Pitt & Giblin Superwax vs GGNTKT M3

Short answer: the GGNTKT M3. It ranks #2 of 6 powered floorstanding speakers by sound quality; the Pitt & Giblin Superwax ranks #3.

What the Pitt & Giblin Superwax offers: The published DSP-adjusted manufacturer measurement combines 26.2Hz -3dB extension with an 8.19 ideal-subwoofer preference score and a smooth predicted room-response trend. Dual 15-inch woofers and a separate 10-inch midrange provide a substantial full-range architecture. Digital and analog inputs, remote volume control and three voicing profiles make the active system flexible despite its size. Watch for: The measured 2.3dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz leaves more local midrange variation than the Superwax Mini; a level overall slope is not a perfectly flat response. Results apply to the measured DSP tuning, not every profile. At about 92kg and one metre wide per speaker, installation and room space are major considerations.

What the GGNTKT M3 offers: The manufacturer measurement shows a very tight 0.5dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz and a 7.84 ideal-subwoofer preference score, supporting exceptionally even midrange balance. Cardioid radiation reduces rearward bass and low-midrange energy, helping with near-wall placement. A dedicated midrange, wide waveguide and DSP-controlled four-way architecture suit a large listening area without relying on a narrow on-axis sweet spot. Watch for: Measured -3dB extension of 35.5Hz is useful but does not match the deepest-reaching towers here. Cardioid operation reduces some boundary interaction rather than eliminating room modes. The broad, heavy cabinets and professional system setup demand space and planning; maximum-output claims should not be confused with equally low distortion at every frequency.

Buy the Pitt & Giblin Superwax when the price outweighs sound quality for you, and the GGNTKT M3 when sound quality outweighs the price instead.

Specifications Side By Side

Related Speaker Comparisons

More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:

• KEF LS60 vs B&O Beolab20
• KEF LS60 vs Buchardt A700
• Buchardt A700 vs B&O Beolab20
• Pitt & Giblin Superwax Mini vs Pitt & Giblin Superwax
• GGNTKT M3 vs KEF LS60

Prices on this page were last checked September 8, 2026 at 6:02 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Pitt & Giblin Superwax: A$25,950-28,545/pair Pitt & Giblin eBay

Pros: The published DSP-adjusted manufacturer measurement combines 26.2Hz -3dB extension with an 8.19 ideal-subwoofer preference score and a smooth predicted room-response trend. Dual 15-inch woofers and a separate 10-inch midrange provide a substantial full-range architecture. Digital and analog inputs, remote volume control and three voicing profiles make the active system flexible despite its size.

Cons: The measured 2.3dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz leaves more local midrange variation than the Superwax Mini; a level overall slope is not a perfectly flat response. Results apply to the measured DSP tuning, not every profile. At about 92kg and one metre wide per speaker, installation and room space are major considerations.

Full Pitt & Giblin Superwax review and specifications →

Bass Extension	24Hz at -3dB, 20Hz at -10dB (half space)
Country	Hand-built in Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
DSP Profiles	Natural, Live, Clean (remote selectable)
Dimensions	39.4"H x 39.4"W x 21.7"D (1000 x 1000 x 550 mm) (with stand)
Drivers	1" compression driver on bronze waveguide, 10" sealed midrange, 2x 15" ported woofers
Enclosure	3-way active, Birch plywood with separate HF waveguide and MF/LF cabinet, hardwood plinth
Frequency Response	27Hz-18kHz +/-1.5dB
Inputs	Analogue XLR/RCA, S/PDIF, AES, TOSLINK
Power Output	950W total (Hypex nCore, discrete per driver)
Weight	202.8 lbs / 92 kg each

• Links
  • Pitt & Giblin Superwax Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • SoundStage! Australia Review
  • Manufacturer Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Pitt & Giblin Superwax vs Pitt & Giblin Superwax Mini

GGNTKT M3: €29,950/pair GGNTKT eBay

Pros: The manufacturer measurement shows a very tight 0.5dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz and a 7.84 ideal-subwoofer preference score, supporting exceptionally even midrange balance. Cardioid radiation reduces rearward bass and low-midrange energy, helping with near-wall placement. A dedicated midrange, wide waveguide and DSP-controlled four-way architecture suit a large listening area without relying on a narrow on-axis sweet spot.

Cons: Measured -3dB extension of 35.5Hz is useful but does not match the deepest-reaching towers here. Cardioid operation reduces some boundary interaction rather than eliminating room modes. The broad, heavy cabinets and professional system setup demand space and planning; maximum-output claims should not be confused with equally low distortion at every frequency.

Full GGNTKT M3 review and specifications →

Country	Germany
Dimensions	50.6"H x 19.6"W x 7.8"D (1286 x 499 x 199 mm) (50.6 x 19.6 x 7.8 in)
Directivity	140 deg horizontal x 100 deg vertical (constant directivity waveguide)
Distortion	0.003% THD @ 1kHz/1W
Drivers	56mm ring-diaphragm compression tweeter, 210mm (8") paper-fiber midrange, 2x 260mm (10") long-throw subwoofers
Enclosure	4-way bass reflex, cardioid-loaded bass (opposed front/rear woofers)
Frequency Response	29Hz-20kHz (-3dB), 24Hz-22kHz (-6dB)
Power Output	approx. 1000W total (PASCAL Class-D UMAC modules)
Warranty	2 years, extendable to 3 with product registration
Weight	approx. 154.3 lbs / 70 kg each

• Links
  • GGNTKT M3 Official Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Fidelity Magazine Review
  • Manufacturer Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • GGNTKT M3 vs KEF LS60