The Ascend CBM-170 SE2 ranks #68 out of 134 total Large Size Bookshelf Speakers for sound quality. See all Passive Home rankings for every top pick.
Brand: Ascend Acoustics
Prices on this page were last checked October 2, 2026 at 10:18 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
#68 Ascend CBM-170 SE2: $468 per pair Ascend Acoustics eBay
Older model: the Ascend CBM-170 SE (ranked lower, rated 2.1/5).
Pros: On-axis response is impressively flat from about 100Hz to 2kHz, staying within roughly ±1dB, with a clean, gradual bass rolloff below that. The directivity index rises smoothly and predictably through the crossover region, and the estimated in-room response shows a smooth, consistent downward tilt from 100Hz to 10kHz with no major discontinuities: close to the ideal in-room target shape. Measured sensitivity of 86.8dB nearly matches Ascend’s 87dB spec. The manufacturer’s own preference-score modeling comes out to 6.30 unequalized (rising to 8.66 with an ideal subwoofer, or 6.79/8.86 with EQ applied): a strong result for a compact 2-way, and a clear step up from the original CBM-170 SE this replaces. Measured sensitivity of 86.8dB.
Cons: A narrow dip in the on-axis and listening-window response appears in the 3-5kHz range (down to about -2.7dB), mirrored by a matching dip in the directivity index at the same frequencies: likely a brief widening of dispersion right at the tweeter/woofer crossover. High-frequency directivity narrows substantially above 10kHz, typical for a small dome tweeter, so the top octave will sound more reserved off-axis than on-axis. Bass rolls off as expected for a compact 2-way monitor: -3dB around 70Hz and -10dB around 50Hz, so a subwoofer is needed for full-range use. This data comes from the manufacturer’s own Klippel measurements rather than an independent third-party review, so there’s no outside verification of channel matching, distortion, or unit-to-unit consistency.
How it compares: Just above it: Infinity Reference R162 - $32 more, 0.2Hz higher bass extension (-3dB). Just below it: NHT C3 - $157 more, 0.2Hz higher bass extension (-3dB).
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50Hz (measured, manufacturer spinorama data) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 70Hz (measured, manufacturer spinorama data) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 12H x 9W x 9.5D in |
| Drivers | 27mm custom SEAS soft dome tweeter, 6.5” proprietary composite polygel cone woofer |
| Impedance | 8 ohms |
| Power Handling | 200W continuous, 400W peak |
| Sensitivity | 86.8dB (2.83V/1m, measured, manufacturer spinorama data; 87dB manufacturer specified) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.30 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.66 |
| Weight | 15 lbs (6.8 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Polk Signature Elite ES20
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Dynaudio Contour 20i
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Klipsch RP-600M II
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Dynaudio Emit 20
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Philharmonic BMR Monitor
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs ELAC DBR62
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Mission LX-3 MKII
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Revel Concerta2 M16
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs GR-Research X-LS Encore
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Dynaudio Special Forty
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs SVS Prime Bookshelf
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Aalto Speakers Aalto 3 Passive
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs KEF Q3 Meta
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Perlisten A3m
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Polk Monitor XT20
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs ELAC Debut 3.0 DB63
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Sonus Faber Lumina II
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Emotiva Airmotiv XB2
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs XTZ Spirit 4
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Polk Reserve R100
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Ascend Acoustics Sierra-2EX V2
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs HSU Research MFL-6
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Philharmonic BMR (v1)
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Polk R200
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Ascend Acoustics Sierra-LX
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Wharfedale Linton 85
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Dynaudio Heritage Special
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Radiant Acoustics Clarity 6.2
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs MoFi SourcePoint 10
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Sonus Faber Lumina II Amator
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Wharfedale Super Linton
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Triangle Borea BR03
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Ascend Acoustics CMT-340 SE2
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Arendal 1528 Monitor 8
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs AsciLab F6Bs
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs MoFi SourcePoint 8
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Buchardt Audio E50
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs KEF R3
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Wharfedale Aura 2
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs ATC SCM19
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs KEF Q Concerto Meta
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs KEF R3 Meta
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Audio First Cadentia 3
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs AsciLab C6B
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs GR-Research NX-Studio
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs KEF Reference 1 Meta
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Perlisten S4b
