Klipsch RP-8000F II vs Revel F226Be

Last updated: October 6, 2026

Short answer: the Revel F226Be if sound quality matters most, the Klipsch RP-8000F II if price matters most. The Revel F226Be ranks #15 of 188 floorstanding speakers, rated 4.6/5, at $8,469.90. The Klipsch RP-8000F II ranks #113, rated 3.9/5, at $1,159.98, $7,309.92 cheaper.

Klipsch RP-8000F II vs Revel F226Be

The case for the Klipsch RP-8000F II: Highest sensitivity of the RP II floorstander line (~92dB measured) and the best dynamics/compression behavior of the three under load: the cleanest at high output. The tradeoff: Mid-bass sounds lean despite the dual 8-inch woofers, and bass extension disappointed for its size: expected to reach 50Hz, didn’t get there in-room.

The Revel F226Be is the more accurate, deeper-bass choice. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 5.96 against 5.39 for the Klipsch RP-8000F II. Its bass reaches about 56Hz before falling 3dB, against 67Hz for the Klipsch RP-8000F II. Watch for: Minimum impedance dips to about 3.7-4 ohms below roughly 500Hz despite the 8-ohm nominal rating, so it wants a genuine 4-ohm-capable two-channel amplifier; budget AVRs rated only for 6 or 8 ohms may struggle.

Buy the Klipsch RP-8000F II if the price matters more than sound quality. Buy the Revel F226Be if sound quality matters more than the price.

Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Klipsch RP-8000F II Revel F226Be
Price$1,159.98 per pair$8,469.90 per pair
Ranked#113 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#15 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)33Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)36Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)56Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity92dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)89.7dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Drivers1” titanium tweeter with 90x90 Tractrix horn, dual 8” cerametallic woofersTwo 6.5” (165mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cones, with cast frames woofer, 5-1/4” (130mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cone, with cast frame midrange, 1” (25mm) Beryllium dome, with acoustic lens waveguide tweeter
Weight61.3 lbs (27.8 kg)58.2 lbs (26.4 kg) each
Impedance8 ohms nominal (3.7 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)8 ohms nominal (3.7 ohms minimum, measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Frequency Response35Hz - 25kHz (+-3dB, Manufacturer specified)-
Crossover Frequency1630Hz-
Power Handling150W continuous, 600W peak-
Dimensions43.1” x 10.8” x 18.3” (1095 x 275 x 464 mm)41.3”H x 9.8”W x 13.7”D (1049 x 248.9 x 348 mm)
Woofer Cabinetported, rearported, front
Spinorama Preference Score5.395.96 (spinorama.org)
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.128.15 (spinorama.org)
DIY KitNoNo

How Revel F226Be compares with other leading options:

Prices on this page were last checked October 7, 2026 at 9:25 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Klipsch RP-8000F II: $1,159.98 per pair Amazon eBay

Klipsch RP-8000F II ranking card

Same family: the Klipsch RP-500M II (smaller bookshelf, rated 4/5), the Klipsch RP-600M II (larger bookshelf, rated 3.7/5), the Klipsch RP-5000F II (smaller floorstanding, ranked higher, rated 4/5), the Klipsch RP-6000F II (smaller floorstanding, ranked lower, rated 3.9/5), the Klipsch RP-404C II (smallest center, rated 3.7/5), the Klipsch RP-500C II (center, rated 3.9/5) and the Klipsch RP-504C II (largest center, rated 3.8/5).

Pros: Highest sensitivity of the RP II floorstander line (~92dB measured) and the best dynamics/compression behavior of the three under load: the cleanest at high output. Dual 8-inch woofers and the highest power handling in the line. Measured bass extension of 67Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 92dB.

Cons: Mid-bass sounds lean despite the dual 8-inch woofers, and bass extension disappointed for its size: expected to reach 50Hz, didn’t get there in-room. Has its own edgy upper-mid bump (2-6kHz) that’s harder to EQ out than the other two models’ issues, since it stems from the vertical horn/woofer offset rather than simple tonal balance. The most placement-critical of the three, with the narrowest horizontal (~40-50 degrees) and vertical (+5/-10 degrees) dispersion.

Bass Extension (-10dB)33Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Crossover Frequency1630Hz
DIY KitNo
Dimensions43.1” x 10.8” x 18.3” (1095 x 275 x 464 mm)
Drivers1” titanium tweeter with 90x90 Tractrix horn, dual 8” cerametallic woofers
Frequency Response35Hz - 25kHz (+-3dB, Manufacturer specified)
Impedance8 ohms nominal (3.7 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)
Power Handling150W continuous, 600W peak
Sensitivity92dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score5.39
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.12
Weight61.3 lbs (27.8 kg)
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

Revel F226Be: $8,469.90 per pair Crutchfield eBay

Revel F226Be ranking card

Older model: the Revel F206 (ranked lower, rated 4.5/5).

Same family: the Revel M126Be (bookshelf, rated 4.3/5), the Revel F228Be (larger floorstanding, ranked lower, rated 4.5/5), the Revel F328Be (larger floorstanding, ranked higher, rated 4.7/5) and the Revel C426Be (center, rated 4/5).

Pros: Compact three-way tower with a beryllium dome tweeter in an acoustic lens waveguide, a dedicated 5.25” mid-range, and dual 6.5” woofers (not a coaxial layout): all Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cones engineered specifically to avoid breakup outside their crossover bands, and it measures that way: neither the woofers nor the mid-range show breakup spikes even well outside their intended pass bands, and even the front port measures unusually clean (only a mild ~3dB bump around 150Hz, well controlled versus the resonances the reviewer typically sees from ports). On-axis frequency response holds within about ±1.5dB above roughly 65Hz (excellent linearity) and off-axis behavior tracks it closely, with only mild, subdued peaking around 4-6kHz that doesn’t show up as real resonance in the spinorama data. Average sensitivity around 90dB (2.83V/1m), notably higher than some competing three-way designs and most bookshelf speakers, translating directly into better dynamic range at both low and high listening levels: one reviewer specifically praised its ability to deliver full transient impact (snare hits, kick drum) even at quiet, conversational volumes rather than needing to be cranked up to feel dynamic. Wide, consistent horizontal radiation of about ±60-70° at the -6dB point, landing right in the reviewer’s preferred range for an enveloping soundstage without excess diffusion, and exceptionally wide vertical dispersion: roughly ±80° up to 10kHz and still ±70° above that, which one reviewer called the widest vertical radiation pattern he had measured to date. Distortion stays under 3% even at 104dB SPL, and in real-world testing up to 105dB from 12-14 feet away, full-range with no crossover, the reviewer heard no audible mechanical noise, port chuffing, or compression at all. Flat enough on- and off-axis response that toeing the speaker 10-15° away from the listener preserves the same tonal balance rather than changing it, and the wide, well-controlled directivity lets sidewall reflections reinforce rather than smear the soundstage. Measured bass extension of 56Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 89.7dB.

Cons: Minimum impedance dips to about 3.7-4 ohms below roughly 500Hz despite the 8-ohm nominal rating, so it wants a genuine 4-ohm-capable two-channel amplifier; budget AVRs rated only for 6 or 8 ohms may struggle. F3 of 56Hz and F10 of 36Hz mean it doesn’t extend nearly as low as some three-way rivals with larger woofers: a dedicated subwoofer (10-12”, or 15” for content below 30Hz) is recommended for home theater or bass-heavy music, even though the speaker itself can play surprisingly loud without one. Vertical directivity tolerance is tighter in the crossover handoff region than a true coaxial design would offer, since the tweeter, midrange, and woofers are physically separated: a mild directivity bump appears around 2-2.5kHz that’s typical of non-coaxial multi-way speakers, though not audibly problematic within about ±10° vertically. On-axis, the top end reads as a bit bright according to one reviewer’s subjective impression, generally benefiting from some toe-out. High-gloss cabinet finish can create distracting reflections if used behind a projector screen in a home theater setup. Front-ported, so it can technically sit close to a wall, but doing so makes the bass boomier.

Bass Extension (-10dB)36Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)56Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions41.3”H x 9.8”W x 13.7”D (1049 x 248.9 x 348 mm)
DriversTwo 6.5” (165mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cones, with cast frames woofer, 5-1/4” (130mm) Deep Ceramic Composite aluminum cone, with cast frame midrange, 1” (25mm) Beryllium dome, with acoustic lens waveguide tweeter
Impedance8 ohms nominal (3.7 ohms minimum, measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity89.7dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score5.96 (spinorama.org)
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub8.15 (spinorama.org)
Weight58.2 lbs (26.4 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, front