The Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower ranks #7 out of 74 total Large Size Floorstanding Speakers for sound quality. See all Passive Home rankings for every top pick.
Brand: Ascend Acoustics
Prices on this page were last checked October 3, 2026 at 10:26 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
#7 Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower: $5,698 per pair Ascend Acoustics eBay
Pros: A RAAL 70-20xram ribbon tweeter and dual SEAS Excel aluminum woofers in a 3-way, 4-driver bamboo tower measure a genuine 38.7Hz extension point with a nearly flat on axis slope of 0.05dB per octave, one of the flattest measured towers we list. The bass alignment Q of 0.62 keeps the low end well damped rather than peaky. Backed by a 7 year parts and labor warranty and hand assembled in Orange County, California, with each pair matched within +/-1.5dB. Measured bass extension of 38.7Hz (-3dB).
Cons: Listening window smoothness measures a moderate 0.40 and on axis deviation runs 0.286dB average, both trailing the tighter figures posted by some of the passive AsciLab and Ascend bookshelf models in this same batch. At $5698/pair it is Ascend’s most expensive tower, well above the Titan dome tweeter version of the same cabinet. The manufacturer’s own claimed sensitivity (87.5dB) runs nearly 1.5dB higher than the independently measured average (86.1dB), worth accounting for when matching an amplifier.
How it compares: Just above it: Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 - $2300 more, 1.6Hz lower bass extension (-3dB). Just below it: Magico S5 2024 - $35302 more, 0.5Hz higher bass extension (-3dB).
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 28.5Hz (measured, spinorama.org vendor data) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 38.7Hz (measured, spinorama.org vendor data) |
| Country | United States |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 43”H x 7.5”W x 10.5”D (1092 x 190 x 267 mm) |
| Drivers | RAAL 70-20xram ribbon tweeter, 6” SEAS Excel Curv midrange (sealed sub-chamber), 2x 6” SEAS Excel aluminum woofers |
| Enclosure | ported |
| Frequency Response | 36-27,000Hz +/-3dB anechoic (manufacturer) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal |
| Power Handling | 400W continuous, 600W peak |
| Sensitivity | 87.5dB @ 2.83V/1m anechoic (manufacturer) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.97 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.42 |
| Warranty | 7 years parts and labor |
| Weight | 56 lbs (25.4 kg) each |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
Head-to-Head Comparisons
25 comparisons- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Revel F328Be
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Revel F226Be
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs JBL 4367
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs KEF Blade Two Meta
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs JBL HDI-3800
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Revel F228Be
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs KEF R11 Meta
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs JBL Studio 698
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs JBL HDI-3600
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Polk Audio Reserve R700
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs ELAC Debut 3.0 DF63
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Q Acoustics 5040
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Klipsch Forte IV
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs KEF Q11 Meta
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Klipsch RP-5000F II
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Klipsch RP-8000F II
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Dynaudio Emit 30
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Klipsch RP-6000F II
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Polk T50
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Polk Audio XT60
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs JBL Stage 2 280F
- Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower vs Klipsch Heresy IV
No comparisons match that search.
