KEF Blade Two Meta vs JBL 4367

Last updated: September 29, 2026

Short answer: the KEF Blade Two Meta. It ranks #2 of 73 floorstanding speakers by sound quality, rated 4.8/5, at $28,000. The JBL 4367 ranks #11, rated 4.6/5, at $16,500, $11,500 cheaper, a saving that is not big enough to make up the sound-quality gap.

KEF Blade Two Meta vs JBL 4367

Why pick the KEF Blade Two Meta: True point-source coaxial design (four 6.5in mid-bass drivers flanking a coincident mid/tweeter) with matched ~50 degree horizontal and vertical dispersion, unusual for a multi-driver speaker. The catch: 2dB dip and slight resonance around 200Hz, also visible in KEF white paper and likely cabinet-related.

Why pick the JBL 4367: Three-way design pairing a 15” front-ported woofer with a compression driver on a controlled-dispersion horn/waveguide, crossed over at 700Hz. The tradeoff: At roughly $16500/pair, this is a major investment: the reviewer recommends buying from a dealer with a liberal return policy.

One note: the JBL 4367 is no longer sold new, but at #11 of 73 floorstanding speakers by sound quality it still outranks most current models, so used is worth considering.

Buy the KEF Blade Two Meta. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $11,500 you would save on the JBL 4367 does not close the gap.

Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

KEF Blade Two Meta JBL 4367
Price$28000 per pair only sold in stores$16500 per pair Discontinued
Ranked#2 of 73 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#11 of 73 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)26Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)31Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)31Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)43Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions46.6”H x 13.5”W x 14.8”D (1183.6 x 342.9 x 375.9 mm)37.2”H x 22.2”W x 16.8”D (944.9 x 563.9 x 426.7 mm)
Impedance4 ohms nominal (3.3 ohms minimum, measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)4 ohms nominal (5.3 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)
Drivers4 x 165 mm (6.5 in.) aluminium cone, force cancelling woofers, 125 mm (5 in.) aluminium cone midrange, 25 mm (1 in.) aluminium dome with MAT tweeter15” (380mm) 2216Nd-1 Dual Differential Drive® woofer, 3” (75mm) D2430K dual compression tweeter
Sensitivity86.8dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)92.5dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Weight79.4 lbs (36 kg) each119 lbs (54 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, rearported, front
Spinorama Preference Score6.995.07
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub8.116.88
DIY KitNoNo

More top alternatives to KEF Blade Two Meta:

Prices on this page were last checked September 29, 2026 at 3:43 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

KEF Blade Two Meta: $28000 per pair only sold in stores eBay

KEF Blade Two Meta ranking card

Pros: True point-source coaxial design (four 6.5in mid-bass drivers flanking a coincident mid/tweeter) with matched ~50 degree horizontal and vertical dispersion, unusual for a multi-driver speaker. Fully rounded, edgeless cabinet eliminates baffle diffraction. Frequency response holds within about 2.5dB across the listening window. Extremely low harmonic and multitone distortion even at 96dB, with under 0.5dB of compression at full output, rivaling the Reference 1 Meta and JBL 4367 in dynamic range. Reviewer described the imaging and soundstage depth as revealing recording details other speakers he tested (PS Audio FR10, MoFi SourcePoint 8, Neumann KH80) masked. Available in any custom finish at no extra charge. Measured bass extension of 31Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 86.8dB.

Cons: 2dB dip and slight resonance around 200Hz, also visible in KEF white paper and likely cabinet-related. Bass rolls off fairly quickly below its 31Hz F3. Horizontal dispersion (~50 degrees) is narrower than the reviewer preferred 70-80 degrees; benefits from toeing out 10-20 degrees to open soundstage without losing image focus. Needs a separate power amp, not AVR-friendly.

Bass Extension (-10dB)26Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)31Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions46.6”H x 13.5”W x 14.8”D (1183.6 x 342.9 x 375.9 mm)
Drivers4 x 165 mm (6.5 in.) aluminium cone, force cancelling woofers, 125 mm (5 in.) aluminium cone midrange, 25 mm (1 in.) aluminium dome with MAT tweeter
Impedance4 ohms nominal (3.3 ohms minimum, measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity86.8dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score6.99
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub8.11
Weight79.4 lbs (36 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

JBL 4367: $16500 per pair Discontinued eBay

JBL 4367 ranking card

Newer model: the JBL 4369. It’s likely to perform similarly, though we don’t have measurements to confirm that yet.

Pros: Three-way design pairing a 15” front-ported woofer with a compression driver on a controlled-dispersion horn/waveguide, crossed over at 700Hz. On-axis frequency response is nearly dead flat, holding within about ±1.5dB, with the listening window tracking it closely except right at the crossover. Distortion stays below 1% THD across the entire audible band at both 86dB and 96dB. Compression/dynamic-range linearity is exceptional: within about a quarter of a dB from 76dB to 102dB, among the best the reviewer has measured. High sensitivity (about 92.6dB average) eases the amplifier match despite the speaker’s size. Minimal rear radiation thanks to the 15” woofer’s directivity and front-firing ports: rear energy runs about 20dB down from the primary wavefront, giving it a near-cardioid radiation pattern. Well-controlled horn directivity keeps the soundstage from noticeably shifting in width across the 700Hz crossover region. A natural high-frequency rolloff above about 7-8kHz gives it an easy, non-fatiguing character for extended listening sessions. Measured bass extension of 43Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 92.5dB.

Cons: At roughly $16500/pair, this is a major investment: the reviewer recommends buying from a dealer with a liberal return policy. Vertical response shows dips beyond about ±10-20°, with a larger null further out: an inherent trade-off of mating a 15” woofer to a horn compression driver at a 700Hz crossover, since crossing lower would hurt power handling and dynamic range. Horizontal directivity isn’t perfectly consistent with frequency: narrow (about ±20°) through 200-800Hz, briefly widening to near ±50° above the crossover, then narrowing again at high frequency. An unusual, non-constant pattern. The high-frequency rolloff that gives it an easy-listening character also reduces the sense of air and space in the soundstage when listening from off-center seats. Massive and heavy (about 120 lbs, roughly 36-37” tall): needs to be raised on a stand to bring the horn to ear level, and isn’t something one person easily moves alone. Only modest EQ adjustment is available on the speaker itself (about ±1-2dB bass/treble trim). Discontinued.

Bass Extension (-10dB)31Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)43Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions37.2”H x 22.2”W x 16.8”D (944.9 x 563.9 x 426.7 mm)
Drivers15” (380mm) 2216Nd-1 Dual Differential Drive® woofer, 3” (75mm) D2430K dual compression tweeter
Impedance4 ohms nominal (5.3 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity92.5dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score5.07
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.88
Weight119 lbs (54 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, front