TRN MT4 vs KZ EDX Lite

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the TRN MT4. It ranks #770 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.6/5, at $20.99; the KZ EDX Lite ranks #830, rated 3.5/5, at $18.99. The price gap is small enough that the sound-quality ranking should decide it.

TRN MT4 vs KZ EDX Lite

Why pick the TRN MT4: A very cheap 10mm dynamic IEM that measures close to the Harman target, with full sub-bass to 20 Hz (score 68 across six measurements). Watch for: A 2.27 dB spread from the target still leaves some peaks and dips.

Why pick the KZ EDX Lite: A very cheap single dynamic driver earphone with a confident, fun tuning: sub-bass and bass both sit about 4 dB above target, so electronic and hip hop tracks hit with real rumble. The tradeoff: An 8.7 dB peak near 8.1 kHz adds sizzle and can make cymbals and S sounds sharp on bright recordings.

Buy the TRN MT4. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $2 you would save on the KZ EDX Lite does not close the gap.

Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.

TRN MT4

A very cheap 10mm dynamic IEM that measures close to the Harman target, with full sub-bass to 20 Hz (score 68 across six measurements).

Amazon $20.99 eBay
$20.99
KZ EDX Lite

A very cheap single dynamic driver earphone with a confident, fun tuning: sub-bass and bass both sit about 4 dB above target, so electronic and hip hop tracks hit with real rumble.

Amazon $18.99 eBay
$18.99

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

TRN MT4 KZ EDX Lite
Price$20.99$18.99
Ranked#770 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#830 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeDynamicDynamic
Drivers1 x 10mm dynamic1 x 10mm dynamic
Impedance22 ohms23 ohms
Sensitivity115 dB108 dB
Harman Preference Score68 (median of 6 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)67 (median of 9 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.27 dB standard deviation2.23 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.67 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.80 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.1 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+3.6 dB at 30 Hz)
Frequency Response-20Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified)

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

TRN MT4KZ EDX LiteHarman target
Frequency response of the TRN MT4 and KZ EDX Lite-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the TRN MT4 from hbb, hore, ianfann, pw, timmyv and tonedeafmonk; the KZ EDX Lite from ankramutt, audioamigo, eplv, kuping-sensi, obodio, suporsalad, tdl, therollo9 and yoshiultra, all via squig.link.

More worthwhile head-to-heads for TRN MT4: