Polk Reserve R500 Review: Ranked #61 of 139

Last updated: October 5, 2026

The Polk Reserve R500 ranks #61 out of 139 total Large Size Floorstanding Speakers for sound quality. See all Passive Home rankings for every top pick.

Brand: Polk

Prices on this page were last checked October 5, 2026 at 10:21 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

#61 Polk Reserve R500: $1,118 per pair Amazon eBay

Smaller model: the Polk Reserve R100 (rated 3.4/5).

Larger models: the Polk Reserve R600 (ranked lower, estimated 4.2/5) and the Polk Audio Reserve R700 (ranked higher, rated 4.3/5).

Pros: Dual 5.25” midwoofers paired with a ring radiator tweeter in a floorstanding tower design. Surprisingly neutral overall compared to Polk’s smaller bookshelf models: notably more even-handed than the brighter-sounding R200 the reviewer tested previously. Good linearity on-axis, within about -3/+2dB. Sensitivity close to 86dB, easily driven to adequate levels in a small-to-medium room with a 100W-capable amplifier. Takes very well to EQ: a single band of correction (about a 2dB cut around 4-5kHz) resolves the main tonal issue and transforms the sound. Dynamic range and compression performance is solidly “medium,” holding up fine through about 20dB of level increase before higher-frequency and bass output start to taper at extreme volumes. Measured bass extension of 51Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 86.2dB.

Cons: A bump around 4-6kHz gives a “shouty,” mildly sibilant quality in the lower treble. Counterintuitively, toeing the speaker out to reduce brightness makes this worse rather than better, since the ring-radiator tweeter’s directivity narrows rapidly above about 6-7kHz: pointed on-axis retains enough top-end air to balance the bump, but toed away that air drops off and the shoutiness stands out more. Bass is adequate for its 5.25” woofers but lacks real weight below about 40-50Hz; a subwoofer is still needed for movies and bass-heavy music. A cabinet resonance around 160-170Hz subtracts from rather than adds boom to the mid-bass region. Vertical listening window is fairly narrow: sitting more than about 10-20° above or below the tweeter axis causes a suckout in the 2-5kHz range, reducing clarity and attack. Multitone distortion ramps up noticeably around 1kHz, and crossing over to a subwoofer at 80Hz doesn’t meaningfully reduce it: likely a surround-related effect rather than excursion-related. Without applying corrective EQ, the reviewer says the 4-6kHz brightness would make it harder to live with day to day.

How it compares: Just above it: ELAC Debut 3.0 DF63 - $90 more, 0.4Hz higher bass extension (-3dB). Just below it: Linkwitz Lab LXmini - $54 cheaper, 1.2Hz lower bass extension (-3dB).

Bass Extension (-10dB)33Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)51Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions40.3”H x 6.8”W x 12.4”D (1023.6 x 172.7 x 315 mm)
DriversTwo 5.25” Turbine Cone woofer, 1” Pinnacle Ring Radiator tweeter
Impedance4.1 ohms minimum above 80Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner; 8 ohms nominal per manufacturer)
Sensitivity86.2dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score5.86
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.44
Weight39.2 lbs (17.8 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

Head-to-Head Comparisons

35 comparisons

More Polk speakers →