Short answer: the PSB Imagine T65. It ranks #61 of 188 floorstanding speakers by sound quality, rated 4.3/5, at $2,699. The SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle ranks #125, rated 3.8/5, at $2,499, $200 cheaper, a saving that is not big enough to make up the sound-quality gap.
The PSB Imagine T65 is the better-sounding pick. Three-way design with dual 6.5” woven carbon fiber woofers delivers genuinely strong, extended low end for a $2699 tower: among the better performers Erin has measured in this price class. Watch for: Noticeable dip in the midrange/crossover region that Erin flagged as affecting dialogue and vocal clarity, though he notes a couple bands of EQ smooths it out.
The SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle is the deeper-bass option. Flagship three-way tower with a diamond-coated tweeter, dual midranges and four force-balanced 8-inch woofers. Its bass reaches about 41Hz before falling 3dB, against 47Hz for the PSB Imagine T65. The tradeoff: The 5.25-to-8-inch transitions and complex array do not produce class-leading smoothness: 0.184 on-axis, 0.226 predicted in-room and 3.64 directivity-index consistency.
Buy the PSB Imagine T65. It is rated higher for sound quality, and saving $200 with the SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle does not make up for the sound-quality gap.
Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| PSB Imagine T65 | SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,699 per pair | $2,499.00 per pair |
| Ranked | #61 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers | #125 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers |
| Drivers | 1” titanium dome tweeter, 5.25” woven carbon fiber midrange, 2x 6.5” woven carbon fiber woofers | 1” diamond-coated tweeter, dual 5.25” midranges, quad 8” woofers |
| Crossover Frequency | 600Hz & 2000Hz, 4th-order Linkwitz-Riley | - |
| Dimensions | 38.8” x 8.4” x 13.5” (986 x 213 x 343 mm) | 50.2H x 11.8W x 18.1D in |
| Weight | 44.1 lbs (20 kg) each | 96.8 lbs (43.9 kg) each |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal (3.3 ohms minimum measured by Erin’s Audio Corner; manufacturer specifies 4 ohms minimum) | 6 ohms nominal |
| Sensitivity | 85.1dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 88dB |
| Recommended Power | 20-200W | - |
| Enclosure | Vented: dual rear slot ports, individual woofer chambers | 3-way passive, dual rear ports |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 47Hz (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 41.0Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner via spinorama.org) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 26Hz (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) | about 27.3Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Frequency Response | 28Hz - 20kHz (±1.5dB, manufacturer specified) | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.29 | 4.91 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.51 | 6.13 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How PSB Imagine T65 compares with other leading options:
- PSB Imagine T65 vs KEF Blade Two Meta
- PSB Imagine T65 vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- PSB Imagine T65 vs Revel F328Be
- PSB Imagine T65 vs KEF R5 Meta
- Revel F226Be vs PSB Imagine T65
Prices on this page were last checked October 9, 2026 at 8:01 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
PSB Imagine T65: $2,699 per pair PSB Speakers eBay
Same family: the PSB Imagine B50 (bookshelf, rated 3.7/5) and the PSB Imagine T54 (smaller floorstanding, ranked lower, estimated 4.2/5).
Pros: Three-way design with dual 6.5” woven carbon fiber woofers delivers genuinely strong, extended low end for a $2699 tower: among the better performers Erin has measured in this price class. Distortion shows a clean second-order character with clear separation from third-order all the way up to 96 dB, indicating a well-controlled motor. Compression data shows enhancement rather than compression below about 50-60 Hz, so the bass can sound louder as you turn it up rather than choking off. Wide, forgiving vertical listening window (about ±25°) thanks to the 3-way layout, giving more seating and placement flexibility than most towers. Plenty of dynamic headroom for home theater use or a two-channel system: 100W drove it comfortably in Erin’s room. Measured bass extension of 47Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85.1dB.
Cons: Noticeable dip in the midrange/crossover region that Erin flagged as affecting dialogue and vocal clarity, though he notes a couple bands of EQ smooths it out. Some horizontal dispersion mismatch (about 10-15° of ballooning between 1-3 kHz) between the midrange and tweeter can add extra perceived attack or detail if your room’s sidewalls are reflective. Dips to 4 ohms, so it wants an amplifier comfortable driving a 4-ohm load. Distortion climbs above 3% around 60 Hz at 96 dB, though it’s benign second-order distortion.
Full PSB Imagine T65 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 26Hz (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 47Hz (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Crossover Frequency | 600Hz & 2000Hz, 4th-order Linkwitz-Riley |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 38.8” x 8.4” x 13.5” (986 x 213 x 343 mm) |
| Drivers | 1” titanium dome tweeter, 5.25” woven carbon fiber midrange, 2x 6.5” woven carbon fiber woofers |
| Enclosure | Vented: dual rear slot ports, individual woofer chambers |
| Frequency Response | 28Hz - 20kHz (±1.5dB, manufacturer specified) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal (3.3 ohms minimum measured by Erin’s Audio Corner; manufacturer specifies 4 ohms minimum) |
| Recommended Power | 20-200W |
| Sensitivity | 85.1dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.29 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.51 |
| Weight | 44.1 lbs (20 kg) each |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- PSB Imagine T65 vs Polk Audio Reserve R700
- PSB Imagine T65 vs JBL HDI-3600
- PSB Imagine T65 vs JBL Studio 698
- PSB Imagine T65 vs Emotiva Airmotiv T2+
- PSB Imagine T65 vs ELAC Debut 3.0 DF63
- PSB Imagine T65 vs Polk Reserve R500
- PSB Imagine T65 vs Arendal 1961 Tower
- PSB Imagine T65 vs Infinity Primus 360
- See all 41 comparisons
SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle: $2,499.00 per pair Amazon SVS eBay
Same family: the SVS Ultra Evolution Nano (smaller bookshelf, estimated 3.9/5), the SVS Ultra Evolution Bookshelf (larger bookshelf, estimated 4/5), the SVS Ultra Evolution Tower (smaller floorstanding, ranked higher, estimated 4.1/5), the SVS Ultra Evolution Titan (smaller floorstanding, ranked higher, estimated 4.2/5) and the SVS Ultra Evolution Center (center, estimated 4.1/5).
Pros: Flagship three-way tower with a diamond-coated tweeter, dual midranges and four force-balanced 8-inch woofers. Erin measured exceptional 27Hz extension, broad roughly +/-75-degree horizontal coverage, an 88.1dB sensitivity and a 4.91 preference score even without a subwoofer. Measured bass extension of 41.0Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The 5.25-to-8-inch transitions and complex array do not produce class-leading smoothness: 0.184 on-axis, 0.226 predicted in-room and 3.64 directivity-index consistency. At 96.7 pounds each, these are difficult to position, and their Q of 1.25 indicates some bass emphasis. A dip in the upper midrange followed closely by a peak around 2 to 3kHz gives vocals a shouty, forward quality that toe-out alone does not resolve.
Full SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | about 27.3Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 41.0Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner via spinorama.org) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 50.2H x 11.8W x 18.1D in |
| Drivers | 1” diamond-coated tweeter, dual 5.25” midranges, quad 8” woofers |
| Enclosure | 3-way passive, dual rear ports |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal |
| Sensitivity | 88dB |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.91 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.13 |
| Weight | 96.8 lbs (43.9 kg) each |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Polk T50
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Definitive Technology BP-9020
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Klipsch RP-6000F II
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Dynaudio Emit 30
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Focal Aria Evo X N°2
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Klipsch RP-8000F II
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Klipsch RP-5000F II
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs KEF Q11 Meta
- See all 23 comparisons