SGOR Venus vs KZ EDX Lite

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the SGOR Venus. It ranks #738 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.6/5, at $19.99; the KZ EDX Lite ranks #830, rated 3.5/5, at $18.99. With prices this close, go by the sound-quality ranking rather than the cost.

SGOR Venus vs KZ EDX Lite

The case for the SGOR Venus: A very cheap single dynamic IEM with treble right on the Harman target and full sub-bass to 20 Hz, scoring 69 across seven measurements. The catch: A 2.42 dB spread from the target shows peaks and dips that better tuned sets avoid.

What the KZ EDX Lite does well: A very cheap single dynamic driver earphone with a confident, fun tuning: sub-bass and bass both sit about 4 dB above target, so electronic and hip hop tracks hit with real rumble. The tradeoff: An 8.7 dB peak near 8.1 kHz adds sizzle and can make cymbals and S sounds sharp on bright recordings.

Buy the SGOR Venus. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $1 saving on the KZ EDX Lite is not enough to make up the difference.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.

SGOR Venus

A very cheap single dynamic IEM with treble right on the Harman target and full sub-bass to 20 Hz, scoring 69 across seven measurements.

Linsoul $19.99 eBay
$19.99
KZ EDX Lite

A very cheap single dynamic driver earphone with a confident, fun tuning: sub-bass and bass both sit about 4 dB above target, so electronic and hip hop tracks hit with real rumble.

Amazon $18.99 eBay
$18.99

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

SGOR Venus KZ EDX Lite
Price$19.99$18.99
Ranked#738 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#830 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeDynamicDynamic
Drivers1 x dynamic1 x 10mm dynamic
Impedance32 ohms23 ohms
Sensitivity110 dB +/-3 dB108 dB
Harman Preference Score69 (median of 7 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)67 (median of 9 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.42 dB standard deviation2.23 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.33 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.80 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.3 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+3.6 dB at 30 Hz)
Frequency Response-20Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified)

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

SGOR VenusKZ EDX LiteHarman target
Frequency response of the SGOR Venus and KZ EDX Lite-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the SGOR Venus from aftersound, ankramutt, audioamigo, fahryst, hbb, mmagtech and recode; the KZ EDX Lite from ankramutt, audioamigo, eplv, kuping-sensi, obodio, suporsalad, tdl, therollo9 and yoshiultra, all via squig.link.

How SGOR Venus compares with other leading options: