Short answer: the Revel Concerta2 F35. Both are rated 4.5/5 for sound quality (#19 and #17 of 74 floorstanding speakers), and the Revel Concerta2 F35 costs $900 against $9,000 for the Revel F228Be, and with sound quality even, the cheaper one is the better buy.
Buy the Revel Concerta2 F35. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $8,100 less than the Revel F228Be.
Still deciding? The full Passive Home rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| Revel F228Be | Revel Concerta2 F35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $9,000 per pair | $900 per pair |
| Ranked | #17 of 74 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers | #19 of 74 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 25Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 50Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 61Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 70Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Dimensions | 50.9”H x 13.5”W x 17.6”D (1292.9 x 342.9 x 447 mm) | 40.3”H x 8.4”W x 12.2”D (1023.6 x 213.4 x 309.9 mm) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms | 6 ohms nominal (3.8 ohms minimum, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Drivers | Dual 8” (200mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cones, with cast frames woofers, 5-1/4” (130mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cone, with cast frame midrange, 1” (25mm) Beryllium dome, with acoustic lens waveguide tweeter | 3x 5.25” deep anodized aluminum cone woofers, 1” Aluminum Tweeter |
| Sensitivity | 89.3dB (300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, measured by Audio Science Review; 90dB manufacturer specified) | 89.4dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner; 90dB manufacturer specified) |
| Weight | 112.4 lbs (51 kg) each | 41 lbs (18.6 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, front | ported, rear |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.01 | 5.35 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.51 | 7.30 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Revel F228Be:
- KEF Blade Two Meta vs Revel F228Be
- MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition vs Revel F228Be
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs Revel F228Be
- Revel F228Be vs Revel F328Be
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs Revel F228Be
Prices on this page were last checked October 2, 2026 at 10:18 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Revel F228Be: $9,000 per pair Crutchfield eBay
Older model: the Revel F208 (ranked higher, rated 4.5/5).
Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows an essentially flat on-axis response with very nice directivity. Predicted in-room response is nearly perfect, with a smooth slope down from bass to treble. Horizontal beamwidth of about ±70 degrees is wide and holds up well until narrowing above 8kHz. Vertical directivity offers more degrees of listening-height freedom than a typical bookshelf design, a benefit of this tower’s driver layout. Distortion is extremely low across the full audio range at 86dB SPL/1m and stays comfortable even at 96dB SPL/1m. Near-field measurements of the individual drivers show nice, well-integrated crossover behavior with only low-level resonances. Measured bass extension of 61Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 89.3dB.
Cons: Minimum impedance dips to 3.4 ohms with a secondary rise around 2kHz, calling for an amplifier comfortable with a demanding load. Very expensive and very heavy (51 kg each).
Full Revel F228Be review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 25Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 61Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 50.9”H x 13.5”W x 17.6”D (1292.9 x 342.9 x 447 mm) |
| Drivers | Dual 8” (200mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cones, with cast frames woofers, 5-1/4” (130mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cone, with cast frame midrange, 1” (25mm) Beryllium dome, with acoustic lens waveguide tweeter |
| Impedance | 8 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 89.3dB (300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, measured by Audio Science Review; 90dB manufacturer specified) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.01 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.51 |
| Weight | 112.4 lbs (51 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, front |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Revel Concerta2 F35: $900 per pair Crutchfield eBay
Pros: Two-and-a-half-way, four-driver design: a 1” aluminum dome tweeter on a waveguide, a 5.25” mid-range, and dual 5.25” mid-bass drivers in a rear-ported cabinet. Measured sensitivity of 89.4dB closely matches the 90dB spec, and distortion looks good at both 86dB and 96dB, holding up well even with a high-pass filter applied. At its sale price of $900/pair, down from full retail, the reviewer calls it a “no-brainer,” undercutting comparable budget floorstanders like the ELAC DF63. Frequency response and directivity mismatches are largely EQ-able, since most of what shows up in measurements traces to physical tweeter/mid-range separation rather than a fundamental flaw. Compression is fairly well controlled for the price: about 1dB of loss around 100Hz under long-term compression, described as “par for the course” at this cost. Measured bass extension of 70Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 89.4dB.
Cons: F3 of 61Hz and F10 of 39Hz mean a subwoofer is needed for real bass extension. A dip in the lower midrange/2-3kHz region reduces attack and detail, and a peak around 5kHz adds some edge and sibilance in the lower treble. A peak in off-axis energy around 3kHz reflects off sidewalls at roughly 60-70° off-axis and arrives louder than the direct sound: this specific issue can’t be fixed with EQ (boosting the direct sound would boost the stronger reflection too) and would need acoustic absorption to properly address, though the reviewer considers it a minor, optional fix at this price. A couple of minor resonances appear in the impedance plot, including one around 300Hz that may partly explain a subtle sense of vocal warmth noticed in listening, though it’s more likely room-related. Minimum impedance around 3.8 ohms. Short-term compression testing shows some increased distortion in the tweeter and higher-frequency compression at loud output.
Full Revel Concerta2 F35 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 70Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 40.3”H x 8.4”W x 12.2”D (1023.6 x 213.4 x 309.9 mm) |
| Drivers | 3x 5.25” deep anodized aluminum cone woofers, 1” Aluminum Tweeter |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal (3.8 ohms minimum, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 89.4dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner; 90dB manufacturer specified) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.35 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.30 |
| Weight | 41 lbs (18.6 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Audio Science Review Revel Concerta2 F35 More from Audio Science Review →
- Erin’s Audio Corner: Revel F35 Review: Great Sound, Lower Price! More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
- Erin’s Audio Review Website Revel Concerta2 F35
- Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
- Erin’s Audio Corner: You’ve Never Seen a Review Like This. Revel F35 Review (Part 1).
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs Revel F206
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs Perlisten S7t
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs Revel F208
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs KEF R5
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs Focal Chora 816
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs JBL HDI-3800
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs KEF R11 Meta
- Revel Concerta2 F35 vs KEF Reference 203
- See all 56 comparisons