Polk Reserve R500 vs Linkwitz Lab LXmini

Last updated: August 15, 2026

Short answer: the Polk Reserve R500 for better sound quality, the Linkwitz Lab LXmini for the lower price. The Polk Reserve R500 ranks #26 of 54 floorstanding speakers at $699. The Linkwitz Lab LXmini ranks #27 at $505, $194 cheaper.

What the Polk Reserve R500 offers: Dual 5.25” midwoofers paired with a ring radiator tweeter in a floorstanding tower design. Watch for: A bump around 4-6kHz gives a “shouty,” mildly sibilant quality in the lower treble.

What the Linkwitz Lab LXmini offers: Open-baffle/dipole upper driver and cylindrical woofer enclosure create a very large, open soundstage with unusually little cabinet signature. Watch for: This is not a conventional passive pair: it requires a construction-plan license, assembly, miniDSP, four matched amplifier channels and careful gain/setup work, so the apparent kit price is not the complete system cost.

Buy the Polk Reserve R500 if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Linkwitz Lab LXmini if the price matters more than sound quality.

Polk Reserve R500 vs Linkwitz Lab LXmini

Specifications Side By Side

Polk Reserve R500 Linkwitz Lab LXmini
Price$699.00$505.00
Ranked#26 of 54 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#27 of 54 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)33Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)33Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)51Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)50Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions40.3"H x 6.8"W x 12.4"D (1023.6 x 172.7 x 315 mm)-
Impedance4.1 ohms minimum above 80Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner; 8 ohms nominal per manufacturer)4 ohms upper driver / 8 ohms woofer nominal (separate actively bi-amplified loads; manufacturer specified)
Sensitivity86.2dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)85dB upper driver / 87dB woofer @ 1W/1m (individual driver specifications; complete active-DSP system sensitivity is not directly specified)
DriversTwo 5.25" Turbine Cone woofer, 1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator tweeter6.5" SEAS woofer in sealed tube, 4" SEAS full-range dipole driver
Weight39.2 lbs / 17.8 kg each-
Woofer Cabinetported, rearsealed cylindrical enclosure; open-baffle upper driver
Crossover Frequency-700Hz LR2, active DSP
Amplification-Four channels, 50W/channel minimum with identical voltage gain

More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:

The Two Speakers In Full

Polk Reserve R500: $699.00 Amazon

Polk Reserve R500 ranking card

Pros: Dual 5.25” midwoofers paired with a ring radiator tweeter in a floorstanding tower design. Surprisingly neutral overall compared to Polk’s smaller bookshelf models - notably more even-handed than the brighter-sounding R200 the reviewer tested previously. Good linearity on-axis, within about -3/+2dB. Sensitivity close to 86dB, easily driven to adequate levels in a small-to-medium room with a 100W-capable amplifier. Takes very well to EQ - a single band of correction (about a 2dB cut around 4-5kHz) resolves the main tonal issue and transforms the sound. Dynamic range and compression performance is solidly “medium,” holding up fine through about 20dB of level increase before higher-frequency and bass output start to taper at extreme volumes.

Cons: A bump around 4-6kHz gives a “shouty,” mildly sibilant quality in the lower treble. Counterintuitively, toeing the speaker out to reduce brightness makes this worse rather than better, since the ring-radiator tweeter’s directivity narrows rapidly above about 6-7kHz - pointed on-axis retains enough top-end air to balance the bump, but toed away that air drops off and the shoutiness stands out more. Bass is adequate for its 5.25” woofers but lacks real weight below about 40-50Hz; a subwoofer is still needed for movies and bass-heavy music. A cabinet resonance around 160-170Hz subtracts from rather than adds boom to the mid-bass region. Vertical listening window is fairly narrow - sitting more than about 10-20° above or below the tweeter axis causes a suckout in the 2-5kHz range, reducing clarity and attack. Multitone distortion ramps up noticeably around 1kHz, and crossing over to a subwoofer at 80Hz doesn’t meaningfully reduce it - likely a surround-related effect rather than excursion-related. Without applying corrective EQ, the reviewer says the 4-6kHz brightness would make it harder to live with day to day.

Bass Extension (-10dB)33Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)51Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions40.3"H x 6.8"W x 12.4"D (1023.6 x 172.7 x 315 mm)
DriversTwo 5.25" Turbine Cone woofer, 1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator tweeter
Impedance4.1 ohms minimum above 80Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner; 8 ohms nominal per manufacturer)
Sensitivity86.2dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Weight39.2 lbs / 17.8 kg each
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Linkwitz Lab LXmini: $505.00 Madisound LXmini Kit

Linkwitz Lab LXmini ranking card

Pros: Open-baffle/dipole upper driver and cylindrical woofer enclosure create a very large, open soundstage with unusually little cabinet signature. Erin praised the stable, well-controlled directivity: despite using a nominal full-range upper driver, off-axis response retains composure beyond its beaming region and the directivity index is smooth enough for reliable DSP voicing. Imaging can be precisely adjusted through placement and toe angle. Erin measured F3 at 50Hz and F10 at 33Hz, impressive for the narrow footprint, and found the system satisfying for much music without a subwoofer. The supplied miniDSP configuration is readily editable; broad shelf correction near 550Hz and a handful of narrow filters can make the response substantially more linear. The kit is mechanically simple, highly customizable and based on well-documented Linkwitz engineering.

Cons: This is not a conventional passive pair: it requires a construction-plan license, assembly, miniDSP, four matched amplifier channels and careful gain/setup work, so the apparent kit price is not the complete system cost. Output below about 50Hz lacks kick-drum weight and benefits from subwoofers. Erin found rising second-order distortion near 1.5kHz on both samples, accompanied by an impedance blip that may indicate an enclosure reflection or driver-compliance effect. At high output the system behaves as if electronically limited even with miniDSP limiting bypassed, reducing bass and subjective dynamics. Default voicing is less linear than expected, with irregularities above roughly 2kHz, though its controlled directivity makes these correctable. Dipole rear radiation demands meaningful distance from the front wall and makes placement less flexible than a box speaker.

AmplificationFour channels, 50W/channel minimum with identical voltage gain
Bass Extension (-10dB)33Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)50Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Crossover Frequency700Hz LR2, active DSP
Drivers6.5" SEAS woofer in sealed tube, 4" SEAS full-range dipole driver
Impedance4 ohms upper driver / 8 ohms woofer nominal (separate actively bi-amplified loads; manufacturer specified)
Sensitivity85dB upper driver / 87dB woofer @ 1W/1m (individual driver specifications; complete active-DSP system sensitivity is not directly specified)
Woofer Cabinetsealed cylindrical enclosure; open-baffle upper driver

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.