revel F228Be

Last updated: October 7, 2026

Short answer: the Revel F228Be if sound quality matters most, the Polk T50 if price matters most. The Revel F228Be ranks #28 of 188 floorstanding speakers, rated 4.5/5, at $11,000. The Polk T50 ranks #126, rated 3.8/5, at $374, $10,626 cheaper.

Polk T50 vs Revel F228Be

The Polk T50 is the deeper-bass pick. Pretty deep bass for the price. Its bass reaches about 47Hz before falling 3dB, against 61Hz for the Revel F228Be. The catch: 5dB peak at 1kHz, 4dB bright top end from 11kHz on up.

The Revel F228Be is the more accurate option. CEA2034 spinorama shows an essentially flat on-axis response with very nice directivity. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 6.01 against 4.14 for the Polk T50. Watch for: Minimum impedance dips to 3.4 ohms with a secondary rise around 2kHz, calling for an amplifier comfortable with a demanding load.

Buy the Polk T50 if the price matters more than sound quality. Buy the Revel F228Be if sound quality matters more than the price.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Polk T50 Revel F228Be
Price$374 per pair$11,000 per pair
Ranked#126 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#28 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)38Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)25Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)61Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Impedance4 ohms nominal (4.2 ohms minimum, measured by Audio Science Review)8 ohms
Drivers2x 6.5” bi-laminate paper cone woofers, 1x 1” Terylene dome tweeter + 2x 8” passive bass radiatorsDual 8” (200mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cones, with cast frames woofers, 5-1/4” (130mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cone, with cast frame midrange, 1” (25mm) Beryllium dome, with acoustic lens waveguide tweeter
Weight75.4 lbs (34.2 kg)112.4 lbs (51 kg) each
Sensitivity86.3dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Audio Science Review)89.3dB (300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, measured by Audio Science Review; 90dB manufacturer specified)
Dimensions40.4”H x 9.3”W x 12.5”D (1026.2 x 235.0 x 317.5 mm)50.9”H x 13.5”W x 17.6”D (1292.9 x 342.9 x 447 mm)
Woofer Cabinetpassive radiatorported, front
Spinorama Preference Score4.146.01
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.157.51
DIY KitNoNo

How Revel F228Be compares with other leading options:

Prices on this page were last checked October 7, 2026 at 9:25 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Polk T50: $374 per pair Amazon eBay

Polk T50 ranking card

Same family: the Polk T15 (bookshelf, rated 1.9/5).

Pros: Pretty deep bass for the price. Distortion at 86dB SPL/1m is reasonably controlled outside a narrow spike around 250Hz. The reviewer notes performance is “not too bad for a budget speaker” once the two main tonal issues are addressed with EQ. Measured bass extension of 47Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 86.3dB.

Cons: 5dB peak at 1kHz, 4dB bright top end from 11kHz on up. Just okay vertical off axis. Impedance and phase show several resonances between 200Hz-1kHz, with a minimum impedance of 4.2 ohms. Distortion rises substantially at 96dB SPL/1m across the midrange, with repeated peaks between 100Hz-2kHz.

Bass Extension (-10dB)38Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions40.4”H x 9.3”W x 12.5”D (1026.2 x 235.0 x 317.5 mm)
Drivers2x 6.5” bi-laminate paper cone woofers, 1x 1” Terylene dome tweeter + 2x 8” passive bass radiators
Impedance4 ohms nominal (4.2 ohms minimum, measured by Audio Science Review)
Sensitivity86.3dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Audio Science Review)
Spinorama Preference Score4.14
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.15
Weight75.4 lbs (34.2 kg)
Woofer Cabinetpassive radiator

Revel F228Be: $11,000 per pair Crutchfield eBay

Revel F228Be ranking card

Older model: the Revel F208 (ranked higher, rated 4.5/5).

Same family: the Revel M126Be (bookshelf, rated 4.3/5), the Revel F226Be (smaller floorstanding, ranked higher, rated 4.6/5), the Revel F328Be (larger floorstanding, ranked higher, rated 4.7/5) and the Revel C426Be (center, rated 4/5).

Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows an essentially flat on-axis response with very nice directivity. Predicted in-room response is nearly perfect, with a smooth slope down from bass to treble. Horizontal beamwidth of about ±70 degrees is wide and holds up well until narrowing above 8kHz. Vertical directivity offers more degrees of listening-height freedom than a typical bookshelf design, a benefit of this tower’s driver layout. Distortion is extremely low across the full audio range at 86dB SPL/1m and stays comfortable even at 96dB SPL/1m. Near-field measurements of the individual drivers show nice, well-integrated crossover behavior with only low-level resonances. Measured bass extension of 61Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 89.3dB.

Cons: Minimum impedance dips to 3.4 ohms with a secondary rise around 2kHz, calling for an amplifier comfortable with a demanding load. Very expensive and very heavy (51 kg each).

Bass Extension (-10dB)25Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)61Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions50.9”H x 13.5”W x 17.6”D (1292.9 x 342.9 x 447 mm)
DriversDual 8” (200mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cones, with cast frames woofers, 5-1/4” (130mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cone, with cast frame midrange, 1” (25mm) Beryllium dome, with acoustic lens waveguide tweeter
Impedance8 ohms
Sensitivity89.3dB (300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, measured by Audio Science Review; 90dB manufacturer specified)
Spinorama Preference Score6.01
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.51
Weight112.4 lbs (51 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, front