Revel Concerta2 F35 vs Polk Audio Reserve R700

Last updated: August 15, 2026

Short answer: the Revel Concerta2 F35. It ranks #17 of 54 floorstanding speakers by sound quality at $900; the Polk Audio Reserve R700 ranks #22 and costs $1199, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.

What the Revel Concerta2 F35 offers: Two-and-a-half-way, four-driver design: a 1” aluminum dome tweeter on a waveguide, a 5.25” mid-range, and dual 5.25” mid-bass drivers in a rear-ported cabinet. Watch for: F3 of 61Hz and F10 of 39Hz mean a subwoofer is needed for real bass extension.

What the Polk Audio Reserve R700 offers: Three-way design with a 1” ring radiator tweeter, 6.5” mid-range, and dual 8” mid-bass drivers in a ported, down-firing cabinet. Watch for: Compression in the high frequencies rises sharply between 96dB and 102dB output - a real limitation only at very high volumes (around 100dB at 3 meters), but a clear step down from pricier ($5,000+) towers.

Buy the Revel Concerta2 F35. It ranks higher for sound quality than the Polk Audio Reserve R700 and costs less, so there is no real case for the other one.

Revel Concerta2 F35 vs Polk Audio Reserve R700

Specifications Side By Side

Revel Concerta2 F35 Polk Audio Reserve R700
Price$900$1,199.00
Ranked#17 of 54 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#22 of 54 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)50Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)31Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)70Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)40Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions40.3"H x 8.4"W x 12.2"D (1023.6 x 213.4 x 309.9 mm)45"H x 12.6"W x 16.9"D (1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3 mm)
Impedance6 ohms nominal (3.8 ohms minimum, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)4 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured above 80Hz, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity89.4dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner; 90dB manufacturer specified)87.5dB (measured average 300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Drivers3x 5.25" deep anodized aluminum cone woofers, 1" Aluminum Tweeter2x 8" polypropylene cone woofers, 1x 6.5" turbine cone midrange, 1x 1" Pinnacle ring radiator tweeter
Weight41 lbs / 18.6 kg each102.1 lbs / 46.3 kg
Woofer Cabinetported, rearported, down-firing

More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:

The Two Speakers In Full

Revel Concerta2 F35: $900 Crutchfield

Revel Concerta2 F35 ranking card

Pros: Two-and-a-half-way, four-driver design: a 1” aluminum dome tweeter on a waveguide, a 5.25” mid-range, and dual 5.25” mid-bass drivers in a rear-ported cabinet. Measured sensitivity of 89.4dB closely matches the 90dB spec, and distortion looks good at both 86dB and 96dB, holding up well even with a high-pass filter applied. At its sale price (around $900/pair, down from full retail), the reviewer calls it a “no-brainer,” undercutting comparable budget floorstanders like the ELAC DF63. Frequency response and directivity mismatches are largely EQ-able, since most of what shows up in measurements traces to physical tweeter/mid-range separation rather than a fundamental flaw. Compression is fairly well controlled for the price - about 1dB of loss around 100Hz under long-term compression, described as “par for the course” at this cost.

Cons: F3 of 61Hz and F10 of 39Hz mean a subwoofer is needed for real bass extension. A dip in the lower midrange/2-3kHz region reduces attack and detail, and a peak around 5kHz adds some edge and sibilance in the lower treble. A peak in off-axis energy around 3kHz reflects off sidewalls at roughly 60-70° off-axis and arrives louder than the direct sound - this specific issue can’t be fixed with EQ (boosting the direct sound would boost the stronger reflection too) and would need acoustic absorption to properly address, though the reviewer considers it a minor, optional fix at this price. A couple of minor resonances appear in the impedance plot, including one around 300Hz that may partly explain a subtle sense of vocal warmth noticed in listening, though it’s more likely room-related. Minimum impedance around 3.8 ohms. Short-term compression testing shows some increased distortion in the tweeter and higher-frequency compression at loud output.

Bass Extension (-10dB)50Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)70Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions40.3"H x 8.4"W x 12.2"D (1023.6 x 213.4 x 309.9 mm)
Drivers3x 5.25" deep anodized aluminum cone woofers, 1" Aluminum Tweeter
Impedance6 ohms nominal (3.8 ohms minimum, measured by Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity89.4dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner; 90dB manufacturer specified)
Weight41 lbs / 18.6 kg each
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Polk Audio Reserve R700: $1,199.00 Amazon

Polk Audio Reserve R700 ranking card

Pros: Three-way design with a 1” ring radiator tweeter, 6.5” mid-range, and dual 8” mid-bass drivers in a ported, down-firing cabinet. On-axis frequency response holds within about ±2dB across most of its range, with genuinely deep bass extension (F3 40Hz) reaching into the mid-30s Hz in-room. Wide horizontal radiation of about ±70°, giving a strong, enveloping stereo width and stage-extension effect on well-recorded tracks. Good low-level dynamics - solid bass thump at quiet listening volumes without over-accentuation. Strong distortion and compression control through the bass and midrange. Real nominal impedance closer to 4 ohms than the marketed 8 ohms, so with the right amplifier it can be driven hard - a $3,000 two-channel integrated brought out significantly more life than a budget $300 unit could. Excellent value at its roughly $2,200/pair MSRP, ranking among the reviewer’s top picks under $2,500; outperforms the similarly-priced Klipsch RP-8000F II in bass extension and overall smoothness.

Cons: Compression in the high frequencies rises sharply between 96dB and 102dB output - a real limitation only at very high volumes (around 100dB at 3 meters), but a clear step down from pricier ($5,000+) towers. Horizontal directivity mismatch around 4-5kHz, where the tweeter flares wider than the midrange, can sound a bit forward - especially noticeable when toed out further into the room; sidewall absorption or curtains help tame it. Harmonic distortion crosses the reviewer’s 3% threshold around 7kHz at 96dB output, possibly contributing to that same forward quality at high volume. Narrow vertical sweet spot (about ±15° from the tweeter axis), typical of non-coaxial tower designs - more of a consideration for multi-row home theater seating than single-row listening. The ring-radiator tweeter narrows noticeably above about 7-8kHz, and toeing the speaker out more than about 20° causes the top end to fall off quickly. Needs at least 2 feet of clearance from the rear wall to avoid boomy, exaggerated bass, since it lacks the bass-shelf tuning some rivals use to allow closer wall placement. Compared to the pricier KEF R5 Meta, has narrower horizontal (and much narrower vertical) directivity, so seating flexibility is more limited.

Bass Extension (-10dB)31Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)40Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions45"H x 12.6"W x 16.9"D (1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3 mm)
Drivers2x 8" polypropylene cone woofers, 1x 6.5" turbine cone midrange, 1x 1" Pinnacle ring radiator tweeter
Impedance4 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured above 80Hz, Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity87.5dB (measured average 300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, Erin's Audio Corner)
Weight102.1 lbs / 46.3 kg
Woofer Cabinetported, down-firing

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.