Short answer: the TRN White Tiger. It ranks #1013 of 1369 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.2/5, at $69.99; the KZ AS16 Pro ranks #1026, rated 3.1/5, and costs $73, so there is little reason to consider the other one.
Why pick the TRN White Tiger: A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap. The catch: Treble about 2 dB below target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound dull or veiled next to brighter headphones.
The case for the KZ AS16 Pro: Bass is lifted about 2.2 dB with extension to 20 Hz, giving kick drums and bass lines extra weight. The tradeoff: Presence sits about 3.8 dB low with an 8.6 dB dip near 5.9 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
Buy the TRN White Tiger. It is rated higher for sound quality than the KZ AS16 Pro and costs less, so only choose the other one for a particular feature it does better.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap.
Shenzhenaudio $69.99 eBay
Bass is lifted about 2.2 dB with extension to 20 Hz, giving kick drums and bass lines extra weight.
Amazon $73.00 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 17, 2026 at 6:04 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| TRN White Tiger | KZ AS16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $69.99 | $73.00 |
| Ranked | #1013 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones | #1026 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 63 (median of 5 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 63 (median of 13 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.67 dB standard deviation | 2.68 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.76 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.49 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.1 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.1 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid | Balanced armature |
| Drivers | 2 DD + 1 Planar (1 x 10.5mm dynamic driver, 1 x 8mm dynamic driver, 1 x 6mm planar magnetic driver) | 8 x balanced armature |
| Impedance | 16 ohms | 23.5 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 118 dB | - |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 40kHz | 20Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Weight | 0 lbs (7.2 g) (per earbud) | - |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the TRN White Tiger from arn, atechreviews, audioamigo, soundcheck39 and tonedeafmonk; the KZ AS16 Pro from achoreviews, aftersound, ankramutt, boizoff, eplv, hbb, hore, ianfann, melatonin, musicafe, practiphile, pw and vortexreviews, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How TRN White Tiger compares with other leading options: