Short answer: the Ascend CBM-170 SE2. It ranks #66 of 131 bookshelf speakers by sound quality, rated 3.8/5, at $468; the HSU Research MFL-6 ranks #96, rated 3.3/5, and costs $558, which makes this an easy call rather than a real tradeoff.
What the Ascend CBM-170 SE2 does well: On-axis response is impressively flat from about 100Hz to 2kHz, staying within roughly ±1dB, with a clean, gradual bass rolloff below that. Watch for: A narrow dip in the on-axis and listening-window response appears in the 3-5kHz range (down to about -2.7dB), mirrored by a matching dip in the directivity index at the same frequencies - likely a brief widening of dispersion right at the tweeter/woofer crossover.
What the HSU Research MFL-6 does well: A high-output 6.5-inch design with horn-loaded tweeter, strong measured sensitivity and flexible wall, stand or horizontal placement. The tradeoff: Its response deviation is substantial and the horn narrows dispersion, so tonal balance and seating coverage are less even than the best conventional monitors.
Buy the Ascend CBM-170 SE2. It is rated higher for sound quality than the HSU Research MFL-6 and costs less, which makes it the one to get unless you need something the other one does better.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Ascend CBM-170 SE2 | HSU Research MFL-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $468 per pair | $558 per pair |
| Ranked | #66 of 131 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers | #96 of 131 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 70Hz (measured, manufacturer spinorama data) | 77.6Hz (measured, spinorama.org) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50Hz (measured, manufacturer spinorama data) | - |
| Sensitivity | 86.8dB (2.83V/1m, measured, manufacturer spinorama data; 87dB manufacturer specified) | 85.6dB (measured average 300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, spinorama.org) |
| Drivers | 27mm custom SEAS soft dome tweeter, 6.5” proprietary composite polygel cone woofer | 1” horn-loaded tweeter, 6.5” paper-cone woofer |
| Dimensions | 12H x 9W x 9.5D in | 16H x 8W x 6.25-10.375D in |
| Weight | 15 lbs (6.8 kg) each | 13 lbs (5.9 kg) each |
| Impedance | 8 ohms | 8 ohms |
| Power Handling | 200W continuous, 400W peak | - |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.30 | 2.63 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.66 | 4.77 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
| Enclosure | - | 2-way bass reflex |
| Frequency Response | - | 60Hz-20kHz +/-2dB |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Ascend CBM-170 SE2:
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Perlisten S4b
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs KEF Reference 1 Meta
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs GR-Research NX-Studio
- AsciLab C6B vs Ascend CBM-170 SE2
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Audio First Cadentia 3
Prices on this page were last checked September 26, 2026 at 11:14 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Ascend CBM-170 SE2: $468 per pair Ascend Acoustics eBay
Older model: the Ascend CBM-170 SE (rated 2.1/5).
Pros: On-axis response is impressively flat from about 100Hz to 2kHz, staying within roughly ±1dB, with a clean, gradual bass rolloff below that. The directivity index rises smoothly and predictably through the crossover region, and the estimated in-room response shows a smooth, consistent downward tilt from 100Hz to 10kHz with no major discontinuities - close to the ideal in-room target shape. Measured sensitivity of 86.8dB nearly matches Ascend’s 87dB spec. The manufacturer’s own preference-score modeling comes out to 6.30 unequalized (rising to 8.66 with an ideal subwoofer, or 6.79/8.86 with EQ applied) - a strong result for a compact 2-way, and a clear step up from the original CBM-170 SE this replaces. Measured sensitivity of 86.8dB.
Cons: A narrow dip in the on-axis and listening-window response appears in the 3-5kHz range (down to about -2.7dB), mirrored by a matching dip in the directivity index at the same frequencies - likely a brief widening of dispersion right at the tweeter/woofer crossover. High-frequency directivity narrows substantially above 10kHz, typical for a small dome tweeter, so the top octave will sound more reserved off-axis than on-axis. Bass rolls off as expected for a compact 2-way monitor: -3dB around 70Hz and -10dB around 50Hz, so a subwoofer is needed for full-range use. This data comes from the manufacturer’s own Klippel measurements rather than an independent third-party review, so there’s no outside verification of channel matching, distortion, or unit-to-unit consistency.
Full Ascend CBM-170 SE2 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50Hz (measured, manufacturer spinorama data) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 70Hz (measured, manufacturer spinorama data) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 12H x 9W x 9.5D in |
| Drivers | 27mm custom SEAS soft dome tweeter, 6.5” proprietary composite polygel cone woofer |
| Impedance | 8 ohms |
| Power Handling | 200W continuous, 400W peak |
| Sensitivity | 86.8dB (2.83V/1m, measured, manufacturer spinorama data; 87dB manufacturer specified) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.30 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.66 |
| Weight | 15 lbs (6.8 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Polk Signature Elite ES20
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Dynaudio Contour 20i
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Klipsch RP-600M II
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Dynaudio Emit 20
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Philharmonic BMR Monitor
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs ELAC DBR62
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Mission LX-3 MKII
- Ascend CBM-170 SE2 vs Revel Concerta2 M16
- See all 48 comparisons
HSU Research MFL-6: $558 per pair HSU Research eBay
Pros: A high-output 6.5-inch design with horn-loaded tweeter, strong measured sensitivity and flexible wall, stand or horizontal placement. The local Spinorama snapshot delivers a solid 2.63 raw score and 4.77 with a subwoofer, with controlled horizontal radiation and 45Hz extension. Measured bass extension of 77.6Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85.6dB.
Cons: Its response deviation is substantial and the horn narrows dispersion, so tonal balance and seating coverage are less even than the best conventional monitors. The trapezoidal cabinet and utilitarian finish are optimized for function rather than furniture-grade appearance.
Full HSU Research MFL-6 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 77.6Hz (measured, spinorama.org) |
|---|---|
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 16H x 8W x 6.25-10.375D in |
| Drivers | 1” horn-loaded tweeter, 6.5” paper-cone woofer |
| Enclosure | 2-way bass reflex |
| Frequency Response | 60Hz-20kHz +/-2dB |
| Impedance | 8 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 85.6dB (measured average 300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, spinorama.org) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 2.63 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 4.77 |
| Weight | 13 lbs (5.9 kg) each |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- HSU Research MFL-6 vs Polk R200
- HSU Research MFL-6 vs Polk Reserve R100
- HSU Research MFL-6 vs Polk Monitor XT20
- HSU Research MFL-6 vs KEF Q3 Meta
- HSU Research MFL-6 vs SVS Prime Bookshelf
- HSU Research MFL-6 vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
- HSU Research MFL-6 vs Dynaudio Emit 20
- HSU Research MFL-6 vs Klipsch RP-600M II
- See all 10 comparisons