Short answer: the TRN White Tiger. Both are rated 3.2/5 for sound quality (#1013 and #975 of 1369 in-ear headphones), and the TRN White Tiger costs $69.99 against $74.99 for the BGVP DN3, and with sound quality even, the cheaper one is the better buy.
Why pick the BGVP DN3: A dynamic driver and balanced armature hybrid that adds about 3.6 dB of bass between 60 and 200 Hz in squig.link measurements, giving rock and pop extra punch and body. The catch: Treble swings from a 4.3 dB peak near 8.1 kHz to a 6.3 dB dip near 9.9 kHz, so cymbals can sound splashy one moment and muted the next.
The case for the TRN White Tiger: A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap. Watch for: Treble about 2 dB below target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound dull or veiled next to brighter headphones.
Buy the TRN White Tiger. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $5 less than the BGVP DN3.
Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.
A dynamic driver and balanced armature hybrid that adds about 3.6 dB of bass between 60 and 200 Hz in squig.link measurements, giving rock and pop extra punch and body.
HiFiGo $74.99 eBay
A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap.
Shenzhenaudio $69.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 17, 2026 at 6:04 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| BGVP DN3 | TRN White Tiger | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $74.99 | $69.99 |
| Ranked | #975 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones | #1013 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 64 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ) | 63 (median of 5 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 3.13 dB standard deviation | 2.67 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.20 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.76 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 1 balanced armature) | Hybrid |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x balanced armature | 2 DD + 1 Planar (1 x 10.5mm dynamic driver, 1 x 8mm dynamic driver, 1 x 6mm planar magnetic driver) |
| Impedance | 19 ohms | 16 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 109 dB/mW | 118 dB |
| Weight | 0 lbs (5 g) | 0 lbs (7.2 g) (per earbud) |
| Frequency Response | 10Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 20Hz - 40kHz |
| Built-in Microphone | No | - |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.7 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.1 dB at 30 Hz) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the BGVP DN3 from aftersound, bryaudioreviews and recode; the TRN White Tiger from arn, atechreviews, audioamigo, soundcheck39 and tonedeafmonk, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More top alternatives to BGVP DN3: