Micca RB42 vs Revel M105

Last updated: August 25, 2026

Short answer: the Revel M105 for better sound quality, the Micca RB42 for the lower price. The Revel M105 ranks #13 of 87 bookshelf speakers at $1500. The Micca RB42 ranks #72 at $159.99, $1340.01 cheaper.

What the Micca RB42 offers: Curved cabinet fit and finish look closer to a $400-500 speaker than a $150 one. Rated for a wide 15-100W amplifier range with 4-8 ohm compatibility, giving flexibility with modest amplification. Watch for: CEA2034 spinorama shows significant peaks and valleys in the on-axis and listening-window response starting a few kHz up, with excess high-frequency energy the reviewer found fatiguing over time despite an initial impression of “detail.” Off-axis response diverges heavily from on-axis, meaning tonality shifts with room and listening position in ways EQ can’t correct. Distorts and the woofer visibly flaps under moderate volume; low 83dB sensitivity makes it a harder amplifier load than its size suggests.

What the Revel M105 offers: CEA2034 spinorama shows an essentially flat on-axis response with only a small 5kHz peak, a smooth listening window, and clean waterfall decay. Wide horizontal dispersion gives flexibility with toe-in. The reviewer called it reference-quality performance with minor EQ correction applied. Watch for: Low nominal impedance demands a capable amplifier that can handle low-impedance loads. Bass distortion runs high in the 80-250Hz range from woofer displacement, and maximum output is limited compared to larger designs.

Buy the Micca RB42 if the price matters more than sound quality. Buy the Revel M105 if sound quality matters more than the price.

If sound quality matters at all to you, skip the Micca RB42. It ranks near the bottom of the 87 bookshelf speakers, so look higher up the list instead.

Micca RB42 vs Revel M105

Specifications Side By Side

Micca RB42 Revel M105
Price$159.99$1500 Discontinued
Ranked#72 of 87 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers#13 of 87 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers
Bass Extension (-3dB)85Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) - the reviewer noted an artificial boost around 100-300Hz, so true extension may be worse than this on-axis reading suggests75Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-10dB)62Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) - the reviewer noted an artificial boost around 100-300Hz, so true extension may be worse than this on-axis reading suggests58Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Drivers4" coated paper woofer, 0.75" silk dome tweeter5.25" aluminum cone woofer, 1" aluminum tweeter with acoustic lens waveguide
Dimensions8.7H x 4.9W x 7.9D in14"H x 7.9"W x 9.8"D (355.6 x 200.7 x 248.9 mm)
Weight6 lbs / 2.7 kg each (per retailer listing)15.4 lbs / 7 kg each
Frequency Response50Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified, typical in-room)60Hz - 44kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
Sensitivity80dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)85dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)
Impedance4-8 ohms8 ohms nominal, low minimum
Power Handling15-100W each-
Woofer Cabinetported, frontported, rear
Discontinued-Yes

More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:

Prices on this page were last checked August 25, 2026 at 6:19 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Micca RB42: $159.99 Amazon eBay

Micca RB42 ranking card

Pros: Curved cabinet fit and finish look closer to a $400-500 speaker than a $150 one. Rated for a wide 15-100W amplifier range with 4-8 ohm compatibility, giving flexibility with modest amplification.

Cons: CEA2034 spinorama shows significant peaks and valleys in the on-axis and listening-window response starting a few kHz up, with excess high-frequency energy the reviewer found fatiguing over time despite an initial impression of “detail.” Off-axis response diverges heavily from on-axis, meaning tonality shifts with room and listening position in ways EQ can’t correct. Distorts and the woofer visibly flaps under moderate volume; low 83dB sensitivity makes it a harder amplifier load than its size suggests.

Bass Extension (-10dB)62Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) - the reviewer noted an artificial boost around 100-300Hz, so true extension may be worse than this on-axis reading suggests
Bass Extension (-3dB)85Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) - the reviewer noted an artificial boost around 100-300Hz, so true extension may be worse than this on-axis reading suggests
Dimensions8.7H x 4.9W x 7.9D in
Drivers4" coated paper woofer, 0.75" silk dome tweeter
Frequency Response50Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified, typical in-room)
Impedance4-8 ohms
Power Handling15-100W each
Sensitivity80dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)
Weight6 lbs / 2.7 kg each (per retailer listing)
Woofer Cabinetported, front

Revel M105: $1500 Discontinued eBay

Revel M105 ranking card

Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows an essentially flat on-axis response with only a small 5kHz peak, a smooth listening window, and clean waterfall decay. Wide horizontal dispersion gives flexibility with toe-in. The reviewer called it reference-quality performance with minor EQ correction applied.

Cons: Low nominal impedance demands a capable amplifier that can handle low-impedance loads. Bass distortion runs high in the 80-250Hz range from woofer displacement, and maximum output is limited compared to larger designs. Discontinued.

Bass Extension (-10dB)58Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)75Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Dimensions14"H x 7.9"W x 9.8"D (355.6 x 200.7 x 248.9 mm)
DiscontinuedYes
Drivers5.25" aluminum cone woofer, 1" aluminum tweeter with acoustic lens waveguide
Frequency Response60Hz - 44kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
Impedance8 ohms nominal, low minimum
Sensitivity85dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)
Weight15.4 lbs / 7 kg each
Woofer Cabinetported, rear