Short answer: the AsciLab F6Bs. It ranks #20 of 216 bookshelf speakers by sound quality (rated 4.5/5); the Philharmonic BMR Monitor ranks #130 (rated 3.6/5).
The AsciLab F6Bs is the better-sounding pick. A slimmer, sealed, VESA 100 wall mountable variant of the AsciLab F6B, trading the AsciLab F6B’s passive radiator for a shallower 15.4cm deep cabinet that can go straight on a wall bracket. The catch: AsciLab’s own site shows the F6Bs sold out, though it remains in stock through resellers like Audiophonics and Tested Audio.
The Philharmonic BMR Monitor is the more accurate, deeper-bass option. Three-way design combining a 6” SB Acoustics mid-woofer, a 2.5” Tectonic balanced-mode radiator (BMR) for the midrange, and a ribbon tweeter: premium component choices relative to the asking price. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 6.02 against 5.24 for the AsciLab F6Bs. Its bass reaches about 47Hz before falling 3dB, against 82Hz for the AsciLab F6Bs. The tradeoff: A 1-2dB bump around 2-3kHz creates a “glare” on vocals, guitars, and strings that the reviewer noticed consistently across many tracks.
Buy the AsciLab F6Bs. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Philharmonic BMR Monitor.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| AsciLab F6Bs | Philharmonic BMR Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €799 per pair | $2200 per pair |
| Ranked | #20 of 216 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers | #130 of 216 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Enclosure | sealed | - |
| Drivers | 1” aluminum dome tweeter with waveguide and phase plug, 6” fiber cone woofer | 6” Ceramic woofer, Balanced Mode Radiator 2.5” midrange, RAAL 64-10X OEM tweeter |
| Dimensions | 14.5”H x 8”W x 6.1”D (368 x 203 x 154 mm) | 20”H x 8”W x 12.5”D (508 x 203.2 x 317.5 mm) |
| Weight | 12.3 lbs (5.6 kg) each | 32 lbs (14.5 kg) each |
| Sensitivity | 85.2dB @ 2.83V/1m (measured, Audio Science Review) | 84dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal, 3.7 ohms minimum | 4 ohms nominal (3 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 82.0Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 47Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50.1Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 32Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Crossover Frequency | 1kHz | - |
| Mounting | VESA 100 wall mount compatible | - |
| Warranty | 2 years | - |
| Country | South Korea | - |
| Maximum SPL | 100dB full bandwidth, 102dB above 100Hz (manufacturer specified) | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.24 | 6.02 (spinorama.org) |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.90 | 7.67 (spinorama.org) |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
| Woofer Cabinet | - | ported, rear |
Frequency Response Compared
Both speakers’ spinorama measurements, overlaid. A flatter line is more neutral: peaks sound forward or harsh, dips sound recessed. Each curve is shifted so its average from 300 Hz to 3 kHz sits at 0 dB, so loudness differences between the two are removed and only the shape is compared. The two were measured by different sources, so small differences, especially in the bass, can come from the measurement setup rather than the speakers.
Measurement data: AsciLab F6Bs (measured by Audio Science Review) and Philharmonic BMR Monitor (measured by Erin’s Audio Corner), via spinorama.org.
Related Speaker Comparisons
How AsciLab F6Bs compares with other leading options:
- AsciLab F6Bs vs Perlisten S4b
- AsciLab F6Bs vs KEF Reference 1 Meta
- AsciLab F6Bs vs GR-Research NX-Studio
- AsciLab C6B vs AsciLab F6Bs
- Audio First Cadentia 3 vs AsciLab F6Bs
Prices on this page were last checked October 14, 2026 at 2:38 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
AsciLab F6Bs: €799 per pair Audiophonics eBay
Same family: the AsciLab F6B (smaller bookshelf, ranked higher, rated 4.6/5).
Pros: A slimmer, sealed, VESA 100 wall mountable variant of the AsciLab F6B, trading the AsciLab F6B’s passive radiator for a shallower 15.4cm deep cabinet that can go straight on a wall bracket. Off axis sound tracks the on axis response unusually consistently for a sealed 2-way this size, and on axis deviation measures a clean 0.25dB average. Measured bass extension of 82.0Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85.2dB.
Cons: AsciLab’s own site shows the F6Bs sold out, though it remains in stock through resellers like Audiophonics and Tested Audio. Bass extension is measured at 82.0Hz at -3dB, noticeably less than the passive radiator equipped AsciLab F6B, and listening window smoothness measures only a moderate 0.39. The 4 ohm nominal impedance calls for a reasonably capable amplifier.
Full AsciLab F6Bs review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50.1Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 82.0Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Country | South Korea |
| Crossover Frequency | 1kHz |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 14.5”H x 8”W x 6.1”D (368 x 203 x 154 mm) |
| Drivers | 1” aluminum dome tweeter with waveguide and phase plug, 6” fiber cone woofer |
| Enclosure | sealed |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal, 3.7 ohms minimum |
| Maximum SPL | 100dB full bandwidth, 102dB above 100Hz (manufacturer specified) |
| Mounting | VESA 100 wall mount compatible |
| Sensitivity | 85.2dB @ 2.83V/1m (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.24 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.90 |
| Warranty | 2 years |
| Weight | 12.3 lbs (5.6 kg) each |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- AsciLab F6Bs vs Epos ES14N
- AsciLab F6Bs vs MoFi SourcePoint 8
- AsciLab F6Bs vs Arendal 1528 Monitor 8
- AsciLab F6Bs vs Buchardt Audio E50
- AsciLab F6Bs vs Ascend Acoustics CMT-340 SE2
- AsciLab F6Bs vs Wharfedale Super Linton
- AsciLab F6Bs vs KEF R3
- AsciLab F6Bs vs Wharfedale Aura 2
- See all 47 comparisons
Philharmonic BMR Monitor: $2200 per pair Philharmonic Audio $2200 eBay
Older model: the Philharmonic BMR (v1) (ranked higher, rated 4.3/5). See every Philharmonic BMR generation.
Pros: Three-way design combining a 6” SB Acoustics mid-woofer, a 2.5” Tectonic balanced-mode radiator (BMR) for the midrange, and a ribbon tweeter: premium component choices relative to the asking price. A clear improvement over the V1: the earlier version’s overly hot, plateauing treble has been resolved, leaving a genuinely good in-room response outside of one specific area. Extremely wide horizontal radiation of about ±70-80°, creating an enveloping, wide soundstage that illuminates the sidewalls. Well-built, attractive cabinet. Midrange and tweeter show no stress or elevated distortion even at higher output: all the compression and distortion issues trace back to the mid-woofer alone. Measured bass extension of 47Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 84dB.
Cons: A 1-2dB bump around 2-3kHz creates a “glare” on vocals, guitars, and strings that the reviewer noticed consistently across many tracks. The extremely wide radiation trades off against imaging precision: instrument placement became noticeably more diffuse and harder to pinpoint in a narrower, more reflective room, though it improved substantially in a larger, more open room with less sidewall interaction. A suspected resonance around 500Hz shows up as an imbalance in sound power and horizontal directivity measurements, loosely correlating with a vague sense of resonance the reviewer heard subjectively. Moderate sensitivity (about 84.1dB anechoic) and a mid-woofer that runs out of steam under real stress: distortion exceeds 3% even at 100Hz at 96dB, and the reviewer notes SB Acoustics’ published excursion specs tend to overstate real-world linear excursion by nearly 2x. Significant compression appears at 102dB: the woofer audibly unloads around 120Hz, and the ribbon tweeter also compresses heavily at high output. Not well suited to very loud two-channel listening (above about 90dB at 4 meters). In-room bass rolls off around 50Hz, so a subwoofer is recommended for most music. Benefits noticeably from a few bands of EQ if available.
Full Philharmonic BMR Monitor review and specifications →
| Released | 2015 (11 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 32Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 47Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 20”H x 8”W x 12.5”D (508 x 203.2 x 317.5 mm) |
| Drivers | 6” Ceramic woofer, Balanced Mode Radiator 2.5” midrange, RAAL 64-10X OEM tweeter |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal (3 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 84dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.02 (spinorama.org) |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.67 (spinorama.org) |
| Weight | 32 lbs (14.5 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Dynaudio Emit 20
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Mission LX-3 MKII
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Klipsch RP-600M II
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Natural Sound NS17
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs GR-Research X-LS Encore
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Dynaudio Special Forty
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs Polk Signature Elite ES20
- Philharmonic BMR Monitor vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
- See all 48 comparisons