Short answer: the Roseselsa Quiet Sea II. Both are rated 3.2/5 for sound quality (#1004 and #1013 of 1369 in-ear headphones), and the Roseselsa Quiet Sea II costs $62.99 against $69.99 for the TRN White Tiger, and with sound quality even, the cheaper one is the better buy.
Why pick the Roseselsa Quiet Sea II: About 3 dB more bass than the Harman target below 150 Hz, for listeners who want a fuller low end. Watch for: An uneven response, 2.4 dB standard deviation from target.
What the TRN White Tiger does well: A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap. The catch: Treble about 2 dB below target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound dull or veiled next to brighter headphones.
Buy the Roseselsa Quiet Sea II. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $7 less than the TRN White Tiger.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
About 3 dB more bass than the Harman target below 150 Hz, for listeners who want a fuller low end.
HiFiGo $62.99 eBay
A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap.
Shenzhenaudio $69.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 17, 2026 at 6:04 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Roseselsa Quiet Sea II | TRN White Tiger | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $62.99 | $69.99 |
| Ranked | #1004 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones | #1013 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 64 (median of 7 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 63 (median of 5 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.43 dB standard deviation | 2.67 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.95 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.76 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.0 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.1 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Hybrid |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dual-magnetic dual-cavity dynamic driver (PEEK substrate + carbon-copper vacuum-coated dome diaphragm) | 2 DD + 1 Planar (1 x 10.5mm dynamic driver, 1 x 8mm dynamic driver, 1 x 6mm planar magnetic driver) |
| Impedance | 18 ohms | 16 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 106 dB/mW | 118 dB |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz | 20Hz - 40kHz |
| Weight | - | 0 lbs (7.2 g) (per earbud) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Roseselsa Quiet Sea II from atechreviews, bassaudio, csi-zone, eplv, faxepremium, jaytiss and practiphile; the TRN White Tiger from arn, atechreviews, audioamigo, soundcheck39 and tonedeafmonk, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How Roseselsa Quiet Sea II compares with other leading options: