Short answer: it depends whether you want to build a speaker. The Arendal 1961 Monitor is the finished product, called “a little bit of a tank” with low compression and low distortion, and its bass rolls off around 70-80Hz. The Mechano23 DIY measures a clean bass alignment with a Q of 0.336 and a -3dB point at 77.6Hz, but you must build the birch plywood cabinet and source drivers and a crossover kit yourself.
Buy the XMechanik Mechano23 DIY. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Arendal 1961 Monitor and costs less, so only choose the other one for a particular feature it does better.
Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| XMechanik Mechano23 DIY | Arendal 1961 Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $200 per pair DIY parts | $1150 per pair |
| Ranked | #6 of 92 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers | #8 of 92 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Enclosure | ported | - |
| Drivers | Scan-Speak Discovery H2606/9200 1” horn loaded textile dome tweeter, SB Acoustics SB13PFCR25-4 5” fiber cone woofer | 2 x 5.5” woofers, 28mm tweeter |
| Dimensions | 11.4”H x 6.9”W x 10.4”D (290 x 174 x 263 mm) | 16.6”H x 6.4”W x 5.9”D (421.6 x 162.6 x 149.9 mm) |
| Sensitivity | 85.1dB @ 2.83V/1m (measured, Audio Science Review) | 85.9dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 77.6Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 84Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 42.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 60Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Port Tuning | Approximately 45Hz | - |
| Cabinet Material | 18mm Baltic birch plywood | - |
| Country | Design origin: United States (ASR forum); assembled by buyer | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.42 | 3.38 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.88 | 6.69 |
| Impedance | 4.1 ohms nominal (measured, ASR) | 4 ohms nominal (4.1 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | Yes | No |
| Crossover Frequency | - | 1500Hz |
| Weight | - | 16 lbs (7.25 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | - | sealed |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How XMechanik Mechano23 DIY compares with other leading options:
- XMechanik Mechano23 DIY vs Audio First Fidelia
- XMechanik Mechano23 DIY vs Philharmonic Ceramic Mini
- Ascend Sierra 1 v2 vs XMechanik Mechano23 DIY
- KEF LS50 Meta vs XMechanik Mechano23 DIY
- Ascend Acoustics HTM-200SE2 vs XMechanik Mechano23 DIY
Prices on this page were last checked October 3, 2026 at 10:26 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
XMechanik Mechano23 DIY: $200 per pair DIY parts Madisound (Tweeter) Madisound (Woofer) eBay
Pros: The bass alignment is unusually well damped, with a measured Q of 0.336, among the lowest of any speaker in this catalog, so the -3dB point at 77.6Hz rolls off cleanly instead of building into a resonant bump the way many small ported designs do. On axis deviation measures a tight 0.195dB average, and Audio Science Review’s independent Klippel NFS review called the predicted in room response nearly perfect, with directivity matching that beats some commercial designs costing many times more, all from about $200 in parts. Measured bass extension of 77.6Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85.1dB.
Cons: This is a true DIY project. There is no assembled unit to buy, drivers come from Madisound, the crossover kit comes separately from EZ Speaker Solutions, and the birch plywood cabinet has to be built and finished by hand. Listening window smoothness measures a moderate 0.47 and the sound power directivity index has more variation (standard deviation 4.02) than the tightest speakers in this catalog, so off axis energy isn’t quite as evenly controlled as the excellent on axis figures suggest.
Full XMechanik Mechano23 DIY review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 42.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 77.6Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Cabinet Material | 18mm Baltic birch plywood |
| Country | Design origin: United States (ASR forum); assembled by buyer |
| DIY Kit | Yes |
| Dimensions | 11.4”H x 6.9”W x 10.4”D (290 x 174 x 263 mm) |
| Drivers | Scan-Speak Discovery H2606/9200 1” horn loaded textile dome tweeter, SB Acoustics SB13PFCR25-4 5” fiber cone woofer |
| Enclosure | ported |
| Impedance | 4.1 ohms nominal (measured, ASR) |
| Port Tuning | Approximately 45Hz |
| Sensitivity | 85.1dB @ 2.83V/1m (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.42 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.88 |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- XMechanik Mechano23 DIY vs Ascend Acoustics HTM-200SE2
- XMechanik Mechano23 DIY vs KEF LS50 Meta
- XMechanik Mechano23 DIY vs Ascend Sierra 1 v2
- XMechanik Mechano23 DIY vs Philharmonic Ceramic Mini
- XMechanik Mechano23 DIY vs Ascend Acoustics Luna V2 Mini-Monitor Titan
- XMechanik Mechano23 DIY vs Aalto Speakers Aalto 1 EVO
- XMechanik Mechano23 DIY vs Audio First Fidelia
- XMechanik Mechano23 DIY vs Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G
- See all 23 comparisons
Arendal 1961 Monitor: $1150 per pair Arendal Sound eBay
Pros: A physically robust build the reviewer calls “a little bit of a tank,” delivering low compression, low distortion, and overall really good neutrality: one of the reviewer’s top 10 picks under $1,500 across roughly 250 speakers tested. Works well both as home theater mains and as surrounds. Independent ASR Klippel measurements corroborate the low-distortion finding: THD at 86dB SPL/1m stays well below the reviewer’s audibility threshold, and even at 96dB SPL/1m it stays “far better than most bookshelves” thanks to the built-in high-pass filter that protects the woofers. Measured bass extension of 84Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85.9dB.
Cons: Bass rolls off around 70-80Hz, so it cannot be used as full-range mains for music without a subwoofer, and a sub is recommended for home theater use as well. Vertical radiation window is narrow, typical of MTM (mid-tweeter-mid) layouts (tighter than a standard two-way’s roughly ±20°) so a second home theater row sitting above or below the tweeter axis will hear a noticeably different tonal balance. ASR’s CEA2034 measurements show the response is elevated above 2kHz with resonant peaks around 3kHz and 9kHz, leading the reviewer to predict it will “likely sound bright.” Those same resonances show up as lingering ridges in the cumulative spectral decay (waterfall) at 96dB SPL/1m.
Full Arendal 1961 Monitor review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 60Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 84Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Crossover Frequency | 1500Hz |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 16.6”H x 6.4”W x 5.9”D (421.6 x 162.6 x 149.9 mm) |
| Drivers | 2 x 5.5” woofers, 28mm tweeter |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal (4.1 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 85.9dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.38 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.69 |
| Weight | 16 lbs (7.25 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | sealed |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs SunAudio Purified 4
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs Ascend Acoustics HTM-200SE2
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs Ascend Acoustics Luna V2 Mini-Monitor Titan
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs Aalto Speakers Aalto 1 EVO
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs Moondrop M4P MTM
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs KEF LS50 Meta
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs Ascend Sierra 1 v2
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs Revel M105
- See all 55 comparisons