JBL 4367 vs Polk Audio Reserve R700

Last updated: August 19, 2026

Short answer: the JBL 4367 for better sound quality, the Polk Audio Reserve R700 for the lower price. The JBL 4367 ranks #12 of 59 floorstanding speakers at $16500. The Polk Audio Reserve R700 ranks #26 at $1199, $15301 cheaper.

On the JBL 4367 side: Three-way design pairing a 15” front-ported woofer with a compression driver on a controlled-dispersion horn/waveguide, crossed over at 700Hz. Watch for: At roughly $16,500/pair, this is a major investment - the reviewer recommends buying from a dealer with a liberal return policy.

What the Polk Audio Reserve R700 offers: Three-way design with a 1” ring radiator tweeter, 6.5” mid-range, and dual 8” mid-bass drivers in a ported, down-firing cabinet. Set against that: Compression in the high frequencies rises sharply between 96dB and 102dB output - a real limitation only at very high volumes (around 100dB at 3 meters), but a clear step down from pricier ($5,000+) towers.

Buy the JBL 4367 if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Polk Audio Reserve R700 if the price matters more than sound quality.

JBL 4367 vs Polk Audio Reserve R700

Specifications Side By Side

JBL 4367 Polk Audio Reserve R700
Price$16500$1,199.00
Ranked#12 of 59 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#26 of 59 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)31Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)31Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)43Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)40Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions37.2"H x 22.2"W x 16.8"D (944.9 x 563.9 x 426.7 mm)45"H x 12.6"W x 16.9"D (1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3 mm)
Impedance4 ohms nominal (5.3 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)4 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured above 80Hz, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity92.5dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner)87.5dB (measured average 300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Drivers15" (380mm) 2216Nd-1 Dual Differential Drive® woofer, 3" (75mm) D2430K dual compression tweeter2x 8" polypropylene cone woofers, 1x 6.5" turbine cone midrange, 1x 1" Pinnacle ring radiator tweeter
Weight119 lbs / 54 kg each102.1 lbs / 46.3 kg
Woofer Cabinetported, frontported, down-firing

More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:

The Two Speakers In Full

JBL 4367: $16500

JBL 4367 ranking card

Pros: Three-way design pairing a 15” front-ported woofer with a compression driver on a controlled-dispersion horn/waveguide, crossed over at 700Hz. On-axis frequency response is nearly dead flat, holding within about ±1.5dB, with the listening window tracking it closely except right at the crossover. Distortion stays below 1% THD across the entire audible band at both 86dB and 96dB. Compression/dynamic-range linearity is exceptional - within about a quarter of a dB from 76dB to 102dB, among the best the reviewer has measured. High sensitivity (about 92.6dB average) eases the amplifier match despite the speaker’s size. Minimal rear radiation thanks to the 15” woofer’s directivity and front-firing ports - rear energy runs about 20dB down from the primary wavefront, giving it a near-cardioid radiation pattern. Well-controlled horn directivity keeps the soundstage from noticeably shifting in width across the 700Hz crossover region. A natural high-frequency rolloff above about 7-8kHz gives it an easy, non-fatiguing character for extended listening sessions.

Cons: At roughly $16,500/pair, this is a major investment - the reviewer recommends buying from a dealer with a liberal return policy. Vertical response shows dips beyond about ±10-20°, with a larger null further out - an inherent trade-off of mating a 15” woofer to a horn compression driver at a 700Hz crossover, since crossing lower would hurt power handling and dynamic range. Horizontal directivity isn’t perfectly consistent with frequency: narrow (about ±20°) through 200-800Hz, briefly widening to near ±50° above the crossover, then narrowing again at high frequency - an unusual, non-constant pattern. The high-frequency rolloff that gives it an easy-listening character also reduces the sense of air and space in the soundstage when listening from off-center seats. Massive and heavy (about 120 lbs, roughly 36-37” tall) - needs to be raised on a stand to bring the horn to ear level, and isn’t something one person easily moves alone. Only modest EQ adjustment is available on the speaker itself (about ±1-2dB bass/treble trim).

Bass Extension (-10dB)31Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)43Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions37.2"H x 22.2"W x 16.8"D (944.9 x 563.9 x 426.7 mm)
Drivers15" (380mm) 2216Nd-1 Dual Differential Drive® woofer, 3" (75mm) D2430K dual compression tweeter
Impedance4 ohms nominal (5.3 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity92.5dB (measured average, Erin's Audio Corner)
Weight119 lbs / 54 kg each
Woofer Cabinetported, front

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Polk Audio Reserve R700: $1,199.00 Amazon

Polk Audio Reserve R700 ranking card

Pros: Three-way design with a 1” ring radiator tweeter, 6.5” mid-range, and dual 8” mid-bass drivers in a ported, down-firing cabinet. On-axis frequency response holds within about ±2dB across most of its range, with genuinely deep bass extension (F3 40Hz) reaching into the mid-30s Hz in-room. Wide horizontal radiation of about ±70°, giving a strong, enveloping stereo width and stage-extension effect on well-recorded tracks. Good low-level dynamics - solid bass thump at quiet listening volumes without over-accentuation. Strong distortion and compression control through the bass and midrange. Real nominal impedance closer to 4 ohms than the marketed 8 ohms, so with the right amplifier it can be driven hard - a $3,000 two-channel integrated brought out significantly more life than a budget $300 unit could. Excellent value at its roughly $2,200/pair MSRP, ranking among the reviewer’s top picks under $2,500; outperforms the similarly-priced Klipsch RP-8000F II in bass extension and overall smoothness.

Cons: Compression in the high frequencies rises sharply between 96dB and 102dB output - a real limitation only at very high volumes (around 100dB at 3 meters), but a clear step down from pricier ($5,000+) towers. Horizontal directivity mismatch around 4-5kHz, where the tweeter flares wider than the midrange, can sound a bit forward - especially noticeable when toed out further into the room; sidewall absorption or curtains help tame it. Harmonic distortion crosses the reviewer’s 3% threshold around 7kHz at 96dB output, possibly contributing to that same forward quality at high volume. Narrow vertical sweet spot (about ±15° from the tweeter axis), typical of non-coaxial tower designs - more of a consideration for multi-row home theater seating than single-row listening. The ring-radiator tweeter narrows noticeably above about 7-8kHz, and toeing the speaker out more than about 20° causes the top end to fall off quickly. Needs at least 2 feet of clearance from the rear wall to avoid boomy, exaggerated bass, since it lacks the bass-shelf tuning some rivals use to allow closer wall placement. Compared to the pricier KEF R5 Meta, has narrower horizontal (and much narrower vertical) directivity, so seating flexibility is more limited.

Bass Extension (-10dB)31Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)40Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions45"H x 12.6"W x 16.9"D (1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3 mm)
Drivers2x 8" polypropylene cone woofers, 1x 6.5" turbine cone midrange, 1x 1" Pinnacle ring radiator tweeter
Impedance4 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured above 80Hz, Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity87.5dB (measured average 300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, Erin's Audio Corner)
Weight102.1 lbs / 46.3 kg
Woofer Cabinetported, down-firing

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.