The Philharmonic BMR Monitor ranks #98 out of 157 total Large Size Bookshelf Speakers for sound quality. See all Passive Home rankings for every top pick.
Brand: Philharmonic
Prices on this page were last checked October 5, 2026 at 10:21 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
#98 Philharmonic BMR Monitor: $2200 per pair Philharmonic Audio eBay
Older model: the Philharmonic BMR (v1) (ranked higher, rated 4.3/5).
Pros: Three-way design combining a 6” SB Acoustics mid-woofer, a 2.5” Tectonic balanced-mode radiator (BMR) for the midrange, and a ribbon tweeter: premium component choices relative to the asking price. A clear improvement over the V1: the earlier version’s overly hot, plateauing treble has been resolved, leaving a genuinely good in-room response outside of one specific area. Extremely wide horizontal radiation of about ±70-80°, creating an enveloping, wide soundstage that illuminates the sidewalls. Well-built, attractive cabinet. Midrange and tweeter show no stress or elevated distortion even at higher output: all the compression and distortion issues trace back to the mid-woofer alone. Measured bass extension of 47Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 84dB.
Cons: A 1-2dB bump around 2-3kHz creates a “glare” on vocals, guitars, and strings that the reviewer noticed consistently across many tracks. The extremely wide radiation trades off against imaging precision: instrument placement became noticeably more diffuse and harder to pinpoint in a narrower, more reflective room, though it improved substantially in a larger, more open room with less sidewall interaction. A suspected resonance around 500Hz shows up as an imbalance in sound power and horizontal directivity measurements, loosely correlating with a vague sense of resonance the reviewer heard subjectively. Moderate sensitivity (about 84.1dB anechoic) and a mid-woofer that runs out of steam under real stress: distortion exceeds 3% even at 100Hz at 96dB, and the reviewer notes SB Acoustics’ published excursion specs tend to overstate real-world linear excursion by nearly 2x. Significant compression appears at 102dB: the woofer audibly unloads around 120Hz, and the ribbon tweeter also compresses heavily at high output. Not well suited to very loud two-channel listening (above about 90dB at 4 meters). In-room bass rolls off around 50Hz, so a subwoofer is recommended for most music. Benefits noticeably from a few bands of EQ if available.
How it compares: Just above it: Dynaudio Emit 20 - $1151 cheaper, 0.5Hz lower bass extension (-3dB). Just below it: JBL Studio 630 - $1501 cheaper, 0.8Hz lower bass extension (-3dB).
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 32Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 47Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 20”H x 8”W x 12.5”D (508 x 203.2 x 317.5 mm) |
| Drivers | 6” Ceramic woofer, Balanced Mode Radiator 2.5” midrange, RAAL 64-10X OEM tweeter |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal (3 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 84dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.02 (spinorama.org) |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.67 (spinorama.org) |
| Weight | 32 lbs (14.5 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
Head-to-Head Comparisons
48 comparisons- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Dynaudio Emit 20
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Klipsch RP-600M II
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Mission LX-3 MKII
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Polk Signature Elite ES20
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs GR-Research X-LS Encore
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Ascend CBM-170 SE2
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Dynaudio Special Forty
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Buchardt S400 MKII
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs SVS Prime Bookshelf
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs KEF Q3 Meta
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Sonus Faber Lumina II
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs XTZ Spirit 4
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Dynaudio Contour 20i
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Polk R200
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs ELAC DBR62
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Pylon Jasper Monitor 18
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Sonus Faber Lumina II Amator
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Triangle Borea BR03
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Revel Concerta2 M16
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs ATC SCM19
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Aalto Speakers Aalto 3 Passive
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Perlisten A3m
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs ELAC Debut 3.0 DB63
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Emotiva Airmotiv XB2
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Ascend Acoustics Sierra-2EX V2
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Philharmonic BMR (v1)
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Ascend Acoustics Sierra-LX
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Wharfedale Linton 85
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Dynaudio Heritage Special
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Radiant Acoustics Clarity 6.2
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs MoFi SourcePoint 10
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Wharfedale Super Linton
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Ascend Acoustics CMT-340 SE2
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Arendal 1528 Monitor 8
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs AsciLab F6Bs
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs MoFi SourcePoint 8
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Buchardt Audio E50
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs KEF R3
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Wharfedale Aura 2
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs KEF Q Concerto Meta
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs KEF R3 Meta
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Audio First Cadentia 3
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs AsciLab C6B
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs GR-Research NX-Studio
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs KEF Reference 1 Meta
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Perlisten S4b
No comparisons match that search.
