Short answer: both are discontinued, so this only matters if you are buying used. Used, the Revel M105 is the better pick: it ranks #15 of 168 bookshelf speakers by sound quality (rated 4.2/5), against #112 (rated 2.9/5) for the Dynaudio X14. If you want one new, the Revel Performa4 M145 replaces the Revel M105 and is rated 4.3/5 at $1,999.95.
The case for the Dynaudio X14: 1” silk-dome tweeter and 5.7” magnesium-silicate-polymer woofer in a compact two-way stand-mount, rated at 85dB sensitivity. The tradeoff: CEA2034 spinorama shows an uneven on-axis response from the lack of a waveguide to control tweeter beam width, plus a port resonance that boosts the lower midrange and imperfect crossover matching between the drivers.
The Revel M105 is the more accurate choice. CEA2034 spinorama shows an essentially flat on-axis response with only a small 5kHz peak, a smooth listening window, and clean waterfall decay. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 5.76 against 4.57 for the Dynaudio X14. The catch: Low nominal impedance demands a capable amplifier that can handle low-impedance loads.
Buy the Revel M105 only if you find one used in good condition; both are discontinued, and it is the better rated of the two. For a new speaker, buy the Revel Performa4 M145, which replaces the Revel M105.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Dynaudio X14 | Revel M105 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,500 per pair Discontinued | $1,500 per pair Discontinued |
| Ranked | #112 of 168 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers | #15 of 168 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 67.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 63Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 43.9Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points) | 49.8Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points) |
| Sensitivity | 82dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) | 85dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal | 8 ohms nominal, low minimum |
| Frequency Response | 50Hz - 23kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) | 60Hz - 44kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| Drivers | 1” silk dome tweeter, 5.7” magnesium-silicate-polymer woofer | 5.25” aluminum cone woofer, 1” aluminum tweeter with acoustic lens waveguide |
| Weight | 14.3 lbs (6.5 kg) each | 15.4 lbs (7 kg) each |
| Dimensions | 11.2”H x 6.7”W x 10”D (285 x 170 x 255 mm) | 14”H x 7.9”W x 9.8”D (355.6 x 200.7 x 248.9 mm) |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported | ported, rear |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.57 (spinorama.org) | 5.76 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.94 (spinorama.org) | 8.18 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to Revel M105:
- Ascend Acoustics Sierra 1 v2 vs Revel M105
- KEF LS50 Meta vs Revel M105
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs Revel M105
- Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G vs Revel M105
- Revel M105 vs Klipsch RP-500M II
Prices on this page were last checked October 9, 2026 at 8:01 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Dynaudio X14: $1,500 per pair Discontinued eBay
Newer model: the Dynaudio Evoke 10, ranked higher, estimated 4/5, released Mar 2019. See every Dynaudio Evoke generation.
Pros: 1” silk-dome tweeter and 5.7” magnesium-silicate-polymer woofer in a compact two-way stand-mount, rated at 85dB sensitivity. Measured bass extension of 67.4Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 82dB.
Cons: CEA2034 spinorama shows an uneven on-axis response from the lack of a waveguide to control tweeter beam width, plus a port resonance that boosts the lower midrange and imperfect crossover matching between the drivers. Too much energy in the lower and upper treble reads as bright, and directivity narrows at higher frequencies rather than staying controlled. The reviewer’s verdict: out of the box, the objective performance isn’t that great, though EQ can make it a satisfying speaker. Discontinued.
Full Dynaudio X14 review and specifications →
| Released | 2013 (13 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 43.9Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 67.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 11.2”H x 6.7”W x 10”D (285 x 170 x 255 mm) |
| Drivers | 1” silk dome tweeter, 5.7” magnesium-silicate-polymer woofer |
| Frequency Response | 50Hz - 23kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal |
| Sensitivity | 82dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.57 (spinorama.org) |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.94 (spinorama.org) |
| Weight | 14.3 lbs (6.5 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Revel M105: $1,500 per pair Discontinued eBay
Newer model: the Revel Performa4 M145, ranked higher, estimated 4.3/5, released Apr 2026. See every Revel Performa generation.
Same family: the Revel M106 (larger bookshelf, rated 4.6/5), the Revel F206 (smaller floorstanding, rated 4.5/5), the Revel F208 (larger floorstanding, rated 4.5/5), the Revel Performa3 C205 (smaller center, rated 4.1/5) and the Revel Performa3 C208 (larger center, rated 4/5).
Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows an essentially flat on-axis response with only a small 5kHz peak, a smooth listening window, and clean waterfall decay. Wide horizontal dispersion gives flexibility with toe-in. The reviewer called it reference-quality performance with minor EQ correction applied. Measured bass extension of 63Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85dB.
Cons: Low nominal impedance demands a capable amplifier that can handle low-impedance loads. Bass distortion runs high in the 80-250Hz range from woofer displacement, and maximum output is limited compared to larger designs. Discontinued.
Full Revel M105 review and specifications →
| Released | Dec 2012 (13 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 49.8Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 63Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 14”H x 7.9”W x 9.8”D (355.6 x 200.7 x 248.9 mm) |
| Drivers | 5.25” aluminum cone woofer, 1” aluminum tweeter with acoustic lens waveguide |
| Frequency Response | 60Hz - 44kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal, low minimum |
| Sensitivity | 85dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.76 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.18 |
| Weight | 15.4 lbs (7 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Revel M105 vs Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G
- Revel M105 vs Arendal 1961 Monitor
- Revel M105 vs KEF LS50 Meta
- Revel M105 vs Klipsch RP-500M II
- Revel M105 vs Ascend Acoustics Sierra 1 v2
- Revel M105 vs Wharfedale Super Denton
- Revel M105 vs Wharfedale Diamond 12.1
- Revel M105 vs KEF Q150
- See all 25 comparisons