Klipsch RP-8000F II vs Polk T50

Last updated: October 15, 2026

Short answer: the Klipsch RP-8000F II, because the Polk’s peaks are harder to overlook. The T50 does deliver pretty deep bass for the price, but a 5dB peak at 1kHz and a 4dB bright top end from 11kHz on up color the midrange and treble. The Klipsch costs $1,159.98 against $498 and counters with ~92dB measured sensitivity and better dynamics, though its mid-bass is lean and bass did not reach the expected 50Hz.

Klipsch RP-8000F II vs Polk T50

Buy the Klipsch RP-8000F II if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Polk T50 if the price matters more than sound quality.

Still deciding? The full Passive Home rankings cover every ranked option.

Klipsch RP-8000F II

Highest sensitivity of the RP II floorstander line (~92dB measured) and the best dynamics/compression behavior of the three under load: the cleanest at high output.

Amazon $1,159.98 eBay
$1,159.98per pair
Polk T50

A budget floorstander with two 6.5-inch woofers and two 8-inch passive radiators that give pretty deep bass for the price, to 47Hz (-3dB).

Amazon $249.00 eBay
$498per pair

Prices on this page were last checked October 15, 2026 at 5:41 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

Klipsch RP-8000F II Polk T50
Price$1,159.98 per pair$498 per pair
Ranked#138 of 228 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#152 of 228 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)33Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)38Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Sensitivity92dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)86.3dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Audio Science Review)
Drivers1” titanium tweeter with 90x90 Tractrix horn, dual 8” cerametallic woofers2x 6.5” bi-laminate paper cone woofers, 1x 1” Terylene dome tweeter + 2x 8” passive bass radiators
Weight61.3 lbs (27.8 kg)75.4 lbs (34.2 kg)
Impedance8 ohms nominal (3.7 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)4 ohms nominal (4.2 ohms minimum, measured by Audio Science Review)
Frequency Response35Hz - 25kHz (+-3dB, Manufacturer specified)-
Crossover Frequency1630Hz-
Power Handling150W continuous, 600W peak-
Dimensions43.1” x 10.8” x 18.3” (1095 x 275 x 464 mm)40.4”H x 9.3”W x 12.5”D (1026.2 x 235.0 x 317.5 mm)
Woofer Cabinetported, rearpassive radiator
Spinorama Preference Score5.394.14
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.126.15
DIY KitNoNo

Frequency Response Compared

Both speakers’ spinorama measurements, overlaid. A flatter line is more neutral: peaks sound forward or harsh, dips sound recessed. Each curve is shifted so its average from 300 Hz to 3 kHz sits at 0 dB, so loudness differences between the two are removed and only the shape is compared. The two were measured by different sources, so small differences, especially in the bass, can come from the measurement setup rather than the speakers.

Listening window: the sound arriving straight at you, averaged over a small window around the listening position.
Klipsch RP-8000F IIPolk T50
Listening window of the Klipsch RP-8000F II and Polk T50-24-18-12-60+6dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k
Estimated in-room response: what a typical room adds: reflections from walls and the floor make it tilt down toward the treble, and a gentle, even tilt is ideal.
Klipsch RP-8000F IIPolk T50
Estimated in-room response of the Klipsch RP-8000F II and Polk T50-24-18-12-60+6dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: Klipsch RP-8000F II (measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) and Polk T50 (measured by Audio Science Review), via spinorama.org.

How Klipsch RP-8000F II compares with other leading options: