Short answer: the Buchardt Audio E50 on measured sound quality, the Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 on price. The Buchardt Audio E50 ranks #16 of 216 bookshelf speakers, rated 4.5/5, at $4,600. The Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 ranks #112, rated 3.8/5, at $468, $4,132 cheaper.
The case for the Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2: On-axis response is impressively flat from about 100Hz to 2kHz, staying within roughly ±1dB, with a clean, gradual bass rolloff below that. The tradeoff: A narrow dip in the on-axis and listening-window response appears in the 3-5kHz range (down to about -2.7dB), mirrored by a matching dip in the directivity index at the same frequencies: likely a brief widening of dispersion right at the tweeter/woofer crossover.
The Buchardt Audio E50 is the better-sounding, deeper-bass choice. Exceptional bass extension for a bookshelf (F3 at 40Hz, F10 at 34Hz) with genuinely low-end weight the reviewer kept noticing track after track, not just a single room-boosted note. Its bass reaches about 40Hz before falling 3dB, against 70Hz for the Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2. The catch: A roughly 3dB dip in the upper midrange/lower treble softens attack and dialogue clarity: the reviewer’s main complaint, and it’s baked into the crossover rather than a directivity artifact, so it’s audible both on and off axis.
Buy the Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 if the price matters more than sound quality. Buy the Buchardt Audio E50 if sound quality matters more than the price.
Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 | Buchardt Audio E50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $468 per pair | $4600 per pair |
| Ranked | #112 of 216 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers | #16 of 216 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 70Hz (measured, manufacturer spinorama data) | 40Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50Hz (measured, manufacturer spinorama data) | 34Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 86.8dB (2.83V/1m, measured, manufacturer spinorama data; 87dB manufacturer specified) | 83.1dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Drivers | 27mm custom SEAS soft dome tweeter, 6.5” proprietary composite polygel cone woofer | 1” Scanspeak dome tweeter with waveguide, 6.5” Purifi extended-stroke woofer, dual 6.5” passive radiators |
| Dimensions | 12H x 9W x 9.5D in | 15.6” x 7.5” x 11.2” (395 x 190 x 284 mm) |
| Weight | 15 lbs (6.8 kg) each | 19 lbs (8.6 kg) each |
| Impedance | 8 ohms | 4 ohms nominal |
| Power Handling | 200W continuous, 400W peak | - |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear | Passive radiator loaded |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.30 | 5.84 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.66 | 7.61 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
| Crossover Frequency | - | 2000Hz |
| Frequency Response | - | 36Hz - 30kHz ±3dB (Manufacturer specified) |
| Recommended Power | - | 60W - 200W |
| Country | - | Denmark |
Frequency Response Compared
Both speakers’ spinorama measurements, overlaid. A flatter line is more neutral: peaks sound forward or harsh, dips sound recessed. Each curve is shifted so its average from 300 Hz to 3 kHz sits at 0 dB, so loudness differences between the two are removed and only the shape is compared. The two were measured by different sources, so small differences, especially in the bass, can come from the measurement setup rather than the speakers.
Measurement data: Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 (measured by the manufacturer) and Buchardt Audio E50 (measured by Erin’s Audio Corner), via spinorama.org.
Related Speaker Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Buchardt Audio E50:
- Buchardt Audio E50 vs Perlisten S4b
- KEF Reference 1 Meta vs Buchardt Audio E50
- Buchardt Audio E50 vs GR-Research NX-Studio
- AsciLab C6B vs Buchardt Audio E50
- Audio First Cadentia 3 vs Buchardt Audio E50
Prices on this page were last checked October 14, 2026 at 2:38 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2: $468 per pair Ascend Acoustics $468 eBay
Older model: the Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE (ranked lower, rated 2.1/5). See every Ascend CBM, HTM and CMT generation.
Same family: the Ascend Acoustics HTM-200SE2 (larger bookshelf, rated 4.3/5) and the Ascend Acoustics CMT-340 SE2 (larger bookshelf, ranked higher, rated 4.4/5).
Pros: On-axis response is impressively flat from about 100Hz to 2kHz, staying within roughly ±1dB, with a clean, gradual bass rolloff below that. The directivity index rises smoothly and predictably through the crossover region, and the estimated in-room response shows a smooth, consistent downward tilt from 100Hz to 10kHz with no major discontinuities: close to the ideal in-room target shape. Measured sensitivity of 86.8dB nearly matches Ascend’s 87dB spec. The manufacturer’s own preference-score modeling comes out to 6.30 unequalized (rising to 8.66 with an ideal subwoofer, or 6.79/8.86 with EQ applied): a strong result for a compact 2-way, and a clear step up from the original Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE this replaces. Measured sensitivity of 86.8dB.
Cons: A narrow dip in the on-axis and listening-window response appears in the 3-5kHz range (down to about -2.7dB), mirrored by a matching dip in the directivity index at the same frequencies: likely a brief widening of dispersion right at the tweeter/woofer crossover. High-frequency directivity narrows substantially above 10kHz, typical for a small dome tweeter, so the top octave will sound more reserved off-axis than on-axis. Bass rolls off as expected for a compact 2-way monitor: -3dB around 70Hz and -10dB around 50Hz, so a subwoofer is needed for full-range use. This data comes from the manufacturer’s own Klippel measurements rather than an independent third-party review, so there’s no outside verification of channel matching, distortion, or unit-to-unit consistency.
Full Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 review and specifications →
| Released | Jul 2026 (3 months ago) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50Hz (measured, manufacturer spinorama data) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 70Hz (measured, manufacturer spinorama data) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 12H x 9W x 9.5D in |
| Drivers | 27mm custom SEAS soft dome tweeter, 6.5” proprietary composite polygel cone woofer |
| Impedance | 8 ohms |
| Power Handling | 200W continuous, 400W peak |
| Sensitivity | 86.8dB (2.83V/1m, measured, manufacturer spinorama data; 87dB manufacturer specified) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.30 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.66 |
| Weight | 15 lbs (6.8 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 vs Polk Signature Elite ES20
- Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 vs Klipsch RP-600M II
- Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 vs Dynaudio Contour 20i
- Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 vs Dynaudio Emit 20
- Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 vs Philharmonic BMR Monitor
- Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 vs Mission LX-3 MKII
- Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 vs GR-Research X-LS Encore
- Ascend Acoustics CBM-170 SE2 vs Dynaudio Special Forty
- See all 48 comparisons
Buchardt Audio E50: $4600 per pair Buchardt Audio $4600 eBay
Pros: Exceptional bass extension for a bookshelf (F3 at 40Hz, F10 at 34Hz) with genuinely low-end weight the reviewer kept noticing track after track, not just a single room-boosted note. Mid and lower-midrange are very neutral with no coloration and well-executed baffle-step compensation, so it doesn’t need to sit close to a wall like many bookshelf designs. Low distortion throughout the midrange, controlled ~60-degree horizontal directivity, and a striking driver/waveguide integration that looks genuinely upscale. Measured bass extension of 40Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 83.1dB.
Cons: A roughly 3dB dip in the upper midrange/lower treble softens attack and dialogue clarity: the reviewer’s main complaint, and it’s baked into the crossover rather than a directivity artifact, so it’s audible both on and off axis. Sounds too bright pointed directly at the listener; needs about 10-20 degrees of toe-out to tame the treble and slightly smooth (not eliminate) that dip. Below-average sensitivity (measured 83.1dB vs 85dB spec) calls for a beefier amp, and the speaker’s tonal balance is unusually sensitive to amplifier output impedance: a poor tube amp can shift the midrange by up to 2dB.
Full Buchardt Audio E50 review and specifications →
| Released | 2024 (2 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 34Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 40Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Country | Denmark |
| Crossover Frequency | 2000Hz |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 15.6” x 7.5” x 11.2” (395 x 190 x 284 mm) |
| Drivers | 1” Scanspeak dome tweeter with waveguide, 6.5” Purifi extended-stroke woofer, dual 6.5” passive radiators |
| Frequency Response | 36Hz - 30kHz ±3dB (Manufacturer specified) |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal |
| Recommended Power | 60W - 200W |
| Sensitivity | 83.1dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.84 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.61 |
| Weight | 19 lbs (8.6 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | Passive radiator loaded |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Buchardt Audio E50 vs KEF R3
- Buchardt Audio E50 vs MoFi SourcePoint 8
- Buchardt Audio E50 vs Wharfedale Aura 2
- Buchardt Audio E50 vs AsciLab F6Bs
- Buchardt Audio E50 vs KEF Q Concerto Meta
- Buchardt Audio E50 vs KEF R3 Meta
- Buchardt Audio E50 vs Arendal 1528 Monitor 8
- Buchardt Audio E50 vs March Audio Sointuva
- See all 45 comparisons